Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Rif1 maintains telomeres and mediates DNA repair by encasing DNA ends


In yeast, Rif1 is part of the telosome, where it inhibits telomerase and checkpoint signaling at chromosome ends. In mammalian cells, Rif1 is not telomeric, but it suppresses DNA end resection at chromosomal breaks, promoting repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Here, we describe crystal structures for the uncharacterized and conserved 125-kDa N-terminal domain of Rif1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Rif1-NTD), revealing an α-helical fold shaped like a shepherd's crook. We identify a high-affinity DNA-binding site in the Rif1-NTD that fully encases DNA as a head-to-tail dimer. Engagement of the Rif1-NTD with telomeres proved essential for checkpoint control and telomere length regulation. Unexpectedly, Rif1-NTD also promoted NHEJ at DNA breaks in yeast, revealing a conserved role of Rif1 in DNA repair. We propose that tight associations between the Rif1-NTD and DNA gate access of processing factors to DNA ends, enabling Rif1 to mediate diverse telomere maintenance and DNA repair functions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Crystal structures of Rif1-NTD in isolation and in complex with DNA.
Figure 2: The Rif1-NTD HOOK domain binds DNA.
Figure 3: Rif1-NTD is an effector of telomere homeostasis at native and critically short telomeres.
Figure 4: Rif1-NTD attenuates end resection at chromosome-internal DSBs to promote DNA repair by NHEJ.
Figure 5: Rif1-NTD controls the fate of DNA ends at telomeres and chromosome breaks.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank


  1. 1

    Mattarocci, S., Hafner, L., Lezaja, A., Shyian, M. & Shore, D. Rif1: a conserved regulator of DNA replication and repair hijacked by telomeres in yeasts. Front. Genet. 7, 45 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Mattarocci, S. et al. Rif1 controls DNA replication timing in yeast through the PP1 phosphatase Glc7. Cell Rep. 7, 62–69 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Davé, A., Cooley, C., Garg, M. & Bianchi, A. Protein phosphatase 1 recruitment by Rif1 regulates DNA replication origin firing by counteracting DDK activity. Cell Rep. 7, 53–61 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Hiraga, S. et al. Rif1 controls DNA replication by directing Protein Phosphatase 1 to reverse Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation of the MCM complex. Genes Dev. 28, 372–383 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Cornacchia, D. et al. Mouse Rif1 is a key regulator of the replication-timing programme in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 31, 3678–3690 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hayano, M. et al. Rif1 is a global regulator of timing of replication origin firing in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 26, 137–150 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Yamazaki, S., Hayano, M. & Masai, H. Replication timing regulation of eukaryotic replicons: Rif1 as a global regulator of replication timing. Trends Genet. 29, 449–460 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Yamazaki, S. et al. Rif1 regulates the replication timing domains on the human genome. EMBO J. 31, 3667–3677 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Peace, J.M., Ter-Zakarian, A. & Aparicio, O.M. Rif1 regulates initiation timing of late replication origins throughout the S. cerevisiae genome. PLoS One 9, e98501 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    König, P., Giraldo, R., Chapman, L. & Rhodes, D. The crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of yeast RAP1 in complex with telomeric DNA. Cell 85, 125–136 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hardy, C.F., Sussel, L. & Shore, D. A RAP1-interacting protein involved in transcriptional silencing and telomere length regulation. Genes Dev. 6, 801–814 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Wotton, D. & Shore, D. A novel Rap1p-interacting factor, Rif2p, cooperates with Rif1p to regulate telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 11, 748–760 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Shi, T. et al. Rif1 and Rif2 shape telomere function and architecture through multivalent Rap1 interactions. Cell 153, 1340–1353 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bianchi, A. & Shore, D. Increased association of telomerase with short telomeres in yeast. Genes Dev. 21, 1726–1730 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Ribeyre, C. & Shore, D. Anticheckpoint pathways at telomeres in yeast. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 307–313 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Sabourin, M., Tuzon, C.T. & Zakian, V.A. Telomerase and Tel1p preferentially associate with short telomeres in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 27, 550–561 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Hirano, Y., Fukunaga, K. & Sugimoto, K. Rif1 and rif2 inhibit localization of tel1 to DNA ends. Mol. Cell 33, 312–322 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Silverman, J., Takai, H., Buonomo, S.B., Eisenhaber, F. & de Lange, T. Human Rif1, ortholog of a yeast telomeric protein, is regulated by ATM and 53BP1 and functions in the S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev. 18, 2108–2119 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Xu, L. & Blackburn, E.H. Human Rif1 protein binds aberrant telomeres and aligns along anaphase midzone microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 167, 819–830 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Buonomo, S.B.C., Wu, Y., Ferguson, D. & de Lange, T. Mammalian Rif1 contributes to replication stress survival and homology-directed repair. J. Cell Biol. 187, 385–398 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Fradet-Turcotte, A. et al. 53BP1 is a reader of the DNA-damage-induced H2A Lys 15 ubiquitin mark. Nature 499, 50–54 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Wilson, M.D. et al. The structural basis of modified nucleosome recognition by 53BP1. Nature 536, 100–103 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Escribano-Díaz, C. et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 49, 872–883 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Chapman, J.R. et al. RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Mol. Cell 49, 858–871 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Di Virgilio, M. et al. Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 339, 711–715 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Zimmermann, M., Lottersberger, F., Buonomo, S.B., Sfeir, A. & de Lange, T. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5′ end resection. Science 339, 700–704 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Martina, M., Bonetti, D., Villa, M., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M.P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rif1 cooperates with MRX-Sae2 in promoting DNA-end resection. EMBO Rep. 15, 695–704 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Ira, G. & Nussenzweig, A. A new Riff: Rif1 eats its cake and has it too. EMBO Rep. 15, 622–624 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Sreesankar, E., Senthilkumar, R., Bharathi, V., Mishra, R.K. & Mishra, K. Functional diversification of yeast telomere associated protein, Rif1, in higher eukaryotes. BMC Genomics 13, 255 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Finn, R.D. et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 D1, D279–D285 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Anbalagan, S., Bonetti, D., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M.P. Rif1 supports the function of the CST complex in yeast telomere capping. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002024 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Xue, Y., Rushton, M.D. & Maringele, L. A novel checkpoint and RPA inhibitory pathway regulated by Rif1. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002417 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Zubko, M.K., Guillard, S. & Lydall, D. Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 168, 103–115 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Haruki, H., Nishikawa, J. & Laemmli, U.K. The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol. Cell 31, 925–932 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Lee, S.E., Pâques, F., Sylvan, J. & Haber, J.E. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Curr. Biol. 9, 767–770 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Moore, J.K. & Haber, J.E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2164–2173 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Horigome, C. et al. PolySUMOylation by Siz2 and Mms21 triggers relocation of DNA breaks to nuclear pores through the Slx5/Slx8 STUbL. Genes Dev. 30, 931–945 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Boulton, S.J. & Jackson, S.P. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4639–4648 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Mages, G.J., Feldmann, H.M. & Winnacker, E.L. Involvement of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HDF1 gene in DNA double-strand break repair and recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7910–7915 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Siede, W., Friedl, A.A., Dianova, I., Eckardt-Schupp, F. & Friedberg, E.C. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku autoantigen homologue affects radiosensitivity only in the absence of homologous recombination. Genetics 142, 91–102 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Clikeman, J.A., Khalsa, G.J., Barton, S.L. & Nickoloff, J.A. Homologous recombinational repair of double-strand breaks in yeast is enhanced by MAT heterozygosity through yKU-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Genetics 157, 579–589 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Zhang, Y. et al. Role of Dnl4-Lif1 in nonhomologous end-joining repair complex assembly and suppression of homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 639–646 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Walker, J.R., Corpina, R.A. & Goldberg, J. Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair. Nature 412, 607–614 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Adams, P.D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Chen, V.B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Zierhut, C. & Diffley, J.F. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J. 27, 1875–1885 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Cronin, C.N., Lim, K.B. & Rogers, J. Production of selenomethionyl-derivatized proteins in baculovirus-infected insect cells. Protein Sci. 16, 2023–2029 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Evans, P.R. & Murshudov, G.N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1204–1214 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Vonrhein, C. et al. Data processing and analysis with the autoPROC toolbox. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 293–302 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Winn, M.D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112–122 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Vonrhein, C., Blanc, E., Roversi, P. & Bricogne, G. in Macromolecular Crystallography Protocols Vol. 2 (ed. Doublié, S.) 215–230 (Humana Press, 2007).

  54. 54

    McCoy, A.J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W.G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Cowtan, K. dm': an automated procedure for phase improvement by density modification. Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACBM Protein Crystallography 31, 34–38 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Baker, N.A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M.J. & McCammon, J.A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037–10041 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S. & Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Hohn, M. et al. SPARX, a new environment for Cryo-EM image processing. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 47–55 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Scheres, S.H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Rose, M.D., Winston, F. & Hieter, P. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Course Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Press, 1990).

  63. 63

    Longtine, M.S. et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953–961 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Stuckey, S., Mukherjee, K. & Storici, F. In vivo site-specific mutagenesis and gene collage using the delitto perfetto system in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Biol. 745, 173–191 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Horigome, C. et al. SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodelers contribute to DNA double-strand break perinuclear anchorage site choice. Mol. Cell 55, 626–639 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the following Technology Platform members of the Friedrich Miescher Institute: A. Graff-Meyer and A. Schenk (Electron Microscopy Facility) for assistance in the collection of the negative-stain EM data and analysis, D. Hess (Proteomics and Protein Analysis) for support with protein analyses, H. Gut and J. Keusch (Protein Structure) for support with protein crystallization and crystallographic data collection. Crystallographic experiments were performed at beamline X06SA and X06DA of the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Switzerland. J.K.R. was supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds PhD fellowship, and L.H. by an Excellence Master fellowship from the University of Geneva. Work in the laboratory of U.R. is supported by the Swiss Cancer League & Swiss Cancer Research and the Novartis Research Foundation. The laboratory of N.H.T. is supported by the Novartis Research Foundation. This project received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 666068, N.H.T.). Work in the laboratory of D.S. and N.H.T. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31003A_149463 to D.S., and Sinergia grant CRSII3_160734 to D.S. and N.H.T.). We thank S. Gasser and I. Hickson for fruitful discussions and S. Gasser (Friedrich Miescher Institute) for providing yeast strains. We would like to thank all members of the Gasser, Thomä, Rass, and Shore laboratories for valuable input and technical assistance.

Author information




U.R., N.H.T., and D.S. conceived this study. J.K.R and T.S. expressed and purified recombinant proteins with help from M.F. and produced crystals with help from R.D.B. J.K.R., T.S., and R.D.B. collected crystallographic data. R.D.B. carried out the crystallographic analysis and interpreted the results. J.K.R. designed, performed, and analyzed electromobility shift assays with help from D.K. J.K.R. designed and performed the negative-stain EM experiments and analyzed the results with help from S.C. S.M. designed, performed, and analyzed western blot and ChIP experiments with help from M.S. and L.H. S.M. designed, performed, and analyzed the assay to measure checkpoint activation, the assays to score the viability of ts mutants, and the Southern blots to assess telomere length. S.M. and G.A.F. performed and analyzed the qPCR experiments to measure ssDNA formed by DNA end resection. G.A.F. designed and analyzed the colony outgrowth assays to score NHEJ efficiency and DNA-damage resistance; data collection was performed with blinding by G.A.F. and D.K. G.A.F. designed, performed, and analyzed DSB stability experiments by Southern blotting with help from D.K. S.M., J.K.R., R.D.B., and G.A.F. contributed equally to this work. All the authors discussed the data. U.R., N.H.T., and D.S. wrote the manuscript with input from S.M., J.K.R., R.D.B., and G.A.F.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David Shore or Nicolas H Thomä or Ulrich Rass.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5, Supplementary Tables 1–3 and Supplementary Note 1 (PDF 1975 kb)

Supplementary Data Set 1

Supplementary Data Set (PDF 571 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mattarocci, S., Reinert, J., Bunker, R. et al. Rif1 maintains telomeres and mediates DNA repair by encasing DNA ends. Nat Struct Mol Biol 24, 588–595 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing