Introduction

The weak attraction between an aliphatic C–H bond and a π-electron system is called the CH/π interaction.1, 2, 3, 4 The attraction energy is on the order of only 1 kcal mol–1, whereas the thermal energy at 300 K is 0.6 kcal mol–1. Several experimental and theoretical studies have supported the existence of inter- and intramolecular CH/π interactions, which play key roles in conformational preference, crystal packing, host-guest complexation and self-organization processes.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 One can assume the existence of the intramolecular CH/π (hereafter called intra-CH/π) interaction of polymers containing a π-electron moiety in the main chain and the side chain. This possibility remains questionable because floppy main and side chains in a fluid solution must overcome the fluctuating thermal energy and enhance the low rotational barrier of the C–C bond on the order of 1 kcal mol–1. Currently, for supramolecular polymer host–guest complexation, the existence of the intermolecular CH/π interaction (hereafter called inter-CH/π) in a highly condensed solution state is indicated by two-dimensional (2D) 1H–1H nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) correlated spectroscopy (NOESY) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR),6 and the inter-CH/π interaction in the solid state is demonstrated by an advanced 2D phase-modulated Lee–Goldburg decoupling heteronuclear 1H–13C correlation (PMLG-HETCOR) NMR technique with cross-polarization magic angle spinning (CPMAS).5, 7

In recent years, the synthesis, condensed-phase structure and photophysical properties of several stiff π-conjugated polymers with n-alkyl and branched alkyl side chains have been reported.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 The roles of the alkyl side chains are possibly (1) to endow better solubility to common organic solvents, (2) to reduce the crystallinity of solid films due to the introduction of highly branched alkyl chain and bulky aryl groups, (3) to enhance the liquid crystallinity by providing n-alkyl chains of the appropriate length and (4) to induce certain degrees of chiral and helical order in solutions and films because of the influence of chiral branched chains. The possibility of the intra-CH/π interaction existing between main chain and alkyl side chains in these π-conjugated polymers under fluidic conditions, however, has not yet been fully clarified because of the rich conformational freedom of side chain and main chain and instrument limitations in structural analysis.

To answer the question of whether the intra-CH/π interaction of π-conjugated polymers in solutions is detectable, we chose three chiral poly(dialkylfluorene)s (S2MO, S37DMO and R37DMO)19, 22 and an achiral poly(di-n-octlylfluorene) (PF8)15 (Figure 1). For comparison, we tested three achiral small molecules, di-n-octylfluorene (F8), n-butylbenzene (BB) and n-octane, as shown in Figure 1. The uniqueness of the dialkylfluorene ring is to fix the C8–Cipso–C9–Cα dihedral angle and to restrict the rotational freedom of Cipso–C9, C9–Cα, Cα–Cβ and Cβ–Cγ bonds. This inherent property facilitates the formation of the folded gauche geometry between the alkyl-π-ring linkage in S2MO, S37DMO, R37DMO and PF8 in a fluid solution state at room temperature relative to what is observed in n-alkylbenzenes (Figure 1). Herein, we demonstrate for the first time that the intra-CH/π interaction exists in these polyfluorenes (PFs) as well as in F8 in chloroform-d1 (CDCl3), methylcyclohexane-d14 (MCH-d14), tetrahydrofuran-d8 (THF-d8) and toluene-d8 (TOL-d8), as revealed by 1H–1H NOESY and 1H-NMR spectroscopy and circular dichroism (CD)/ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy. NOESY NMR data indicate no detectable intra-CH/π interaction of BB in CDCl3.

Figure 1
figure 1

Chemical structures of three chiral and one achiral poly(dialkylfluorene)s, and, for comparison, several dialkylfluorenes, n-butylbenzene and n-octane.

To support this idea theoretically, possible folded conformations were searched using Conflex7 (MMFF94s force field)26, 27 http://www.conflex.us for simple molecular models of S2MO, S37DMO and PF8, followed by optimizing the most probable conformation by second-order Møller–Plesett (MP2) perturbation calculations (Gaussian 03, 6-311 G(d) basis set)28 (http://www.gaussian.com). This calculation revealed that the distances between the fluorene ring and the (S)-2-methyl and β-methylene protons of the alkyl groups (that is, ≈2.53–2.64 Å) are shorter than the closest van der Waals (vdW) C–H/ring contact (2.90 Å).

Materials and methods

Instruments

The CD and UV–vis spectra of the solutions were recorded on a JASCO (Tokyo, Japan) J-820 spectropolarimeter equipped with Peltier-controlled housing units using synthetic quartz-grade cuvettes with a 10 mm path length (100 nm min–1 scanning rate, 2 nm bandwidth, 1 s response time, 0.5 nm interval sampling and double accumulation) at 20 °C. The one-dimensional (1D) 1H-NMR) spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-ECP400 (400 MHz) spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 20 °C and, in some cases, at 25 °C, with 16 scans performed at a 45 ° pulse angle, a relaxation delay of 5.0 s and a repetition time of 7.1 s. The 2D 1H–1H NOESY NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-ECX400 (400 MHz) spectrometer at 20 °C with 2048 scans and a mixing time of 0.5 s for polymer, through a mixing time of 1.0 s for small molecules, a relaxation delay of 1.5 s, a repetition time of 1.7 s and a scramble time of 1.0 ms.

Materials

The synthesis and characterization of S2MO, S37DMO and R37DMO have already been reported in our previous study.19 It should be noted that R2MO, which is an enantiomeric pair of S2MO, is not produced because (R)-2-methyloctanol is not commercially available as a starting material. Samples were stored in darkness and used without further treatment. Commercially available PF8 (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan), BB (Sigma-Aldrich), F8 Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI, Tokyo, Japan) and n-octane (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for NMR and/or CD/UV-vis measurements. The weight-average molecular weight (Mw), number-average molecular weight (Mn) and polydispersity index (PDI=Mw/Mn) of the PFs evaluated by size-exclusion chromatography with polystyrene standards (PLGel 10 μm Mixed-B (Agilent Japan, Tokyo, Japan), eluent THF, 40 °C) were as follows:19 S2MO: Mw=5.66 × 104 and PDI=3.09; S37DMO: Mw=1.90 × 105 and PDI=2.33; R37DMO: Mw=1.79 × 105 and PDI=3.01; and PF8, Mw=8.77 × 104 and PDI=3.47. Tetramethylsilane (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an internal standard, and deuterated solvents (CDCl3 (Cambridge Isotope Lab., Andover, MA, USA), MCH-d14 (Sigma-Aldrich), THF-d8 (Sigma-Aldrich) and toluene-d8 (Sigma-Aldrich)) were used as the NMR solvents. The sample concentration of all NMR measurements was fixed to 1.0 × 10−2 mol l–1 (≈ 0.4% (w/v) for PFs) in deuterated solvents. Spectroscopic-grade chloroform (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was used for the CD/UV-vis measurements.

Calculation

Conflex7 (rev A) using an MMFF94s force field (Conflex, Japan) http://www.conflex.us generated possible conformers of fluorene molecules. A conformation search was performed according to not only energy dependence but also torsion angle. The total numbers of possible conformations of EPF, ES2MPF and ES3MPF were 37, 50 and 47, respectively. Among these, we focused on the specific conformers with the highest populations based on torsion angle of EPF (39.3%), ES2MPF (18.7%) and ES3MPF (17.7%) to apply MP2 calculations, using sequential STO-3 G, 3–21 G, 6–31 G and 6–311 G(d) basis sets with the Gaussian 03 (rev E) (Gaussian) package program.28 (http://www.gaussian.com). Using an MP2 technique based on higher-level 6–31G and 6–311G(d) basis sets allowed us to provide reliable optimized conformers with CH/π interactions.4 All calculations were run on an Apple MacPro (MacOS 10.5 for Gaussian 03 and 10.6 for Conflex7, Quad-core × 2, 2.8 GHz clock, 16 GB memory, 2 TB × 3 hard disk).

Results and discussion

In 1977, Nishio et al.29 proposed the intra-CH/π interaction to account for an unexpected conformation in which the closest contact is between bulky alkyl and phenyl groups in solid crystals, as observed by X-ray crystallographic analysis. In 1980, Smalley et al.30, 31 discovered the coexistence of gauche- and trans-conformations with almost equal intensity by analyzing ππ* absorption and fluorescence excitation spectra in a series of supersonic jet-cooled n-alkylbenzenes (alkyl number: 3–6) in a collision-free gas phase. In the gauche-n-alkylbenzenes, the Cα–Cβ bond of the n-alkyl chain (see Figure 1) partially covered one side of the phenyl ring, whereas the n-alkyl chain in the trans-form extended away from the phenyl ring to avoid a van der Waals (vdW) contact between alkyl and phenyl groups.30 This uniqueness arises from the rotational freedom of the Cα–Cβ bond of n-alkylbenzenes. Later theoretical and experimental studies demonstrated that the intra-CH/π interaction allows for the aromatic ring and the alkyl side chain to move into close proximity.32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 This finding led to the adoption of the folded gauche-geometry of n-alkylbenzenes and several benzene analogs carrying freely rotatable alkyl moieties in the vapor phase. A subsequent analysis of BB revealed the existence of two gauche-forms under the jet-cooled conditions.35 More elegantly, the advanced 1D 1H-NMR NOE effect successfully allowed for the detection of the intra-CH/π interaction as a folded gauche-conformation in several mono-substituted benzene derivatives carrying aliphatic groups in chloroform-d1 and dimethylsulfoxide-d6 at 30 °C.36 These studies prompted us to study the possible existence of the intra-CH/π interaction in S2MO, S37DMO, R37DMO and PF8 and, for comparison, F8, BB and n-octane in chloroform-d1 at 20 °C.

π-Ring systems bearing achiral side chains

1H-NMR spectra

Figures 2a–c compare the α-methylene regions in the 1H-NMR spectra of BB, F8 and PF8 in CDCl3 at 20 °C. The full 1H-NMR spectra of BB, F8, PF8 and n-octane are provided in Supplementary Figure S1. Two α-methylene protons of BB have a triplet signal, whereas four α-methylene protons of F8 apparently consist of doublet and triplet signals, and PF8 has one broad signal with a couple of additional signals. The α-methylene protons of BB resonate at ≈2.6 p.p.m., whereas the α-methylene protons of F8 and PF8 are shifted upfield to ≈1.9–2.1 p.p.m. This upfield shift is induced by the ring-current shielding effect of benzene and fluorene rings. This induces the intra-CH/π interaction because of the restricted rotational freedom of C9–Cα–Cβ–Cγ dihedral angle and the fixed Cipso–C9–Cα bond angle. Thus, two α-methylenes of PF8 are in largely restricted rotational motion, as indicated by the largely broadened proton signals. Similarly, doublet and triplet signals for α-methylene protons in hexa-n-propylbenzene and n-propylbenzene have been reported.38

Figure 2
figure 2

The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra of the α-methylene region for (a) n-butylbenzene (BB), (b) di-n-octylfluorene (F8) and (c) poly(di-n-octlylfluorene (PF8) in chloroform-d1 (CDCl3) at 20 °C.

The BB pattern is ascribed to a magnetically equivalent, freely rotating A2X2 spin system of α- and β-methylenes, whereas the F8 and PF8 pattern indicates the magnetically nonequivalent AA′BB′C3 spin system because of restricted rotational motion. The Cipso–Cα–Cβ–Cγ bond of BB adopts a statistical population of anti:gauche=1:2,38 whereas the apparent doublet–triplet signals of C9–Cα–Cβ–Cγ in F8 arise from the unaveraged 3Jtrans and 3Jgauche couplings in the CHα–CHβ fragment. Two α- and β-methylenes of PF8 are possibly in restricted rotational states to a greater degree. This leads to the idea that the Cipso–C9–Cα–Cβ bonds of F8 could facilitate the intra-CH/π interaction between the fluorene ring and α-, β- and γ-methylene protons in n-alkyl side groups (PF8), as illustrated in Figure 1. This hypothesis may naturally be extended to the possibility of the intra-CH/π interaction existing between the fluorene ring and methyl protons located at the β- and γ-positions of the chiral alkyl groups (S2MO, S37DMO and R37DMO).

The upfield shift in the β-methylene proton signals of F8 and PF8 is more remarkable than the shift in the signals of BB. The upfield shift originates from the ring-current-induced shielding effect according to the classical Johnson–Bovey (J-B) model,39, 40, 41 and allows interrogation of the relative position of alkyl and aromatic rings in experimental conditions. Indeed, the J-B model applies to the unusual upfield shift of freely rotating alkyl moieties in μ-trialkylsiloxy silicon phthalocyanines, although the CH/π interaction between the phthalocyanine ring and trialkylsiloxy groups is not postulated in this case.40 The J-B model thus allows for interrogation of the possible CH/π interaction of aromatic derivatives bearing alkyl side groups in a fluid solution.

Figures 3a–c compare the β-methylene region in the 1H-NMR spectra of BB, F8 and PF8 in CDCl3 at 20 °C. Two β-methylene protons of BB have multiplet signals at ≈1.5–1.6 p.p.m., whereas four β-methylene protons of F8 broaden and resonate at ≈0.6 p.p.m., with the upfield shift attained at ≈1.0 p.p.m. Four β-methylene protons of PF8 resonate at ≈0.7–0.8 p.p.m. as broadened signals, highlighted by arrows that completely overlap six methyl protons of the n-octyl side groups, which can be seen as well-resolved triplet signals centered at 0.75 p.p.m. These upfield shifts in β-methylene protons should support the existence of the intra-CH/π-interaction in F8 and PF8 in CDCl3 at 20 °C.

Figure 3
figure 3

The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra of the β-methylene region for (a) n-butylbenzene (BB), (b) di-n-octylfluorene (F8) and (c) poly(di-n-octlylfluorene (PF8) in chloroform-d1 (CDCl3) at 20 °C.

Although located at remote positions from the fluorene ring, the mobile terminal methyl proton signals of F8 and PF8 weakly shifted toward the upfield because of the ring-current effect, as shown in Supplementary Figure S1. The methyl protons of n-octane resonate at 0.88 p.p.m., whereas those of F8 and PF8 resonate at 0.81 and 0.75 p.p.m., respectively. The subtle upfield shifts of F8 (0.07 p.p.m.) and PF8 (0.13 p.p.m.) are because of a weak ring-current-induced shielding effect. Conversely, methyl protons of BB resonate at 0.93 p.p.m. and show a downfield shift of 0.04 p.p.m. because of a ring-current-induced deshielding effect.

Similarly, as shown in Supplementary Figure S1, the weak upfield shifts in the mobile methylene proton signals of aromatic F8 and PF8 that are due to the ring-current effect, although at remote positions from the fluorene ring, can be observed. The most intense methylene protons of n-octane resonate at 1.26 p.p.m., whereas those of F8 and PF8 resonate at 1.03 and 1.07 p.p.m., respectively. Compared with the shift of n-octane, the upfield shifts of F8 and PF8 are 0.23 and 0.19 p.p.m., respectively. Conversely, the mobile two methylenes of BB resonate at approximately 1.35 and show downfield shift of ≈0.1 p.p.m. and ≈0.3 p.p.m., respectively.

These subtle upfield shifts in the methyl and methylene protons of F8 and PF8 should mainly originate from the weak ring-current shielding effect of fluorene, not from a direct intra-CH/π interaction. We thus assume that the methyl and methylene protons of F8 and PF8 are remotely located at the top and/or bottom positions of the fluorene ring, possibly reflecting the intra-CH/π interaction between β- and/or γ-methylene protons and the fluorene ring. Indeed, because of the detection of cross-peaks between the fluorene ring and several methylene protons within PF8 in fluid solutions by the NOESY NMR spectrum, the intra-CH/π interaction may exist, as discussed in the following section.

1H–1H NOESY NMR spectra

1H–1H NOESY NMR spectroscopy42 of F8 and PF8 in solution allows for the detection of the hypothetical intra-CH/π interaction between alkyl groups and fluorene rings and between different alkyl groups, arising from the restricted rotational freedom of the C9–Cα−Cβ–Cγ and fixed Cipso–C9–Cα bond angle, to be more directly tested.

Figures 4a and b show the NOESY NMR spectra of F8 and PF8 in CDCl3 at 20 °C. For comparison, the original NOESY NMR spectra of F8 and PF8 in CDCl3 at 20 °C are presented in Supplementary Figure S2, and the original spectrum of BB in CDCl3 is presented in Supplementary Figure S3. The cross-peaks between the n-butyl groups and the benzene ring of BB cannot clearly be seen because of a very weak interaction between the alkyl groups and the ring in CDCl3 at 20 °C, indicating no detectable intra-CH/π interaction in BB, as discussed above.

Figure 4
figure 4

Contour plots from the 2D 1H-1H NOESY NMR spectra of (a) F8 and (b) PF8 in chloroform-d1 (CDCl3) at 20 °C showing the inter-residual cross-peaks that contact between the fluorene ring protons and the α- and β-methylene protons of the n-octyl groups.

From Figure 4a, two major cross-peaks, highlighted by arrows in the NOESY NMR spectrum of F8, can clearly be seen. This suggests that the α- and β-methylene protons of n-octyl groups are in close contact with the fluorene ring protons in the 1,2,3,6,7,8-positions. Similarly, the three major cross-peaks due to α-, β- and γ-methylene protons suggest close contact between these species.

On the other hand, from Figure 4b, the NOESY NMR spectrum of PF8 shows several major cross-peaks, highlighted by arrows. Major cross-peaks between broadened α-methylene protons at ≈2.1 p.p.m. and fluorene ring protons in the 1,3,6,8-positions are evident. Additionally, weak cross-peaks between the α-methylene protons and the β-methylene protons at ≈0.8 p.p.m. can be seen, whereas cross-peaks between the α-methylene protons and broadened γ-methylene protons at ≈1.1 p.p.m. are observed. This result is consistent with the idea that the attractive intra-CH/π interaction of PF8 and F8 exists in CDCl3 at 20 °C, leading to a folded gauche-like geometry of n-octyl chains in contact with the fluorene ring, as demonstrated by the considerable upfield shift of the β-methylene proton signals because of the ring-current effect based on the J-B model.39, 40

Stereocenter dependency of polyfluorenes with chiral alkyl side groups at 9,9-positions

1H-NMR spectra

In a previous paper, we compared the stereocenter dependency of the CD magnitude using S2MO, S37DMO and R37DMO.19 The stereocenter of S2MO is located at the β-position of the side group, whereas the stereocenters of S37DMO and R37DMO are in the remote γ-position. This subtle difference in the stereocenter of 9,9-alkyl groups largely affects the magnitude of Cotton CD signals in solutions. Although S2MO in THF shows considerably intense CD signals at room and elevated temperatures, S37DMO and R37DMO in THF do not show any detectable CD signals at 50 °C and exhibit intense CD signals at −80 °C.19 However, the reason for this stereocenter dependency remains an unresolved issue to date. Keeping in mind the intra-CH/π interaction of PF8 and F8 discussed above, we revisited S2MO, S37DMO and R37DMO with the help of advanced 1H–1H NOESY and 1H-NMR spectroscopy and CD/UV-vis spectroscopy with high sensitivity.

Figures 5a and b and Supplementary Figure S4 present the 1H-NMR spectra of S2MO, S37DMO and R37DMO in CDCl3 at 20 °C. Four α-methylene protons of S2MO are split into two broader signals of an equal intensity at 2.00 and 2.28 p.p.m., indicating magnetically nonequivalent and diastereotopic protons. This feature is in contrast to a broad signal located at 2.13 p.p.m. that is due to magnetically equivalent α-methylene protons of S37DMO and R37DMO.

Figure 5
figure 5

Aliphatic regions from the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra of (a) S2MO and (b) S37MO in chloroform-d1 (CDCl3) at 20 °C.

A more notable difference between the (S)-2-methyl proton signals in S2MO and the (S)-3-methyl proton signals in S37DMO (and R37DMO) can be seen. The (S)-2-methyl protons generating a doublet signal due to H-Cβ methine protons resonate at 0.37 and 0.36 p.p.m., along with several additional signals in the upfield region of ≈0.3 p.p.m. In contrast, the (S)-3-methyl protons generating a doublet signal due to H–Cγ methine protons resonate at 0.75 and 0.77 p.p.m., along with the sharper triplet signals of terminal mobile termini methyl protons in the downfield region of ≈0.8 p.p.m. The upfield shift because of the (S)-2-methyl protons is much greater than that of the (S)-3-methyl protons. This behavior suggests that the marked upfield shift of the (S)-2-methyl protons of S2MO originates from an intense intra-CH/π interaction, whereas the upfield shift of the (S)-3-methyl protons of S37DMO originates solely from a ring-current shielding effect and/or a weaker chiral intra-CH/π interaction because of the long distance between the (S)-3-methyl proton and a fluorene ring. However, it is unclear whether the γ-/δ-methylene and β-methine protons of S2MO and β-/δ-methylene and γ-methine protons of S37DMO contact a fluorene ring because of the high complexity of 1H-NMR spectra.

For comparison, Supplementary Figures S5a–m displays the aliphatic region in the 1H-NMR spectra of S2MO, S37DMO, R37DMO and PF8 in CDCl3, MCH-d14, THF-d8 and TOL-d8, respectively. Similar upfield shifts of the β-methylene and (S)-2-/(S)-3-methyl proton signals induced by the fluorene ring current can be seen, indicating the existence of a similar intra-CH/π interaction in these deuterated solvents at 20 °C.

1H–1H NOESY NMR spectra

Additionally, the NOESY technique42 more directly allows for the detection of the chiral intra-CH/π interaction arising from the closest contacts between chiral alkyl groups and fluorene rings, reflecting the fixed C8-Cipso-C9-Cα dihedral angle and the restricted rotational freedom of C9-Cα-Cβ-Cγ bonds. Figures 6a and b show the NOESY NMR spectra of S2MO and S37DMO in CDCl3 at 20 °C. For comparison, the spectrum of R37DMO, which is similar to that of S37DMO, is presented in Supplementary Figure S6.

Figure 6
figure 6

Contour plots from the two-dimensional 1H–1H nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) correlated spectroscopy (NOESY) nuclear magnetic resonance (2D 1H–1H NOESY NMR) spectra of (a) S2MO and (b) S37DMO in chloroform-d1 (CDCl3 at 20 °C showing the inter-residual cross-peaks that contact between the fluorene ring protons and the α-/β-/γ-methylene protons and between the fluorene ring protons and the (S)-2-/(S)-3-methyl protons of chiral alkyl groups.

It is evident from Figure 6a that at least five cross-peaks between the fluorene ring and (S)-2-methyloctyl groups exist. The split α-methylene protons at 2.00 and 2.28 p.p.m. strongly interact with the 1,3,6,8-ring protons of fluorene at ≈7.6 p.p.m. and weakly interact with the 4,5-ring protons at ≈7.7 p.p.m. It is also clear that both the (S)-2-methyl protons at ≈ 0.3 p.p.m. and γ-methylene protons at ≈0.7–0.8 p.p.m. also strongly interact with the 1,3,6,8-ring protons and weakly interact with the 4,5-ring protons. The β-methylene protons are difficult to identify because of a high degree of overlap of several proton signals. The (S)-2-methyl proton at ≈0.3 p.p.m. of S2MO may be shifted upfield by ≈0.45–0.47 p.p.m. relative to the (S)-3-methyl protons of S37DMO at 0.75–0.77 p.p.m. Surprisingly, the γ-methylene protons, which may also split into two signals, resonating at ≈0.9 and 1.1 p.p.m., appear to strongly interact with the 1,3,6,8-ring protons and weakly interact with the 4,5-ring protons. The γ-methylene protons, as well as the α-methylene protons, may thus become magnetically nonequivalent and diastereotopic. These five cross-peaks support the existence of an intense intra-CH/π interaction between the fluorene ring and (S)-2-methyloctyl groups.

As shown in Figure 6b, at least four cross-peaks between the fluorene ring and (S)-3,7-dimethyloctyl groups also exist. The broader α-methylene protons at ≈2.13 p.p.m. weakly interact with the 1,3,6,8-ring protons. The (S)-3-methyl protons at 0.75 p.p.m. and 0.77 p.p.m., although difficult to definitively identify, interact with the 1,3,6,8-ring protons and weakly interact with the 4,5-ring protons. The β-methylene protons at ≈0.7 p.p.m. interact with the 1,3,6,8-ring protons. These four cross-peaks support the existence of an intra-CH/π interaction between the fluorene ring and several C-H protons of the (S)-3,7-dimethyloctyl groups.

S2MO, S37DMO and R37DMO commonly provide the cross-peaks between the several alkyl and ring protons in the contour plots. However, the subtle difference in the stereocenter of the chiral side chains greatly affects the magnitude of the Cotton CD bands in the ππ* region in chloroform at 20 °C, as shown in the following section.

CD-/UV–vis spectra in chloroform

Figures 7a and b display the CD and UV-vis spectra of S2MO, S37DMO and PF8 in CHCl3 at 20 °C. For comparison, Supplementary Figure S7 presents the CD and UV-vis spectra of R37DMO in CHCl3 at 20 °C. S2MO shows large positive Cotton CD bands at 380 and 310 nm that correspond to the ππ* transition and, possibly, adopt the 52 helical conformation with preferential right- or left-handed screw-sense.14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22 However, regardless of the chiral alkyl substitution at the 9,9-position, S37DMO and R37DMO do not show any detectable Cotton CD bands at 380 and 310 nm, reconfirming our previously reported results in dilute THF.19

Figure 7
figure 7

The circular dichroism (CD) and ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra of (a) S2MO and S37DMO and (b) PF8 in CHCl3 at 20 °C.

Thus, the β-position at the stereocenter of the chiral side chain is required to induce optical activity in the floppy PF main chain in a fluid solution, whereas the γ-branched chiral side chains do not provide any detectable chiroptical induction effects. As revealed by the cross-peaks in the NOESY NMR spectra and the large upfield shift signals from the 1H-NMR spectra of S2MO, the intense intra-CH/π interaction between the fluorene ring and (S)-2-methyloctyl group should induce a certain helical conformation with a preferential screw direction. The appearance and disappearance of optical activity in PF bearing chiral substituents in a fluid solution can be explained by the fact that the α-methylene protons of the side chains are magnetically nonequivalent and surrounded by a diastereotopic environment.

S37DMO, R37DMO and PF8 in CHCl3 at 20 °C are in CD-silent stiff helical conformational states with an equal probability of producing a right- or left-handed helix because the λmax values are almost identical to each other.19 The persistence length (q) of S37DMO in THF at 20 °C has been determined to be 9.5 nm.22 This q-value, responsible for the efficiency in chiral amplification, is similar to that of other PFs bearing alkyl side chains: q=8.5 nm for PF8 in THF (40 °C)23 and q=7 nm for PF carrying 2-ethylhexyl groups in toluene at 20 °C.24 These PFs are as stiff as some aromatic polyamides and cellulose derivatives and stiffer than typical randomly coiled flexible polystyrene (q=1 nm), but they are more flexible than typical stiff poly(n-hexylisocyanate) (q=42 nm) in n-hexane at 25 °C.43 However, CD-silent S37DMO and R37DMO in CHCl3 at 20 °C may possibly yield optically active PF particles during aggregation with the help of poorer alcoholic solvents. Results supporting this notion are likely to be reported in the future.

Computational simulation

MP2 calculations using Gaussian 03 (6-311G(d) basis set)28 http://www.gaussian.com and Conflex7 (MMFF94s force field)26, 27 http://www.conflex.us also support the existence of the intra-CH/π interaction between (S)-2-methyl/β-methylene protons and the fluorene ring in S2MO and PF8. First, Figures 8a–c show the possible folded gauche-like conformers of (a) 9-ethyl-9-n-pentyfluorene (EPF), (b) 9-ethyl-9-(S)-2-methylpentylfluorene (ES2MPF) and (c) 9-ethyl-9-(S)-3-methylpentylfluorene (ES3MPF) (Figure 1), respectively, generated using Conflex7. EPF, ES2MPF and ES3MPF are simplified molecular models of PF8, S2MO and S37DMO, respectively.

Figure 8
figure 8

Folded gauche-like intramolecular CH/π interactions of optimized (a) EPF, (b) ES2MPF and (c) ES3MPF conformers with Mulliken charges on several alkyl protons and fluorene ring carbons.

Regarding EPF, conformer (a) depicts intra-CH/π interactions with a distance of 2.64 Å between β-methylene protons and ipso-carbons. This distance is shorter than the closest vdW contact distance of 2.90 Å by ≈0.26 Å.44, 45 In this case, the β-methylene protons and 1,3,4-carbons of the fluorene ring attract each other by a weak Coulombic interaction because the Mulliken charges of β-methylene protons and ring carbons are oppositely charged, +0.228 and −0.238/−0.215/−0.227, respectively. This picture is also applicable when accounting for the achiral intra-CH/π interaction between the β-methylene protons and fluorene ring of PF8 and F8.

As for ES2MPF, conformer (b) shows two possible chiral intra-CH/π interactions at ≈2.54 Å between the (S)-2-methyl proton and ipso-carbons of the ring and at ≈2.53 Å between the β-methine proton and ipso-carbon. These distances are shorter than the closest vdW contact distance of 2.90 Å by ≈0.36 Å and ≈0.37 Å, respectively.44, 45 The (S)-2-methyl proton is slightly more favorable than the β-methine proton because the Mulliken charges of the (S)-2-methyl and the β-methine protons are +0.258 and +0.237, respectively, whereas those of the 1,3,4-ring carbons are −0.228/−0.205/−0.247. The same idea is applicable to the chiral intra-CH/π interaction between the (S)-2-methyl protons and the fluorene ring of S2MO.

We noted that conformer (c) of ES3MPF shows two possible intra-CH/π interactions at ≈2.57 Å and ≈2.67 Å between the β-methylene protons and ipso-carbons. These distances are shorter than the closest vdW contact distance of 2.90 Å by≈0.33 Å and ≈0.23 Å, respectively.44, 45 A distance of ≈2.88 Å between the terminus methyl proton and the ipso-carbons of the ring may be because of vdW contact, leading to an upfield shift due to the ring-current effect. Note that the distance between the (S)-3-methyl protons and the ipso-carbon is unexpectedly long (4.55 Å). However, the (S)-3-methyl and β-methylene protons can be attracted by 1,3,4-carbons because the Mulliken charges of the (S)-3-methyl and β-methylene protons are +0.207 and +0.232/+0.248, respectively, and those of the 1,3,4-ring carbons are −0.240/−0.215/−0.225. These results may lead to considerably reduced chiral intra-CH/π interactions between (S)-3-methyl protons and the fluorene ring, thus accounting for the intra-CH/π interactions of S37DMO and R37DMO.

Crystallographic analysis of a fluorene dimer bearing four n-propyl groups at the 9,9,9′,9′-positions46 (F3-dimer in Figure 1) provides clearer evidence of the folded gauche-like geometry of the fluorene ring covered with β-methylene protons in the solid, possibly due to the existence of the intra-CH/π interaction. A similar folded gauche-like geometry for the fluorene ring covered with β-methylene protons can be seen in a solid crystal of fluorene molecules with 2,7-thiophene substituents bearing two n-octyl groups at the 9,9-postions,47 which is an analog of F8. These crystallographic data46, 47 clearly indicate that several fluorenes capped with β-methylene protons in their molecular crystals may be common and that the folded gauche-like geometry is one of the most favorable geometries, possibly because of the existence of the intra-CH/π interaction.1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This tendency agrees well with the magnitudes of the upfield shifts seen in the NMR spectra of F8, PF8, S2MO and S37DMO mentioned above. The shortest intra-CH/π distance of ES2MPF, inducing an intense ring-current effect, is believed to afford the ≈0.6 p.p.m. upfield shift of the (S)-2-methyl protons of S2MO; moreover, the shortest intra-CH/π distance of EPF, which also induces an intense ring-current effect, affords the ≈1.0 p.p.m. upfield shift of PF8 and the ≈0.6–0.7 p.p.m. upfield shift of F8. However, the longer intra-CH/π distance of ES3MPF might only effect an ≈0.18 p.p.m. upfield shift of the (S)-3-methyl protons of S37DMO.

Perspectives

We have deduced the origin of the intense photoluminescence of PF derivatives bearing alkyl side chains in aggregate and solid films.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 48, 49, 50, 51 Although most π-conjugated molecules and polymers dissolved in a dilute solution are highly emissive,8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 their solid films and aggregates in solution often form nonemissive, face-to-face ππ stacking structures. Among several π-conjugated molecules and polymers,8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 48, 49, 50, 51 PF derivatives and their copolymers are exceptionally emissive in the form of solid films and aggregates with a high quantum efficiency (ΦF) of ≈0.9. Based on 1H-NMR studies and the theoretical calculations discussed above, the existence of alkyl side chains at the 9,9-position is the key to efficiently cover one side and/or both sides of the fluorene ring due to the gauche-like geometry of the forced intra-CH/π interaction. This self-wrapping by n- and/or branched alkyl groups prevents the formation of face-to-face, intermolecular fluorene ring ππ stacks in solid films and aggregates.48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 The introduction of the forced gauche-like intra-CH/π interaction into other π-conjugated aromatic polymers and molecules should provide a new way of preventing unfavorable face-to-face ππ stacks.

When the forced chiral intra-CH/π interaction using chiral α-/β-/γ-branched chains is applied to π-conjugated aromatic systems, the resulting materials may emit strong circularly polarized light because of J-type slipped helical ππ stacks in the solid film and aggregate states. If the forced achiral intra-CH/π interaction with achiral α-/β-/γ-branched and n-alkyl chains and/or bulky aromatic substituents is applied, the resulting films and aggregates would be highly emissive with loss of the optical activity.

Recently, Yamaguchi et al.54 designed 3-boryl-2,2′-bithiophene derivatives exhibiting an intense emission with very high ΦF values of 0.30−0.87 in the solid state by introducing a bulky dimesitylboryl substituent to a bithiophene skeleton. The ORTEP (Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot) drawing of the bithiophene crystal suggested the existence of forced intra-CH/π interactions between the methyl group and the benzene ring within two mesityls and between two methyl groups of the mesityl and bithiophene ring.54 We assume that the forced intra-CH/π interactions in the bithiophenes are responsible for the high ΦF.

Conclusion

We tested the possibility of intra-CH/π interactions existing in S2MO, S37DMO, R37DMO and PF8 and, for comparison, F8, BB and n-octane under fluidic conditions at 20 °C by 2D 1H–1H NOESY and 1H-NMR. Regarding S2MO, S37DMO, R37DMO, PF8 and F8, the 2D NMR revealed several cross-peaks between the fluorene ring and alkyl side chains, revealing the intra-CH/π interaction between the fluorene ring and α-/β-/γ-methylene and (S)-2-/(S)-3-/(R)-3-methyl protons in the alkyl side chains, regardless of chiral and achiral alkyl groups and regardless of polymer and molecular structures. In the 1D NMR spectra, marked upfield shifts of several proton signals because of the alkyl groups of S2MO, S37DMO, R37DMO, PF8 and F8, relative to the spectra of BB and n-octane, were consistent with these cross-peaks in the 2D NMR spectra. Among these chiral PFs, only S2MO showed intense cross-peaks in its 2D NMR spectra and large upfield shifts in the signals of (S)-2-methyl protons in its 1D NMR spectra. S2MO provided magnetically nonequivalent, diastereotopic α-methylene protons with doublet signals. CD spectroscopic data reconfirmed the notion that the β-position at the stereocenter of the side chain, (S)-2-methyloctyl group, is required to induce optical activity in the PF main chain in a fluid solution, whereas the γ-branched (S)-3,7-dimethyloctyl and (R)-3,7-dimethyloctyl did not induce any detectable CD signals under the same conditions. This tendency is consistent with the magnitudes of the cross-peaks in the 2D NMR spectra and the upfield shifts in the 1D NMR spectra. Theoretical calculations performed using Confelx7 and Gaussian 03 at the MP2 level (6-311G(d) basis set) also supported these upfield shifts in the NMR spectra, indicating that the folded gauche-like geometry is because of the attractive intra-CH/π interactions.