Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

The frequency and pathogenicity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in the general Japanese population

A Correction to this article was published on 14 March 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) resulting from pathogenic variants of BRCA1 or BRCA2 is the most common and well-documented hereditary tumor. Although founder variants have been identified in population-based surveys in various countries, the types of variants are not uniform across races and regions. Recently, the Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (ToMMo) released whole-genome sequence data including approximately 54,000 individuals from the general population of the Tohoku area in Japan. We analyzed these data and comprehensively identified the prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic and truncating variants. We believe that an accurate understanding of the unique distribution and characteristics of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in Japan through this analysis will enable better surveillance and intervention for HBOC patients, not only in Japan but also worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

References

  1. Hu C, Hart SN, Gnanaolivu R, Huang H, Lee KY, Na J, et al. A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:440–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sekine M, Enomoto T, Arai M, Yokoyama S, Nomura H, Nishino K, et al. Correlation between the risk of ovarian cancer and BRCA recurrent pathogenic variants in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2022;67:267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arai M, Yokoyama S, Watanabe C, Yoshida R, Kita M, Okawa M, et al. Genetic and clinical characteristics in Japanese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: first report after establishment of HBOC registration system in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2018;63:447–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rebbeck TR, Friebel TM, Friedman E, Hamann U, Huo D, Kwong A, et al. Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:593–620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tadaka S, Hishinuma E, Komaki S, Motoike IN, Kawashima J, Saigusa D, et al. jMorp updates in 2020: large enhancement of multi-omics data resources on the general Japanese population. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D536–D44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Idogawa M, Hida T, Tanaka T, Ohira N, Tange S, Sasaki Y, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) harboring a missense mutation of TSC2 with copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH). Cancer Biol Ther. 2020;21:315–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moghadasi S, Meeks HD, Vreeswijk MP, Janssen LA, Borg A, Ehrencrona H, et al. The BRCA1 c. 5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) intermediate risk variant: breast and ovarian cancer risk estimation and recommendations for clinical management from the ENIGMA consortium. J Med Genet. 2018;55:15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spurdle AB, Whiley PJ, Thompson B, Feng B, Healey S, Brown MA, et al. BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk. J Med Genet. 2012;49:525–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fanale D, Pivetti A, Cancelliere D, Spera A, Bono M, Fiorino A, et al. BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome: Looking for the hidden meaning. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;172:103626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spurdle AB, Healey S, Devereau A, Hogervorst FB, Monteiro AN, Nathanson KL, et al. ENIGMA–evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:2–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng J, Novati G, Pan J, Bycroft C, Zemgulyte A, Applebaum T, et al. Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science. 2023;381:eadg7492.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Macklin S, Durand N, Atwal P, Hines S. Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic. Genet Med. 2018;20:346–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Momozawa Y, Iwasaki Y, Parsons MT, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, Tamura C, et al. Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4083.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Momozawa Y, Sasai R, Usui Y, Shiraishi K, Iwasaki Y, Taniyama Y, et al. Expansion of Cancer Risk Profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:871–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masashi Idogawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In Table 2 of this article PDF, the data in the rows headed “c.7601_7602ins” and “c.7606_7607ins” were mistakenly listed as another rows. In Table 3, the layout has been changed to identify four tables respectively.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Idogawa, M., Mariya, T., Tanaka, Y. et al. The frequency and pathogenicity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in the general Japanese population. J Hum Genet 69, 225–230 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-024-01233-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-024-01233-w

Search

Quick links