Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Risk factors

The obesity paradox—an artifact of small sample size?

Intentional weight loss is associated with many benefits, including reduced mortality and cardiometabolic and inflammatory risk, as well as improved quality of life. Unintentional weight loss, however, is often a harbinger of future ill-health. Separating these types of weight loss in clinical trials is sometimes difficult and in small trials can produce the 'obesity paradox'.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Strandberg, T. E. et al. Explaining the obesity paradox: cardiovascular risk, weight change, and mortality during long-term follow-up of men. Eur. Heart J. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryan, D. Risks and benefits of weight loss: challenges to obesity research. Eur. Heart J. 7 (Suppl. L), L27–L31 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sjöström, L. V. Mortality of severely obese subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 55 (2 Suppl.), 516S–523S (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calle, E. E., Thun, M. J., Petrelli, J. M., Rodriguez, C. & Heath, C. W. Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 1097–1105 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitlock, G. et al. for the Prospective Studies Collaboration. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900,000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet 373, 1083–1096 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pi-Sunyer, X. et al. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care 30, 1374–1383 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sjöström, L. et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 741–752 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hubert, H. B., Feinleib, M., McNamara, P. M. & Castelli, W. P. Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 67, 968–977 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Appel, L. J. et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 1117–1124 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sacks, F. M. et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 3–10 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George A. Bray.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bray, G. The obesity paradox—an artifact of small sample size?. Nat Rev Cardiol 6, 561–562 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2009.140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2009.140

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing