Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Structural basis for substrate transport in the GLUT-homology family of monosaccharide transporters

Abstract

Here we present two structures of the major facilitator (MFS) xylose transporter XylE from Escherichia coli in inward open and partially occluded inward open conformations. These structures provide key information about the transport cycle of XylE and the closely related human GLUT transporters. This is, to our knowledge, the first MFS transporter structure determined in more than one conformational state, which may establish XylE as an important MFS model protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Overview of conserved cytoplasmic motifs in selected members of the GLUT-homology family.
Figure 2: Overall structure of XylE.
Figure 3: Structural changes during the transport cycle.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Referenced accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Augustin, R. IUBMB Life 62, 315–333 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, E.O. & Henderson, P.J. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 13928–13932 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Newstead, S. et al. EMBO J. 30, 417–426 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jardetzky, O. Nature 211, 969–970 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, L. et al. Nature 490, 361–366 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abramson, J. et al. Science 301, 610–615 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, Y. et al. Science 301, 616–620 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Solcan, N. et al. EMBO J. 31, 3411–3421 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carruthers, A. et al. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 297, E836–E848 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Law, C.J. et al. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 289–305 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woestenenk, E.A., Hammarstrom, M., van den Berg, S., Hard, T. & Berglund, H. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 5, 217–229 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Strong, M. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8060–8065 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCoy, A.J. et al. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adams, P.D. et al. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Waterhouse, A.M., Procter, J.B., Martin, D.M., Clamp, M. & Barton, G.J. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

E.M.Q. was supported by The Danish Council for Independent Research (Medical Sciences; grant 271-09-0187). C.L. was supported by a European Molecular Biology Organization postdoctoral fellowship. This research was further supported by grants from the Swedish Research council, the Swedish Cancer Society and the integrated EU project European drug initiative on channels and transporters (EDICT), as well as a Singapore National Research Foundation Competitive Research Programme grant (NRF2008NRF-CRP002-067). We thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamline I02 (MX5873 and MX6603) that contributed to the results presented here and acknowledge the SOLEIL synchrotron for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities at beamline PROXIMA1 (proposal 20110314). We also thank the Protein Science Facility at the Karolinska Institute for provision of crystallization infrastructure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.M.Q., C.L. and P.M. conducted experiments. L.T. assisted in data collection and analysis. E.M.Q. and C.L. wrote the initial manuscript, and L.T. and P.N. contributed with revisions. P.N. supervised the project. All authors contributed to experimental design and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pär Nordlund.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 2120 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quistgaard, E., Löw, C., Moberg, P. et al. Structural basis for substrate transport in the GLUT-homology family of monosaccharide transporters. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20, 766–768 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2569

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing