Comment | Published:

Combining drugs and extending treatment — a PFS end point is not sufficient

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology volume 14, pages 521522 (2017) | Download Citation

In studies investigating the combination of two or more anticancer drugs that are already approved for independent use, or 'maintenance' regimens, the use of progression-free survival as the end point for approval is inadequate; sequential treatment with the same agents or existing salvage therapies, respectively, might provide an equivalent survival benefit, with lower toxicity, cost, and treatment burden, therefore, the use of an overall survival end point is essential to justify such interventions.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & The strength of association between surrogate end points and survival in oncology: a systematic review of trial-level meta-analyses. JAMA Intern. Med. 175, 1389–1398 (2015).

  2. 2.

    & Progression-free survival: meaningful or simply measurable? J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 1030–1033 (2012).

  3. 3.

    & Five years of cancer drug approvals: innovation, efficacy, and costs. JAMA Oncol. 1, 539–540 (2015).

  4. 4.

    et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 23–34 (2015).

  5. 5.

    et al. Maintenance daily oral etoposide versus no further therapy following induction chemotherapy with etoposide plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group randomized study. Ann. Oncol. 13, 95–102 (2002).

  6. 6.

    Routine cancer antigen 125 surveillance — the fatal attraction of testing. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1412–1413 (2016).

  7. 7.

    et al. Brentuximab vedotin as consolidation therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma at risk of relapse or progression (AETHERA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 385, 1853–1862 (2015).

  8. 8.

    et al. Updated efficacy and safety data from the AETHERA trial of consolidation with brentuximab vedotin after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in Hodgkin lymphoma patients at high risk of relapse [abstract]. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 22, S36 (2016).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, SE1 9RT, UK.

    • Bishal Gyawali
  2. Division of Hematology Oncology in the Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University (OHSU).

    • Vinay Prasad
  3. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, OSHU.

    • Vinay Prasad
  4. Center for Health Care Ethics, OSHU, 3181 South West Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon 97239–3098, USA.

    • Vinay Prasad

Authors

  1. Search for Bishal Gyawali in:

  2. Search for Vinay Prasad in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinay Prasad.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information S1 (table)

    Selected studies of combination and maintenance therapies in oncology

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.72

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing