Abstract
Background: Developmental evaluation of VLBWI after hospital discharge is important to assess the effectiveness of management during hospitalization.
Objective: Compare neurodevelopment at 24 months corrected age of VLBWI according to adequacy for gestational age at birth and at discharge.
Methods: A prospective cohort including VLBWI in the follow-up. They were rated SGA or AGA at birth and at discharge. Data of birth, maternal age and education, family income and neurodevelopment (Bayley III) were evaluated.
Results: 125 infants were sequentially included: 15 had GA≤27 weeks, 73 GA 28-31 weeks, 37 GA>31 weeks. Maternal age, education and income were similar among groups. Infants GA≤27 weeks had more ROP (III and IV), lower head circumference at birth, longer duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization (all p< 0.001). When they were rated SGA or AGA at birth or discharge no significant differences were found. Comparing according to GA the results were significantly different. The mean Bayley III scores were: Cognitive: 76.8±8.8 group GA≤27 weeks, 86.5±12.9 group GA 28-31 weeks and 88.7±17.1 group GA>31 weeks; Language: 90.8±9 group GA≤27 weeks, 92.8±14.9 group GA 28-31 weeks and 94±9.6 group GA>31 weeks; Motor: 81.9±13.6 group GA≤27 weeks, 94.9±17.4 group GA 28-31 weeks and 95±13 group GA>31 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences for language. The differences were statistically significant in cognitive and motor scales (p=0.020 and p=0.016, respectively). The most impaired group was GA≤27 weeks.
Conclusion: Our data suggest that GA is more important for VLBWI neurodevelopment than nutritional status at birth or at discharge.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Procianoy, R., Filipouski, G. & Silveira, R. Influence of Gestational Age and Nutritional Status on Neurodevelopment of Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatr Res 70 (Suppl 5), 346 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2011.571
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2011.571