Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology volume 14, pages 103–105 (2007)Cite this article

Eukaryotes transcribe much of their genomes, but little is known about the fidelity of transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase II in vivo. I suggest that ∼90% of Pol II initiation events in yeast represent transcriptional noise, and that the specificity of initiation is comparable to that of DNA-binding proteins and other biological processes. This emphasizes the need to develop criteria that distinguish transcriptional noise from transcription with a biological function.

In the classic view of the transcriptome, RNA polymerase initiates transcription from specific sites that are designed to produce functional RNA products. However, biological processes do not work perfectly, and the fidelity of a biological process is defined by the frequency of an 'incorrect' event as compared with the 'correct' event. For eukaryotic Pol II, 'correct' initiation events lead to discrete RNA species, most of which are messenger RNAs. However, very little is known about how often Pol II initiates transcription 'nonspecifically' from incorrect sites and generates 'transcriptional noise' of no biological significance. The concept of transcriptional noise used here is distinct from noise arising from stochastic variations in the expression level of a given gene in individual cells1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Raser, J.M. & O'Shea, E.K. Science 309, 2010–2013 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Willingham, A.T. & Gingeras, T.R. Cell 125, 1215–1220 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carninci, P. et al. Science 309, 1559–1563 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinmetz, E.J. et al. Mol. Cell 24, 735–746 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Borggrefe, T. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47150–47153 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Svejstrup, J.Q. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6075–6078 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Otero, G. et al. Mol. Cell 3, 109–118 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuras, L. & Struhl, K. Nature 399, 609–612 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, X.-Y. et al. Nature 399, 605–609 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mason, P.B. & Struhl, K. Mol. Cell 17, 831–840 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Iyer, V. & Struhl, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5208–5212 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holstege, F.C. et al. Cell 95, 717–728 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Warner, J.R. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 437–440 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. David, L. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5320–5325 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hampsey, M. & Reinberg, D. Cell 113, 429–432 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng, H.H., Dole, S. & Struhl, K. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 33625–33628 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miura, F. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17846–17851 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Workman, J.L. Genes Dev. 20, 2009–2017 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sekinger, E.A., Moqtaderi, Z. & Struhl, K. Mol. Cell 18, 735–748 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan, G.-C. et al. Science 309, 626–630 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker, K.E. & Parker, R. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 293–299 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. LaCava, J. et al. Cell 121, 713–724 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wyers, F. et al. Cell 121, 725–737 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwabish, M.A. & Struhl, K. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10111–10117 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kristjuhan, A. & Svejstrup, J.Q. EMBO J. 23, 4243–4252 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank R. Kornberg, Z. Moqtaderi, M. Oettinger, A. Sandelin, J.Svejstrup & J. Wade for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kevin Struhl is in the Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. kevin@hms.harvard.edu,

    Kevin Struhl

Authors
  1. Kevin Struhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Struhl, K. Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14, 103–105 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb0207-103

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb0207-103

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing