Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

Revascularization in 2017

Technical and diagnostic improvements in PCI: more pieces in the puzzle

The past year provided strong evidence on the use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio to determine the severity of coronary artery disease, the improving outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention, the increased risk of thrombosis with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, and the benefits of a simple revascularization strategy in cardiogenic shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: New pieces added to the puzzle of coronary revascularization.

References

  1. Davies, J. E. et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 1824–1834 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Götberg, M. et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 1813–1823 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Escaned, J. et al. Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study. Eur. Heart J. 38, 3124–3134 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Serruys, P. W. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 961–972 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis, S. G. et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1905–1915 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wykrzykowska, J. J. et al. Bioresorbable scaffolds versus metallic stents in routine PCI. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2319–2328 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiele, H. et al. PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2319–2328 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wald, D. S. et al. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1115–1123 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01471522 (2017).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Colombo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colombo, A., Mangieri, A. Technical and diagnostic improvements in PCI: more pieces in the puzzle. Nat Rev Cardiol 15, 80–82 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.205

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.205

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing