Fluid mixing controls many natural and industrial processes, including the spread of air pollution1, mass transfer and reactions in microfluidic devices2,3 and the detection of odours or other chemical signals4. Strongly nonlinear flows enhance mixing by chaotic advection5,6, stretching and folding7,8 fluid volumes. Though these processes have been studied in simple models9,10, stretching and folding are difficult to distinguish in real flows with complex spatiotemporal structure. Here we report measurements of these two distinct processes in a two-dimensional laboratory flow. We decouple stretching and folding using tools developed for analysing glassy solids11 and colloids12, breaking fluid deformation into a linear, affine component (primarily stretching) and a nonlinear, non-affine component (primarily folding). Short-time deformation is dominated by stretching, whereas folding occurs only after fluid elements are elongated. The relative strength of the two processes depends strongly on space and time; folding-dominated regions are initially isolated, but later grow to fill space.
Mixing is fundamentally a diffusion process: at the boundary of an impurity in a fluid, the concentration gradient is large and material flows until the gradient vanishes. Diffusion alone is inefficient for large-scale transport, such as is required in industrial mixers or observed in geophysical flow. Moving fluids, however, can greatly enhance mixing through chaotic advection5,6. As the fluid moves, the region containing the impurity is strongly deformed, the length of its boundary grows exponentially and diffusion becomes efficient. The key to understanding chaotic mixing, then, is the characterization of the deformation of fluid elements8. As first described by Reynolds7, this process is one of stretching, which increases the length of the interface, and folding, which constrains the fluid element to fill a finite region of space. These geometric processes are often studied in simple mathematical models such as the baker’s or horseshoe maps9,10. Such models, however, differ from actual fluid flow in that they are discrete, periodic and highly idealized. Although stretching and folding have been described qualitatively in real flows2,13,14, they have not been quantitatively distinguished spatially, temporally or dynamically in flows with complex spatiotemporal structure.
Deformation of a material volume consists of the relative motion, and potentially rearrangement, of infinitesimal fluid elements. These relative displacements can be broadly characterized as either affine—that is, some combination of rotation, shear, dilation or compression15—or non-affine. Affine deformation is linear, and can be represented by a matrix operator. Non-affine deformation is nonlinear, and generally consists of irreversible rearrangements of the constituent volume elements11. This distinction between affine and non-affine deformation has been used to study shear transformation zones and plasticity in metallic glasses11,16, flow in granular systems17 and glassy colloidal suspensions12. As stretching is affine and folding is non-affine, we can characterize the chaotic mixing process in a fluid using this same distinction.
We study the deformation of fluid elements in a nearly two-dimensional experimental fluid flow that is chaotic in both space and time. We drive flow in a thin layer of salt water (16% by mass NaCl), with a lateral area of 86×86 cm2 and a depth of 4 mm. A square lattice of magnets of alternating polarity lies below the fluid. When we run d.c. electric current (up to 1 A) through the salt water, Lorentz forces produce motion that lies almost entirely in the plane13,18,19,20,21. We measure the fluid motion by tracking22 51 μm polystyrene particles using a 4 megapixel digital camera at 60 frames per second. The particles are small enough to follow the flow accurately21 and lie at the interface between the salt water and a less dense pure water layer, eliminating surface-tension-driven interactions between the particles23. We image only the central 31×23 cm2 of the flow, so that boundary effects are negligible, and track up to 35,000 particles per frame. We reconstruct the full velocity field by projecting the measurements onto a basis of streamfunction eigenmodes24,25. As the velocity field is well resolved in space and time, we can construct the trajectories of arbitrarily located fluid elements by numerically integrating their equations of motion through the measured fields18,19,21. We define the Reynolds number Re=U L/ν on the basis of the root-mean-square velocity U, the magnet spacing L=2.54 cm and the kinematic viscosity ν=0.0124 cm2 s−1. Dimensional arguments give the characteristic forcing timescale as TL=L/U. At low Re, the flow is a vortex lattice; as Re increases past a critical value Rec∼75, the symmetries of the forcing are broken and the flow becomes chaotic in space and time20. A sample velocity field at Re=185 (well above the transition to chaos) with TL=2.8 s is shown in Fig. 1a.
To study deformation quantitatively, we need mathematical measures of the affine and non-affine deformation experienced by the fluid. Working in the Lagrangian framework, where the fluid is represented by a continuum of fluid elements, we parameterize material volumes by a central point x(0)(t) and a cluster of N neighbours x(n)(t) equally spaced on a circle of radius d0 around the central point, where n indexes the elements of the cluster. The relative positions of the neighbours are given by d(n)(t)=x(n)(t)−x(0)(t), where |d(n)(t)|=d0. After a time τd, which we call the deformation time, the vectors describing the new shape of the cluster are d(n)(t+τd). By fitting the deformation of the cluster to a linear (affine) model, we extract both the affine and non-affine parts of the deformation separately. More precisely, we compute the non-affine (folding) deformation of the cluster as
where all sums are explicit, ND=2 is the space dimension, δi j is the Kronecker delta and αi j is the best-fit (in a least-squares sense) affine deformation matrix11. D2, the residual of this fit, is large when the linear model is poor, that is, when the deformation is far from affine. We can then express the total affine (stretching) component of the deformation as
where αi j is the same matrix that minimized D2. Both A2 and D2 are non-dimensional. In our experiments, we used N=12 and d0=1.4 mm (≈L/18, the typical distance between particles); the variation of our results with these two parameters is shown in Supplementary Figs S1 and S2. We note that, even though pure rotations are also affine, we have defined A2 so that it measures primarily stretching in our flow.
By computing A2 and D2 at many x(0)(t), we construct spatially resolved deformation fields, as shown in Fig. 1 for both positive and negative τd; that is, for the deformation that the fluid will experience (positive τd) and the deformation that it has experienced (negative τd). Both the affine and non-affine deformation vary strongly in space, suggesting that stretching and folding are highly non-uniform. Similar spatial variability has been demonstrated for flow nonlinearity26. Though these two deformation fields look similar, we show below that their behaviour as a function of τd is quite different. Both fields resemble the stretching fields that have recently been used to identify so-called Lagrangian coherent structures 18,27,28, which are deeply connected to mixing29. This result is unsurprising for the affine deformation, given that the stretching field is also a linearization of the total deformation, constructed by ignoring high-order spatial derivatives. It is intriguing, however, that the structure of the non-affine field is so similar. In particular, we note that the non-affine field, which shows regions where the evolution of the flow is highly nonlinear, is large only in a small subset of the total flow, even though the Reynolds number is both much larger than unity and larger than the critical value at which the flow becomes spatiotemporally chaotic (Re/Rec∼2.5). This result suggests that the Reynolds number alone is a poor measure of mixing efficiency.
The distinction between our deformation fields and Lagrangian coherent structures becomes clear by studying the behaviour of the deformation as a function of τd. Here, we focus only on positive τd; our results for negative τd are similar (as shown in Supplementary Fig. S3). By increasing τd we can watch individual clusters deform over time; one such progression (chosen at random from our data set; other examples are shown in Supplementary Fig. S4) is shown in Fig. 2. This example suggests that deformation is a two-stage process: short-time deformation is dominated by stretching, whereas folding occurs at longer times. This hypothesis is borne out by measurements of 〈A2〉 and 〈D2〉 as a function of τd, where 〈·〉 denotes an average over both space and t. As shown in Fig. 2g, 〈A2〉 far exceeds 〈D2〉 at early times, but 〈D2〉 increases suddenly at τd∼TL and dominates 〈A2〉 at later times. We also measured the mean Lagrangian coherent structure stretching field from our data; as shown in Supplementary Fig. S5, its average closely resembles 〈A2〉 but is very different from 〈D2〉. The full probability density functions of A2 and D2, shown in Fig. 2b–e, tell a similar story. Although the distributions of A2 and D2 both become broader as τd increases, the tail of the D2 distribution grows quickly for τd>TL, and its width soon exceeds that of the A2 distribution. The rapid change in the growth of the non-affine deformation at τd∼TL coincides with the time when A2∼1, corresponding to the doubling of the cluster’s aspect ratio. This observation supports our hypothesis of a two-stage deformation process: a spherical volume cannot be folded without first being stretched. Although we show data from only one Re in Fig. 2, our results are similar for all other Re measured (as shown in Supplementary Fig. S6).
Although the averages of A2 and D2 in Fig. 2g suggest that the relative importance of folding increases rapidly once τd∼TL, the heavy tails in the probability density functions imply that stretching and folding have significant spatial variability. In Fig. 3, we show the spatially resolved ratio of D2 to A2. This ratio is highly heterogeneous in space, varying by many orders of magnitude over very short length scales. Before τd∼TL, stretching exceeds folding nearly everywhere. Later, however, folding begins to dominate in isolated, line-like regions. These regions often lie close to the invariant manifolds of the hyperbolic critical points in the flow, as would be expected from a lobe-dynamics analysis30. To study the regions where D2>A2 in more detail, in Fig. 4a we plot the fraction of our measurement area where D2>A2 as a function of τd. Consistent with our earlier observations, stretching exceeds folding everywhere when the deformation time is short (τd≪TL), but folding dominates nearly everywhere at later times (τd≫TL). A progression of snapshots in Fig. 4b–e reveals the growth of the regions where D2>A2 as τd increases, which proceeds quickly in the range 2TL<τd<4TL. These regions are point-like at small τd, when the flow dynamics are well characterized by linearized equations. As τd increases, however, these regions become line-like and finally space filling (with fractal dimension two): eventually, the entire flow undergoes strong nonlinear deformation.
Our experiments provide new insights in the details of fluid mixing. By explicitly considering the non-affine part of the fluid deformation, we can move past the linearized models commonly used to study this complex problem toward a fully nonlinear description. We have shown that stretching and folding operate on different timescales and that their relative strength depends strongly on space and time; similar effects are likely to be present in other situations described by stretching and folding, such as the evolution of magnetic field lines (and therefore magnetic energy density) in liquid metals and plasmas. Finally, we have shown that tools developed for studying glassy solids can be used to gain a deeper understanding of a fluid system, a result that suggests that further exchange of techniques between these communities may be fruitful.
Jaeglé, L. Pumping up surface air. Science 315, 772–773 (2007).
Stroock, A. D. et al. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295, 647–651 (2002).
Stone, H. A., Stroock, A. D. & Ajdari, A. Engineering flows in small devices: Microfluidics towards a lab-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 381–411 (2004).
Vergassola, M., Villermaux, E. & Shraiman, B. I. ‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients. Nature 445, 406–409 (2007).
Aref, H. Stirring by chaotic advection. J. Fluid Mech. 143, 1–21 (1984).
Shraiman, B. I. & Siggia, E. D. Scalar turbulence. Nature 405, 639–646 (2000).
Reynolds, O. Study of fluid motion by means of coloured bands. Nature 50, 161–164 (1894).
Ottino, J. M. The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989).
Ott, E. Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).
Wiggins, S. Chaotic Transport in Dynamical Systems (Springer, 2010).
Falk, M. L. & Langer, J. S. Dynamics of viscoplastic deformation in amorphous solids. Phys. Rev. E 57, 7192–7205 (1998).
Schall, P., Weitz, D. A. & Spaepen, F. Structural rearrangements that govern flow in colloidal glasses. Science 318, 1895–1899 (2007).
Rothstein, D., Henry, E. & Gollub, J. P. Persistent patterns in transient chaotic fluid mixing. Nature 401, 770–772 (1999).
Boyland, P. L., Aref, H. & Stremler, M. A. Topological fluid mechanics of stirring. J. Fluid Mech. 403, 277–304 (2000).
Rogers, D. F. & Adams, J. A. Mathematical Elements for Computer Graphics (McGraw-Hill, 1990).
Schuh, C. A. & Lund, A. C. Atomistic basis for the plastic yield criterion of metallic glass. Nature Mater. 2, 449–452 (2003).
Lemaître, A. Rearrangements and dilatancy for sheared dense materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 195503 (2002).
Voth, G. A., Haller, G. & Gollub, J. P. Experimental measurements of stretching fields in fluid mixing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 254501 (2002).
Rivera, M. K. & Ecke, R. E. Pair dispersion and doubling time statistics in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 194503 (2005).
Ouellette, N. T. & Gollub, J. P. Curvature fields, topology, and the dynamics of spatiotemporal chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 194502 (2007).
Ouellette, N. T., O’Malley, P. J. J. & Gollub, J. P. Transport of finite-sized particles in chaotic flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 174504 (2008).
Ouellette, N. T., Xu, H. & Bodenschatz, E. A quantitative study of three-dimensional Lagrangian particle tracking algorithms. Exp. Fluids 40, 301–313 (2006).
Vella, D. & Mahadevan, L. The Cheerios effect. Am. J. Phys. 73, 817–825 (2005).
Lekien, F., Coulliette, C., Bank, R. & Marsden, J. Open-boundary modal analysis: Interpolation, extrapolation, and filtering. J. Geophys. Res. 109, C12004 (2004).
Kelley, D. H. & Ouellette, N. T. Direct multi-scale reconstruction of velocity fields from measurements of particle tracks. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4687 (2010).
Egolf, D. A., Melnikov, I. V., Pesch, W. & Ecke, R. E. Mechanisms of extensive spatiotemporal chaos in Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Nature 404, 733–736 (2000).
Haller, G. & Yuan, G. Lagrangian coherent structures and mixing in two-dimensional turbulence. Physica D 147, 352–370 (2000).
Mathur, M., Haller, G., Peacock, T., Ruppert-Felsot, J. E. & Swinney, H. L. Uncovering the Lagrangian skeleton of turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 144502 (2007).
Shadden, S. C., Lekien, F. & Marsden, J. E. Definition and properties of Lagrangian coherent structures from finite-time Lyapunov exponents in two-dimensional aperiodic flows. Physica D 212, 271–304 (2005).
Malhotra, N. & Wiggins, S. Geometric structures, lobe dynamics, and Lagrangian transport in flows with aperiodic time-dependence, with applications to Rossby wave flow. J. Nonlinear Sci. 8, 401–456 (1998).
This work was supported in part by the facilities and staff of the Yale University Faculty of Arts and Sciences High Performance Computing Center. We acknowledge financial support from the US National Science Foundation under grant No DMR-0906245.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelley, D., Ouellette, N. Separating stretching from folding in fluid mixing. Nature Phys 7, 477–480 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1941
This article is cited by
Helical Flow and Transient Solute Dilution in Porous Media
Transport in Porous Media (2016)
Braid Entropy of Two-Dimensional Turbulence
Scientific Reports (2015)
A flexible layout design method for passive micromixers
Biomedical Microdevices (2012)