Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Genome sequencing identifies coding and non-coding variants for non-syndromic hearing loss

Abstract

Hearing loss (HL) is a common heterogeneous trait that involves variants in more than 200 genes. In this study, we utilized exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) to effectively identify the genetic cause of presumably non-syndromic HL in 322 families from South and West Asia and Latin America. Biallelic GJB2 variants were identified in 58 probands at the time of enrollment these probands were excluded. In addition, upon review of phenotypic findings, 38/322 probands were excluded based on syndromic findings at the time of ascertainment and no further evaluation was performed on those samples. We performed ES as a primary diagnostic tool on one or two affected individuals from 212/226 families. Via ES we detected a total of 78 variants in 30 genes and showed their co-segregation with HL in 71 affected families. Most of the variants were frameshift or missense and affected individuals were either homozygous or compound heterozygous in their respective families. We employed GS as a primary test on a subset of 14 families and a secondary tool on 22 families which were unsolved by ES. Although the cumulative detection rate of causal variants by ES and GS is 40% (89/226), GS alone has led to a molecular diagnosis in 7 of 14 families as the primary tool and 5 of 22 families as the secondary test. GS successfully identified variants present in deep intronic or complex regions not detectable by ES.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening—a silent revolution. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2151–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamasoba T, Lin FR, Someya S, Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Kondo K. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res. 2013;303:30–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gettelfinger JD, Dahl JP. Syndromic hearing loss: a brief review of common presentations and genetics. J Pediatr Genet. 2018;7:001–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hilgert N, Smith RJ, Van Camp G. Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics? Mutat Res/Rev Mutat Res. 2009;681:189–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kimberling WJ, Hildebrand MS, Shearer AE, Jensen ML, Halder JA, Trzupek K, et al. Frequency of Usher syndrome in two pediatric populations: Implications for genetic screening of deaf and hard of hearing children. Genet Med. 2010;12:512–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodie KD, Moore AT, Slavotinek AM, Meyer AK, Nadaraja GS, Conrad DE, et al. Genetic testing leading to early identification of childhood ocular manifestations of usher syndrome. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:E2053–E9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fromer M, Moran JL, Chambert K, Banks E, Bergen SE, Ruderfer DM, et al. Discovery and statistical genotyping of copy-number variation from whole-exome sequencing depth. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91:597–607.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Krumm N, Sudmant PH, Ko A, O’Roak BJ, Malig M, Coe BP, et al. Copy number variation detection and genotyping from exome sequence data. Genome Res. 2012;22:1525–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang J, Liang X, Xuan Y, Geng C, Li Y, Lu H, et al. A reference human genome dataset of the BGISEQ-500 sequencer. Gigascience 2017;6:gix024.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bademci G, Abad C, Incesulu A, Rad A, Alper O, Kolb SM, et al. MPZL2 is a novel gene associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic moderate hearing loss. Hum Genet. 2018;137:479–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Oza AM, DiStefano MT, Hemphill SE, Cushman BJ, Grant AR, Siegert RK, et al. Expert specification of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for genetic hearing loss. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1593–613.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tavtigian SV, Harrison SM, Boucher KM, Biesecker LG. Fitting a naturally scaled point system to the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. Hum Mutat. 2020;41:1734–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cartegni L, Wang J, Zhu Z, Zhang MQ, Krainer AR. ESEfinder: a web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3568–71.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–58.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Naz S, Imtiaz A, Mujtaba G, Maqsood A, Bashir R, Bukhari I, et al. Genetic causes of moderate to severe hearing loss point to modifiers. Clin Genet. 2017;91:589–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rehman AU, Santos-Cortez RLP, Drummond MC, Shahzad M, Lee K, Morell RJ, et al. Challenges and solutions for gene identification in the presence of familial locus heterogeneity. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:1207–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Richard EM, Santos‐Cortez RLP, Faridi R, Rehman AU, Lee K, Shahzad M, et al. Global genetic insight contributed by consanguineous Pakistani families segregating hearing loss. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:53–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bademci G, Foster J, Mahdieh N, Bonyadi M, Duman D, Cengiz FB, et al. Comprehensive analysis via exome sequencing uncovers genetic etiology in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness in a large multiethnic cohort. Genet Med. 2016;18:364–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Denoyelle F, Weil D, Maw MA, Wilcox SA, Lench NJ, Allen-Powell DR, et al. Prelingual deafness: high prevalence of a 30delG mutation in the connexin 26 gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:2173–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de la Luz Arenas-Sordo M, Menendez I, Hernández-Zamora E, Sirmaci A, Gutiérrez-Tinajero D, McGetrick M, et al. Unique spectrum of GJB2 mutations in Mexico. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76:1678–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Batissoco AC, Abreu-Silva RS, Braga MCC, Lezirovitz K, Della-Rosa V, Alfredo T Jr, et al. Prevalence of GJB2 (connexin-26) and GJB6 (connexin-30) mutations in a cohort of 300 Brazilian hearing-impaired individuals: implications for diagnosis and genetic counseling. Ear Hear. 2009;30:1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bouzaher MH, Worden CP, Jeyakumar A. Systematic review of pathogenic GJB2 variants in the Latino population. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41:e182–e91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grangeiro CHP, Picanço-Albuquerque CG, dos Anjos TO, De Molfetta GA, Silva WA. Ferraz VEdF. Contribution of SLC26A4 to the molecular diagnosis of nonsyndromic prelingual sensorineural hearing loss in a Brazilian cohort. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Manzoli GN, Bademci G, Acosta AX, Félix TM, Cengiz FB, Foster J, et al. Targeted resequencing of deafness genes reveals a founder MYO15A variant in northeastern Brazil. Ann Hum Genet. 2016;80:327–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Demain LA, Urquhart JE, O’Sullivan J, Williams SG, Bhaskar SS, Jenkinson EM, et al. Expanding the genotypic spectrum of Perrault syndrome. Clin Genet. 2017;91:302–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baker S, Booth C, Fillman C, Shapiro M, Blair MP, Hyland JC, et al. A loss of function mutation in the COL9A2 gene causes autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2011;155:1668–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kjellström U, Martell S, Brobeck C, Andréasson S. Autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome associated with homozygous mutations in the COL9A2 gene. Ophthalmic Genet. 2021;42:161–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nixon TR, Alexander P, Richards A, McNinch A, Bearcroft PW, Cobben J, et al. Homozygous type IX collagen variants (COL9A1, COL9A2, and COL9A3) causing recessive Stickler syndrome—expanding the phenotype. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2019;179:1498–506.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hatch EP, Noyes CA, Wang X, Wright TJ, Mansour SL. Fgf3 is required for dorsal patterning and morphogenesis of the inner ear epithelium. 2007.

  32. Ramsebner R, Ludwig M, Parzefall T, Lucas T, Baumgartner WD, Bodamer O, et al. A FGF3 mutation associated with differential inner ear malformation, microtia, and microdontia. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:359–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Riazuddin S, Ahmed ZM, Hegde RS, Khan SN, Nasir I, Shaukat U, et al. Variable expressivity of FGF3 mutations associated with deafness and LAMM syndrome. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tekin M, Hişmi BÖ, Fitoz S, Özdağ H, Cengiz FB, Sırmacı A, et al. Homozygous mutations in fibroblast growth factor 3 are associated with a new form of syndromic deafness characterized by inner ear agenesis, microtia, and microdontia. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:338–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tekin M, Öztürkmen Akay H, Fitoz S, Birnbaum S, Cengiz F, Sennaroğlu L, et al. Homozygous FGF3 mutations result in congenital deafness with inner ear agenesis, microtia, and microdontia. Clin Genet. 2008;73:554–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cabanillas R, Diñeiro M, Cifuentes GA, Castillo D, Pruneda PC, Álvarez R, et al. Comprehensive genomic diagnosis of non-syndromic and syndromic hereditary hearing loss in Spanish patients. BMC Med Genom. 2018;11:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Baux D, Vaché C, Blanchet C, Willems M, Baudoin C, Moclyn M, et al. Combined genetic approaches yield a 48% diagnostic rate in a large cohort of French hearing-impaired patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Heurck R, Carminho-Rodrigues MT, Ranza E, Stafuzza C, Quteineh L, Gehrig C, et al. Benefits of exome sequencing in children with suspected isolated hearing loss. Genes 2021;12:1277.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Shearer AE, Smith RJ. Massively parallel sequencing for genetic diagnosis of hearing loss: the new standard of care. Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg. 2015;153:175–82.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sloan-Heggen CM, Bierer AO, Shearer AE, Kolbe DL, Nishimura CJ, Frees KL, et al. Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss. Hum Genet. 2016;135:441–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Najmabadi H, Kahrizi K. Genetics of non-syndromic hearing loss in the Middle East. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:2026–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Murthy T, Paul KV, Minella AC, Pillai MM. The development and use of scalable systems for studying aberrant splicing in SF3B1-mutant CLL. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Springer; 2019. 83–99.

  43. Wang Z, Rolish ME, Yeo G, Tung V, Mawson M, Burge CB. Systematic identification and analysis of exonic splicing silencers. Cell. 2004;119:831–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participating families included in this study. We thank all physicians, genetic counselors, and audiologists for providing all the relevant information. We are grateful to the DNA-Neurogenetics Bank of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas for supporting the collection of DNA samples and associated data used in this publication. The content of this publication does not reflect the opinion of the DNA-Neurogenetics Bank. This work was supported by the NIH R01DC009645 grant to MT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Tekin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramzan, M., Duman, D., Hendricks, L.C.P. et al. Genome sequencing identifies coding and non-coding variants for non-syndromic hearing loss. J Hum Genet 68, 657–669 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-023-01159-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-023-01159-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links