Background: Bolus administration of surfactant (surf) can lead to obstruction of bronchus or endotracheal tube and has potential hazards concerning circulation and cerebral perfusion. We gave surf as a slow infusion (inf) via a small catheter within the tube and compared effects on static compliance (C) and resistance(R) with the recommended bolus administration (bol).
Subjects: 18 infants with RDS (27-39 weeks GA: 0.7-3.3 kg BW; FiO2 0.3-1.0)
Interventions: 15 infants randomized for either inf or bol with bovine surf (18 interventions), 3 controls(con) treated with synthetic surf as fractionated bol. Measurement of C every 3 min.
Results: Given as mean of Ctn/Cto or Rtn/Rto± S.D. (tn = time 15/45/75 min; to = start of treatment). Difference of inf vs. bol not significant for p <.05 at each tn. Table
Conclusions: Natural surf leads to increase of R, whereas C first decreases and then increases. Course of C or R is not different in both treatments. Synthetic surf has no effect on C or R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
(Supported by German Research Council (DFG) # He 1835/1-1)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hentschel, R., Brune, T., Rabe, H. et al. Effects on Compliance and Resistance of Bolus Administration vs. Slow Infusion of Surfactant 113. Pediatr Res 40, 534 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199609000-00136
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199609000-00136