Abstract
Signal transduction originates at the membrane, where the clustering of signaling proteins is a key step in transmitting a message. Membranes are difficult to study, and their influence on signaling is still only understood at the most rudimentary level. Recent advances in the biophysics of membranes, surveyed in this review, have highlighted a variety of phenomena that are likely to influence signaling activity, such as local composition heterogeneities and long-range mechanical effects. We discuss recent mechanistic insights into three signaling systems—Ras activation, Ephrin signaling and the control of actin nucleation—where the active role of membrane components is now appreciated and for which experimentation on the membrane is required for further understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattacharyya, R.P., Remenyi, A., Yeh, B.J. & Lim, W.A. Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 655–680 (2006).
Engelman, D.M. Membranes are more mosaic than fluid. Nature 438, 578–580 (2005).
Scott, J.D. & Pawson, T. Cell signaling in space and time: where proteins come together and when they're apart. Science 326, 1220–1224 (2009).
Hunter, T. Tyrosine phosphorylation: thirty years and counting. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 140–146 (2009).
Lemmon, M.A. Membrane recognition by phospholipid-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 99–111 (2008).
Newton, A.C. Protein kinase C: poised to signal. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 298, E395–E402 (2010).
Newton, A.C. Lipid activation of protein kinases. J. Lipid Res. 50 Suppl, S266–S271 (2009).
Rosse, C. et al. PKC and the control of localized signal dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 103–112 (2010).
Prehoda, K.E., Scott, J.A., Mullins, R.D. & Lim, W.A. Integration of multiple signals through cooperative regulation of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex. Science 290, 801–806 (2000).
McLaughlin, S., Wang, J., Gambhir, A. & Murray, D. PIP(2) and proteins: interactions, organization, and information flow. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31, 151–175 (2002).
Gambhir, A. et al. Electrostatic sequestration of PIP2 on phospholipid membranes by basic/aromatic regions of proteins. Biophys. J. 86, 2188–2207 (2004).
Kholodenko, B.N., Hoek, J.B. & Westerhoff, H.V. Why cytoplasmic signalling proteins should be recruited to cell membranes. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 173–178 (2000).
Jung, H., Robison, A.D. & Cremer, P.S. Multivalent ligand-receptor binding on supported lipid bilayers. J. Struct. Biol. 168, 90–94 (2009).
Loose, M., Fischer-Friedrich, E., Ries, J., Kruse, K. & Schwille, P. Spatial regulators for bacterial cell division self-organize into surface waves in vitro. Science 320, 789–792 (2008).
Weiner, O.D., Marganski, W.A., Wu, L.F., Altschuler, S.J. & Kirschner, M.W. An actin-based wave generator organizes cell motility. PLoS Biol. 5, e221 (2007).
Qi, S.Y., Groves, J.T. & Chakraborty, A.K. Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6548–6553 (2001).
Manz, B.N. & Groves, J.T. Spatial organization and signal transduction at intercellular junctions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 342–352 (2010).
Huppa, J.B. et al. TCR-peptide-MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 463, 963–967 (2010).
Huang, J. et al. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 464, 932–936 (2010).
Mayor, S. & Rao, M. Rafts: scale-dependent, active lipid organization at the cell surface. Traffic 5, 231–240 (2004).
Lingwood, D. & Simons, K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327, 46–50 (2010).
Veatch, S.L. & Keller, S.L. Organization in lipid membranes containing cholesterol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 268101 (2002).
Baumgart, T., Hess, S.T. & Webb, W.W. Imaging coexisting fluid domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension. Nature 425, 821–824 (2003).
Kaizuka, Y. & Groves, J.T. Structure and dynamics of supported intermembrane junctions. Biophys. J. 86, 905–912 (2004).
Baumgart, T. et al. Large-scale fluid/fluid phase separation of proteins and lipids in giant plasma membrane vesicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3165–3170 (2007).
Veatch, S.L. et al. Critical fluctuations in plasma membrane vesicles. ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 287–293 (2008).
Groves, J.T., Boxer, S.G. & McConnell, H.M. Electric field effects in multicomponent fluid lipid membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 119–124 (2000).
Honerkamp-Smith, A.R., Veatch, S.L. & Keller, S.L. An introduction to critical points for biophysicists; observations of compositional heterogeneity in lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1788, 53–63 (2009).
Yamazaki, V., Sirenko, O., Schafer, R.J. & Groves, J.T. Lipid mobility and molecular binding in fluid lipid membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 2826–2827 (2005).
Forstner, M.B., Yee, C.K., Parikh, A.N. & Groves, J.T. Lipid lateral mobility and membrane phase structure modulation by protein binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 15221–15227 (2006).
Hammond, A.T. et al. Crosslinking a lipid raft component triggers liquid ordered-liquid disordered phase separation in model plasma membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6320–6325 (2005).
Liu, A.P. & Fletcher, D.A. Actin polymerization serves as a membrane domain switch in model lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 91, 4064–4070 (2006).
Groves, J.T., Boxer, S.G. & McConnell, H.M. Electric field-induced critical demixing in lipid bilayer membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 935–938 (1998).
de Meyer, F. & Smit, B. Effect of cholesterol on the structure of a phospholipid bilayer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3654–3658 (2009).
Ayton, G.S. & Voth, G.A. Systematic multiscale simulation of membrane protein systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19, 138–144 (2009).
Reynwar, B.J. et al. Aggregation and vesiculation of membrane proteins by curvature-mediated interactions. Nature 447, 461–464 (2007).
Lyman, E. et al. A role for a specific cholesterol interaction in stabilizing the Apo configuration of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor. Structure 17, 1660–1668 (2009).
Schmidt, D., Jiang, Q.X. & MacKinnon, R. Phospholipids and the origin of cationic gating charges in voltage sensors. Nature 444, 775–779 (2006).
Phillips, R., Ursell, T., Wiggins, P. & Sens, P. Emerging roles for lipids in shaping membrane-protein function. Nature 459, 379–385 (2009).
Groves, J.T., Boxer, S.G. & McConnell, H.M. Lateral reorganization of fluid lipid membranes in response to the electric field produced by a buried charge. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 11409–11415 (2000).
Saxton, M.J. & Jacobson, K. Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26, 373–399 (1997).
Saffman, P.G. & Delbruck, M. Brownian motion in biological membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 3111–3113 (1975).
Kusumi, A. et al. Paradigm shift of the plasma membrane concept from the two-dimensional continuum fluid to the partitioned fluid: high-speed single-molecule tracking of membrane molecules. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 34, 351–378 (2005).
Rozovsky, S., Kaizuka, Y. & Groves, J.T. Formation and spatio-temporal evolution of periodic structures in lipid bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 36–37 (2005).
Groves, J.T. Bending mechanics and molecular organization in biological membranes. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 697–717 (2007).
Ursell, T.S., Klug, W.S. & Phillips, R. Morphology and interaction between lipid domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13301–13306 (2009).
Mouritsen, O.G. & Bloom, M. Mattress model of lipid-protein interactions in membranes. Biophys. J. 46, 141–153 (1984).
Ursell, T., Huang, K.C., Peterson, E. & Phillips, R. Cooperative gating and spatial organization of membrane proteins through elastic interactions. PLOS Comput. Biol. 3, e81 (2007).
Parthasarathy, R., Yu, C.H. & Groves, J.T. Curvature-modulated phase separation in lipid bilayer membranes. Langmuir 22, 5095–5099 (2006).
Shaw, A.S. & Dustin, M.L. Making the T cell receptor go the distance: a topological view of T cell activation. Immunity 6, 361–369 (1997).
Weikl, T.R., Groves, J.T. & Lipowsky, R. Pattern formation during adhesion of multicomponent membranes. Europhys. Lett. 59, 916–922 (2002).
Campi, G., Varma, R. & Dustin, M.L. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1031–1036 (2005).
Yokosuka, T. et al. Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat. Immunol. 6, 1253–1262 (2005).
DeMond, A.L., Mossman, K.D., Starr, T., Dustin, M.L. & Groves, J.T. T cell receptor microcluster transport through molecular mazes reveals mechanism of translocation. Biophys. J. 94, 3286–3292 (2008).
Lillemeier, B.F. et al. TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation. Nat. Immunol. 11, 90–96 (2010).
Henis, Y.I., Hancock, J.F. & Prior, I.A. Ras acylation, compartmentalization and signaling nanoclusters. Mol. Membr. Biol. (Review) 26, 80–92 (2009).
Sourjik, V. & Berg, H.C. Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 428, 437–441 (2004).
Suzuki, K., Fujiwara, T.K., Sanematsu, F., Iino, R., Edidin, M. & Kusumi, A. GPI-anchored receptor clusters transiently recruit Lyn and Gα for temporary cluster immobilization and Lyn activation: single-molecule tracking study 1. J. Cell Biol. 177, 717–730 (2007).
Suzuki, K., Fujiwara, T.K., Edidin, M. & Kusumi, A. Dynamic recruitment of phospholipase Cγ at transiently immobilized GPI-anchored receptor clusters induces IP3-Ca2+ signaling: single-molecule tracking study 2. J. Cell Biol. 177, 731–742 (2007).
Schlessinger, J. & Bar-Sagi, D. Activation of Ras and other signaling pathways by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 59, 173–179 (1994).
Downward, J. The GRB2/Sem-5 adaptor protein. FEBS Lett. 338, 113–117 (1994).
Haugh, J.M. & Lauffenburger, D.A. Physical modulation of intracellular signaling processes by locational regulation. Biophys. J. 72, 2014–2031 (1997).
Kuriyan, J. & Eisenberg, D. The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 450, 983–990 (2007).
McLaughlin, S. & Aderem, A. The myristoyl-electrostatic switch: a modulator of reversible protein-membrane interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 272–276 (1995).
Margarit, S.M. et al. Structural evidence for feedback activation by Ras.GTP of the Ras-specific nucleotide exchange factor SOS. Cell 112, 685–695 (2003).
Boykevisch, S. et al. Regulation of ras signaling dynamics by Sos-mediated positive feedback. Curr. Biol. 16, 2173–2179 (2006).
Gureasko, J. et al. Membrane-dependent signal integration by the Ras activator Son of sevenless. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 452–461 (2008).
Sondermann, H. et al. Structural analysis of autoinhibition in the Ras activator Son of sevenless. Cell 119, 393–405 (2004).
Sondermann, H., Nagar, B., Bar-Sagi, D. & Kuriyan, J. Computational docking and solution x-ray scattering predict a membrane-interacting role for the histone domain of the Ras activator son of sevenless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16632–16637 (2005).
Gureasko, J. et al. Role of the histone domain in the autoinhibition and activation of the Ras activator Son of Sevenless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3430–3435 (2010).
Zhao, C., Du, G., Skowronek, K., Frohman, M.A. & Bar-Sagi, D. Phospholipase D2-generated phosphatidic acid couples EGFR stimulation to Ras activation by Sos. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 706–712 (2007).
Yadav, K.K. & Bar-Sagi, D. Allosteric gating of Son of sevenless activity by the histone domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3436–3440 (2010).
Wang, W. et al. The Grb2 binding domain of mSos1 is not required for downstream signal transduction. Nat. Genet. 10, 294–300 (1995).
Corbalan-Garcia, S., Margarit, S.M., Galron, D., Yang, S.S. & Bar-Sagi, D. Regulation of Sos activity by intramolecular interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 880–886 (1998).
Tartaglia, M. & Gelb, B.D. Noonan syndrome and related disorders: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 6, 45–68 (2005).
Roberts, A.E. et al. Germline gain-of-function mutations in SOS1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat. Genet. 39, 70–74 (2007).
Tartaglia, M. et al. Gain-of-function SOS1 mutations cause a distinctive form of Noonan syndrome. Nat. Genet. 39, 75–79 (2007).
Plowman, S.J., Muncke, C., Parton, R.G. & Hancock, J.F. H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15500–15505 (2005).
Abankwa, D. et al. A novel switch region regulates H-ras membrane orientation and signal output. EMBO J. 27, 727–735 (2008).
Tian, T. et al. Plasma membrane nanoswitches generate high-fidelity Ras signal transduction. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 905–914 (2007).
Rajakulendran, T., Sahmi, M., Lefrancois, M., Sicheri, F. & Therrien, M. A dimerization-dependent mechanism drives RAF catalytic activation. Nature 461, 542–545 (2009).
Das, J. et al. Digital signaling and hysteresis characterize ras activation in lymphoid cells. Cell 136, 337–351 (2009).
Prasad, A. et al. Origin of the sharp boundary that discriminates positive and negative selection of thymocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 528–533 (2009).
Kullander, K. & Klein, R. Mechanisms and functions of Eph and ephrin signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 475–486 (2002).
Wykosky, J. & Debinski, W. The EphA2 receptor and ephrinA1 ligand in solid tumors: function and therapeutic targeting. Mol. Cancer Res. 6, 1795–1806 (2008).
Salaita, K. et al. Restriction of receptor movement alters cellular response: physical force sensing by EphA2. Science 327, 1380–1385 (2010).
Mossman, K.D., Campi, G., Groves, J.T. & Dustin, M.L. Altered TCR signaling from geometrically repatterned immunological synapses. Science 310, 1191–1193 (2005).
Groves, J.T. Spatial mutation of the T cell immunological synapse. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 544–550 (2006).
Castellana, E.T., Kataoka, S., Albertorio, F. & Cremer, P.S. Direct writing of metal nanoparticle films inside sealed microfluidic channels. Anal. Chem. 78, 107–112 (2006).
Groves, J.T., Ulman, N. & Boxer, S.G. Micropatterning fluid lipid bilayers on solid supports. Science 275, 651–653 (1997).
Ridley, A.J. et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704–1709 (2003).
Hall, A. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279, 509–514 (1998).
Pollard, T.D. Regulation of actin filament assembly by Arp2/3 complex and formins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 451–477 (2007).
Stradal, T.E. et al. Regulation of actin dynamics by WASP and WAVE family proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 303–311 (2004).
Takenawa, T. & Suetsugu, S. The WASP-WAVE protein network: connecting the membrane to the cytoskeleton. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 37–48 (2007).
Leung, D.W. & Rosen, M.K. The nucleotide switch in Cdc42 modulates coupling between the GTPase-binding and allosteric equilibria of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5685–5690 (2005).
Papayannopoulos, V. et al. A polybasic motif allows N-WASP to act as a sensor of PIP(2) density. Mol. Cell 17, 181–191 (2005).
Padrick, S.B. et al. Hierarchical regulation of WASP/WAVE proteins. Mol. Cell 32, 426–438 (2008).
Machesky, L.M. et al. Scar, a WASp-related protein, activates nucleation of actin filaments by the Arp2/3 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3739–3744 (1999).
Ismail, A.M., Padrick, S.B., Chen, B., Umetani, J. & Rosen, M.K. The WAVE regulatory complex is inhibited. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 561–563 (2009).
Derivery, E., Lombard, B., Loew, D. & Gautreau, A. The Wave complex is intrinsically inactive. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 66, 777–790 (2009).
Lebensohn, A.M. & Kirschner, M.W. Activation of the WAVE complex by coincident signals controls actin assembly. Mol. Cell 36, 512–524 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank the members of our laboratories and our collaborators for many stimulating discussions and for sharing their insights into the topics described here.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groves, J., Kuriyan, J. Molecular mechanisms in signal transduction at the membrane. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17, 659–665 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1844
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1844
This article is cited by
-
Metabolic glycan labeling immobilizes dendritic cell membrane and enhances antitumor efficacy of dendritic cell vaccine
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Nanomechanical properties of cholesterol-rich domains in mica-supported unsaturated lipid bilayer: an atomic force microscopy study
Bulletin of Materials Science (2023)
-
Adherens junctions organize size-selective proteolytic hotspots critical for Notch signalling
Nature Cell Biology (2022)
-
Optimal pulse length of insonification for Piezo1 activation and intracellular calcium response
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Membrane anchoring facilitates colocalization of enzymes in plant cytochrome P450 redox systems
Communications Biology (2021)