Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Rescoring the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index: nothing new

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) is a commonly used 13-item questionnaire for the assessment of symptom severity in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). For each item, score ranges are 0–1 (6 items), 0–3 (2 items), 0–5 (3 items), 0–6 (1 item) and 0–10 (1 item). This scoring system is straightforward, but items with wider score ranges are de facto weighted more, which could adversely affect the performance characteristics of the questionnaire. We rescored the NIH-CPSI so that equal weights were assigned to each item, and compared the performance of the standard and rescored questionnaires using the original validation dataset. Both the original and revised versions of the scoring algorithm discriminated similarly among groups of men with CP (n=151), benign prostatic hyperplasia (n=149) and controls (n=134). The internal consistency of the questionnaire was slightly better with the revised scoring, but values with the standard scoring were sufficiently high (Cronbach's 0.80). We conclude that although the rescored NIH-CPSI provides better face validity than the standard scoring algorithm, it requires additional calculation efforts and yields only marginal improvements in performance.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Litwin MS, McNaughton-Collins M, Fowler Jr FJ, Nickel JC, Calhoun EA, Pontari MA et al. The National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index: development and validation of a new outcome measure. J Urol 1999; 162: 369–375.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Propert KJ, Litwin MS, Wang Y, Alexander RB, Calhoun EA, Nickel JC et al. Responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). QOL Research 2006; 15: 299–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander RB, Propert KJ, Schaeffer AJ, Landis JR, Nickel JC, O'Leary MP et al. Ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 581–589.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nickel JC, Krieger JN, McNaughton-Collins M, Anderson RU, Pontari M, Shoskes DA et al. Alfuzosin and symptoms of chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome. NEJM 2008; 359: 2663–2673.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McNaughton-Collins M, O'Leary MP, Calhoun EA, Pontari MA, Adler A, Eremenco S et al. The Spanish National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index: translation and linguistic validation. J Urol 2001; 166: 1800–1803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monden K, Tsugawa M, Ninomiya Y, Ando E, Kumon H . A Japanese version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index and the clinical evaluation of cernitin pollen extract for chronic non-bacterial prostatitis. Jap J Urol 2002; 93: 539–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leskinen MJ, Mehik A, Sarpola A, Tammela TL, Jarvelin MR . The Finnish version of The National Institutes Of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index correlates well with the visual pain scale: translation and results of a modified linguistic validation study. BJU Intl 2003; 92: 251–256.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giubilei G, Mondaini N, Crisci A, Raugei A, Lombardi G, Travaglini F et al. The Italian version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. Eur Urol 2005; 47: 805–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karakiewicz PI, Perrotte P, Valiquette L, Benard F, McCormack M, Menard C et al. French-Canadian linguistic validation of the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. Can J Urol 2005; 12: 2816–2823.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheah PY, Liong ML, Yuen KH, Lee S, Yang JR, Teh CL et al. Reliability and validity of the National Institutes of Health: Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index in a Malaysian population. World J Urol 2006; 24: 79–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Nashaar A, Fathy A, Zeedan A, Al-Ahwany A, Shamloul R . Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. Urol Int 2006; 77: 227–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Streiner DL, Norman GR . Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd edition. Chapter 7, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 1995, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by NIDDK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Q Clemens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clemens, J., Calhoun, E., Litwin, M. et al. Rescoring the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index: nothing new. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 12, 285–287 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2009.22

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2009.22

Keywords

  • chronic pelvic pain syndrome
  • questionnaire
  • psychometrics

Further reading

Search

Quick links