Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Dementia

What is behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia?

In an era of etiology-specific therapies, defining the criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia is essential. How do we determine whether bad manners, laziness, or unsolicited friendliness represents the earliest presentation of this condition? Diagnostic criteria are being actively evaluated to help establish a foundation for diagnostic decisions regarding this and other neurodegenerative diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Neary, D. et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 51, 1546–1554 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rascovsky, K. et al. Diagnostic criteria for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD): current limitations and future directions. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 21, 514–518 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Piguet, O., Hornberger, M., Shelley, B. P., Kipps, C. M. & Hodges, J. R. Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 72, 732–737 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mendez, M. F. & Perryman, K. M. Neuropsychiatric features of frontotemporal dementia: evaluation of consensus criteria and review. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 14, 424–429 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosen, H. J. et al. Utility of clinical criteria in differentiating frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) from AD. Neurology 58, 1608–1615 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Knibb, J. A., Xuereb, J. H., Patterson, K. & Hodges, J. Clinical and pathological characterization of progressive aphasia. Ann. Neurol. 59, 156–165 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grossman, M. et al. Longitudinal decline in autopsy-defined frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 70, 2036–2045 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forman, M. S. et al. Frontotemporal dementia: clinicopathological correlations. Ann. Neurol. 59, 952–962 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Knopman, D. S. et al. Antemortem diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Ann. Neurol. 57, 480–488 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, W. T. et al. Clinical features of pathologic subtypes of behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia. Arch. Neurol. 64, 1611–1616 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murray Grossman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M. Grossman has received research support from the NIH and has acted as a consultant for Allon Pharmaceutical.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grossman, M. What is behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia?. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 358–359 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2009.81

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2009.81

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing