The effects of different dietary fiber pectin structures on the gastrointestinal immune barrier: impact via gut microbiota and direct effects on immune cells

Abstract

Pectins are dietary fibers with different structural characteristics. Specific pectin structures can influence the gastrointestinal immune barrier by directly interacting with immune cells or by impacting the intestinal microbiota. The impact of pectin strongly depends on the specific structural characteristics of pectin; for example, the degree of methyl-esterification, acetylation and rhamnogalacturonan I or rhamnogalacturonan II neutral side chains. Here, we review the interactions of specific pectin structures with the gastrointestinal immune barrier. The effects of pectin include strengthening the mucus layer, enhancing epithelial integrity, and activating or inhibiting dendritic cell and macrophage responses. The direct interaction of pectins with the gastrointestinal immune barrier may be governed through pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 or Galectin-3. In addition, specific pectins can stimulate the diversity and abundance of beneficial microbial communities. Furthermore, the gastrointestinal immune barrier may be enhanced by short-chain fatty acids. Moreover, pectins can enhance the intestinal immune barrier by favoring the adhesion of commensal bacteria and inhibiting the adhesion of pathogens to epithelial cells. Current data illustrate that pectin may be a powerful dietary fiber to manage and prevent several inflammatory conditions, but additional human studies with pectin molecules with well-defined structures are urgently needed.

Introduction

Dietary fibers play an important role in the maintenance of health1. Several meta-analyses have illustrated that higher dietary fiber intake is correlated with a reduced incidence of disease and mortality1,2,3. These findings are corroborated by other studies showing that reduced dietary fiber intake is correlated with a higher incidence of Western diseases with anomalies in immunity4,5, indicating that dietary fiber plays an important role in immune homeostasis. One mechanism by which fibers may protect against the development of disease is by preserving the gastrointestinal immune barrier. The gastrointestinal immune barrier is the gatekeeper of the human body. It is composed of a mucus layer and a layer of epithelial cells and prevents luminal molecules from entering the underlying lamina propria containing immune cells6,7. Intestinal barrier dysfunction may result in immune disorders such as autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis8,9. Improving intestinal barrier function by increasing dietary fiber consumption may therefore be an effective strategy to prevent or delay Western immune-related diseases10.

Before dietary fibers are degraded by microbial enzymes in the colon, they may interact directly with the cells of the immune barrier in the small intestine11. The small intestine contains a thin and loose mucus layer12 that not only facilitates nutrient uptake but also allows dietary molecules such as fibers to interact with the intestinal epithelial and immune cells directly11. The consequences of these direct interactions with cells of the intestinal immune barrier include strengthening of the mucus layer13, enhancing barrier function of epithelial cells14 or modulating intestinal immune responses15. This direct interaction between dietary fibers and the intestinal immune system may be one of the mechanisms by which dietary fibers improve health and prevent disease16.

Dietary fibers can also have indirect beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal immune barrier through stimulation of the growth of intestinal microbiota communities and their metabolic activities17. Dietary fibers cannot be digested by human enzymes and are subject to fermentation by the intestinal microbiota mainly in the colon18. Some dietary fibers stimulate the growth of specific microbial communities and serve as substrates for the production of fermentation products, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)17. Dietary fibers can exert health-promoting effects through stimulation of the production of SCFAs. Numerous recent publications have shown that these SCFAs play an important role in metabolism19,20 and immunity21,22. In addition to the fermentation products of dietary fibers, microbial communities can secrete other metabolites, such as tryptophan metabolites or secondary bile acids, which have the potential to regulate intestinal immunity (Fig. 1)23. In addition, stimulating the growth of commensal microbiota by dietary fibers may be beneficial for limiting the growth of pathogens that adhere to the intestinal wall less in the presence of a high abundance of gut commensals24. Dietary fibers are therefore also proposed as a means to indirectly protect the gastrointestinal immune barrier from damage caused by pathogens24.

Fig. 1: Diet-derived microbial metabolites.
figure1

Intestinal microbiota can secrete diet-derived metabolites, which can potentially activate the immune system through Ahr, GPRs or GPBAR1. Ahr Aryl hydrogen receptor, BCFA branched chain fatty acid, GPBAR1 G protein–coupled bile acid receptor 1, GPR G-protein-coupled receptor, SCFA short-chain fatty acids, TMA trimethylamine, TMAO trimethylamine N-oxide.

The soluble dietary fiber pectin is an important dietary fiber with known modulatory effects on the gastrointestinal immune barrier. Pectins have been isolated from the primary and secondary cell walls of many fruits and vegetables, including citrus fruits, apples, sugar beets, and potatoes25. They mainly consist of linear 1,4-D-galacturonan (homogalacturonan) segments and branched rhamnogalacturonan segments25. Pectins can have many different structural characteristics contributing to their functional properties, including the degree of methyl-esterification, molecular weight or neutral side chain structures25. Several studies involving animal models and human subjects have shown that pectins protect the intestinal barrier from damage26,27,28. These effects may be exerted by direct interactions with the gastrointestinal immune barrier, as some types of pectins are known to interact with immune receptors29,30. Furthermore, pectins may protect the intestinal barrier indirectly by stimulating the growth and diversity of microbiota communities as pectins are known to stimulate microbial communities31. These effects are strongly dependent on the chemical structure of pectins29,30,31. In recent years, many studies have demonstrated the impact of specific structural features of pectins on their health benefits to consumers32. The main aim of this review article was to overview the current knowledge of the modulatory properties of specific chemical structures of pectins and their beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal immune barrier; for example, for a dietary fiber that might be instrumental in preventing many Western diseases5. We will focus on pectin structures that influence the immune system by direct effects on immune cells or by indirectly interacting with the immune system by modulating intestinal microbial communities and the metabolites they produce. This article may provide insight into the structural features responsible for intestinal health benefits. Ultimately, this might lead to tailoring of pectin formulation or products that might contribute to prevention or delay of human disease development.

Differences in the chemical structures of pectins

Pectins have been isolated from the primary and secondary cell walls of many fruits and vegetables. The structure of pectin is dependent on several parameters, including the origin, the endogenous enzyme activity or the method of extraction25. Pectins are heteropolysaccharides consisting mainly of α-1,4-linked galacturonic acid (GalA) residues (Fig. 2). Some pectins consist of regions with only GalA molecules, which are known as homogalacturonans. Up to 70% of pectin molecules consist of homogalacturonan regions. In those regions, the GalA residues can be methyl-esterified at the C6 carboxyl group. GalA residues in pectins can also be acetylated at O-2 or O-3, as is commonly found in sugar beet pectins25,33. A certain percentage of the GalA residues of pectins can have attached methyl esters, and this percentage is known as the degree of methyl-esterification (DM). Pectins can be classified as low DM pectins (DM < 50%) or high DM pectins (DM > 50%)34. These methyl-esterified GalA residues can be differently distributed along the pectin molecule. The degree of blockiness (DB) determines the distribution of non-esterified galacturonic acid residues. Pectins with a high DB contain a more blockwise distribution of non-esterified GalA residues, whereas low DB pectins have a more random distribution of non-esterified GalA residues35. Homogalacturonan pectins have been isolated from several fruits and vegetables origins, including sunflower, citrus fruits, sisal, rice endosperm cell walls or apples33.

Fig. 2: Structural characteristics of pectin molecules.
figure2

A pectin molecule can contain different structural characteristics, including homogalacturonan, xylogalacturonan, apiogalacturonan, rhamnogalacturonan I, and rhamnogalacturonan II.

In addition to homogalacturonan regions, pectins can contain other structural regions, such as xylogalacturonan, apiogalacturonan, rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I) or rhamnogalacturonan II (RG-II) (Fig. 2). Xylogalacturonan regions are homogalacturonan structures substituted with xylose molecules. Apiogalacturonan regions are homogalacturonan structures with attached monosaccharide or disaccharide apioduranosyl. RG-I regions are based on disaccharide backbone structures of alternating galacturonic acid and rhamnose residues. The rhamnose residues in RG-I can be branched with neutral side chains consisting of galactose or arabinose. The GalA residues of RG-I are mostly non-methyl esterified. RG-II regions contain a different backbone than RG-I regions and consist of only galacturonic acid residues. RG-II molecules have complex pectin structures that may comprise up to 12 different branched sugar residues. These sugar molecules can be linked by 21 different glycosidic linkages, making RG-II molecules very complex25,36. Pectins containing regions with such a high number of neutral side chains have been isolated from many fruits and vegetables, including apples, sugar beets, apricots, carrots, cabbage, onions or pears33.

The gastrointestinal immune barrier as a primary target for pectins

Pectins are considered to greatly impact the health of the gastrointestinal tract37, although some studies have reported effects independent of those exerted on the gastrointestinal tract, including the direct uptake of pectic oligosaccharides in blood and the direct interaction of pectins with systemic organs38. Currently, however, the pronounced health benefits of pectins are considered to result from modulating the intestinal immune barrier37. As pectins might impact different aspects of the gastrointestinal immune barrier37, we first briefly discuss the current understanding of the composition of the gastrointestinal immune barrier. The gastrointestinal immune barrier consists of multiple layers, including a mucus layer, a cellular layer of epithelial cells and the lamina propria containing immune cells (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: The gastrointestinal immune barrier.
figure3

The gastrointestinal immune barrier contains several layers that provide protection against harmful substances. From the outside (lumen) to the inside (lamina propria): (1) The mucus layer in the small intestine consists of a single loose layer, whereas in the colon, it consists of a loose outer layer and a dense inner layer. The mucus layer provides extra protection against pathogens due to the presence of IgA and antimicrobial peptides. (2) The cellular layer consists of a single layer of epithelial cells that forms a physical barrier against incoming antigens. (3) Beyond the cellular layer is the lamina propria, which is densely populated with immune cells. These immune cells provide protection against harmful substances but also induce tolerance against harmless substances.

The mucus layer forms a physical barrier that separates the epithelium from the microbiota and luminal content39. In addition, it provides a substrate for microbial growth24,40. These bacteria secrete fermentation products that alter the composition and gelling properties of the mucus layer40. These mucus strengthening effects are also induced by luminal dietary components, including pectins41. The mucus layer is composed of secretory products from goblet cells, Paneth cells and other epithelial cells42. The main components of the mucus layer are mucins, which are goblet cell-derived glycoproteins42. Luminal bacteria or dietary components can stimulate the secretion of mucins from goblet cells by activating pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) or stimulating SCFA production43. Mucin secretion from goblet cells can also be enhanced by immune cell-derived cytokines44. In addition to mucins, the mucus layer contains immunoglobin A (IgA) and Paneth cell-derived antimicrobial components, which provide a defense against invading, undesired microbial species45. Luminal bacteria or dietary components can stimulate the secretion of these antimicrobial components after PRR activation in Paneth cells46.

Underneath the mucus layer resides the cellular layer, which is composed of a single layer of epithelial cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes. The intraepithelial lymphocytes secrete factors that support and maintain the epithelial layer47. The epithelial cells consist of enterocytes and secretory epithelial cells, such as the aforementioned Paneth cells or goblet cells48. Furthermore, the cellular layer contains an additional epithelial cell type called microfold (M) cells, which are present on subepithelial lymphoid structures called Peyer’s patches (PP). M cells are specialized antigen sampling cells that present antigens to underlying immune cells in the PP49. Together, these epithelial cells form a physical barrier that separates the luminal content from the lamina propria. The integrity of the gastrointestinal barrier relies on the permeability of the epithelial cell layer50. A network of desmosomes, tight junctions and adherens junctions regulates epithelial permeability and thereby the paracellular passage of the luminal content to the underlying lamina propria50. Epithelial integrity can be enhanced by bacteria or luminal dietary components through the activation of PRRs, such as TLR2, or through SCFA-induced GPR activation51,52.

A large proportion, 70–80%, of all immune cells in the human body are located in gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT), which include the lamina propria, PP and mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN)39. These immune cells must recognize incoming antigens and provide protection against harmful substances, but also induce tolerance for commensal bacteria53. The lamina propria is the homing site for a large proportion of innate immune cells, such as DCs, macrophages, innate lymphoid cells and granulocytes, and adaptive immune cells, such as B cells and T cells39. DCs and macrophages are innate immune cells that can recognize luminal antigens with PRRs54. DCs are capable of sampling antigens and food components through their epithelial-penetrating dendrites55. After recognition, DCs and macrophages can phagocytose microbes or other molecules and present them as antigens to adaptive immune cells in the lamina propria, PP or mLN. Via this route, DCs and macrophages regulate the induction of IgA-producing plasma cells or induce the differentiation of naïve T cells into regulatory T cells (Treg) or effector T cells (Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, or Th22)56. In addition, the differentiation of naïve T cells can be induced by microbial-derived SCFAs or aryl hydrogen receptor ligands57. These effector T cells induce pro-inflammatory responses against specific antigens, whereas their counterparts, Tregs, suppress these pro-inflammatory responses57.

PPs are located in the small intestine and are located under the epithelium. PPs consist of DCs, macrophages, B cells, and T cells. Luminal antigens from the microbiota or dietary components can be taken up through M cells and are presented to subepithelial dendritic cells49. DCs present luminal antigens to underlying adaptive immune cells, leading to specific T cell differentiation or the formation of IgA-producing plasma cells58.

The immune cells in the lamina propria and in the PP can communicate with immune cells in the mLN. CD103+-expressing DCs mainly migrate to the mLN via lymph vessels, after which they stimulate naïve T cells and B cells. CD103+-expressing DCs together with mLN stromal cells generate gut-homing T cells59,60.

A balanced regulation between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses in the gastrointestinal tract leads to protection against pathogens and tolerance to food antigens or commensal microbiota61. However, tolerance to dietary antigens appears to develop in a different compartment of the gastrointestinal tract than tolerance to intestinal microbiota61,62. This is because intestinal immunity in the small intestine is more directed towards exposure to dietary antigens, whereas immune responses in the large intestine are more adapted to the greater bacterial load61,62. Pectins may therefore stimulate the immune system in the small intestine through direct interactions with immune cells, whereas they may stimulate large intestinal immunity in a microbiota-dependent manner.

Interaction of pectins with immune cells and their receptors

Dietary fibers such as pectins can impact the aforementioned gastrointestinal immune barrier at different levels, as discussed in the following sections.

Strengthening of the mucus layer

Dietary fibers such as pectins can strengthen the mucus layer through several mechanisms63. A strengthened mucus layer may limit the passage of harmful substances into the underlying tissues and thereby prevent activation of inflammatory responses. Several studies have shown that pectins have beneficial effects on the integrity of the gastrointestinal mucus layer. Under both healthy and diseased conditions, it has been shown that pectins can strengthen the intestinal mucus layer by influencing goblet cells or by the mucoadhesive effects of pectins41,64,65,66.

The effects of pectins on the mucus layer are dependent on the structure of pectin41,64,65. In vitro, both DM30 and DM59 pectins stimulated mucin secretion in HT-29MTX cells41. However, in vivo in rats, only DM30 pectins, and not DM59 pectins, were able to stimulate jejunal mucus secretion by goblet cells without affecting the number of mucus-secreting goblet cells41. The different effects of low and high DM pectins on mucus secretion could be explained by the different mucoadhesive properties of low and high DM pectins. Due to the negative charge of their non-esterified galacturonic acid residues, DM38 pectins cannot interact with the negatively charged mucins65. Low DM pectins are thereby able to penetrate the mucus layer and reach the epithelium, where they may stimulate the production and secretion of mucus by goblet cells67. DM70 pectins, however, can form hydrogen bonds with mucins and form gel networks that strengthen the mucus layer65. High DM pectins are not thought to reach goblet cells to induce mucus secretion, but they may protect the epithelium from harmful mucus-penetrating agents by strengthening the mucus layer. In addition, the pectin structure of RG-I showed protective effects on the mucus layer in mice with DSS-induced colitis66. RG-I protected the mucus layer by preserving the number of goblet cells and the expression of Muc-166. Together, these findings suggest that low DM pectins, high DM pectins or RG-I pectin structures can strengthen gut barrier function by stimulating mucin secretion by goblet cells or through mucus adhesive properties.

Preservation of epithelial integrity

Dietary fibers are known to have positive effects on epithelial cell layer integrity in the gastrointestinal tract. They can enhance epithelial integrity by stimulating gut bacteria to produce SCFAs that are derived from microbial fermentation of dietary fibers or through direct interaction with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as TLR214,68. Several studies have highlighted the importance of pectins in the preservation of epithelial integrity under healthy and diseased conditions27,28,69. In healthy young adults and elderly individuals, four weeks of pectin supplementation did not increase epithelial barrier integrity, as tight junction-related genes were unchanged after pectin administration28. Under diseased conditions, pectins lowered epithelial permeability in Bangladeshi children with persistent diarrhea69. In addition, pectins were able to maintain epithelial integrity in rats after disruption by a high-fat diet27. These studies suggest that pectins cannot enhance epithelial integrity under healthy conditions, but they can restore or maintain epithelial integrity under diseased conditions.

Recent research indicates that not all pectins but specific structural characteristics of pectins induce the protective effects of pectins on epithelial integrity, which might cause sometimes contradictory findings in humans. DM63 pectins were not able to enhance epithelial integrity in intestinal biopsies from healthy young adults and elderly individuals using Ussing chambers28. However, Vogt et al. demonstrated in vitro that DM30 or DM74 pectins were more protective against the epithelial barrier disruptor PMA than DM56 pectins29. Moreover, DM7 pectins maintained epithelial integrity in mice with caerulein-induced pancreatitis by preserving tight junction structures26. The findings of Vogt et al. and Sun et al. suggest that compared to DM63 pectins, low DM pectins (DM < 30) or very high DM pectins (DM > 74) might enhance epithelial integrity in young adults and elderly individuals28. In addition to the DM-dependent effects, the in vitro effect of RG-I pectins was investigated. RG-I pectins reduced intestinal permeability in Caco-2 cells by maintaining claudin-1 structures66. These studies demonstrate that pectins can protect epithelial integrity against barrier-disrupting agents by maintaining tight junction structures. Low DM pectins and very high DM pectins or pectins with RG-I structures may be responsible for these effects26,29,66.

Pectin and innate immune responses after uptake in Peyer’s patches

Many dietary fibers, including pectins, can directly interact with innate immune cells, such as macrophages or DCs, and influence their responses70,71,72,73. It has been suggested that dietary fibers are transported into the PP through M cells and activate immune cells, and this effect has been demonstrated for pectins70,74,75,76. In addition, in vitro studies have demonstrated that pectins activate or inhibit the responses of DCs and macrophages through direct interaction with immune receptors71,72,73,77. The activation and inhibition of macrophage and DC responses may be beneficial to the host under different circumstances. Under healthy conditions, mild activation of innate immune responses by pectins can be beneficial because it promotes intestinal immunity. Furthermore, under conditions with aberrant immune activation, inhibition of immune activation can be beneficial78. Attenuating immune activation may prevent the initiation of excessive immune responses and thereby limit inappropriate activation of immune cells and inflammation78.

Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that specific pectin structures can activate DC and macrophage responses73,76,77. Suh et al. demonstrated that pectins must have an intact backbone to exhibit their activating effects, as pectin hydrolysates with low molecular weights have no activating properties76. Furthermore, other studies demonstrated that RG-I and RG-II pectins activate macrophages and dendritic cells, but RG-I pectins activate these cells more than RG-II pectins73,77. Galactan and arabinan structures seem to regulate the strong activation of immune responses by RG-I pectins73,77. It has also been demonstrated that the DM of pectin plays an important role in immune activation. Partial removal of methyl esters from DM57 pectins to DM21 pectins enhanced the macrophage-activating properties of pectins72. This was, however, not corroborated by another study that showed that partial removal of methyl esters from DM85 pectins to DM17 pectins strongly decreased its macrophage-activating effects79. This could, however, be explained by activating properties of RG-I side chains in this DM85 pectin, which were removed together with the methyl esters by a specific procedure79. Current insight is that the molecular weight, DM and RG-I side chain structures of pectin influence the ability of pectins to activate macrophages and DCs. RG-II side chains may be involved but activate immune cells to a lower extent72,73,76,77,79.

Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that specific pectin structures can inhibit DC and macrophage responses70,71,72. Ishisono et al. suggested that the highly branched side chains of pectins are required for the anti-inflammatory effects of pectins on LPS-induced IL-6 secretion in macrophages70. This study, however, did not specify which specific side chains of RG-I or RG-II pectins were required. Another study showed that removing the RG-I side chains of pectins enhanced the inhibitory effect of pectins on LPS-induced cytokine secretion in macrophages71. The anti-inflammatory effects as measured by Ishisono et al. may therefore have been derived from RG-II side chain structures. Furthermore, another study confirmed that DM21 pectins, with a certain degree of acetylation of 9%, have anti-inflammatory properties and inhibit macrophage responses71. Together, these studies suggest that the inhibitory effect of pectins is orchestrated through structural characteristics such as DM, acetylation, RG-I, and RG-II structures.

Interaction of pectin with pattern recognition receptors

Innate immune cells can recognize dietary fibers through interaction with extracellular PRRs. PRRs function as sensors that recognize molecular patterns from microbes, known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). PRRs are expressed by innate immune cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils and epithelial cells80. Molecules derived from damaged cells are known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). PRRs play an important role in initiating innate immune responses80. In recent years, many studies have reported that PRRs interact with dietary fibers80,81,82. Pectins are known to affect immune responses through interactions with the PRRs galectins and Toll-like receptors29,83.

Pectin has been reported to bind to Galectin-383. Galectin-3 is expressed extracellularly or intracellularly by different cell types and plays a role in health and disease84. Extracellular Galectin-3 is known to interact with carbohydrates, but intracellular Galectin-3 is considered to bind to intracellular proteins84. The effects of pectins on Galectin-3 are suggested to initially occur via extracellular Galectin-3. However, as pectin and Galectin-3 can be endocytosed by macrophages, pectins may also affect intracellular pathways by binding to Galectin-385. The binding of pectins to Galectin-3 is established through the interaction between the lectin domain of Galectin-3 and galactose residues or arabinan side chains of RG-I and RG-II pectins83. By binding to Galectin-3, pectins can stimulate immunity against cancer cells. Cancer cells express Galectin-3, limiting T-cell mediated immunity against cancer cells. Galectin-3 binds to T-cells, leading to inhibition of T cell responses or apoptosis. By binding to Galectin-3, pectins block the inhibition of T-cell mediated immunity against cancer cells and can therefore be used in anticancer therapy86,87. In addition to cancer cells, Galectin-3 is expressed on immune cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, DCs, neutrophils and epithelial cells. These immune cells use Galectin-3 as a PRR to induce innate immune responses against pathogens88. Pectins might enhance these responses by binding to Galectin-3. Thus, RG-I and RG-II pectins with galactose or arabinan structures can bind to Galectin-3, and pectins might exert anti-metastatic or anti-pathogenic effects through this interaction86,87,88.

Toll-like receptors are another type of PRR that can interact with pectins. Toll-like receptors are intracellularly or extracellularly expressed on most immune and epithelial cells51,89. Specific pectin structures can activate signaling of TLR2 and TLR4, which are extracellularly expressed, and thereby stimulate innate immune responses. Pectins containing RG-II and homogalacturonan structures induce strong activation of TLR4 in DCs90,91. The TLR4-activating effect of homogalacturonan pectins is independent of the DM, as DM30, DM56 and DM74 pectins activate TLR4 at a similar level29. In contrast to TLR4, TLR2 activation by pectins is exerted in a DM-dependent manner. Only very high-DM pectins (DM74) activate TLR2, whereas lower DM pectins (DM30 and DM56) do not activate TLR229. This indicates that the activation of TLR2 is induced after recognition of very high-DM pectins. TLR4 may be induced after recognition of the specific patterns of the non-esterified galacturonic acid backbone or RG-II structures.

In addition to their TLR-activating properties, pectins are recognized for their TLR-inhibiting properties on TLR2 and TLR4. Several studies have shown that pectins inhibit LPS-induced TLR4 activation in monocytes or dendritic cells70,92. These TLR4-inhibiting effects were suggested to be exerted through neutral side chains of RG-I or RG-II structures70. In addition, the DM can explain the TLR4-inhibiting effects of pectins because very high DM (DM90) pectin inhibited LPS-induced TLR4 activation in macrophages more effectively than lower DM pectins (DM60 and DM30)93. Furthermore, an opposite trend was observed for TLR2-1 inhibition. TLR2-1 was more effectively inhibited by low DM pectins, and this TLR2-1-inhibiting effect decreased with higher DM pectins30. Together, these results suggest that TLR4 inhibition is exerted through recognition of high DM structures or neutral side chain structures of RG-I or RG-II pectins. TLR2-1 is more effectively inhibited by low DM pectins30.

Impact of pectins on gut microbiota and microbial metabolic products

The gastrointestinal tract harbors trillions of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoa and archaea, which together form the intestinal microbiota18. These intestinal species interact with the intestinal immune barrier, contributing to the health status of the host18. Given the importance of health, maintaining a balanced intestinal microbiota composition is crucial. Dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota composition may disturb host-microbe interactions and contribute to the development of diseases5. A balanced composition of the intestinal microbiota is therefore vital to maintain health and prevent disease development.

Dietary fibers, including pectin, are components that can contribute to a balanced microbiota composition. Dietary fibers can have beneficial effects on the intestinal immune barrier via the intestinal microbiota through several mechanisms94. For example, dietary fibers can increase the abundance of beneficial intestinal microbiota17. As a consequence, dietary fibers reduce the abundance of pathogens or mucin-degrading bacteria, which in turn protect the epithelium against invading pathogens, as has been shown for Citrobacter rodentium in a mouse study24. Another mechanism by which dietary fibers have beneficial effects on the intestinal immune barrier is through stimulating gut bacteria to produce SCFAs18. Dietary fibers can be used by anaerobic bacteria as fermentation substrates to produce SCFAs, including acetate, propionate and butyrate18. SCFAs help maintain a low pH in the intestine, thereby inhibiting pathogen growth and favoring the growth of healthy intestinal microbiota95. In addition, SCFAs can dampen immune responses by acting on DCs, macrophages, neutrophils, T regulatory cells and epithelial cells21. They influence immune responses through interactions with GPR41, GPR43 or GPR109a, by inhibition of histone deacetylases or by direct interaction with transcription factors96,97. The influence of SCFAs on epithelial cells is mainly through stimulation of butyrate production in bacteria, as epithelial cells use butyrate as an energy substrate that stimulates epithelial cell growth98. Moreover, dietary fibers can have beneficial effects on the intestinal immune barrier, favoring adhesion of commensal or beneficial bacteria to the epithelium99,100. Thus, dietary fibers can have beneficial effects on the intestinal immune barrier through stimulation of microbial communities and SCFA production and modulation of bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells18,24,99,100. Proof that pectin can influence gut microbiota via one or a combination of the above described mechanisms is discussed in the next sections.

Stimulation of microbiota communities by pectins

Many studies have demonstrated that dietary pectin can influence the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota27,101,102,103,104,105,106,107. The genera Bacteroides and Prevotella are the primary pectin degraders, as they possess carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) within their polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL)108. These bacteria use lyases, methylesterases and acetylases to breakdown pectin molecules109. The breakdown substrates can be used by surrounding bacteria as growth substrates and thereby influence the composition of the microbial community110. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have reported that pectins induce distinct microbial compositions27,101,102,103,104,105,106,107. In vitro, it was shown that pectins can increase the abundance of Lactobacilli, Bacteroides and Prevotella101,102,103. Furthermore, some in vivo studies showed that pectins increase the abundance of Bacteroidetes, Clostridiales, Bacteroides, Lactobacilli and Prevotella, whereas other in vivo studies report that pectins decrease the abundance of Lactobacillus and Bacteroides spp.27,104,105,106,107. The inconsistencies in the composition of the microbial communities between the different studies may be related to the variations in initial microbiota composition, fermentation substrates or the influence of the host; however, a recent correlation study found that the impact by which pectins affect the composition of the microbial community strongly depends on the structural characteristics of pectins31.

In a recent in vitro fermentation study, five structural characteristics of pectins were strongly linked to shifts in microbiota composition. The five structural characteristics included the DM of homogalacturonan regions, the composition of neutral sugars, the distribution of homogalacturonan and rhamnogalacturonan fractions, the degree of branching and the presence of amide groups31. This study suggested that DM is the most important regulator of microbiota composition31. The effect of DM has been demonstrated in other in vitro and in vivo studies107,111,112. DM8 and DM35 pectins were preferably metabolized by gut microbiota and induced a higher abundance of Bifidobacteria and Bacteroides than DM66, DM71 and DM93 pectins in fermentation studies111,112. In addition, both DM29 and DM53 pectins induced a higher abundance of Prevotella spp. and a lower abundance of Lactobacillus in the pig colon, but these effects were stronger with low DM pectins than with high DM pectins107. The differences in microbiota composition between low and high DM pectins may be related to their differences in digestibility. Low DM pectins are digested faster than high DM pectins, which is suggested to be due to the production of pectate lyases and methyl esterases that digest low DM pectins faster than high DM pectins112. Enzymatic degradation higher in the gastrointestinal tract of low DM pectins may lead to earlier availability of growth substrates for the microbiota than high DM pectins. Consequently, low DM pectins start inducing the growth of microbiota communities earlier in the gastrointestinal tract than high DM pectins112,113. In addition to DM-dependent effects of pectins, other in vitro fermentation studies confirmed that the RG-I structures and RG-I side chain structures, i.e., arabinan, galactan, oligoarabinosides, and oligogalactosides, of pectins were very efficient in stimulating the growth of Bifidobacteria101,113. Together, these results show that pectins can induce shifts in microbiota composition and that these shifts are mainly dependent on the DM or RG-I structures of pectins.

Stimulation of SCFA production by pectins

SCFAs are metabolic products derived from the fermentation of dietary fibers under anaerobic conditions95. Particularly, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes can utilize dietary fibers and are the main producers of the SCFAs acetate, butyrate and propionate in the gastrointestinal tract95,114,115. The generation of SCFAs strongly depends on substrate availability, microbiota composition and intestinal transit time95.

Pectins can be used as fermentation substrates to stimulate the production of SCFAs31,112,113,116,117. Each individual structural pattern of pectin induces distinct profiles of acetate, propionate and butyrate in the gastrointestinal tract. Larsen et al. showed that after in vitro fermentation of RG-I structures, high levels of propionate and butyrate were induced31. This effect of RG-I structures on SCFA production was confirmed in rats, showing an increased the production of SCFAs production in rats fed with RG-I-enriched diets113. Furthermore, a correlation study by Larsen et al. confirmed an association between high DM pectins and high levels of propionate31. The higher production of propionate induced by DM53 pectins compared to DM29 pectins was also reported in another fecal batch fermentation study116. In contrast, an opposite pattern was observed in rats, showing that total SCFA concentrations were higher in the cecum of rats fed with low DM pectins (DM0, DM1, DM35, DM36, and DM40) than in rats fed with high DM pectins (DM56, DM58, DM63, DM64, DM69, DM71, and DM93)112,117. The contradicting findings on the impact of pectin structures on SCFA production may result from a different initial microbiota composition, a different pectin dosage, a difference in pectin digestibility or the influence of the host on microbiota composition31. Overall, the current understanding is that pectins can be used as fermentation substrates for gut microbiota and that the production of SCFAs is strongly influenced by the RG-I structures or the DM of pectins.

Effects on bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells

Dietary fibers are known to inhibit the growth of pathogens by preventing their adhesion to epithelial cells. Blocking pathogenic adhesion to epithelial cells may be beneficial because it prevents pathogen-induced epithelial damage118. Several studies have demonstrated that pectins and pectic-oligosaccharides (POS) have the ability to block the adhesion of pathogens to epithelial cells99,119,120,121. POS are known to reduce the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter jejuni, to epithelial cells122,123,124. This anti-adhesive effect of pectins and POS on pathogens was higher with pectins with a lower molecular weight or DM3 or DM5 pectins119,121.

In contrast to the anti-adhesive effects of pectins on pathogens, stimulating adhesion of commensal bacteria to epithelial cells may be favorable, as commensal bacteria may compete with pathogens for attachment or secrete other beneficial products118. Several studies have shown that pectins or pectic oligosaccharides enhance the adherence of commensal or probiotic Lactobacilli strains to epithelial cells122,124. The effects were species dependent, as pectins enhanced the adhesive effects of some Lactobacillus species, such as Lactobacillus plantarum 0981, 0995 or Lactobacillus brevis 0983, whereas pectins decreased the adhesion of other Lactobacillus species, such as Lactobacillus paracasei 0985, Lactobacillus plantarum 0989, 0990, and 0996122. The structural characteristics were, however, not specified in those studies. The exact mechanisms by which pectins or dietary fibers affect bacterial attachment are not fully understood and are thought to be multifaceted125. Fibers may resemble the saccharides from glycoproteins on epithelial cells that pathogens normally adhere to126. Furthermore, pectins may target other mechanisms in epithelial cells, including the regulation of transcription factors, chaperone proteins, glycosidic hydrolysates or other adhesion-related proteins125.

Concluding remarks and future perspectives

This review discusses the current knowledge on the impact of specific pectin structures on the intestinal immune barrier (Fig. 4). Several studies suggest that multiple structural characteristics of pectins exhibit diverse effects that enhance the intestinal immune barrier through a direct, microbiota-independent interaction with immune cells. Pectins may enhance the intestinal immune barrier by strengthening the mucus layer, enhancing epithelial integrity or activating and inhibiting macrophage and DC responses, which may be governed through interactions with PRRs30,41,64,65,66,70,71,72,73,76,77. However, most of these studies were performed in vitro. Some in vivo studies have confirmed the microbiota-independent effects of pectins on the gastrointestinal immune barrier. A recent study showed that pectins ameliorate TNSB-induced colitis in a microbiota-independent manner, as pectins had colitis-attenuating effects after deletion of microbiota by antibiotics127. Moreover, to show the direct microbiota-independent effects of pectins on the gastrointestinal immune barrier, it is recommended to perform in vivo studies with germ-free mice, such as those previously performed by Fransen et al., for inulin-type fructans128. Furthermore, additional experiments with human intestinal organoid models are needed to further extrapolate these direct effects of pectins on the gastrointestinal immune barrier of humans129.

Fig. 4: Influence of pectins on the gastrointestinal immune barrier.
figure4

Pectins can influence the gastrointestinal immune barrier in a microbiota-dependent (indirect effects) and microbiota-independent (direct effects) manner. Direct effects include strengthening of the mucus layer, stimulation of epithelial integrity or modulation of immune responses. Pectins can exert direct effects through interaction with galectins or TLRs. Indirect effects include stimulation of microbial diversity, production of SCFAs, favoring adhesion of commensals to epithelial cells or anti-adhesive effects of pathogens to epithelial cells. SCFAs may stimulate epithelial integrity and mucus secretion by binding to GPR41, GPR43, or GPR109a. Immune responses are also influenced by SCFAs, which may interact with GPR41, GPR43, or GPR109a, activate or inhibit histone deacetylases or regulate transcription factors.

In addition, the ability of pectins to reinforce the gastrointestinal immune barrier by impacting the gut microbiota and its fermentation products was reviewed. Specific pectin structures may contribute to intestinal homeostasis by stimulating the growth of microbial communities and enhancing their metabolic activity or by affecting the attachment of bacteria to epithelial cells18,24,99,100. However, due to the individual differences of the human microbiota, achieving similar effects of the pectin structures in humans may be challenging130. To better understand the microbiota-dependent impact of pectins on the gastrointestinal immune barrier, human studies are needed in which diet, age, gender, use of medication and host milieu are controlled131.

The dietary fiber pectin is a complex molecule with many structural characteristics25. Most studies that investigated the health effects of pectins used pectins with a combination of several structural characteristics. It is therefore hard if not impossible to determine which specific structural patterns of pectins induced health-promoting effects in these studies. To better understand how specific pectin structures can stimulate the intestinal immune barrier, future research should address the following: (1) The impact of the degree of single structural components of pectins (i.e., DM or acetylation, arabinose or galactose) on the gastrointestinal immune barrier; (2) The impact of the distribution of a single structural component (i.e., degree of blockiness) of pectins on the gastrointestinal immune barrier; (3) The combined impact of the degree and distribution of single structural characteristics of pectin on the gastrointestinal immune barrier. This may lead to the development of specific pectin formulations with beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal immune barrier in specific target groups. Because of its wide variety of structural features and specific health effects, pectin is a molecule that can be tailored for personalized medicine. Pectins may, for instance, be useful in preventing or restoring dysbiotic microbiota compositions associated with obesity, inflammatory bowel disease and metabolic syndrome94. Several studies have shown that supplementation of dietary fibers can prolong remission periods in patients with IBDs132,133, but no human studies have demonstrated that dietary fibers can be used to treat active IBDs134, suggesting that dietary fibers can prevent but not cure IBD symptoms. In Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and IBS food processing are dysregulated and might lead to disturbed fermentation of dietary fibers with possible negative effects on disease progression as a consequence134. This should always be considered when administering dietary fibers in these disorders. Furthermore, the microbiota-independent effects of pectins, including reducing mucositis by blocking TLR2-1, may be useful in limiting chemically induced intestinal inflammation after chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic treatments30,135. Pectin-based nutraceutical or functional foods may therefore be used to limit the development of diseases and maintain health in a microbiota-dependent and microbiota-independent manner.

References

  1. 1.

    Fardet, A. New hypotheses for the health-protective mechanisms of whole-grain cereals: what is beyond fibre? Nutr. Res. Rev. 23, 65–134 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aune, D. et al. Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 343, d6617 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Reynolds, A. et al. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet 393, 434–445 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Burkitt, D. P., Walker, A. R. P. & Painter, N. S. Effect of dietary fibre on stools and transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet 2, 1408–1412 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sonnenburg, E. D. & Sonnenburg, J. L. Starving our microbial self: the deleterious consequences of a diet deficient in microbiota-accessible carbohydrates. Cell Metab. 20, 779–786 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    König, J. et al. Human intestinal barrier function in health and disease. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.54 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Schenk, M. & Mueller, C. The mucosal immune system at the gastrointestinal barrier. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 22, 391–409 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mu, Q., Kirby, J., Reilly, C. M. & Luo, X. M. Leaky gut as a danger signal for autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00598 (2017).

  9. 9.

    McGuckin, M. A., Eri, R., Simms, L. A., Florin, T. H. J. & Radford-Smith, G. Intestinal barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 15, 100–113 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Catalioto, R.-M., A. Maggi, C. & Giuliani, S. Intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in disease and possible therapeutical interventions. Curr. Med. Chem. 18, 398–426 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Breton, J. et al. Intrinsic immunomodulatory effects of low-digestible carbohydrates selectively extend their anti-inflammatory prebiotic potentials. Biomed. Res. Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/162398 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Ermund, A., Schütte, A., Johansson, M. E. V, Gustafsson, J. K. & Hansson, G. C. Studies of mucus in mouse stomach, small intestine, and colon. I. Gastrointestinal mucus layers have different properties depending on location as well as over the Peyer’s patches. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00046.2013 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Mackie, A., Rigby, N., Harvey, P. & Bajka, B. Increasing dietary oat fibre decreases the permeability of intestinal mucus. J. Funct. Foods 26, 418–427 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vogt, L. M. et al. Toll-like receptor 2 activation by β2→1-fructans protects barrier function of T84 human intestinal epithelial cells in a chain length-dependent manner. J. Nutr. 144, 1002–1008 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bermudez-Brito, M. et al. The impact of dietary fibers on dendritic cell responses in vitro is dependent on the differential effects of the fibers on intestinal epithelial cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 59, 698–710 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cai, Y., Folkerts, J., Folkerts, G., Maurer, M. & Braber, S. Microbiota‐dependent and ‐independent effects of dietary fiber on human health. Br. J. Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14871 (2019).

  17. 17.

    Holscher, H. D. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes 8, 172–184 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nicholson, J. K. et al. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 336, 1262–1267 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bellahcene, M. et al. Male mice that lack the G-protein-coupled receptor GPR41 have low energy expenditure and increased body fat content. Br. J. Nutr. 109, 1755–1764 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kimura, I., Inoue, D., Hirano, K. & Tsujimoto, G. The SCFA receptor GPR43 and energy metabolism. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00085 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Smith, P. M. et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic T reg cell homeostasis. Science 341, 569–573 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li, M. et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory effects of short chain fatty acids on immune and endothelial cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 831, 52–59 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Roager, H. M. & Dragsted, L. O. Diet-derived microbial metabolites in health and disease. Nutr. Bull. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11040923 (2019).

  24. 24.

    Desai, M. S. et al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Voragen, A. G. J., Coenen, G. J., Verhoef, R. P. & Schols, H. A. Pectin, a versatile polysaccharide present in plant cell walls. Struct. Chem. 20, 263–275 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sun, Y. et al. Low-methoxyl lemon pectin attenuates inflammatory responses and improves intestinal barrier integrity in caerulein-induced experimental acute pancreatitis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600885 (2017).

  27. 27.

    Jiang, T. et al. Apple-derived pectin modulates gut microbiota, improves gut barrier function, and attenuates metabolic endotoxemia in rats with diet-induced obesity. Nutrients 152, s814–s815 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wilms et al. The impact of pectin supplementation on intestinal barrier function in healthy young adults and healthy elderly. Nutrients https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071554 (2019).

  29. 29.

    Vogt, L. M. et al. The impact of lemon pectin characteristics on TLR activation and T84 intestinal epithelial cell barrier function. J. Funct. Foods 22, 398–407 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sahasrabudhe, N. M. et al. Dietary fiber pectin directly blocks toll-like receptor 2-1 and prevents doxorubicin-induced ileitis. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00383 (2018).

  31. 31.

    Larsen, N. et al. Potential of pectins to beneficially modulate the gut microbiota depends on their structural properties. Front. Microbiol 10, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lara-Espinoza, C., Carvajal-Millán, E., Balandrán-Quintana, R., López-Franco, Y. & Rascón-Chu, A. Pectin and pectin-based composite materials: beyond food texture. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040942 (2018).

  33. 33.

    Voragen, A. G. J., Pilnik, W., Thibault, J. F., Axelos, M. A. V. & Renard, C. M. G. Pectins. in Food Polysaccharides and Their Applications (ed. Stephen, A.) (Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1995).

  34. 34.

    Thakur, B. R. et al. Chemistry and uses of pectin—A review chemistry and uses of pectin—a review. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 37, 47–73 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Daas, P. J. H., Meyer-Hansen, K., Schols, H. A., De Ruiter, G. A. & Voragen, A. G. J. Investigation of the non-esterified galacturonic acid distribution in pectin with endopolygalacturonase. Carbohydr. Res. 318, 135–145 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    O’Neill, M. A., Ishii, T., Albersheim, P. & Darvill, A. G. Rhamnogalacturonan II: structure and function of a borate cross-linked cell wall pectic polysaccharide. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 109–139 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wikiera, A., Irla, M. & Mika, M. Health-promoting properties of pectin. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 68, 590–596 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Eiwegger, T. et al. Prebiotic oligosaccharides: in vitro evidence for gastrointestinal epithelial transfer and immunomodulatory properties. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 21, 1179–1188 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mowat, A. M. & Agace, W. W. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 667–685 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jakobsson, H. E. et al. The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier. EMBO Rep. 16, 164–177 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hino, S. et al. Low-methoxyl pectin stimulates small intestinal mucin secretion irrespective of goblet cell proliferation and is characterized by Jejunum Muc2 upregulation in rats. J. Nutr. 143, 34–40 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Peterson, L. W. & Artis, D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 141–153 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jung, T. H., Park, J. H., Jeon, W. M. & Han, K. S. Butyrate modulates bacterial adherence on LS174T human colorectal cells by stimulating mucin secretion and MAPK signaling pathway. Nutr. Res. Pr. 9, 343–349 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bautista, M. V. et al. IL-8 regulates mucin gene expression at the posttranscriptional level in lung epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 183, 2159–2166 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Faderl, M., Noti, M., Corazza, N. & Mueller, C. Keeping bugs in check: the mucus layer as a critical component in maintaining intestinal homeostasis. IUBMB Life 67, 275–285 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang, H. et al. Rip2 is required for Nod2-mediated lysozyme sorting in Paneth cells. J. Immunol. 198, 3727–3736 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cheroutre, H., Lambolez, F. & Mucida, D. The light and dark sides of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 445–456 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Okumura, R. & Takeda, K. Roles of intestinal epithelial cells in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Exp. Mol. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2017.20 (2017).

  49. 49.

    Dillon, A. & Lo, D. D. M cells: Intelligent engineering of mucosal immune surveillance. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01499 (2019).

  50. 50.

    Arrieta, M. C., Bistritz, L. & Meddings, J. B. Alterations in intestinal permeability. Gut 55, 1512–1520 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Abreu, M. T. Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: how bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 131–144 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chen, G. et al. G protein-coupled receptor 109A and host microbiota modulate intestinal epithelial integrity during sepsis. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02079 (2018).

  53. 53.

    Ahluwalia, B., Magnusson, M. K. & Öhman, L. Mucosal immune system of the gastrointestinal tract: maintaining balance between the good and the bad. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 52, 1185–1193 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gordon, S. Pattern recognition receptors: doubling up for the innate immune response. Cell 111, 927–930 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rescigno, M. et al. Dendritic cells express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial monolayers to sample bacteria. Nat. Immunol. 2, 361–367 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Joeris, T., Müller-Luda, K., Agace, W. W. & Mowat, A. M. I. Diversity and functions of intestinal mononuclear phagocytes. Mucosal Immunol. 10, 845–864 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Pezoldt, J., Yang, J., Zou, M. & Huehn, J. Microbiome and gut immunity: T cells. Gut Microbiom. Health Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90545-7_9 (2018).

  58. 58.

    Masahata, K. et al. Generation of colonic IgA-secreting cells in the caecal patch. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4704 (2014).

  59. 59.

    Hammerschmidt, S. I. et al. Stromal mesenteric lymph node cells are essential for the generation of gut-Homing T cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 205, 2483–2490 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jaensson-Gyllenbäck, E. et al. Bile retinoids imprint intestinal CD103+ dendritic cells with the ability to generate gut-tropic T cells. Mucosal Immunol. 4, 438–447 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Agace, W. W. & McCoy, K. D. Regionalized development and maintenance of the intestinal adaptive immune landscape. Immunity https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.004 (2017).

  62. 62.

    Mann, E. R. et al. Compartment-specific immunity in the human gut: Properties and functions of dendritic cells in the colon versus the ileum. Gut https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307916 (2016).

  63. 63.

    McRorie, J. W. & McKeown, N. M. Understanding the physics of functional fibers in the gastrointestinal tract: an evidence-based approach to resolving enduring misconceptions about insoluble and soluble fiber. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 117, 251–264 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Popov, S. V. et al. Preventive effect of a peptic polysaccharide of the common cranberry Vaccinium oxycoccos L. on acetic acid-induced colitis in mice. World J. Gastroenterol. 12, 6646–6651 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sriamornsak, P., Wattanakorn, N. & Takeuchi, H. Study on the mucoadhesion mechanism of pectin by atomic force microscopy and mucin-particle method. Carbohydr. Polym. 79, 54–59 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Maria-Ferreira, D. et al. Rhamnogalacturonan, a chemically-defined polysaccharide, improves intestinal barrier function in DSS-induced colitis in mice and human Caco-2 cells. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30526-2 (2018).

  67. 67.

    Liu, L. S., Fishman, M. L., Hicks, K. B. & Kende, M. Interaction of various pectin formulations with porcine colonic tissues. Biomaterials 26, 5907–5916 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Cario, E., Gerken, G. & Podolsky, D. K. Toll-Like receptor 2 controls mucosal inflammation by regulating epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 132, 1359–1374 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Rabbani, G. H. et al. Green banana and pectin improve small intestinal permeability and reduce fluid loss in Bangladeshi children with persistent diarrhea. Dig. Dis. Sci. 49, 475–484 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ishisono, K., Yabe, T. & Kitaguchi, K. Citrus pectin attenuates endotoxin shock via suppression of Toll-like receptor signaling in Peyer’s patch myeloid cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 50, 38–45 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    do Nascimento, G. E., Winnischofer, S. M. B., Ramirez, M. I., Iacomini, M. & Cordeiro, L. M. C. The influence of sweet pepper pectin structural characteristics on cytokine secretion by THP-1 macrophages. Food Res. Int. 50, 588–594 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Amorim, J. C., Vriesmann, L. C., Petkowicz, C. L. O., Martinez, G. R. & Noleto, G. R. Modified pectin from Theobroma cacao induces potent pro-inflammatory activity in murine peritoneal macrophage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 92, 1040–1048 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Inngjerdingen, M. et al. Pectic polysaccharides from Biophytum petersianum Klotzsch, and their activation of macrophages and dendritic cells. Glycobiology 18, 1074–1084 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sakurai, M. H., Matsumoto, T., Kiyohara, H. & Yamada, H. Detection and tissue distribution of anti-ulcer peptic polysaccharides from Bepleurum falcatum by polyclonal antibody. Planta Med. 62, 341–346 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    De Jesus, M., Ostroff, G. R., Levitz, S. M., Bartling, T. R. & Mantis, N. J. A population of langerin-positive dendritic cells in murine peyer’s patches involved in sampling β-glucan microparticles. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0091002 (2014).

  76. 76.

    Suh, H. J. et al. Peyer’s patch-mediated intestinal immune system modulating activity of pectic-type polysaccharide from peel of Citrus unshiu. Food Chem. 138, 1079–1086 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Popov, S. V. & Ovodov, Y. S. Polypotency of the immunomodulatory effect of pectins. Biochem 78, 823–835 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kamada, N. & Núñez, G. Regulation of the immune system by the resident intestinal bacteria. Gastroenterology 146, 1477–1488 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    do Nascimento, G. E., Winnischofer, S. M. B., Ramirez, M. I., Iacomini, M. & Cordeiro, L. M. C. The influence of sweet pepper pectin structural characteristics on cytokine secretion by THP-1 macrophages. Food Res. Int. 102, 588–594 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Takeuchi, O. & Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140, 805–820 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Sahasrabudhe, N. M. et al. Endo-glucanase digestion of oat β-Glucan enhances Dectin-1 activation in human dendritic cells. J. Funct. Foods https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.11.0377 (2016).

  82. 82.

    Vogt, L. M. et al. Immune modulation by different types of β2→1-fructans is toll-like receptor dependent. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0068367 (2013).

  83. 83.

    Gao, X. et al. The inhibitory effects of a rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I) domain from ginseng Pectin on galectin-3 and its structure-activity relationship. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 33953–33965 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Sciacchitano, S. et al. Galectin-3: one molecule for an alphabet of diseases, from A to Z. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020379 (2018).

  85. 85.

    Lepur, A. et al. Galectin-3 endocytosis by carbohydrate independent and dependent pathways in different macrophage like cell types. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1820, 804–818 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Glinsky, V. V. & Raz, A. Modified citrus pectin anti-metastatic properties: one bullet, multiple targets. Carbohydr. Res. 344, 1788–1791 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Prado, S. B. R. Do et al. Ripening-induced chemical modifications of papaya pectin inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16709-3 (2017).

  88. 88.

    Díaz-Alvarez, L. & Ortega, E. The many roles of galectin-3, a multifaceted molecule, in innate immune responses against pathogens. Mediators Inflamm. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9247574 (2017).

  89. 89.

    Yiu, J. H. C., Dorweiler, B. & Woo, C. W. Interaction between gut microbiota and toll-like receptor: from immunity to metabolism. J. Mol. Med. 95, 13–20 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Park, S. N. et al. Rhamnogalacturonan II is a Toll-like receptor 4 agonist that inhibits tumor growth by activating dendritic cell-mediated CD8+ T cells. Exp. Mol. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2014.38 (2013).

  91. 91.

    Wang, H. et al. A homogalacturonan from Hippophae rhamnoides L. Berries enhance immunomodulatory activity through TLR4/MyD88 pathway mediated activation of macrophages. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 107, 1039–1045 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Liu, Y., Su, W. W., Wang, S. & Li, P. B. Naringin inhibits chemokine production in an LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line. Mol. Med. Rep. 6, 1343–1350 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Chen, C. H. et al. Suppression of endotoxin-induced proinflammatory responses by citrus pectin through blocking LPS signaling pathways. Biochem. Pharmacol. 72, 1001–1009 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Cui, J. et al. Dietary fibers from fruits and vegetables and their health benefits via modulation of gut microbiota. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 95, 50–60 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Macfarlane, G. T. & Macfarlane, S. Bacteria, colonic fermentation, and gastrointestinal health. J. AOAC Int. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.SGE_Macfarlane (2012).

  96. 96.

    Kim, C. H. Immune regulation by microbiome metabolites. Immunology 154, 220–229 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Donohoe, D. R. et al. The Warburg effect dictates the mechanism of butyrate-mediated histone acetylation and cell proliferation. Mol. Cell 48, 612–626 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Gonçalves, P. & Martel, F. Regulation of colonic epithelial butyrate transport: focus on colorectal cancer. Porto Biomed. J. 1, 83–91 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Rhoades, J. et al. Oligosaccharide-mediated inhibition of the adhesion of pathogenic Escherichia coli strains to human gut epithelial cells in vitro. J. Food Prot. 71, 2272–2277 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Larsen, N., Cahú, T. B., Isay Saad, S. M., Blennow, A. & Jespersen, L. The effect of pectins on survival of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. in gastrointestinal juices is related to their structure and physical properties. Food Microbiol. 74, 11–20 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Onumpai, C., Kolida, S., Bonnin, E. & Rastall, R. A. Microbial utilization and selectivity of pectin fractions with various structures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 5747–5754 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Shinohara, K., Ohashi, Y., Kawasumi, K., Terada, A. & Fujisawa, T. Effect of apple intake on fecal microbiota and metabolites in humans. Anaerobe 16, 510–515 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Gómez, B., Gullón, B., Yáñez, R., Schols, H. & Alonso, J. L. Prebiotic potential of pectins and pectic oligosaccharides derived from lemon peel wastes and sugar beet pulp: a comparative evaluation. J. Funct. Foods 20, 108–121 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Li, W., Zhang, K. & Yang, H. Pectin alleviates high fat (Lard) diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice: possible role of short-chain fatty acids and gut microbiota regulated by pectin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 8015–8025 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Licht, T. R. et al. Effects of apples and specific apple components on the cecal environment of conventional rats: Role of apple pectin. BMC Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-13 (2010).

  106. 106.

    Paturi, G., Butts, C. A., Stoklosinski, H., Herath, T. D. & Monro, J. A. Short-term feeding of fermentable dietary fibres influences the gut microbiota composition and metabolic activity in rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600186 (2017).

  107. 107.

    Tian, L. et al. Effects of pectin on fermentation characteristics, carbohydrate utilization, and microbial community composition in the gastrointestinal tract of weaning pigs. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600186 (2016).

  108. 108.

    Martens, E. C. et al. Recognition and degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides by two human gut symbionts. PLoS Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001221 (2011).

  109. 109.

    Grondin, J. M., Tamura, K., Déjean, G., Abbott, D. W. & Brumer, H. Polysaccharide utilization loci: fueling microbial communities. J. Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00860-16 (2017).

  110. 110.

    Flint, H. J., Duncan, S. H., Scott, K. P. & Louis, P. Interactions and competition within the microbial community of the human colon: Links between diet and health: minireview. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1101–1111 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Olano-Martin, E., Gibson, G. R. & Rastall, R. A. Comparison of the in vitro bifidogenic properties of pectins and pectic-oligosaccharides. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93, 505–511 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Dongowski, G., Lorenz, A. & Proll, J. The degree of methylation influences the degradation of pectin in the intestinal tract of rats and in vitro. J. Nutr. 132, 1935–1944 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Mao, G. et al. Depolymerized RG-I enriched pectin from citrus segment membrane modulates gut microbiota, increases SCFAs production, promotes the growth of Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Faecalibaculum spp. Food Funct. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9FO01534E (2019).

  114. 114.

    Levy, M., Thaiss, C. A. & Elinav, E. Metabolites: messengers between the microbiota and the immune system. Genes Dev. 30, 1589–1597 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Den Besten, G. et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 54, 2325–2340 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Gulfi, M., Arrigoni, E. & Amadò, R. Influence of structure on in vitro fermentability of commercial pectins and partially hydrolysed pectin preparations. Carbohydr. Polym. 59, 247–255 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Tian, L. et al. Effects of pectin supplementation on the fermentation patterns of different structural carbohydrates in rats. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 60, 2256–2266 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Lu, L. & Walker, W. A. Pathologic and physiologic interactions of bacteria with the gastrointestinal epithelium. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 1124s–1130s (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Olano-Martin, E., Rimbach, G. H., Gibson, G. R. & Rastall, R. A. Pectin and pectic-oligosaccharides induce apoptosis in in vitro human colonic adenocarcinoma cells. Anticancer Res. 23, 341–346 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Lee, J. H. et al. Pectin-like acidic polysaccharide from Panax ginseng with selective antiadhesive activity against pathogenic bacteria. Carbohydr. Res. 341, 1154–1163 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Di, R. et al. Pectic oligosaccharide structure-function relationships: prebiotics, inhibitors of Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion and reduction of Shiga toxin cytotoxicity in HT29 cells. Food Chem. 227, 245–254 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Wilkowska, A. et al. Structurally different pectic oligosaccharides produced from apple pomace and their biological activity in vitro. Foods https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8090365 (2019).

  123. 123.

    Ganan, M. et al. Inhibition by pectic oligosaccharides of the invasion of undifferentiated and differentiated Caco-2 cells by Campylobacter jejuni. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 137, 181–185 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Parkar, S. G. et al. Gut health benefits of kiwifruit pectins: comparison with commercial functional polysaccharides. J. Funct. Foods 2, 210–218 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Kavanaugh, D. W. et al. Exposure of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis to milk oligosaccharides increases adhesion to epithelial cells and induces a substantial transcriptional response. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067224.g001 (2013).

  126. 126.

    Shoaf-Sweeney, K. D. & Hutkins, R. W. Adherence, anti-adherence, and oligosaccharides. preventing pathogens from sticking to the host. Adv. Food Nutr. Res 55, 101–161 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Ishisono, K., Mano, T., Yabe, T. & Kitaguchi, K. Dietary fiber pectin ameliorates experimental colitis in a neutral sugar side chain-dependent manner. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02979 (2019).

  128. 128.

    Fransen, F. et al. β2→1-fructans modulate the immune system in vivo in a microbiota-dependent and -independent fashion. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00154 (2017).

  129. 129.

    Rubert, J. et al. Intestinal organoids: a tool for modelling diet–microbiome–host interactions. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 1576, 183–194 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Tap, J. et al. Gut microbiota richness promotes its stability upon increased dietary fibre intake in healthy adults. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 4954–4964 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Hasan, N. & Yang, H. Factors affecting the composition of the gut microbiota, and its modulation. PeerJ https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7502 (2019).

  132. 132.

    Hallert, C. et al. Increasing fecal butyrate in ulcerative colitis patients by diet: controlled pilot study. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 9, 116–121 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Hanai, H. et al. Germinated barley foodstuff prolongs remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. Int. J. Mol. Med. 13, 643–647 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Sugihara, K., Morhardt, T. L. & Kamada, N. The role of dietary nutrients in inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03183 (2019).

  135. 135.

    Sonis, S. T. The pathobiology of mucositis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 277–284 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the public-private partnership ‘CarboKinetics’ coordinated by the Carbohydrate Competence Center (CCC, www.cccresearch.nl). CarboKinetics is financed by participating industrial partners Agrifirm Innovation Center B.V., Nutrition Sciences N.V., Cooperatie Avebe U.A., DSM Food Specialties B.V., VanDrie Holding N.V. and Sensus B.V., and allowances of The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Beukema.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beukema, M., Faas, M.M. & de Vos, P. The effects of different dietary fiber pectin structures on the gastrointestinal immune barrier: impact via gut microbiota and direct effects on immune cells. Exp Mol Med (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0449-2

Download citation

Search

Quick links