Abstract
Aims:
To test whether participation in clinical audit is associated with improved care of a long-term health condition.
Methods:
‘Real world’ study comparing 1339 patients of all ages and severity of asthma managed by 77 self-selected highly motivated general practices in Scotland with 9617 patients from 319 practices from a national sample. Results: Patients managed by ‘audit’ practices had more structured clinical reviews by nurses [817 (61%) versus 4301 (45%) OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46–0.58] and less acute GP contacts [440 (33%) v 4161 (43%) OR 1.56, CI 1.38–1.56]. Consequently they experienced more checking of inhaler technique, use of peak flow meters and self-management plans. ‘Audit’ patients had more symptom free days [365 (42%) v 2216 (23%) OR 0.80, CI 0.70–0.91], and fewer asthma attacks [217 (16%) v 1938 (20%) OR 1.30, CI 1.12–1.53]. They made less use of hospital services including A&E [30 (2%) v 326 (3%) OR 1.53, CI 1.03–2.28] and outpatients [42 (3%) v 459 (5%) OR 1.55, CI 1.11–2.16].
Conclusions
Patients with asthma benefit from being managed by a practice involved in a programme of audit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
None declared
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neville, R., Hoskins, G., McCowan, C. et al. Pragmatic ‘real world’ study of the effect of audit of asthma on clinical outcome. Prim Care Respir J 13, 198–204 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2004.06.007
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2004.06.007