Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Polyubiquitin substrates allosterically activate their own degradation by the 26S proteasome

Abstract

The 26S proteasome degrades polyubiquitylated (polyUb) proteins by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Here we show that binding of model polyUb substrates to the 19S regulator of mammalian and yeast 26S proteasomes enhances the peptidase activities of the 20S proteasome about two-fold in a process requiring ATP hydrolysis. Monoubiquitylated proteins or tetraubiquitin alone exert no effect. However, 26S proteasomes from the yeast α3ΔN open-gate mutant and the rpt2YA and rpt5YA mutants with impaired gating can still be activated (approximately 1.3-fold to 1.8-fold) by polyUb-protein binding. Thus, binding of polyUb substrates to the 19S regulator stabilizes gate opening of the 20S proteasome and induces conformational changes of the 20S proteasome that facilitate channeling of substrates and their access to active sites. In consequence, polyUb substrates will allosterically stimulate their own degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: MUC1-derived model substrates for 26S proteasomes.
Figure 2: PolyUb proteins stimulate the activity of the 26S proteasome.
Figure 3: Ub5-MUC4 binding stimulates all peptidase activities.
Figure 4: Proteasome activation correlates with Ub5-MUC4 binding affinity.
Figure 5: PolyUb-mediated stimulation requires ATP hydrolysis.
Figure 6: Conformational changes of the proteasome caused by Ub5-MUC4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Voges, D., Zwickl, P. & Baumeister, W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 1015–1068 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Groll, M. et al. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1062–1067 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rechsteiner, M. & Hill, C.P. Mobilizing the proteolytic machine: cell biological roles of proteasome activators and inhibitors. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 27–33 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, C.W. et al. ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell 24, 39–50 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298, 611–615 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao, T. & Cohen, R.E. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 419, 403–407 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubin, D.M., Glickman, M.H., Larsen, C.N., Dhruvakumar, S. & Finley, D. Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J. 17, 4909–4919 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun, B.C. et al. The base of the proteasome regulatory particle exhibits chaperone-like activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 221–226 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohler, A. et al. The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release. Mol. Cell 7, 1143–1152 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, D.M. et al. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's α ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 27, 731–744 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam, Y.A., Lawson, T.G., Velayutham, M., Zweier, J.L. & Pickart, C.M. A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature 416, 763–767 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pickart, C.M. & Cohen, R.E. Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 177–187 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Seeger, M., Ferrell, K., Frank, R. & Dubiel, W. HIV-1 tat inhibits the 20 S proteasome and its 11 S regulator-mediated activation. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8145–8148 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrell, K., Wilkinson, C.R., Dubiel, W. & Gordon, C. Regulatory subunit interactions of the 26S proteasome, a complex problem. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 83–88 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Babbitt, S.E. et al. ATP hydrolysis-dependent disassembly of the 26S proteasome is part of the catalytic cycle. Cell 121, 553–565 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleijnen, M.F. et al. Stability of the proteasome can be regulated allosterically through engagement of its proteolytic active sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1180–1188 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hetfeld, B.K. et al. The zinc finger of the CSN-associated deubiquitinating enzyme USP15 is essential to rescue the E3 ligase Rbx1. Curr. Biol. 15, 1217–1221 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thrower, J.S., Hoffman, L., Rechsteiner, M. & Pickart, C.M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 19, 94–102 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fenteany, G. et al. Inhibition of proteasome activities and subunit-specific amino-terminal threonine modification by lactacystin. Science 268, 726–731 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidtke, G., Emch, S., Groettrup, M. & Holzhutter, H.G. Evidence for the existence of a non-catalytic modifier site of peptide hydrolysis by the 20 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22056–22063 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kisselev, A.F., Kaganovich, D. & Goldberg, A.L. Binding of hydrophobic peptides to several non-catalytic sites promotes peptide hydrolysis by all active sites of 20 S proteasomes. Evidence for peptide-induced channel opening in the α-rings. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22260–22270 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Glickman, M.H. Getting in and out of the proteasome. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 149–158 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohler, A. et al. The substrate translocation channel of the proteasome. Biochimie 83, 325–332 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Verma, R., Oania, R., Graumann, J. & Deshaies, R.J. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell 118, 99–110 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Benaroudj, N., Zwickl, P., Seemuller, E., Baumeister, W. & Goldberg, A.L. ATP hydrolysis by the proteasome regulatory complex PAN serves multiple functions in protein degradation. Mol. Cell 11, 69–78 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Navon, A. & Goldberg, A.L. Proteins are unfolded on the surface of the ATPase ring before transport into the proteasome. Mol. Cell 8, 1339–1349 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Amerik, A.Y. & Hochstrasser, M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1695, 189–207 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stohwasser, R., Salzmann, U., Giesebrecht, J., Kloetzel, P.M. & Holzhutter, H.G. Kinetic evidences for facilitation of peptide channelling by the proteasome activator PA28. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6221–6230 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kopp, F., Dahlmann, B. & Kuehn, L. Reconstitution of hybrid proteasomes from purified PA700–20 S complexes and PA28αβ activator: ultrastructure and peptidase activities. J. Mol. Biol. 313, 465–471 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Walz, J. et al. 26S proteasome structure revealed by three-dimensional electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 121, 19–29 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. da Fonseca, P.C. & Morris, E.P. Structure of the human 26S proteasome: Subunit radial displacements open the gate into the proteolytic core. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23305–23314 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Groettrup, M. et al. The interferon-γ-inducible 11 S regulator (PA28) and the LMP2/LMP7 subunits govern the peptide production by the 20 S proteasome in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23808–23815 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dahlmann, B., Kuehn, L. & Reinauer, H. Studies on the activation by ATP of the 26 S proteasome complex from rat skeletal muscle. Biochem. J. 309, 195–202 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wendler, P., Lehmann, A., Janek, K., Baumgart, S. & Enenkel, C. The bipartite nuclear localization sequence of Rpn2 is required for nuclear import of proteasomal base complexes via karyopherin αβ and proteasome functions. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 37751–37762 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank D. Finley (Harvard Medical School) for the yeast strains rpt2YA and rpt5YA, J. Dohmen (University of Cologne) for the rpn10 mutant strain and A. Lehmann for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB421 and SFB 740 to P.-M.K.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.B.-O. and A.H. performed all biochemical experiments; C.E. purified yeast proteasomes; G.C. generated the MUC1 peptides; M.S. and H.-G.H. supervised the biochemical and enzyme kinetic experiments; B.D. purified the mammalian proteasomes; D.B.-O., B.D. and P.-M.K. prepared the manuscript; P.-M.K. designed the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter-Michael Kloetzel.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–4 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 297 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bech-Otschir, D., Helfrich, A., Enenkel, C. et al. Polyubiquitin substrates allosterically activate their own degradation by the 26S proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16, 219–225 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1547

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1547

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing