The optimum strategy to treat patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) has been under debate. New data show that revascularization guided by fractional flow measurements leads to better outcomes than revascularization guided by arteriography. We call for a paradigm shift in CAD care, with coronary flow measurements by PET as key to diagnosis and clinical decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Pijls, N. H. et al. for the FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 56, 177–184 (2010).
Tonino, P. A. et al. for the FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 213–224 (2009).
Boden, W. E. et al. for the COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 1503–1516 (2007).
Gould, K. L. Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy? JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2, 1009–1023 (2009).
White, C. W. et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N. Engl. J. Med. 310, 819–824 (1984).
Topol, E. J. & Nissen, S. E. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 92, 2333–2342 (1995).
Meijboom, W. B. et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52, 636–643 (2008).
Tonino, P. A. et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study: fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55, 2816–2821 (2010).
Lin, G. A., Dudley, R. A. & Redberg, R. F. Cardiologists' use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 167, 1604–1609 (2007).
Sdringola, S. et al. Combined intense lifestyle and pharmacologic lipid treatment further reduce coronary events and myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with usual-care cholesterol-lowering drugs in coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41, 263–272 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gould, K., Johnson, N. Percent stenosis in CAD—a flaw in current practice. Nat Rev Cardiol 7, 482–484 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.119
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.119
This article is cited by
-
Cardiac hybrid imaging
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2014)
