Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Anoikis resistance is a critical feature of highly aggressive ovarian cancer cells

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer is an aggressive form of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and accounts for the majority of deaths due to EOC. The critical cellular processes and underlying molecular mechanisms that define this malignancy remain poorly understood. Using a syngeneic murine model, we investigated the changes that accompanied the progression to increased aggressiveness induced by in vivo passage of mouse EOC cells. We found that enhanced anoikis resistance was a key cellular process associated with greater aggressiveness and tumorigenicity in vivo. Biochemical studies revealed that the enhanced anoikis resistance was associated with the activation of the Src/Akt/Erk signaling pathway. A higher rate of metabolism and autophagy were also associated with increased anoikis resistance. Blocking these pathways with specific inhibitors and/or genetic modifications significantly increased anoikis in vitro and inhibited tumor development in vivo. In addition, we demonstrated that similar signaling pathways were also involved in a human EOC cell line model. Collectively, our data suggest that anoikis resistance represents a critical and a distinguishing feature underlying the aggressiveness of ovarian cancer cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 2011; 474: 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Janat-Amsbury MM, Yockman JW, Anderson ML, Kieback DG, Kim SW Combination of local, non-viral IL12 gene therapy and systemic paclitaxel chemotherapy in a syngeneic ID8 mouse model for human ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 2006; 26: 3223–3228.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Said NA, Najwer I, Socha MJ, Fulton DJ, Mok SC, Motamed K SPARC inhibits LPA-mediated mesothelial-ovarian cancer cell crosstalk. Neoplasia 2007; 9: 23–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roby KF, Taylor CC, Sweetwood JP, Cheng Y, Pace JL, Tawfik O et al. Development of a syngeneic mouse model for events related to ovarian cancer. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21: 585–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sher I, Adham SA, Petrik J, Coomber BL Autocrine VEGF-A/KDR loop protects epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells from anoikis. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 553–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiarugi P, Giannoni E . Anoikis: a necessary death program for anchorage-dependent cells. Biochem Pharmacol 2008; 76: 1352–1364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guadamillas MC, Cerezo A, Del Pozo MA Overcoming anoikis-pathways to anchorage-independent growth in cancer. J Cell Sci 2011; 124: 3189–3197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schafer ZT, Grassian AR, Song L, Jiang Z, Gerhart-Hines Z, Irie HY et al. Antioxidant and oncogene rescue of metabolic defects caused by loss of matrix attachment. Nature 2009; 461: 109–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ward PS, Thompson CB Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell 2012; 21: 297–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miskimins WK, Ahn HJ, Kim JY, Ryu S, Jung YS, Choi JY Synergistic anti-cancer effect of phenformin and oxamate. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e85576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu D, Wolf JK, Scanlon M, Price JE, Hung MC Enhanced c-erbB-2/neu expression in human ovarian cancer cells correlates with more severe malignancy that can be suppressed by E1A. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 891–898.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baumal R, Law J, Buick RN, Kahn H, Yeger H, Sheldon K et al. Monoclonal antibodies to an epithelial ovarian adenocarcinoma: distinctive reactivity with xenografts of the original tumor and a cultured cell line. Cancer Res 1986; 46: 3994–4000.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed N, Stenvers KL Getting to know ovarian cancer ascites: opportunities for targeted therapy-based translational research. Front Oncol 2013; 3: 256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ward KK, Tancioni I, Lawson C, Miller NL, Jean C, Chen XL et al. Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity prevents anchorage-independent ovarian carcinoma cell growth and tumor progression. Clin Exp Metastasis 2013; 30: 579–594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, Wang D, Zhang H, Kirmani K, Zhao Z, Steinmetz R et al. Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates cell migration, invasion, and colony formation as well as tumorigenesis/metastasis of mouse ovarian cancer in immunocompetent mice. Mol Cancer Ther 2009; 8: 1692–1701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Caryl Antalis and Christy A Tidwell for their critical reading and editing of this manuscript. This work is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 155145 to YX) and the Mary Fendrich-Hulman Charitable Trust Fund to YX.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, Q., Yan, L. & Xu, Y. Anoikis resistance is a critical feature of highly aggressive ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene 34, 3315–3324 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.264

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.264

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links