Chemotherapy options for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are limited. A recent phase III trial assessed the combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed but this regimen produced inferior survival results compared with the standard carboplatin and etoposide regimen. The combination of carboplatin and etoposide remains the standard first-line chemotherapy option for the treatment of patients with extensive-stage SCLC.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Targeting a non-oncogene addiction to the ATR/CHK1 axis for the treatment of small cell lung cancer
Scientific Reports Open Access 14 November 2017
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Socinski, M. A. et al. Randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed combined with either cisplatin or carboplatin in untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 4840–4847 (2006).
Socinski, M. A. et al. Phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with etoposide plus carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 4787–4792 (2009).
Jett, J. R. et al. Phase II trial of pemetrexed (P) and carboplatin (C) in previously untreated extensive stage disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): A NCCTG Study [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, a8066 (2008).
Gronberg, B. H. et al. A prospective phase II study: high-dose pemetrexed as second-line chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 63, 88–93 (2009).
Jalal, S. et al. Pemetrexed in second line and beyond small cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group phase II study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 4, 93–96 (2009).
Noda, K. et al. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 85–91 (2002).
Lara, P. N. Jr et al. Phase III trial of irinotecan/cisplatin compared with etoposide/cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: clinical and pharmacogenomic results from SWOG S0124. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 2530–2505 (2009).
Hanna, N. et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 2038–2043 (2006).
Inoue, A. et al. A phase II study of amrubicin combined with carboplatin for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0405. Ann. Oncol. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp384.
Inoue, A. et al. Randomized phase II trial comparing amrubicin with topotecan in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0402. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 5401–5406 (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Ramaswamy Govindan declares he is a consultant for Lilly Oncology. Janakiraman Subramanian declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Subramanian, J., Govindan, R. Continued lack of progress in SCLC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7, 77–78 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.223
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.223
This article is cited by
-
Targeting a non-oncogene addiction to the ATR/CHK1 axis for the treatment of small cell lung cancer
Scientific Reports (2017)