Science needs reason to be trusted

That we now live in the grip of post-factualism would seem naturally repellent to most physicists. But in championing theory without demanding empirical evidence, we're guilty of ignoring the facts ourselves.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Baker, M. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Khachatryan, V. et al. (CMS Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 051802 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Aaboud, A. et al. (ATLAS Collaboration) J. High Energ. Phys. 2016, 001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Backović, M. Preprint at (2016).

  5. 5

    Martin, J., Ringeval, C., Trotta, R. & Vennin, V. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014, 039 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Smaldino, P. E. & McElreath, R. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160384 (2016).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 672–695 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Hossenfelder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hossenfelder, S. Science needs reason to be trusted. Nature Phys 13, 316–317 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing