Abstract
Faced with recurring staffing problems, nurses in our small (250 admissions in 1976) but expanding unit voluntarily changed from three 8-hour to two 12-hour shifts per day in late June 1976. A questionaire using a seven point scale was administered four months later. Twenty-eight out of thirty (28/30) staff nurses responded. Continuity of patient care (25/28) and familiarity with families (19/28) were considered important benefits of the new schedule. Physician concerns, plans, and diagnosis were thought to be transmitted better (20/28) from one shift to the next. However, (16/28) nurses felt they lost contact with patients who had short stays in the nursery. Scheduling of holidays (18/28), vacation (17/28), and workdays (23/28) was generally thought to be improved. Changing from days to nights was thought to be improved by (4/25), unaffected by (13/25), and made more difficult by (8/25).
The nursing staff felt that the rate of patient care error was unaffected by the new schedule (20/28), but there was thought to be a significant improvement in transcribing orders (20/28). Sign-off from one shift to the next was considered improved by (25/28). Finally, personal performance was assessed to be no different (13/28), or actually improved (15/28) by the new schedule. The results of this study indicate support for the 12-hour day. Additional evaluations including physician assessment, job performance and clinical outcome continue.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Black, V., Nagy, J., Little, G. et al. ICN NURSE STAFFING: THE 12-HOUR ALTERNATIVE. Pediatr Res 11, 375 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-197704000-00033
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-197704000-00033