Applications of nanotechnology for immunology

An Erratum to this article was published on 25 July 2013

This article has been updated

Key Points

  • Nanotechnology makes use of the unique properties of objects that function as a unit within the overall size range of 1 to 1,000 nanometres, which is on the same scale as for many biological structures such as antigens, receptors, subcellular components of the immune system and microbes. The engineering of nanoscale compounds by the modification of properties such as nanoparticle size, shape, charge, porosity, surface area and hydrophobicity holds great promise for the development of immune response modulators and vaccines.

  • The enhancement of the immune response by nanoparticles can be achieved through innate immune potentiation or by the enhanced delivery of antigens. Virus-like particles activate the innate immune response via Toll-like receptors and the repetitive display of antigens, whereas nanogels and cationic liposomes are examples of vaccine carriers.

  • The molecular pathways involved in immune activation by nanoparticles are diverse and might include the upregulation of homing receptors such as CC-chemokine receptor 7, co-stimulatory molecules including CD40, CD80 and CD86, as well as increased cytokine production. Enhanced delivery by nanoparticles might induce apoptosis or necrosis.

  • The suppression of the immune response can be achieved through direct immunosuppression or by the delivery of immunosuppressants. Fullerenes have a direct immunosuppressive effect but can also deliver immunosuppressive drugs, as can dendrimers, polymers, and liposomes.

  • The molecular pathways involved in immunosuppression might include increased expression of cyclooxygenase 2, prostangandin E2 and interleukin-10 (IL-10), and apoptosis. The delivery of immunosuppressants results in a decreased response to IL-2 with sirolimus, in the downregulation of nuclear factor-kB with steroids, and in the upregulation of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), which causes an increased regulatory T cell activity when self antigens are presented.

  • Nanotechnology will continue to provide remarkable insights into the nature of the immune response. The application of nanotechnology to immunology might also affect new strategies to prevent or to treat human diseases.

Abstract

Nanotechnology uses the unique properties of objects that function as a unit within the overall size range of 1–1,000 nanometres. The engineering of nanostructure materials, including nanoparticles, nanoemulsions or nanotubules, holds great promise for the development of new immunomodulatory agents, as such nanostructures can be used to more effectively manipulate or deliver immunologically active components to target sites. Successful applications of nanotechnology in the field of immunology will enable new generations of vaccines, adjuvants and immunomodulatory drugs that aim to improve clinical outcomes in response to a range of infectious and non-infectious diseases.

Main

Biological molecules such as oligonucleotides, polysaccharides, and proteins that function as antigens, allergens or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are of nanometre (nm) size1,2 (Table 1). In this Review we discuss how the size, shape, charge, porosity and hydrophobic properties of a compound influence its effects on the immune response and how nanotechnology can be used to engineer each of these properties (Fig. 1). We review the role of nanotechnology with respect to its applications in the development of vaccines and immunosuppressive agents, and we highlight how the manipulation and control of objects at the nanoscale level (Box 1) can contribute to our understanding, as well as to our targeting, of the immune response. The field of nanotechnology is vast, therefore including all of the relevant studies is beyond the scope of this Review. However, we provide examples of selected studies that show the broad range of immunological applications of nanotechnology.

Table 1 Biological scale of immunologically relevant materials
Figure 1: Examples of nanotechnologies applied to immunoregulation.
figure1

Nanotechnologies that can be applied to immunoregulation include nanoparticles (parts ac), nanoemulsions (parts df) and virus-like particles (parts gh). Nanoparticles include dendrimers which branch out (part a), carbon molecules known as spherical fullerenes (part b) and cylindrical carbon molecules known as cylindrical fullerenes (part c). Nanoemulsions incorporate immiscible components such as oil and water that might form amphiphilic molecules such as micelles (part d), liposomes with a lipid bilayer (part e) and oil-in-water emulsions (part f). Virus-like particles are self-assembled structures composed of one or more viral capsid proteins (part g), whereas synthetic virus-like particles are self-assembled from chemically synthesized components (part h). Examples of the relationship between nanoparticle size and bioactivity are shown in (part i).

PowerPoint slide

Nanotechnology in vaccination

Inactivated vaccines typically incorporate adjuvants, which are substances that enhance the quantity and the quality of the cellular and humoral immune responses generated against the antigens that are included in the vaccine. Nanoparticles provide adjuvant activity by enhancing the delivery of antigens to the immune system or by potentiating innate immune responses (Fig. 2). We discuss some of these nanotechnologies in the section below (Fig. 3; Table 2). Some nanotechnologies that improve vaccine efficiency, such as virus-like particles (VLPs) and MF59 (Novartis), have been used for decades, whereas others are still at the early stages of development.

Figure 2: Mechanisms by which nanoparticles alter the induction of immune responses.
figure2

The immunostimulatory activity of nanoscale materials has been attributed to diverse mechanisms: the delivery of antigens, including particle size-dependent tissue penetration and access to the lymphatics (part a); a depot effect, which promotes the persistence, the stability, the conformational integrity and the gradual release of vaccine antigens (part b); and repetitive antigen display in which the spatial organization of the antigens on the particle surface facilitates B cell receptor (BCR) co-aggregation, triggering and activation (part c). Additional mechanisms associated with innate immune potentiation include Toll-like receptor (TLR)-dependent and TLR-independent signal transduction (not shown); cross-presentation, which is a mechanism by which exogenously acquired-antigens are processed into MHC class I pathways, caused by the nanoparticle-mediated leakage of antigens into the cytosol after they have been taken up by the phagosome (part d); and the release of soluble mediators such as cytokines, chemokines and immunomodulatory molecules that regulate the immune response (not shown). APC, antigen-presenting cell; DC, dendritic cell; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; TCR, T cell receptor.

PowerPoint slide

Figure 3: Nanoscale immune activation.
figure3

Nanoscale products might have a direct immunostimulatory effect (part a) on components of the immune system, including antigen presenting cells (APCs), B cells or T cells; they might deliver compounds that result in immunostimulation (part b); or they might use both mechanisms at the same time. Direct effects include the upregulation of homing receptors such as CC-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) and co-stimulatory molecules including CD40, CD80 and CD86, which results in the enhanced secretion of cytokines and increased B cell and T cell activation. Enhanced delivery of antigens and adjuvants might result in apoptosis or necrosis, which enhances vaccine immunogenicity. The pathways shown are representative examples of how different nanoparticles might activate the immune system. BCR, B cell receptor; CTL, cytotoxic T cell; IFNγ, interferon-γ; IL, interleukin; MYD88, myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TCR, T cell receptor; TGFβ, transforming growth factor-β; TH, T helper; TLR, Toll-like receptor.

PowerPoint slide

Table 2 Examples of immunostimulatory nanovaccines

VLP-based vaccines. VLPs are diverse and highly versatile nanoparticles (20–100 nm in size) that have been used in vaccines against infectious diseases and cancer (Table 2). More recently, VLPs have been used in vaccines that aim to protect against chronic diseases that have an inflammatory basis, such as hypertension, Alzheimer's disease and rheumatoid arthritis, and also in vaccines against drug addiction3,4. VLPs used in vaccines can be broadly divided into two classes: in one class, VLPs that comprise the viral protein subunits that form the viral capsid in nature; and in another class, synthetic VLPs that are derived by the chemical synthesis of pre-designed subunits as described below.

VLPs can be distinguished from viruses by their absence of genetic material and their inability to replicate or to undergo genetic recombination. More than 20 to 30 different enveloped or non-enveloped VLPs are currently in preclinical and clinical development4. VLPs can be produced either without modification or by genetically engineering the viral capsid subunit by bioconjugation of the viral capsid subunit with antigenic peptides or other ligands or by site-directed mutagenesis of the intact VLP to create a functional scaffold for multivalent surface presentation of antigens. Other structures can be incorporated into VLPs, such as Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands, cell-targeting moieties or other biologically active mediators, to augment vaccine efficacy. In human clinical trials, VLPs loaded with synthetic A-type CpG-oligonucleotides (CpG-ODNs) and peptide epitopes derived from melanoma-associated antigens, such as melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART1), have been shown to activate multifunctional central memory T cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that produce interferon-γ (IFNγ), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) and interleukin-2 (IL-2)5.

Several of the advantages of using VLPs and other nanoparticles in vaccines are related to the unique nanodimensional size, symmetrical shape, uniformity and stable structure of the assembled nanoparticles, which closely resemble native viruses. These nanoparticles have been used to enable the preferential uptake of vaccine antigens by antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Notably, smaller nanoparticles (25–40 nm in size)6 penetrate tissue barriers and traffic to the draining lymph nodes more rapidly than larger nanoparticles (greater than 100 nm in size), which are typically retained by cells at the site of injection and which need to be taken up and trafficked by dendritic cells (DCs) to facilitate their transport to the lymph nodes6,7 (Fig. 2). As such, smaller nanoparticles might lead to more effective activation of adaptive immune responses7,8,9.

In combination with specific cell-targeting strategies, nanoparticles also seem to be more effective than microparticles at enhancing antigen uptake by cells of the immune system; for example, when nanoparticles or microparticles were coated with DC-specific ICAM3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN; also known as CD209)-specific monoclonal antibody to target them to DCs, the DC-SIGN-coated nanoparticles were effectively targeted to DCs in a mixed population of human blood cells, whereas the DC-SIGN-coated microparticles were endocytosed in a nonspecific manner10. Furthermore, whereas most extracellular proteins that are taken up by DCs are processed and presented via the MHC class II pathway, the uptake of nanoparticles such as VLPs promotes DC activation and the presentation of antigens on both MHC class I and MHC class II molecules. Importantly, this leads to the priming of both antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells4,11,12,13,14 (Figs 2,3).

Two prophylactic VLP-based vaccines have been licensed worldwide: one prevents hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the associated risk of hepatocellular carcinoma15,16,17; the other prevents human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and its sequela, cervical cancer18. The use of a recombinant protein engineered to self-assemble into a VLP in the recombinant HBV vaccine was a major advance in safety, and the plasma-based HBV vaccine has now been replaced15. However, this first generation of VLP-based vaccines requires adjuvants for optimal immunogenicity in healthy individuals and is not highly effective in high-risk populations such as immunosuppressed patients and elderly individuals. In addition, the HBV vaccines are highly effective as a prophylactic vaccine but ineffective as a therapeutic vaccine. The formulation of HBV vaccines with aluminium (alum) adjuvants is a major limitation with respect to the effective induction of T cell-mediated immunity against chronic hepatitis B, as alum predominantly activates T helper 2 (TH2)-type immune responses19,20. The HPV vaccine that has more recently been developed uses monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) added to alum as an adjuvant to induce a TH1-type immune response and CTLs that are associated with antiviral immunity19,21,22,23,24,25.

Although current VLP-based vaccines are only prophylactically efficacious but have limitations for use in therapeutic applications, these vaccines have an excellent safety record26. Recombinant HBV vaccines have been licensed since 1986 and hundreds of millions of doses have been administered worldwide. Pitfalls of advancing any new technology, such as novel adjuvants that enhance the immune response, include the potential risks of inducing rare, but serious, adverse reactions that only become evident after the evaluation of hundreds of thousands of individuals. Concerns about the induction of autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis, Guillain–Barré syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis, following VLP-based vaccination have been raised but have not been confirmed27. In a systematic review of the association between multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B vaccination, 1 out of 12 studies reported an association. The authors of that review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to modify vaccination schedules and called for additional studies to be carried out27. VLPs and other emerging nanoparticle-based technologies provide new strategies to enhance the induction of potent, long-lasting and potentially broadly reactive (multiclade neutralization) humoral and cellular immune responses that will be crucial to achieve protection and therapy against chronic infections, rapidly mutating pathogens such as influenza and HIV-1, and late-stage malignant diseases as discussed below. These benefits must be balanced against any real or perceived risks so that the use of the vaccine is high and a benefit to public health is achieved.

Synthetic VLPs. The development of fully synthetic VLPs using chemically synthesized lipopeptide monomers28 to enhance nanoparticle assembly and to stabilize the three-dimensional conformational structure of protein antigens provides an intriguing vaccine strategy to stimulate neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1. In contrast to enveloped HIV-1 VLPs, which are limited by low Env density per virion4,29,30, or to the self-assembling peptide nanoparticles (SAPNs) described below, the synthetic approach does not require recombinant DNA technology or the expression and the purification of the monomer proteins from producer cells. Lipopeptide-based synthetic VLPs (20–30 nm in size) have been used to repetitively display a peptide-mimetic epitope derived from the V3-variable loop of gp120 (Ref. 31). This engineered epitope was designed by modelling the stable three-dimensional β-hairpin conformation that is formed after the binding of a broadly cross-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody to the gp120 antigen. This synthetic VLP also incorporated a universal TH cell epitope32 (this immunogenic peptide promiscuously binds to multiple different MHC class II molecules to improve the induction of TH cells) and a tripalmitoyl-S-glyceryl cysteine (Pam3Cys) lipid moiety, which induces TLR2 activation. Interestingly, the immunization of New Zealand white rabbits with these synthetic VLPs alone induced the production of neutralizing antibodies against the envelope proteins of multiple HIV-1 strains31. Thus, structural vaccinology and other strategies for immunogen design29,33, in combination with repetitive antigen display using nanoparticle-based technologies as a vaccine platform, might enable the induction of responses against poorly accessible but conserved neutralizing epitopes rather than against more readily accessible immunodominant non-neutralizing epitopes expressed on the native gp120 spike29. Responses against these poorly accessible epitopes are required to overcome the extraordinary mutation rate and the diversification of HIV-1 during the course of infection and to prevent viral escape.

The design of synthetic nanoparticles to incorporate lipid moieties for the conformational stabilization of protein antigens, such as the membrane-proximal external region of gp41, is also of great interest as certain broadly reactive HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies that interfere with Env-mediated viral membrane fusion have been shown to engage with both membrane lipid and protein components34,35 that contribute to native antigenic structure. These interactions potentially enable the generation of improved protective immune responses to the vaccine. Finally, new design strategies for nanoparticle-based vaccines are needed to focus immune responses against conserved CTL epitopes, as cell-mediated immune responses, together with broadly neutralizing antibodies, are associated with the initial control of HIV-1 infection and other viral diseases36.

Nanoparticle-based vaccine carriers. Several different types of nanoparticles have been used either alone as vaccine carriers to entrap antigens or together with other agents, such as humanized DC-specific antibodies10 or immunomodulators, to enable targeted antigen delivery and the activation of APCs37. Examples of nanoparticles that have been used as vaccine carriers include biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles, co-polymer hydrogels or 'nanogels', cholesterol-bearing hydrophobized pullulan (CHP) and cationic liposomes. Polymers have been used in nanotechnology as nanoparticles, nanospheres and nanocapsules. Vaccine carriers composed of PLGA have been extensively characterized in animal models and are widely used in clinical applications as a matrix to encapsulate, co-deliver and gradually release active drugs38. In vaccine development, pegylated PLGA (150–200 nm in size) has been used to encapsulate hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and it promotes the rapid uptake and the endosomal localization of vaccine antigens in DCs, as well as the subsequent production of high titres of antigen-specific antibodies39.

A thermosensitive biodegradable hydrogel consisting of the monomethoxy form of pegylated PLGA (less than 100 nm in size) has recently been used in mice to achieve the subcutaneous delivery of HBsAg at the injection site at the same time as the local and sustained release of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), which is a crucial cytokine for the survival, the differentiation and the maturation of DCs40. This vaccine enhanced the recruitment of DC precursor cells to the site of injection and promoted the maturation and the migration of CD11c+ DCs to the local draining lymph nodes. This was followed by the strong induction of HBsAg-specific antibody and T cell responses, even in mice that do not normally generate immune responses against HBsAg or when low concentrations (≤2 μg) of HBsAg were used. Importantly, this suggests that this adjuvant could potentially be used in vaccines that incorporate poorly immunogenic antigens or in vaccines for individuals who have an impaired immune system. The ability to protect antigens or other bioactive mediators, to maintain the native conformation of these components at the site of immune challenge and to create a depot effect with the gradual local release of antigens over time is a key advantage for these types of nanoparticles. Biodegradable nanoparticles have also been shown to be safe and biocompatible for use in vaccine technology38.

SAPNs. The unique properties of certain microbial pathogens and VLPs have inspired and guided the systematic modelling, design and manufacture of novel nanoparticles that use combinations of both naturally occurring and synthetically engineered biostructural motifs to optimize immune responses to vaccine antigens. SAPNs constructed from different protein oligomerization domains have been designed to achieve repetitive antigen display41 (Fig. 2). A customized recombinant construct, which is expressed in Escherichia coli, encodes a single polypeptide chain with two different linked protein oligomerization domains, each containing particular coiled-coil heptad repeat patterns that drive the self assembly of the purified monomers into nanoparticles approximately 16 to 25 nm in diameter; these nanoparticles have icosahedral symmetry that is analogous to viral capsids. Thus, SAPNs provide a repeating scaffold structure to enable the conformational presentation of inserted protein epitopes or domains in a highly exposed configuration that protrudes or extends from the surface of the particle after the assembly of the subunits41. Approximately 180 peptide chains are assembled into a single nanoparticle to form this icosahedral structure. This geometry enables the manipulation of nearly all of the parameters described above as being necessary for VLPs: a scaffold for antigen display and cellular activation that leads to substantial increases in the specific production of high-titre, high-affinity antibodies directed against the inserted linear or conformational antigen epitopes42.

SAPNs have been produced with the insertion of a range of different antigens, including the hydrophobic loop-peptide epitope of actin, and can successfully induce the production of antibodies against poorly antigenic phylogenetically conserved determinants43. The incorporation of trimeric coiled-coil epitopes from the surface protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) into SAPNs was shown to strongly induce the production of virus-specific neutralizing antibodies after the immunization of mice with these SAPNs44. In addition, the insertion of a tetrameric form of the immunogenic epitope from the external domain of the avian influenza virus matrix protein 2 (M2e) into SAPNs led to the high-density display of oligomeric epitopes in a native conformation and the subsequent reduction of H5N2 virus-shedding after the immunization of chickens with these SAPNs45. Furthermore, the integration of a tandem repeat of an immunodominant B cell epitope from the malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei circumsporozoite protein (CSP) into SAPNs induced the production of T cell-dependent high-avidity antibodies in mice without the use of an adjuvant. This protected mice against both primary and long-term secondary challenges with live sporozoites without causing parasitaemia46. Interestingly, modification of the SAPN vaccine to incorporate both B cell and T cell epitopes derived from the CSP of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum induced the production of both high-titre antibodies and long-lived polyfunctional interferon-γ (IFNγ)-producing central memory T cells, which protected mice against a lethal dose of a transgenic P. berghei malaria parasite that expressed the CSP from P. falciparum14. Finally, the α-helical domain located in the membrane-proximal external region of HIV-1 gp41 was incorporated into a SAPN scaffold to recapitulate the epitopes recognized by pre-existing HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies; however, this approach was unsuccessful in inducing HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies in immunized rats47.

Nanoemulsions. Nanoemulsion adjuvants are oil-in-water emulsions that are composed of solvents and surfactants. An example of a nanoemulsion is MF59, which consists of squalene oil in combination with polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) and sorbitan trioleate (Span 85). MF59 has been licensed in Europe as a clinical vaccine adjuvant for influenza and has been intramuscularly administered to tens of millions of healthy adults, elderly individuals and children48. The adjuvant activity seems to involve a combination of mechanisms, including an increased cellular uptake of antigens, an enhanced release of cytokines and chemokines, a recruitment of monocytes and granulocytes to the site of intramuscular injection, and an augmented maturation and upregulation of CC-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) by antigen-primed DCs, which promotes their migration to the draining lymph nodes49,50.

MF59 has been shown to be a more potent adjuvant than alum for inducing broadly protective humoral and TH1-type cell-mediated immune responses48,51,52. Furthermore, with respect to vaccination against pandemic influenza viruses (for example, H5N1), M59 promotes protective antiviral immune responses when delivered with relatively low doses of virus-derived antigens. By contrast, the delivery of similar antigen doses in combination with alum results in variable or ineffective antiviral immunity48,53. The clinical experience of using MF59 has been documented in these clinical studies as well as in post-marketing surveillance. Increased reactogenicity, including injection site pain, has been described following administration of MF59 and has been attributed to the increased inflammation that is associated with the enhanced immune response. The ratio of the increased reactogenicity to the benefit of increased immunity remains favourable, especially if enhanced responses are needed, as is the case with pandemic influenza vaccines54. Early-stage clinical trials are currently in progress to study the efficacy of MF59 as an adjuvant for vaccines against other viral pathogens, including herpes simplex virus, HBV and cytomegalovirus48. Intranasal administration of MF59 enhanced serum antibody responses in naive mice but not in pre-infected mice55 or in humans56.

The nanoemulsion W805EC is composed of soybean oil as opposed to squalene and has been shown, both in animal models and more recently in humans, to augment the targeting of vaccine antigens to the immune system and to safely induce potent mucosal, humoral and cellular immune responses after its intranasal administration57. The adjuvant activity of this nanoemulsion–antigen mixture is primarily dependent on the retention of a nanodroplet structure in the emulsion and on the positive charge that facilitates binding to negatively charged proteins such as mucin. The nanoscale size and positive ζ-potential of the emulsion enables the penetration of the mucous layer, the binding to cell membranes and the cellular uptake that together mediate the induction of the innate and the adaptive immune responses58. Cytokine secretion by ciliated epithelial cells in the nasal mucosa and by cells in the nasal-associated lymphoid tissues (NALT) is followed by the activation and the migration of antigen-primed DEC205 (also known as LY75)+ DCs to the regional lymph nodes59. Interestingly, nanoemulsions have been shown to induce necrosis or apoptosis in epithelial cells and to simultaneously activate the surface expression of calreticulin, which is a signal for immunogenic cell death60,61. These observations are consistent with a mechanism by which nanoemulsions rapidly facilitate the engulfment of dying antigen-loaded epithelial cells by DCs and other phagocytic cells in the tissue59. Nanoemulsions have broad antimicrobial activity against enveloped viruses, bacteria and fungi62,63,64,65 and can be used to inactivate, as well as to provide adjuvant activity, for vaccine preparations involving intact viruses such as vaccinia virus66, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)67 and influenza viruses68. Single-antigen formulations, including the 17 kDa outer membrane lipid protein A (OmpA) polypeptide from Burkholderia cenocepacia69, the anthrax protective antigen70, the HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 (Ref. 71) and the hepatitis B surface antigen58, can also be used as adjuvants.

Nanoemulsions have shown little or no toxicity during extensive testing in multiple species58,66,70,71 and no serious adverse effects in humans, although intranasally administered nanoemulsions have only been evaluated in less than 200 individuals so far57. This is particularly relevant as the history of intranasally administered adjuvants includes an association of cranial nerve VII palsy (also known as Bell's palsy) with the nasal administration of influenza virosomes together with the E. coli heat labile toxin mucosal adjuvant72. Although there is no evidence that an intranasally administered nanoemulsion adjuvant undergoes retrograde transport or that it is associated with cranial nerve VII palsy, vigilant monitoring for this side effect and others will continue throughout the clinical development programme and after it has been licensed.

Cationic liposomes. Cationic liposomes (typically ranging in particle diameter from 200 to 1,000 nm depending on the formulation) have been used as vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems to encapsulate, protect and enable antigen uptake with the prolonged activation of professional APCs73,74. The cationic charge and the composition of the lipid components is essential for efficient antigen adsorption to the nanoparticle during the preparation of the vaccine, for retention at the site of injection, for innate activation of immune accessory cells and for vaccine immunogenicity, including the induction of TH1-type cellular responses75,76,77,74. Different cationic lipids incorporated into these formulations have included quaternary ammonium compounds (for example, dimethyl dioctadecyl ammonium bromide (DDA) and 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethyl-ammonium-propane (DOTAP)), cholesterol derivatives (for example, dimethylaminoethanecarbamoyl-cholesterol), imidazolium compounds (for example, 1-[2-(oleoyloxy)ethyl]-2-oleyl-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)imidazolinium chloride (DOTIM)), diC14-amidine-based compounds and other immunostimulants such as trehalose dibehenate (TDB), which is a synthetic analogue of trehalose dimycolate that engages a TLR-independent pathway for innate activation78. These components have systematically been used to optimize adjuvant activity and to improve the type, the quality and the magnitude of the cellular and humoral responses in different disease models and applications. Cationic liposomes have also been shown to enhance the efficacy and to reduce the systemic toxicity of immunostimulators, including MPL and other TLR ligands79,80,81,82. Different cationic liposomes that incorporate immunostimulators and vaccine antigens are currently under evaluation in human clinical trials to test for safety and efficacy against infectious diseases and cancer74.

Taken together, these studies show the striking range of applications and the safety of diverse types of nanoparticles (Fig. 1), such as the use of nanoemulsions, nanogels and liposomes to induce potent immune responses against different antigens, including microorganisms and tumour antigens (Table 2). Nanoparticles induce a broad spectrum of immune responses, including TH1, TH2, and TH17 cell responses, and they induce the development of IgG and IgA antibodies, both systemically and locally, depending on the formulation and the route of delivery (Fig. 2). These studies indicate that different nanoparticle compositions can be engineered as desired to enhance the immune response through mechanisms associated with nanoparticle delivery, the controlled release of antigens or the entrapment of immunomodulators in the same location, in addition to the recruitment, the targeting and the uptake of antigens by accessory cells and professional APCs (Table 2).

Nanotechnology and immunosuppression

In addition to stimulating and directing the immune response, nanotechnology can be therapeutically used to inhibit the detrimental immune responses that occur in allergy, autoimmunity and in transplant rejection. The immunosuppressive effects of nanotherapeutics are discussed in the following sections (Fig. 4; Table 3).

Figure 4: Nanoscale immunosuppression.
figure4

Nanoscale products might have a direct immunosuppressive effect (part a) on components of the immune response, including antigen presenting cells (APCs), B cells or T cells; they might deliver compounds that result in immunosuppression (part b); or they might use both mechanisms at the same time. Direct effects include the upregulation of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), which results in increased cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), prostangandin E2 (PGE2) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), and decreased B cell and T cell activity, as well as apoptosis. The delivery of immunosuppressants results in a decreased response to IL-2 with sirolimus, the downregulation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) with steroids and the upregulation of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), which results in increased regulatory T cell (TReg) activity when self antigens are presented in a nanoemulsion. The pathways shown are representative examples by which different nanoscale products might suppress the immune system. MYD88, myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88; PLGA, poly(lactide-co-glycolide); TH, T helper; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TRIF, TIR-domain-containing adaptor protein inducing IFNβ.

PowerPoint slide

Table 3 Examples of immunosuppressive effects of nanotherapeutics

Immunosuppressive effects of fullerenes. Much of the work exploring the direct effect of nanoparticles on the immune response has come from the field of toxicology, in which fullerenes have been shown to have direct immunosuppressive effects83. Fullerenes are molecules that are exclusively composed of carbon and that are commonly used in nanotechnology in the development of items such as electronics, paints and polymer composites84. Fullerenes are globally produced in the order of hundreds of tonnes per year85. Spherical fullerenes are approximately 1 nm in diameter and can absorb electrons through the benzene rings on their surface, which enables them to function as scavengers for reactive oxygen species (ROS)86. When incubated with human mast cells and peripheral blood basophils, spherical fullerenes result in decreased IgE receptor-mediated signalling, decreased production of ROS and decreased degranulation. In a mouse model of anaphylaxis, fullerene treatment prevents histamine release and prevents the reduction in body temperature that normally occurs in mice after allergen challenge87.

When fullerene-like structures are manufactured as cylinders they are called carbon nanotubules (CNTs) and they typically have a diameter of approximately 10 nm and a length that can be as much as several micrometres. These structures can be formed as single-walled or multi-walled tubes, both of which have been shown to have direct immunosuppressive effects. Mice exposed to single-walled CNTs by pharyngeal aspiration had increased levels of inflammation in the lungs and enhanced recruitment of DCs, alveolar macrophages, polymorphonuclear cells and lymphocytes. Interestingly, when cultured with stimulatory DCs, both the proliferation and the expansion of splenic T cell populations were decreased in animals that had been exposed to single-walled CNTs. In co-culture experiments, DCs that had been exposed to both lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and single-walled CNTs were less capable of promoting the proliferation and the expansion of T cell populations than DCs that had been exposed to LPS alone88.

Although the mechanisms responsible for the effect of single-walled CNTs on DC function have not been fully elucidated, more is known about the mechanisms by which multi-walled CNTs affect T cell function. Animals exposed to inhaled multi-walled CNTs for several weeks showed no increase in pulmonary inflammation but they showed systemic immune suppression in the form of decreased T cell proliferation and a lower production of T cell-dependent antibodies85. The gene expression of the enzymes cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2; also known as PTGS2) and prostaglandin E synthase 2 (PTGES2) was upregulated in the spleens of multi-walled CNT-treated mice — a response that was abrogated by the administration of a cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1) antagonist and in COX2-knockout mice. The overall immunosuppressive effect was shown to be mediated by transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) produced by alveolar macrophages89.

Fullerenes, which have direct immunosuppressive effects (discussed above), also have the capacity to store and to deliver active drug substances that have immunosuppressive properties. Although spherical fullerenes have not been efficient in the delivery of immunosuppressive drugs such as dexamethasone90, carbon nanotubules have been used to effectively deliver compounds such as the pro-apoptotic protein cytochrome c91.

Nanoparticles as vehicles for immunosuppressants. In addition to having direct immunosuppressive effects, nanotechnology can also be used to deliver drugs with known immunosuppressive activity; for example, nanocrystals are used to increase the water solubility and the bioavailability of immunosuppressive drugs that are used to prevent transplant rejection, such as sirolimus92,93. Sirolimus is a triene macrolide that has immunosuppressive effects through the inhibition of IL-2 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines. Owing to its poor solubility in water, the initial formulations of sirolimus were oral solutions with solvent–water mixtures. The currently licensed oral tablet formulation was made available by the use of nanometre-sized crystals generated using nanoscale stabilizers93.

Dendrimers and polymers. Dendrimers are molecules that repetitively branch around a focal point. Similarly to nanocrystals, dendrimers can encapsulate active drugs and in this way they can deliver active drugs to target tissues. In addition, dendrimers and polymers can present targeting ligands94. Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers are among the best known dendrimers and are composed of a diamine core reacted with methyl acrylate, followed by another diamine, which results in regular radially concentric layers or 'generations' that give rise to successively larger dendrimers. PAMAM dendrimers have been reported to deliver N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) across the blood brain barrier. NAC is an antioxidant and an anti-inflammatory agent that is commonly used to treat acetaminophen poisoning and as a mucolytic. On the basis of work showing PAMAM dendrimers to localize to activated microglia and astrocytes in rabbits with cerebral palsy, NAC has been conjugated to a PAMAM dendrimer and intravenously administered to rabbits with cerebral palsy. The administration of NAC with a PAMAM dendrimer but not NAC alone was reported to decrease neuroinflammation and to improve motor function95.

Other examples of the use of PAMAM dendrimers in immunosuppression include the development of PAMAM dendrimer glucosamines that have been shown to inhibit TLR4-mediated inflammatory responses and scar tissue formation96. Mechanistic studies have shown that the PAMAM dendrimer glucosamine blocks the formation of the TLR4–MD2 (also known as LY96)–LPS complex97 by interfering with the electrostatic binding of LPS to MD2 and by blocking the entry of the lipid chains of LPS into the hydrophobic pocket of MD2. On the basis of these findings, the dendrimer glucosamine has been tested in the rabbit ileal loop model of Shigella spp. infection and has been shown to decrease IL-6 and IL-8 production98 and, as a proof of concept, to decrease inflammation in this model of gastroenteritis.

The effects of dendrimers on TLR7 and TLR8 have also been studied using a dendrimer synthesized from the TLR7 and TLR8 agonist imidazoquinoline99. Interestingly, dendrimerization of the small molecule imidazoquinoline99 results in a loss of TLR8 activity and a maintenance of TLR7 activity, with an initial dose-dependent increase in cytokine production followed by a decrease. Although the mechanisms by which particular TLRs are 'turned on' and 'turned off' by dendrimers is not fully understood, it highlights the possibility of molecular manipulation at the nanoscale level with respect to both elucidating and modulating the innate immune response for therapeutic use.

PLGA has been formulated at the nanoscale level and has been used to deliver immunosuppressants including betamethasone100, bifunctional peptide inhibitors and leukaemia-inhibitory factor (LIF)101. The addition of betamethasone to PLGA resulted in a more sustained anti-inflammatory effect in two animal models of arthritis compared with betamethasone alone100. Bifunctional peptide inhibitors that simultaneously target MHC class II molecules and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) have been effectively delivered using PLGA complexes, which results in decreased cytokine production and a suppression of disease in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis101. PLGA has also been used to deliver LIF, which results in the upregulation of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) expression by T cells and an expansion of the regulatory T cell population in mice. This effect was not seen when LIF was administered to mice in the absence of PLGA102.

The type of polymer and the route of administration might also influence whether there is an enhanced or a suppressed immune response. When negatively charged PLGA was compared to positively charged N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC) both nanoparticles increased the humoral immune responses to ovalbumin when intramuscularly administered; however, only the negatively charged TMC increased the humoral immune responses to ovalbumin when intranasally administered103. This is probably due to the electrostatic interaction of the positively charged carrier and the negatively charged mucous and has been shown to occur with other carriers, including liposomes104 and nanoemulsions. Interestingly, only the negatively charged intranasally administered PLGA induced immunoregulatory responses, which were characterized by enhanced FOXP3 expression in NALT and cervical lymph nodes, by decreased delayed type hypersensitivity responses and by increased IL-10 expression105. These results show that the type of polymer, its charge and the route of administration can influence whether the resultant immune response is enhanced or suppressed105.

SLNs, liposomes and micelles. Lipid-based nanotechnology includes solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), liposomes and micelles (Fig. 1). SLNs are solid at room temperature and body temperature, whereas liposomes and micelles are liquid at these temperatures. Liposomes are vesicles composed of a lipid bilayer with a hydrophilic centre. Conversely, micelles are composed of amphiphilic molecules arranged as oil in water (a hydrophobic core) or water in oil (a hydrophilic core). An active drug is incorporated and delivered by the carrier, which is chosen on the basis of composition, size and charge92,106. In addition, the carrier might be targeted to specific tissues using specific ligands107. Examples of liposomes that have been used as carriers to achieve immunosuppression include bisphosphonates, such as clondronate, to deplete pulmonary macrophages in acute lung injury108 and arthritis109, as well as alendronate to deplete circulating monocytes in coronary artery stenosis110. Targeting of liposomes to specific cells is exemplified by the delivery of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to DCs by surrounding the liposome that is carrying the siRNA with a monoclonal antibody that is specific to DCs. This gene-silencing approach was used to specifically target CD40 expression by DCs and resulted in reduced levels of T cell proliferation in the liposome-treated mice111. Micelles have also been used to deliver agents that impair the immune response, including camptothecin112,113. Camptothecin is a topoisomerase inhibitor that was originally used in the treatment of cancer and has more recently been applied to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The formulation of camptothecin in sterically stabilized micelles (SSMs) improved its delivery and had anti-inflammatory effects in a mouse model of arthritis; in this study, vasoactive intestinal peptide was used to target the SSMs to T cells, macrophages and synoviocytes112.

Nanoemulsions and immunosuppression. A final example of how nanotechnology can be applied to suppress an immune response is the use of nanoemulsions to deliver self antigens114. When the nanoemulsion W805EC is combined with the self antigen thyroglobulin and is delivered to mice, the animals become tolerant to thyroglobulin; this response is characterized by a reduced humoral immune response to thyroglobulin, an upregulation of FOXP3 and TGFβ expression and increased T regulatory (TReg) cell activity. This is particularly interesting, as W805EC administered with foreign antigens enhances immune responses by increasing antigen delivery as well as by increasing TLR2 and TLR4 activation57,115. The signalling pathways that are activated after TLR4 stimulation include the myeloid differentiation primary-response gene 88 (MYD88) and the TIR domain-containing adaptor protein inducing interferon-β (TRIF; also known as TICAM1) pathways, which result in the production and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines116. As too much inflammation is detrimental to the host117, the control of TLR4 stimulation is an important immunoregulatory function. Endotoxin tolerance is a mechanism by which immunosuppression occurs in the continued presence of LPS118. In addition, the immunoregulatory molecule TGFβ has been described as being increased in endotoxin tolerance, as well as in the aforementioned direct immunosuppressive effects of fullerenes89 and in the indirect immunosuppressive effects of nanoemulsion delivery of self antigens114. Another similarity between the signalling mechanisms in nanotechnology-mediated immunosuppression and endotoxin tolerance is a relative increase in TRIF activation and a decrease in MYD88 activation118. This 'TRIF bias' has been described for particular TLR4 agonists such as MPL119, which is an LPS derivative that is used as an adjuvant in numerous vaccines, including licensed recombinant HPV bivalent vaccine120.

Summary

Nanotechnology is currently being used to engineer specific immune responses for prophylactic and therapeutic effects. In the future, the use of nanoparticles that have unique immunological properties determined by their size, shape, charge, porosity and hydrophobicity will enable researchers to 'customize' immune responses in new and unexpected ways. Improved protection against the outbreak of pandemic viruses and other emerging or mutating pathogens will require the rapid activation of innate and adaptive immune responses, ideally within hours (for an innate immune response) or days (for an adaptive immune response) after a single priming dose of vaccine. This could be achieved through the absorption of nanoparticles that have unique combinations of antigens and cytokines. It is also possible that passive immunity through nanoparticle-delivered immunoglobulin genes could produce antibodies specific for pathogens and could provide immune replacement rather than simply immune manipulation by nanotechnology.

In addition, the activation of CTL responses that can target tumours or virally infected cells can be accomplished in several ways using nanotechnology. Nanoparticles could be surrounded by antigens to augment CTL activity or they could be combined with immunomodulators, including cytokines such as GM-CSF, IL-12, IL-15 and FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3L). As many co-stimulatory ligands are now known, multimerizing CD40 ligand (CD40L), glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR; also known as TNFRSF18) or other activating and blocking ligands could turn lymphocytes on and off with greater precision than the antibodies that are currently being used to help to control autoimmunity and immune responses to allergens or even to transplanted organs. Using antigens with NOD-like receptors, TLR ligands and other microbial pattern recognition systems could induce CTL responses to antigens that normally do not produce this activity. It is also possible that 'suppressive nanoparticles' could be given to relatives of patients with specific autoimmune diseases in order to prevent disease development. Genetic screening for many immune diseases might enable the early correction of some immune defects using nanoparticle gene delivery methods rather than bone marrow transplantation.

In addition to the potential therapeutic applications of nanotechnology, recent advances in nanotechnology-based screening strategies using silicon nanowires in combination with siRNA and transcriptional profiling over time have shown promise for the selective perturbation of the immune response. This therefore has facilitated the identification of crucial points in the molecular network that regulates the immune response121. These emerging nanotechnologies provide new ways to interrogate complex pathways that control the differentiation of immune cells, including the balance of TH17 and TReg cells. This approach might also enable the future design of more effective therapeutics to regulate the immune system and to potentially reduce side effects and inflammation.

In summary, the field of nanotechnology will continue to provide remarkable insights into the nature of the immune response. The application of nanotechnology in immunology might also affect new strategies for the prevention or the treatment of human diseases.

Change history

  • 25 July 2013

    In the version of this Review that was initially published, the reference citations in Tables 1–3 were not accurate. This error has been corrected in the online HTML and PDF versions of the article. Nature Reviews Immunology apologizes for this error.

References

  1. 1

    Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Mandelkern, M., Elias, J. G., Eden, D. & Crothers, D. M. The dimensions of DNA in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 152, 153–161 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Jennings, G. T. & Bachmann, M. F. Immunodrugs: therapeutic VLP-based vaccines for chronic diseases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 49, 303–326 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Buonaguro, L., Tagliamonte, M., Tornesello, M. L. & Buonaguro, F. M. Developments in virus-like particle-based vaccines for infectious diseases and cancer. Expert Rev. Vaccines 10, 1569–1583 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Goldinger, S. M. et al. Nano-particle vaccination combined with TLR-7 and -9 ligands triggers memory and effector CD8+ T-cell responses in melanoma patients. Eur. J. Immunol. 42, 3049–3061 (2012). This Phase IIa clinical trial shows both the advantages and the potential limitations of using an improved MelQbG10 virus-like nanoparticle (30 nm) vaccine displaying MART1 on the surface together with integrated and exogenous TLR agonists for the enhanced generation of T H 1 cell responses and effector or memory CD8+ T cell activation in late stage cancer patients.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Manolova, V. et al. Nanoparticles target distinct dendritic cell populations according to their size. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 1404–1413 (2008). This paper shows that polystyrene nanoparticles of a defined size (20–200 nm), or VLPs (30 nm) biodistribute rapidly to the draining lymph nodes to be taken up by lymph node resident DCs, whereas larger nanoparticles (500–2,000 nm) are acquired by DCs at the site of injection to be subsequently transported to the lymphatic tissues. This establishes nanoscale size as a crucial parameter for the mechanism of biodistribution and delivery and for vaccine applications.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Reddy, S. T. et al. Exploiting lymphatic transport and complement activation in nanoparticle vaccines. Nature Biotech. 25, 1159–1164 (2007). This paper uses polyethylene glycol-stabilized polypropylene sulfide nanoparticles in the absence of specific targeting ligands to show efficient passive distribution of nanoparticles to the draining lymph nodes on the basis of size using differently sized particles of identical composition.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Reddy, S. T., Rehor, A., Schmoekel, H. G., Hubbell, J. A. & Swartz, M. A. In vivo targeting of dendritic cells in lymph nodes with poly(propylene sulfide) nanoparticles. J. Control Release 112, 26–34 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Fifis, T. et al. Size-dependent immunogenicity: therapeutic and protective properties of nano-vaccines against tumors. J. Immunol. 173, 3148–3154 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Cruz, L. J. et al. Targeted PLGA nano- but not microparticles specifically deliver antigen to human dendritic cells via DC-SIGN in vitro. J. Control Release 144, 118–126 (2010). This study shows a crucial contribution of nanoscale size to the uptake of targeted nanoparticles by DCs.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Paliard, X. et al. Priming of strong, broad, and long-lived HIV type 1 p55gag-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells after administration of a virus-like particle vaccine in rhesus macaques. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 16, 273–282 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Schirmbeck, R., Bohm, W. & Reimann, J. Virus-like particles induce MHC class I-restricted T-cell responses. Lessons learned from the hepatitis B small surface antigen. Intervirology 39, 111–119 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Buonaguro, L. et al. Induction of neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T lymphocytes in Balb/c mice immunized with virus-like particles presenting a gp120 molecule from a HIV-1 isolate of clade A. Antiviral Res. 54, 189–201 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Kaba, S. A. et al. Protective antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses to the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein induced by a nanoparticle vaccine. PLoS ONE 7, e48304 (2012). This paper shows SAPNs, consisting of multiple 125 amino acid-long polypeptide subunits engineered to express repetitively displayed B cell and T cell epitopes derived from an antigen of the causative agent of human malaria, activate long-lasting (>1 year) and high-affinity protective cellular and humoral immune responses in a mouse model, which is an important proof of principle for progression to clinical trials using this novel vaccine platform.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Douglas, R. G. Jr. The heritage of hepatitis B vaccine. JAMA 276, 1796–1798 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Hilleman, M. R., McAleer, W. J., Buynak, E. B. & McLean, A. A. The preparation and safety of hepatitis B vaccine. J. Infect. 7 (Suppl. 1), 3–8 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Buonaguro, L., Petrizzo, A., Tornesello, M. L. & Buonaguro, F. M. Translating tumor antigens into cancer vaccines. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18, 23–34 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    No, J. H., Kim, M. K., Jeon, Y. T., Kim, Y. B. & Song, Y. S. Human papillomavirus vaccine: widening the scope for cancer prevention. Mol. Carcinog. 50, 244–253 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Grun, J. L. & Maurer, P. H. Different T helper cell subsets elicited in mice utilizing two different adjuvant vehicles: the role of endogenous interleukin 1 in proliferative responses. Cell. Immunol. 121, 134–145 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Jordan, M. B., Mills, D. M., Kappler, J., Marrack, P. & Cambier, J. C. Promotion of B cell immune responses via an alum-induced myeloid cell population. Science 304, 1808–1810 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Bomford, R. The comparative selectivity of adjuvants for humoral and cell-mediated immunity. I. Effect on the antibody response to bovine serum albumin and sheep red blood cells of Freund's incomplete and complete adjuvants, alhydrogel, Corynebacterium parvum, Bordetella pertussis, muramyl dipeptide and saponin. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 39, 426–434 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Brewer, J. M. (How) do aluminium adjuvants work? Immunol. Lett. 102, 10–15 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Gupta, R. K., Rost, B. E., Relyveld, E. & Siber, G. R. Vaccine Design: The Subunit and Vaccine Approach 229–248 (Plenum, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Wijburg, O. L. et al. The role of macrophages in the induction and regulation of immunity elicited by exogenous antigens. Eur. J. Immunol. 28, 479–487 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Naim, J. O., van Oss, C. J., Wu, W., Giese, R. F. & Nickerson, P. A. Mechanisms of adjuvancy: I—metal oxides as adjuvants. Vaccine 15, 1183–1193 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Zanetti, A. R., Van Damme, P. & Shouval, D. The global impact of vaccination against hepatitis B: a historical overview. Vaccine 26, 6266–6273 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Martinez-Sernandez, V. & Figueiras, A. Central nervous system demyelinating diseases and recombinant hepatitis B vaccination: a critical systematic review of scientific production. J. Neurol. 20 Oct 2012 [epub ahead of print].

  28. 28

    Boato, F. et al. Synthetic virus-like particles from self-assembling coiled-coil lipopeptides and their use in antigen display to the immune system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 9015–9018 (2007). This paper uses a lipopeptide monomer incorporating a coiled-coil self-assembly motif in which the lipid tails form a central core to stabilize the particle and enable the multivalent display of antigens in a nanometre-scale (20 nm) synthetic VLP vaccine platform.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Mascola, J. R. & Montefiori, D. C. The role of antibodies in HIV vaccines. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 413–444 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Wang, B. Z. et al. Incorporation of high levels of chimeric human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins into virus-like particles. J. Virol. 81, 10869–10878 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Riedel, T. et al. Synthetic virus-like particles and conformationally constrained peptidomimetics in vaccine design. Chembiochem 12, 2829–2836 (2011). This report shows that synthetic VLPs can be engineered by structural vaccinology to stimulate immune responses targeted against narrowly-defined and critically exposed regions of an antigen, as for the induction of HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies against gp120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Ghasparian, A. et al. Engineered synthetic virus-like particles and their use in vaccine delivery. Chembiochem 12, 100–109 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    McBurney, S. P. & Ross, T. M. Human immunodeficiency virus-like particles with consensus envelopes elicited broader cell-mediated peripheral and mucosal immune responses than polyvalent and monovalent Env vaccines. Vaccine 27, 4337–4349 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Scherer, E. M., Leaman, D. P., Zwick, M. B., McMichael, A. J. & Burton, D. R. Aromatic residues at the edge of the antibody combining site facilitate viral glycoprotein recognition through membrane interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1529–1534 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Julien, J. P. et al. Ablation of the complementarity-determining region H3 apex of the anti-HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody 2F5 abrogates neutralizing capacity without affecting core epitope binding. J. Virol. 84, 4136–4147 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Sanou, M. P., De Groot, A. S., Murphey-Corb, M., Levy, J. A. & Yamamoto, J. K. HIV-1 vaccine trials: evolving concepts and designs. Open AIDS J. 6, 274–288 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Look, M., Bandyopadhyay, A., Blum, J. S. & Fahmy, T. M. Application of nanotechnologies for improved immune response against infectious diseases in the developing world. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62, 378–393 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Mundargi, R. C., Babu, V. R., Rangaswamy, V., Patel, P. & Aminabhavi, T. M. Nano/micro technologies for delivering macromolecular therapeutics using poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) and its derivatives. J. Control Release 125, 193–209 (2008). This article provides an overview of the concept and the importance of ordered and repetitive structural arrays expressed by VLPs and other nanoparticles for the optimal induction of B cell responses using the example of gp23, which is the major capsid protein of bacteriophage T4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Bharali, D. J. et al. Novel nanoparticles for the delivery of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. Nanomedicine 4, 311–317 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Chou, H. Y. et al. Hydrogel-delivered GM-CSF overcomes nonresponsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine through the recruitment and activation of dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 185, 5468–5475 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Raman, S., Machaidze, G., Lustig, A., Aebi, U. & Burkhard, P. Structure-based design of peptides that self-assemble into regular polyhedral nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2, 95–102 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Baschong, W., Hasler, L., Haner, M., Kistler, J. & Aebi, U. Repetitive versus monomeric antigen presentation: direct visualization of antibody affinity and specificity. J. Struct. Biol. 143, 258–262 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Schroeder, U. et al. Peptide nanoparticles serve as a powerful platform for the immunogenic display of poorly antigenic actin determinants. J. Mol. Biol. 386, 1368–1381 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Pimentel, T. A. et al. Peptide nanoparticles as novel immunogens: design and analysis of a prototypic severe acute respiratory syndrome vaccine. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 73, 53–61 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Babapoor, S. et al. A novel vaccine using nanoparticle platform to present immunogenic M2e against avian influenza infection. Influenza Res. Treat. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/126794 (2012).

  46. 46

    Kaba, S. A. et al. A nonadjuvanted polypeptide nanoparticle vaccine confers long-lasting protection against rodent malaria. J. Immunol. 183, 7268–7277 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Wahome, N. et al. Conformation-specific display of 4E10 and 2F5 epitopes on self-assembling protein nanoparticles as a potential HIV vaccine. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 80, 349–357 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    O'Hagan, D. T., Tsai, T. & Reed, S. in Influenza Vaccines for the Future 2nd edn (eds Rappuoli, R. & Del Giudice, G.) 327–357 (Springer, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Vogel, F. R., Caillet, C., Kusters, I. C. & Haensler, J. Emulsion-based adjuvants for influenza vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines 8, 483–492 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Calabro, S. et al. Vaccine adjuvants alum and MF59 induce rapid recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes that participate in antigen transport to draining lymph nodes. Vaccine 29, 1812–1823 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Seubert, A., Monaci, E., Pizza, M., O'Hagan, D. T. & Wack, A. The adjuvants aluminum hydroxide and MF59 induce monocyte and granulocyte chemoattractants and enhance monocyte differentiation toward dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 180, 5402–5412 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Wack, A. et al. Combination adjuvants for the induction of potent, long-lasting antibody and T-cell responses to influenza vaccine in mice. Vaccine 26, 552–561 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Bernstein, D. I. et al. Effects of adjuvants on the safety and immunogenicity of an avian influenza H5N1 vaccine in adults. J. Infect. Dis. 197, 667–675 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Schultze, V. et al. Safety of MF59 adjuvant. Vaccine 26, 3209–3222 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Barchfeld, G. L. et al. The adjuvants MF59 and LT-K63 enhance the mucosal and systemic immunogenicity of subunit influenza vaccine administered intranasally in mice. Vaccine 17, 695–704 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Boyce, T. G. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted subunit influenza vaccines administered intranasally to healthy adults. Vaccine 19, 217–226 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Stanberry, L. R. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a novel nanoemulsion mucosal adjuvant W805EC combined with approved seasonal influenza antigens. Vaccine 30, 307–316 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Makidon, P. E. et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of a novel nanoemulsion-based hepatitis B mucosal vaccine. PLoS ONE 3, e2954 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Makidon, P. E. et al. Nanoemulsion mucosal adjuvant uniquely activates cytokine production by nasal ciliated epithelium and induces dendritic cell trafficking. Eur. J. Immunol. 42, 2073–2086 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Green, D. R., Ferguson, T., Zitvogel, L. & Kroemer, G. Immunogenic and tolerogenic cell death. Nature Rev. Immunol. 9, 353–363 (2009). This article provides an overview of immunogenic cell death as a concept used to describe signals produced by dying cells or expressed on the cell surface that lead to the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses rather than to the induction of unresponsiveness or tolerance. This is an important consideration for particular types of nanoparticles that are known to induce apoptosis or necrosis as this could potentially be related to vaccine immunogenicity.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Obeid, M. et al. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death. Nature Med. 13, 54–61 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Hamouda, T. et al. A novel surfactant nanoemulsion with broad-spectrum sporicidal activity against Bacillus species. J. Infect. Dis. 180, 1939–1949 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Hamouda, T. & Baker, J. R. Jr. Antimicrobial mechanism of action of surfactant lipid preparations in enteric Gram-negative bacilli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 89, 397–403 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Hamouda, T. et al. A novel surfactant nanoemulsion with a unique non-irritant topical antimicrobial activity against bacteria, enveloped viruses and fungi. Microbiol. Res. 156, 1–7 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Donovan, B. W. et al. Prevention of murine influenza A virus pneumonitis by surfactant nano-emulsions. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 11, 41–49 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Bielinska, A. U. et al. A novel, killed-virus nasal vaccinia virus vaccine. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 15, 348–358 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Lindell, D. M. et al. A novel inactivated intranasal respiratory syncytial virus vaccine promotes viral clearance without Th2 associated vaccine-enhanced disease. PLoS ONE 6, e21823 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Myc, A. et al. Development of immune response that protects mice from viral pneumonitis after a single intranasal immunization with influenza A virus and nanoemulsion. Vaccine 21, 3801–3814 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Makidon, P. E. et al. Induction of immune response to the 17 kDa OMPA Burkholderia cenocepacia polypeptide and protection against pulmonary infection in mice after nasal vaccination with an OMP nanoemulsion-based vaccine. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 199, 81–92 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Bielinska, A. U. et al. Mucosal immunization with a novel nanoemulsion-based recombinant anthrax protective antigen vaccine protects against Bacillus anthracis spore challenge. Infect. Immun. 75, 4020–4029 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Bielinska, A. U. et al. Nasal immunization with a recombinant HIV gp120 and nanoemulsion adjuvant produces Th1 polarized responses and neutralizing antibodies to primary HIV type 1 isolates. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 24, 271–281 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Durrer, P. et al. Mucosal antibody response induced with a nasal virosome-based influenza vaccine. Vaccine 21, 4328–4334 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Kamath, A. T. et al. A liposome-based mycobacterial vaccine induces potent adult and neonatal multifunctional T cells through the exquisite targeting of dendritic cells. PLoS ONE 4, e5771 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Christensen, D., Korsholm, K. S., Andersen, P. & Agger, E. M. Cationic liposomes as vaccine adjuvants. Expert Rev. Vaccines 10, 513–521 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Henriksen-Lacey, M. et al. Liposomal cationic charge and antigen adsorption are important properties for the efficient deposition of antigen at the injection site and ability of the vaccine to induce a CMI response. J. Control Release 145, 102–108 (2010). This study evaluates the biodistribution of separately radiolabelled lipids and antigens to show the gradual release or depot effect to be a crucial delivery mechanism, in combination with innate activation and monocyte infiltration, for cationic liposome-based vaccines after intramuscular administration to mice.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76

    Henriksen-Lacey, M. et al. Comparison of the depot effect and immunogenicity of liposomes based on dimethyldioctadecylammonium (DDA), 3β-[N-(N′,N′-Dimethylaminoethane)carbomyl] cholesterol (DC-Chol), and 1,2-Dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane (DOTAP): prolonged liposome retention mediates stronger Th1 responses. Mol. Pharm. 8, 153–161 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Brunel, F., Darbouret, A. & Ronco, J. Cationic lipid DC-Chol induces an improved and balanced immunity able to overcome the unresponsiveness to the hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine 17, 2192–2203 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Werninghaus, K. et al. Adjuvanticity of a synthetic cord factor analogue for subunit Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccination requires FcRγ-Syk-Card9-dependent innate immune activation. J. Exp. Med. 206, 89–97 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79

    Bal, S. M., Hortensius, S., Ding, Z., Jiskoot, W. & Bouwstra, J. A. Co-encapsulation of antigen and Toll-like receptor ligand in cationic liposomes affects the quality of the immune response in mice after intradermal vaccination. Vaccine 29, 1045–1052 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80

    Zhou, S., Kawakami, S., Yamashita, F. & Hashida, M. Intranasal administration of CpG DNA lipoplex prevents pulmonary metastasis in mice. Cancer Lett. 287, 75–81 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81

    Zaks, K. et al. Efficient immunization and cross-priming by vaccine adjuvants containing TLR3 or TLR9 agonists complexed to cationic liposomes. J. Immunol. 176, 7335–7345 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82

    Whitmore, M. M., Li, S., Falo, L. Jr & Huang, L. Systemic administration of LPD prepared with CpG oligonucleotides inhibits the growth of established pulmonary metastases by stimulating innate and acquired antitumor immune responses. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 50, 503–514 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83

    Zolnik, B. S., Gonzalez-Fernandez, A., Sadrieh, N. & Dobrovolskaia, M. A. Nanoparticles and the immune system. Endocrinology 151, 458–465 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84

    Nielsen, G. D., Roursgaard, M., Jensen, K. A., Poulsen, S. S. & Larsen, S. T. In vivo biology and toxicology of fullerenes and their derivatives. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 103, 197–208 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85

    Mitchell, L. A. et al. Pulmonary and systemic immune response to inhaled multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Toxicol. Sci. 100, 203–214 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86

    Bosi, S., Da Ros, T., Spalluto, G. & Prato, M. Fullerene derivatives: an attractive tool for biological applications. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 38, 913–923 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87

    Ryan, J. J. et al. Fullerene nanomaterials inhibit the allergic response. J. Immunol. 179, 665–672 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88

    Tkach, A. V. et al. Direct effects of carbon nanotubes on dendritic cells induce immune suppression upon pulmonary exposure. ACS Nano 5, 5755–5762 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89

    Mitchell, L. A., Lauer, F. T., Burchiel, S. W. & McDonald, J. D. Mechanisms for how inhaled multiwalled carbon nanotubes suppress systemic immune function in mice. Nature Nanotechnol. 4, 451–456 (2009). This work explores the mechanisms by which multi-walled carbon nanotubules have a direct effect on immunomodulation.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90

    Liu, R. et al. Research on the bioactivities of C60-dexamethasone. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9, 3171–3176 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91

    Konduru, N. V. et al. Phosphatidylserine targets single-walled carbon nanotubes to professional phagocytes in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE 4, e4398 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92

    Muller, R. H. & Keck, C. M. Challenges and solutions for the delivery of biotech drugs — a review of drug nanocrystal technology and lipid nanoparticles. J. Biotechnol. 113, 151–170 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93

    Shen, L. J. & Wu, F. L. Nanomedicines in renal transplant rejection — focus on sirolimus. Int. J. Nanomed. 2, 25–32 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94

    Kaminskas, L. M., McLeod, V. M., Porter, C. J. & Boyd, B. J. Association of chemotherapeutic drugs with dendrimer nanocarriers: an assessment of the merits of covalent conjugation compared to noncovalent encapsulation. Mol. Pharm. 9, 355–373 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95

    Kannan, S. et al. Dendrimer-based postnatal therapy for neuroinflammation and cerebral palsy in a rabbit model. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 130ra146 (2012). This article shows that the beneficial effect of the anti-inflammatory agent NAC is enhanced by polyamidoamine dendrimers and suggests that the enhanced effect is due to the enhanced delivery of the anti-inflammatory agent.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96

    Shaunak, S. et al. Polyvalent dendrimer glucosamine conjugates prevent scar tissue formation. Nature Biotech. 22, 977–984 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97

    Barata, T. S., Teo, I., Brocchini, S., Zloh, M. & Shaunak, S. Partially glycosylated dendrimers block MD-2 and prevent TLR4-MD-2-LPS complex mediated cytokine responses. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002095 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98

    Teo, I. et al. Preventing acute gut wall damage in infectious diarrhoeas with glycosylated dendrimers. EMBO Mol. Med. 4, 866–881 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99

    Shukla, N. M. et al. Potent adjuvanticity of a pure TLR7-agonistic imidazoquinoline dendrimer. PLoS ONE 7, e43612 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100

    Higaki, M., Ishihara, T., Izumo, N., Takatsu, M. & Mizushima, Y. Treatment of experimental arthritis with poly(d, l-lactic/glycolic acid) nanoparticles encapsulating β-methasone sodium phosphate. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 64, 1132–1136 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101

    Buyuktimkin, B. et al. Vaccine-like controlled-release delivery of an immunomodulating peptide to treat experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Mol. Pharm. 9, 979–985 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102

    Park, J. et al. Modulation of CD4+ T lymphocyte lineage outcomes with targeted, nanoparticle-mediated cytokine delivery. Mol. Pharm. 8, 143–152 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103

    Slutter, B. et al. Nasal vaccination with N-trimethyl chitosan and PLGA based nanoparticles: nanoparticle characteristics determine quality and strength of the antibody response in mice against the encapsulated antigen. Vaccine 28, 6282–6291 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104

    Baca-Estrada, M. E., Foldvari, M. & Snider, M. Induction of mucosal immune responses by administration of liposome-antigen formulations and interleukin-12. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 19, 455–462 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105

    Keijzer, C. et al. PLGA, PLGA-TMC and TMC-TPP nanoparticles differentially modulate the outcome of nasal vaccination by inducing tolerance or enhancing humoral immunity. PLoS ONE 6, e26684 (2011). This work shows that specific properties of a nanoparticle, including charge and route of administration, have a differential effect on the immune response.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106

    Landesman-Milo, D. & Peer, D. Altering the immune response with lipid-based nanoparticles. J. Control Release 161, 600–608 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107

    Musacchio, T. & Torchilin, V. P. Recent developments in lipid-based pharmaceutical nanocarriers. Front. Biosci. 16, 1388–1412 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108

    Gaca, J. G. et al. Prevention of acute lung injury in swine: depletion of pulmonary intravascular macrophages using liposomal clodronate. J. Surg. Res. 112, 19–25 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109

    Richards, P. J., Williams, B. D. & Williams, A. S. Suppression of chronic streptococcal cell wall-induced arthritis in Lewis rats by liposomal clodronate. Rheumatology 40, 978–987 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110

    Epstein, H. et al. Preparation of alendronate liposomes for enhanced stability and bioactivity: in vitro and in vivo characterization. AAPS J. 10, 505–515 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111

    Zheng, X. et al. A novel in vivo siRNA delivery system specifically targeting dendritic cells and silencing CD40 genes for immunomodulation. Blood 113, 2646–2654 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112

    Koo, O. M., Rubinstein, I. & Onyuksel, H. Actively targeted low-dose camptothecin as a safe, long-acting, disease-modifying nanomedicine for rheumatoid arthritis. Pharm. Res. 28, 776–787 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113

    Khaja, F. A., Koo, O. M. & Onyuksel, H. Nanomedicines for inflammatory diseases. Methods Enzymol. 508, 355–375 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114

    Wang, S. H., Fan, Y., Makidon, P. E., Cao, Z. & Baker, J. R. Induction of immune tolerance in mice with a novel mucosal nanoemulsion adjuvant and self-antigen. Nanomedicine 7, 867–876 (2012). This study shows that nanoemulsion-enhanced uptake of self antigens results in a decreased humoral immune response, upregulation of FOXP3 and TGFβ expression, and increased T Reg cell activity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115

    Bielinska, A. U. et al. Induction of Th17 cellular immunity with a novel nanoemulsion adjuvant. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 30, 189–199 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116

    McAleer, J. P. & Vella, A. T. Educating CD4 T cells with vaccine adjuvants: lessons from LPSsaccharide. Trends Immunol. 31, 429–435 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117

    Wiersinga, W. J. Current insights in sepsis: from pathogenesis to new treatment targets. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 17, 480–486 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118

    Biswas, S. K. & Lopez-Collazo, E. Endotoxin tolerance: new mechanisms, molecules and clinical significance. Trends Immunol. 30, 475–487 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119

    Mata-Haro, V. et al. The vaccine adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A as a TRIF-biased agonist of TLR4. Science 316, 1628–1632 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120

    Dubensky, T. W. Jr & Reed, S. G. Adjuvants for cancer vaccines. Semin. Immunol. 22, 155–161 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121

    Yosef, N. et al. Dynamic regulatory network controlling TH17 cell differentiation. Nature 496, 461–468 (2013). In this paper, the silicon composition, needle-like shape and dimensions of vertical-oriented nanowires are used in a new way to penetrate the T cell membrane without cellular toxicity to introduce siRNA into the cytosol as a means to evaluate the network of genes regulating T H 17 cell differentiation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122

    US National Nanotechnology Initiative. What is nanotechnology? Nano.gov [online], (2012).

  123. 123

    US Food and Drug Administration. Considering whether an FDA-regulated product involves the application of nanotechnology: guidance for industry. FDA [online], (2011).

  124. 124

    European Medicines Agency. Nanotechnology. [online], (2012).

  125. 125

    Tao, Y. & Zhang, L. Characterization of polysaccharide-protein complexes by size-exclusion chromatography combined with three detectors. Carbohydr. Res. 343, 2251–2257 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. 126

    Erickson, H. P. Size and shape of protein molecules at the nanometer level determined by sedimentation, gel filtration, and electron microscopy. Biol. Proced. Online 11, 32–51 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127

    Choe, J., Kelker, M. S. & Wilson, I. A. Crystal structure of human toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) ectodomain. Science 309, 581–585 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128

    Klein, J. S. et al. Examination of the contributions of size and avidity to the neutralization mechanisms of the anti-HIV antibodies b12 and 4E10. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7385–7390 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129

    Arechaga, I. et al. Structural characterization of the TCR complex by electron microscopy. Int. Immunol. 22, 897–903 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130

    Bachmann, M. F. & Jennings, G. T. Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nature Rev. Immunol. 10, 787–796 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131

    Alexopoulos, C. J., Mims, C. W. & M., B. Introductory Mycology (John Wiley and Sons, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  132. 132

    Yaeger, R. G. in Medical microbiology 4th edn Ch. 77 (ed. Baron, S.) (Univ. of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  133. 133

    Lipscomb, M. F. & Masten, B. J. Dendritic cells: immune regulators in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 82, 97–130 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134

    Krombach, F. et al. Cell size of alveolar macrophages: an interspecies comparison. Environ. Health Perspect. 105 (Suppl. 5), 1261–1263 (1997).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. 135

    DeFranco, A. L. Structure and function of the B cell antigen receptor. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9, 377–410 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136

    Weiss, A. Structure and function of the T cell antigen receptor. J. Clin. Invest. 86, 1015–1022 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137

    Zucker-Franklin, D. Atlas of Blood Cells: Function and Pathology (Lea & Febiger,1981).

    Google Scholar 

  138. 138

    Weller, P. F. Eosinophils: structure and functions. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6, 85–90 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139

    Hamdy, S. et al. Co-delivery of cancer-associated antigen and Toll-like receptor 4 ligand in PLGA nanoparticles induces potent CD8+ T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. Vaccine 26, 5046–5057 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140

    Zhang, Z. et al. Induction of anti-tumor cytotoxic T cell responses through PLGA-nanoparticle mediated antigen delivery. Biomaterials 32, 3666–3678 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. 141

    Uenaka, A. et al. T cell immunomonitoring and tumor responses in patients immunized with a complex of cholesterol-bearing hydrophobized pullulan (CHP) and NY-ESO-1 protein. Cancer Immun. 7, 9 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142

    Kitano, S. et al. HER2-specific T-cell immune responses in patients vaccinated with truncated HER2 protein complexed with nanogels of cholesteryl pullulan. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 7397–7405 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143

    Nochi, T. et al. Nanogel antigenic protein-delivery system for adjuvant-free intranasal vaccines. Nature Mater. 9, 572–578 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144

    Gu, X. G. et al. A novel hydrophobized polysaccharide/oncoprotein complex vaccine induces in vitro and in vivo cellular and humoral immune responses against HER2-expressing murine sarcomas. Cancer Res. 58, 3385–3390 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. 145

    Ikuta, Y. et al. Presentation of a major histocompatibility complex class 1-binding peptide by monocyte-derived dendritic cells incorporating hydrophobized polysaccharide-truncated HER2 protein complex: implications for a polyvalent immuno-cell therapy. Blood 99, 3717–3724 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. 146

    Vangala, A. et al. Comparison of vesicle based antigen delivery systems for delivery of hepatitis B surface antigen. J. Control Release 119, 102–110 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. 147

    Frazer, I. H. et al. Phase 1 study of HPV16-specific immunotherapy with E6E7 fusion protein and ISCOMATRIX adjuvant in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Vaccine 23, 172–181 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. 148

    Maraskovsky, E. et al. NY-ESO-1 protein formulated in ISCOMATRIX adjuvant is a potent anticancer vaccine inducing both humoral and CD8+ T-cell-mediated immunity and protection against NY-ESO-1+ tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 2879–2890 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. 149

    Mitchell, J. E. et al. The presumptive phosphatidylserine receptor is dispensable for innate anti-inflammatory recognition and clearance of apoptotic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 5718–5725 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank A. Myc and A. Bielinska, University of Michigan, USA, for helpful discussions of dendrimer-based technologies.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas M. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.R.B.J. holds an ownership stake in NanoBio Corporation, USA, and is the inventor of technologies that the University of Michigan has licensed to NanoBio Corporation.

Related links

PowerPoint slides

Glossary

Nanometre

(nm). A unit of measurement equal to one billionth of a metre. It is the unit of measurement for many molecular structures that are relevant to immunology.

Nanoparticles

Small particles of non-biological origin typically with at least one dimension that is less than 100 to 1,000 nm; examples include diverse compounds such as dendrimers, carbon fullerenes, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanoemulsions and biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide).

Central memory T cells

Antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells that lack immediate effector functions but that are able to mediate rapid memory responses. They also rapidly develop the phenotype and the function of effector memory cells after re-stimulation with antigens. Central memory T cells retain the migratory properties of naive cells and therefore circulate through the secondary lymphoid organs.

ζ-potential

A measure of the magnitude of the electrostatic charge or potential (positive or negative) of any particle or nanoparticle, and it is typically expressed in millivolts.

Bifunctional peptide inhibitors

Molecules that are capable of binding both the major histocompatibility complex (the first signal) and a co-stimulatory receptor (the second signal) on an antigen-presenting cell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D., Simon, J. & Baker Jr, J. Applications of nanotechnology for immunology. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 592–605 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3488

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing