Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Gastrointestinal cancer

Rationale for metronomic chemotherapy in phase III trials

Investigational metronomic chemotherapy involves frequent, regularly spaced, long-term administration of a sub-maximum tolerated dose. The phase III CAIRO3 trial evaluated continuous metronomic oral capecitabine, with bevacizumab, as a maintenance treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer; a benefit in progression-free survival compared with observation only was observed, highlighting that metronomic chemotherapy could be a less toxic and convenient therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Browder, T. et al. Antiangiogenic scheduling of chemotherapy improves efficacy against experimental drug-resistant cancer. Cancer Res. 60, 1878–1886 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klement, G. et al. Continuous low-dose therapy with vinblastine and VEGF receptor-2 antibody induces sustained tumor regression without overt toxicity. J. Clin. Invest. 105, R15–R24 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasquier, E., Kavallaris, M. & André, N. Metronomic chemotherapy: new rationale for new directions. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 7, 455–465 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pietras, K. & Hanahan, D. A multitargeted, metronomic, and maximum-tolerated dose “chemo-switch” regimen is antiangiogenic, producing objective responses and survival benefit in a mouse model of cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 939–952 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Francia, G., Cruz-Munoz, W., Man, S., Xu, P. & Kerbel, R. S. Mouse models of advanced spontaneous metastasis for experimental therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 135–141 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Simkens, L. H. et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): A phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3 (2015).

  7. Hubbard, J. M. & Grothey, A. Colorectal cancer in 2014: Progress in defining first-line and maintenance therapies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 12, 73–74 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amiri-Kordestani, L. & Fojo, T. Why do phase III clinical trials in oncology fail so often? J. Natl Cancer Inst. 104, 568–569 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunningham, D. et al. Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 14, 1077–1085 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gligorov, J. et al. Maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone after initial first-line bevacizumab and docetaxel for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (IMELDA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1351–1360 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert S. Kerbel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.S.K. receives consulting fees/honoraria from Angiocrine Biosciences, Boehringer–Ingelheim, Cerulean Pharma, Eli-Lilly, Merrimack, MolMed, and Triphase Accelerator. R.S.K. also has stock options from Angiocrine Biosciences. The Mayo Clinic Foundation received research funding and honoraria for consulting activities by A.G. from Bayer, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Genentech, and Pfizer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kerbel, R., Grothey, A. Rationale for metronomic chemotherapy in phase III trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12, 313–314 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.89

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.89

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing