Comment | Published:

Data management and best practice for plant science

Nature Plants volume 3, Article number: 17086 (2017) | Download Citation

Subjects

Plant research produces data in a profusion of types and scales, and in ever-increasing volume. What are the challenges and opportunities presented by data management in contemporary plant science? And how can researchers make efficient and fruitful use of data management tools and strategies?

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Nature 537, 138 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World — a Vision for Europe (European Commission, 2016);

  3. 3.

    Open Access Policy (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 2016).

  4. 4.

    Open Data in a Big Data World (Science International, 2015);

  5. 5.

    Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study (Chicago Univ. Press, 2016).

  6. 6.

    Integrating Large Data into Plant Science: From Big Data to Discovery (GARNet/Egenis, 2016);

  7. 7.

    , & in Online Information Review (eds & ) Vol. 39, 664–681 (2015).

  8. 8.

    EU Open Science Agenda (European Commission, 2016).

  9. 9.

    in The Encyclopedia of Database Systems (eds , Ö) 1963–1965 (Springer, 2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Database (Oxford) 2016, baw018 (2016).

  11. 11.

  12. 12.

    & EMBO Rep. 11, 730–735 (2010).

  13. 13.

    et al. Plant Methods 12, 44 (2016).

  14. 14.

    et al. Front. Physiol. (2012).

  15. 15.

  16. 16.

    Breeding Management System (IBP);

  17. 17.

  18. 18.

  19. 19.

  20. 20.

    Big Data Platform (CGIAR);

  21. 21.

  22. 22.

  23. 23.

    Collaborative Open Plant Omics (Earlham Institute);

  24. 24.

  25. 25.

    Data Management Plans (DCC);

  26. 26.

    et al. Nat. Genet. 29, 365–371 (2001).

  27. 27.

    Minimal Information About a Microarray Experiment (FGED);

  28. 28.

    et al. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

  29. 29.

  30. 30.

  31. 31.

    Wheat Data Interoperability Recommendations (Wheat Data Interoperability WG);

  32. 32.

  33. 33.

  34. 34.

    et al. Nat. Genet. 44, 121–126, (2012).

  35. 35.

  36. 36.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology & Exeter Centre for the Study of the Life Sciences, Byrne House, Exeter University, Exeter EX4 4PJ, UK.

    • Sabina Leonelli
  2. School of Humanities, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.

    • Sabina Leonelli
  3. The Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UG, UK.

    • Robert P. Davey
  4. Bioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, 34397 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

    • Elizabeth Arnaud
  5. GARNet, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK.

    • Geraint Parry
    •  & Ruth Bastow
  6. Global Plant Council, 1a Bow Lane, London EC4M 9EE, UK.

    • Ruth Bastow

Authors

  1. Search for Sabina Leonelli in:

  2. Search for Robert P. Davey in:

  3. Search for Elizabeth Arnaud in:

  4. Search for Geraint Parry in:

  5. Search for Ruth Bastow in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabina Leonelli.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.86

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing