Letter | Published:

Phase separation and magnetic order in K-doped iron selenide superconductor

Nature Physics volume 8, pages 126130 (2012) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The newly discovered alkali-doped iron selenide superconductors1,2 not only reach a superconducting transition temperature as high as 32 K, but also exhibit unique characteristics that are absent from other iron-based superconductors, such as antiferromagnetically ordered insulating phases3,4, extremely high Néel transition temperatures5,6 and the presence of Fe vacancies and ordering7,8,9,10. These features have generated considerable excitement as well as confusion, regarding the delicate interplay between Fe vacancies, magnetism and superconductivity11,12,13. Here we report on molecular beam epitaxy growth of high-quality KxFe2−ySe2 thin films and in situ low-temperature scanning tunnelling microscope measurement of their atomic and electronic structures. We demonstrate that a KxFe2−ySe2 sample contains two distinct phases: an insulating phase with well-defined order of Fe vacancies, and a superconducting KFe2Se2 phase containing no Fe vacancies. An individual Fe vacancy can locally destroy superconductivity in a similar way to a magnetic impurity in conventional superconductors. Measurement of the magnetic-field dependence of the Fe-vacancy-induced bound states reveals a magnetically related bipartite order in the tetragonal iron lattice. These findings elucidate the existing controversies on this new superconductor and provide atomistic information on the interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in iron-based superconductors.

Main

Two central issues in studying quantum materials are the quality of samples and sensitivity of experimental probes. Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is one of the most powerful techniques for growth of thin films with precisely controlled composition and crystalline quality. The combination of MBE with a low-temperature scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) in the same ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) environment avoids the complexity due to various irregularities in materials and ambient contamination, and enables us to reveal the intrinsic properties14. Here we extend the unique capability of the combined system to study ternary iron selenide.

Our experiments were conducted in a Unisoku UHV low-temperature (down to 0.4 K) STM equipped with an MBE chamber for thin-film growth. Magnetic field up to 11 T can be applied perpendicular to the sample surface. We grew KxFe2−ySe2 on graphitized 6H-SiC(0001) substrate, which follows the island growth mode. The size of an island is typically 100 nm×100 nm. Two distinct regions (marked by I and II in Fig. 1b), coexisting side by side, are clearly revealed on each island, indicating that phase separation7,13 occurs.

Figure 1: MBE film and the superconducting phase of KxFe2−ySe2.
Figure 1

a, The crystal structure of KFe2Se2. The same conventions for atoms and Miller indices are used throughout. b, STM topographic image (bias voltage V =3.9 V, tunnelling current It=0.02 nA) of a KxFe2−ySe2 film. The grain size is usually larger than 50 nm×50 nm. Two distinct regions are labelled by I and II, respectively. c, Atomic-resolution STM topography of region I (5 nm×5 nm, V =0.15 V, It=0.03 nA). The K atoms are visible at positive bias. d, Atomic structure of (110) plane. K and Se atoms are in the topmost layer. Fe atoms are in the second layer. e, STM image of the same area as c, but at negative bias. V =−2 V, It=−0.03 nA. Se atoms (marked by black dots) are visible. The positions of K atoms are marked by white dots. f, Differential conductance spectrum in region I measured at 0.4 K (set point, V =14 mV, It=0.1 nA). g, Temperature dependence of differential tunnelling conductance of the superconducting phase. Set point, V =25 mV, It=0.16 nA. The curves are offset vertically for clarity. h,i, Uniformity of the superconducting gap. The spectra in i were measured along the white line in h. The size of the image in h is 20 nm×20 nm. Set point, V =14 mV, It=0.1 nA.

The STM image with atomic resolution (Fig. 1c) of region I exhibits a centred rectangular lattice structure. The periods along the two orthogonal directions are 5.5 and 14.1 Å, respectively, as shown in Fig. 1c. Comparison with X-ray diffraction data suggests that the orientation of the film is (110) (see Fig. 1d) instead of the natural cleavage plane (001). Thus the STM actually images the cross-section of the layered material. The (110) plane is terminated with K and Se atoms. The K atoms are visible at positive bias and form atomic rows (Fig. 1c), which are 7.05 Å apart and oriented along the direction. At negative bias, the Se atomic rows (indicated by black dots in Fig. 1e) appear and zigzag through the K atoms. These images are fully consistent with the atomic structure of the (110) surface (Fig. 1d). Furthermore, our STM observation shows that there are very few defects in region I. We therefore identify region I as the stoichiometric KFe2Se2.

Scanning tunnelling spectroscopy (STS) probes the quasiparticle density of states. In Fig. 1f, we show the STS at 0.4 K in region I. The spectrum exhibits a superconducting gap centred at the Fermi energy and two characteristic coherence peaks, indicating that the stoichiometric phase KFe2Se2 is a superconductor. As expected, the gap and coherence peaks gradually disappear at higher temperatures as shown in the temperature-dependent tunnelling spectra (Fig. 1g).

The STS reveals a double-gap structure. The larger gap Δ1=4 meV is half of the energy between the two pronounced coherence peaks. The smaller one, Δ21 meV, is estimated by the two shoulders near the Fermi energy in the spectra. The coherence peaks of the smaller gap are hardly distinguishable because of thermal broadening. A nearly isotropic gap has also been observed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES; refs  15, 16, 17, 18) on the electron-like Fermi surfaces near M and Γ points. However, the gap measured by ARPES is more than twice as large as Δ1. The discrepancy may be related to the averaging over different regions. The gap Δ2 is too small to be resolved by ARPES.

The finite-size effect on superconductivity is negligible because the typical size of region I, 20 nm thick (along the [110] direction in ab plane) and 50 nm wide (along the c and directions), is much larger than the superconducting coherence length of KFe2Se2. Here the anisotropic coherence lengths ξab2 nm and ξc0.5 nm can be estimated by the upper critical fields19,20 in the ab plane and along the c direction using Hc2ab=ϕ0/2πξabξc and Hc2c=ϕ0/2πξab2, respectively, where ϕ0 is the quantum of flux. On the other hand, the penetration depth21 of the material is much larger than the sample size. Under this circumstance, the magnetic field is essentially uniform in a sample. In contrast to our previous work on FeSe (ref. 14), vortex structure is not formed in KFe2Se2 owing to the large penetration depth when compared with the sample size. However, the effect of magnetic field on superconductivity in KFe2Se2 is still clearly manifested in STS. A magnetic field breaks the time-reversal symmetry and weakens the superconductivity, giving rise to a reduction in the height of the coherence peak in the density of states (see Supplementary Fig. S1).

Because of the good sample quality, the superconducting gap exhibits high spatial homogeneity, as shown in Fig. 1h,i. Previous studies of iron-based superconductors usually suffer from various imperfections in the materials22. It is therefore crucial to prepare high-quality samples. As mentioned above, we solved this problem by MBE growth under well-controlled conditions (see also ref. 14). Furthermore, surface contamination is avoided because our film growth and STM study were conducted in a single UHV system. More significantly, by growing films with a (110)-oriented crystallographic surface where both K and Se atoms are exposed, we have realized the cross-sectional tunnelling configuration. Such a configuration for unconventional superconductors has been highly desirable, but very challenging to achieve owing to the difficulty in preparing a suitable surface for STM studies23.

Now we turn to region II, which shows a periodic stripe pattern (Fig. 1b). The STS in Fig. 2a exhibits an energy gap up to 0.43 eV across the Fermi level, suggesting that this region is insulating. As well as the K atomic rows in the topmost layer, there is a superposed striped structure with a period of 14.0 Å in the STM image (Fig. 2b). The stripes are along the c axis and perpendicular to the K atomic rows. We attribute this superstructure to the pattern of Fe vacancies in the second atomic layer. They are visible in STM images because the electronic structure of the topmost layer is perturbed by the missing Fe–Se bonds. Neutron scattering5, transmission electron microscopy7 and X-ray diffraction8 measurements have all revealed a order formed by Fe vacancies. Such a blocked checkerboard pattern9 gives rise to a 5aFe14.0 Å periodicity in the (110) plane (Fig. 2c) and is consistent with the superstructure observed in our STM images. Here aFe is the in-plane distance between two neighbouring Fe atoms. The vacancy order leads to a composition of KxFe1.6Se2, where x is either 1 or 0.8. As illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S2, among every five consecutive bright spots along the K atomic row, the one in the middle seems different from the other four. The STM image alone cannot show if this difference is due to the missing of one K atom (x=0.8)or simply an electronic feature (x=1), thus leaving the value of x undetermined.

Figure 2: The insulating phase.
Figure 2

a, Differential conductance spectrum in region II (set point, V =1.1 V, It=0.26 nA). b, Atomic-resolution STM topography of region II (10 nm×10 nm, V =2.9 V, It=0.02 nA). c, The structure of the Fe vacancy pattern as seen from (001) and (110) planes, respectively. The positions of Fe vacancies are marked by crosses.

The above STM study, which combines the capabilities of imaging and spectroscopy together, has thus explicitly proved that KxFe2−ySe2 is composed of two different phases, that is, superconducting KFe2Se2 and insulating KxFe1.6Se2. The ordered pattern of Fe vacancies only exists in the insulating phase. As discussed below, our further experiment demonstrates that the superconducting phase has a hidden order related to Fe as well.

Defect-induced subgap states in superconductors, which can be detected by local probes such as STM/STS (refs 24, 25, 26), have often been used to uncover the nature of the superconducting state and magnetic interaction. To reveal the hidden order, we introduced defects (bright parallelograms in Fig. 3a) into the superconducting KFe2Se2 phase by annealing the sample at 450 °C for several hours. The atomically resolved STM images indicate that the topmost layer remains a perfect lattice without K or Se vacancies (Supplementary Fig. S3). The resulting defects are always located in the middle between two adjacent K atomic rows. We therefore attribute the parallelogram-shaped structures to single Fe vacancies in the second atomic layer (Fig. 3b). By examining the registration of Fe sites with respect to the Se lattice in the topmost layer, the Fe atoms in the (110) plane can be divided into two interpenetrating sublattices. The Fe vacancies on two different sublattices are labelled by A and B, respectively. The atomic structure, chemical environment and STM images of these two types of vacancy are mirror images of each other.

Figure 3: Fe-vacancy-induced bound states in the superconducting gap of KFe2Se2.
Figure 3

a,b, STM topography (12 nm×12 nm, V =30 mV, It=0.03 nA) and atomic structure of Fe vacancies. Two types of vacancy are labelled by A and B, respectively. c,d, dI/dV spectrum measured at 0.4 K (set point, V =15 mV, It=0.1 nA) and density-of-states map of the bound state on a single Fe vacancy (4 nm×4 nm, 2 mV). The tunnelling junction was set by 25 mV and 0.16 nA during mapping. The positions of the Fe vacancy, K atoms and Se atoms are marked by a cross, black dots and white dots, respectively. eg, Magnetic-field dependence of the bound-state energies.

An Fe vacancy carries spin and breaks superconducting pairing in the singlet channel through spin-flip scattering. The exchange interaction JS·Svac, where S and Svac are the spins of a quasiparticle and a vacancy, respectively, gives rise to the bound quasiparticle states. The STS on a vacancy (Fig. 3c) shows strongly suppressed coherence peaks and a pair of resonances inside the superconducting gap, that is, an electron-like bound state at 1.9 mV and a hole-like bound state at −1.9 mV. Although the energies of the electron-like and hole-like states are symmetric with respect to zero bias, their amplitudes are different as a result of on-site Coulomb interaction27. The spatial extent of a resonance peak as shown in the dI/dV mapping (Fig. 3d) is comparable to the coherence lengths in and [001] directions. A vacancy is considered to be isolated if no others exist within twice the coherence length. The spectra on all isolated vacancies are identical, indicating that type-A and -B vacancies have the same magnitude of magnetic moment and the same exchange interaction J. The spectrum itself does not provide direct information on the orientation of magnetic moment.

To reveal the spin orientations of the two types (A and B) of vacancy, we apply a magnetic field perpendicular to the sample surface to break the rotational symmetry. So far, the magnetic-field effect on defect-induced subgap resonance has not been observed. However, in KFe2Se2, the observation of such an effect becomes possible owing to the high upper critical field and large penetration depth. As clearly shown in Fig. 3e,f, the energy of the subgap resonance in KFe2Se2 exhibits a linear dependence on magnetic field B:E=E0+gμBB·S, where μB is the Bohr magneton and g the Landé factor. Fitting the data to a line (Fig. 3g) gives g=2.070±0.07, close to 2.0023 of a free electron. The most striking behaviour of the field effect is that the peaks on type-A and B vacancies shift in opposite directions with magnetic field. The opposite shifting suggests that the two types of vacancy have different spin orientations, implying a magnetically related bipartite order in the tetragonal Fe lattice. The bipartite spin structure is barely influenced by the applied magnetic field because of the relatively strong antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between neighbouring spins. Such bipartite structure may account for the large electron-like Fermi surface sheet with weak intensity near the Γ point in ARPES data17,18 through Brillouin-zone folding.

The interplay between magnetism and superconductivity is one of the most intriguing phenomena in high-critical-temperature (Tc) superconductors. The technique mentioned above can sensitively probe local magnetism in superconductors and may help to understand how superconductivity arises in high- Tc materials.

The role of Fe vacancies in the superconducting phase has been rather controversial in previous studies. For example, some experiments indicated that randomly distributed vacancies may help to stabilize the superconducting state13. To further elucidate the effect of Fe vacancies on superconductivity, we prepared samples with higher density of randomly distributed vacancies (see Fig. 4a) by UHV annealing. The STS in Fig. 4b shows that a sample with high density of vacancies eventually becomes a gapless superconductor. Therefore, the Fe vacancies are always destructive to superconductivity in KFe2Se2.

Figure 4: Suppression of superconductivity of KFe2Se2 by Fe vacancies.
Figure 4

a, STM topography (18 nm×18 nm, V =60 mV, It=0.02 nA) of an area with a high density of Fe vacancies. b, Superconducting gaps (set point, V =15 mV, It=0.1 nA) at various densities of vacancies. Black curve, no vacancies. Cyan curve, low density (0.05 nm−2) of vacancies. Red curve, high density (0.1 nm−2) of vacancies as shown in a.

Methods

The KxFe2−ySe2 sample was grown on a graphitized 6H-SiC(0001) substrate. High-purity Fe (99.995%), Se (99.9999%) and K were evaporated from two standard Knudsen cells and one alkali-metal dispenser (SAES Getters), respectively. The growth was carried out under Se-rich conditions with a nominal Se/Fe flux ratio of 20, which is known to lead to stoichiometric and superconductive FeSe (ref. 14). To intercalate K atoms in between FeSe layers (see the schematic crystal structure of KFe2Se2 in Fig. 1a), the substrate was held at 440 °C during growth and the sample was subsequently annealed at 470 °C for three hours. The K flux is relatively flexible, which determines the area ratio of the two different phases.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Superconductivity in the iron selenide KxFe2Se2 (0≤x≤1.0). Phys. Rev. B 82, 180520(R) (2010).

  2. 2.

    et al. Superconductivity at 32 K in single-crystalline RbxFe2−ySe2. Phys. Rev. B 83, 060512(R) (2011).

  3. 3.

    et al. Fe-based superconductivity with Tc=31 K bordering an antiferromagnetic insulator in (Tl,K)FexSe2. Europhys. Lett. 94, 27009 (2011).

  4. 4.

    et al. Infrared spectrum and its implications for the electronic structure of the semiconducting iron selenide K0.83Fe1.53Se2. Phys. Rev. B 83, 220507(R) (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. A novel large moment antiferromagnetic order in K0.8Fe1.6Se2 superconductor. Chin. Phys. Lett. 28, 086104 (2011).

  6. 6.

    et al. Iron-vacancy superstructure and possible room-temperature antiferromagnetic order in superconducting CsyFe2−xSe2. Phys. Rev. B 83, 144410 (2011).

  7. 7.

    et al. Microstructure and ordering of iron vacancies in the superconductor system KyFexSe2 as seen via transmission electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 83, 140505(R) (2011).

  8. 8.

    et al. Structure of vacancy-ordered single-crystalline superconducting potassium iron selenide. Phys. Rev. B 83, 132509 (2011).

  9. 9.

    , , & Ternary iron selenide K0.8Fe1.6Se2 is an antiferromagnetic semiconductor. Phys. Rev. B 83, 233205 (2011).

  10. 10.

    et al. Nanoscale phase separation in the iron chalcogenide superconductor K0.8Fe1.6Se2 as seen via scanning nanofocused X-ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. B 84, 060511(R) (2011).

  11. 11.

    et al. Coexistence of magnetism and superconductivity in the iron-based compound Cs0.8(FeSe0.98)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 117602 (2011).

  12. 12.

    et al. Vacancy tuned magnetic high- Tc superconductor KxFe2−x/2Se2. Preprint at (2011).

  13. 13.

    et al. Intrinsic percolative superconductivity in KxFe2−ySe2 single crystals. Europhys. Lett. 96, 37010 (2011).

  14. 14.

    et al. Direct observation of nodes and twofold symmetry in FeSe superconductor. Science 332, 1410–1413 (2011).

  15. 15.

    et al. Nodeless superconducting gap in AxFe2Se2(A=K,Cs) revealed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Nature Mater. 10, 273–277 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. Absence of a holelike Fermi surface for the iron-based K0.8Fe1.7Se2 superconductor revealed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 187001 (2011).

  17. 17.

    et al. Common Fermi-surface topology and nodeless superconducting gap of K0.68Fe1.79Se2 and (Tl0.45K0.34)Fe1.84Se2 superconductors revealed via angle-resolved photoemission. Phys. Rev. B 83, 140508(R) (2011).

  18. 18.

    et al. Strong nodeless pairing on separate electron Fermi surface sheets in (Tl,K)Fe1.78Se2 probed by ARPES. Europhys. Lett. 93, 57001 (2011).

  19. 19.

    et al. Anisotropic Hc2 of K0.8Fe1.76Se2 determined up to 60 T. Phys. Rev. B 83, 100514(R) (2011).

  20. 20.

    et al. Upper fields and critical current density of K0.58Fe1.56Se2 single crystals grown by one step technique. Preprint at (2011).

  21. 21.

    et al. 77Se NMR investigation of the KxFe2−ySe2 high- Tc superconductor (Tc=33 K). Phys. Rev. B 83, 104508 (2011).

  22. 22.

    The puzzle of high temperature superconductivity in layered iron pnictides and chalcogenides. Adv. Phys. 59, 803–1061 (2010).

  23. 23.

    et al. Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of high-temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 353–419 (2007).

  24. 24.

    et al. Probing the local effects of magnetic impurities on superconductivity. Science 275, 1767–1770 (1997).

  25. 25.

    et al. High-resolution scanning tunneling spectroscopy of magnetic impurity induced bound states in the superconducting gap of Pb thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 226801 (2008).

  26. 26.

    , & Impurity-induced states in conventional and unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 373–433 (2006).

  27. 27.

    , & Spectral properties of quasiparticle excitations induced by magnetic moments in superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 55, 12648–12661 (1997).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Y. G. Zhao for discussions. The work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation and Ministry of Science and Technology of China.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

    • Wei Li
    • , Hao Ding
    • , Peng Deng
    • , Kai Chang
    • , Canli Song
    • , Xi Chen
    •  & Qi-Kun Xue
  2. Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

    • Ke He
    • , Lili Wang
    •  & Xucun Ma
  3. Department of Physics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

    • Jiang-Ping Hu

Authors

  1. Search for Wei Li in:

  2. Search for Hao Ding in:

  3. Search for Peng Deng in:

  4. Search for Kai Chang in:

  5. Search for Canli Song in:

  6. Search for Ke He in:

  7. Search for Lili Wang in:

  8. Search for Xucun Ma in:

  9. Search for Jiang-Ping Hu in:

  10. Search for Xi Chen in:

  11. Search for Qi-Kun Xue in:

Contributions

W.L., H.D., P.D., K.C. and C.S. carried out the experiments; K.H., L.W., X.M. and J-P.H. analysed the data; X.C. and Q-K.X. designed and coordinated the experiments; X.C. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xi Chen or Qi-Kun Xue.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2155

Further reading