Letter | Published:

Extraction of a single photon from an optical pulse

Nature Photonics volume 10, pages 1922 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Removing a single photon from a pulse is one of the most elementary operations that can be performed on light, having both fundamental significance1,2 and practical applications in quantum communication3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and computation10. So far, photon subtraction, in which the removed photon is detected and therefore irreversibly lost, has been implemented in a probabilistic manner with inherently low success rates using low-reflectivity beam splitters1. Here we demonstrate a scheme for the deterministic extraction of a single photon from an incoming pulse. The removed photon is diverted to a different mode, enabling its use for other purposes, such as a photon number-splitting attack on quantum key distribution protocols11. Our implementation makes use of single-photon Raman interaction (SPRINT)12,13 with a single atom near a nanofibre-coupled microresonator. The single-photon extraction probability in our current realization is limited mostly by linear loss, yet probabilities close to unity should be attainable with realistic experimental parameters13.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from $8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Probing quantum commutation rules by addition and subtraction of single photons to/from a light field. Science 317, 1890–1893 (2007).

  2. 2.

    & Subtracting photons from arbitrary light fields: experimental test of coherent state invariance by single-photon annihilation. New J. Phys. 10, 123006 (2008).

  3. 3.

    & Nongaussian statistics from individual pulses of squeezed light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 153601 (2004).

  4. 4.

    & Generating optical Schrödinger kittens for quantum information processing. Science 312, 83–86 (2006).

  5. 5.

    & Generation of a superposition of odd photon number states for quantum information networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 083604 (2006).

  6. 6.

    & Increasing entanglement between gaussian states by coherent photon subtraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 030502 (2007).

  7. 7.

    & Preparation of non-local superpositions of quasi-classical light states. Nature Phys. 5, 189–192 (2009).

  8. 8.

    et al. Entanglement distillation from gaussian input states. Nature Photon. 4, 178–181 (2010).

  9. 9.

    & Improvement on teleportation of continuous variables by photon subtraction via conditional measurement. Phys Rev. A 61, 032302 (2000).

  10. 10.

    et al. Schrödinger cats and their power for quantum information processing. J. Opt. B 6, S828 (2004).

  11. 11.

    & Limitations on practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1330–1333 (2000).

  12. 12.

    et al. All-optical routing of single photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon. Science 345, 903–906 (2014).

  13. 13.

    & Analysis of photonic quantum nodes based on single-photon Raman interaction. Preprint at (2014).

  14. 14.

    & Conditional generation of arbitrary single-mode quantum states of light by repeated photon subtractions. Phys. Rev. A 72, 033822 (2005).

  15. 15.

    & Artificial atoms can do more than atoms: Deterministic single photon subtraction from arbitrary light fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 093601 (2011).

  16. 16.

    & Removal of a single photon by adaptive absorption. Phys. Rev. A 64, 043814 (2001).

  17. 17.

    & Photon routing in cavity QED: beyond the fundamental limit of photon blockade. Phys. Rev. A 84, 033854 (2011).

  18. 18.

    & Photon subtraction and addition by a three-level atom in an optical cavity. Phys. Rev. A 88, 033832 (2013).

  19. 19.

    & Nondemolition measurement of the vacuum state or its complement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 210504 (2013).

  20. 20.

    & Single photon absorption by a single quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093603 (2008).

  21. 21.

    & Heralded quantum memory for single-photon polarization qubits. Europhys. Lett. 86, 3006 (2009).

  22. 22.

    & Deterministic photon-photon √SWAP gate using a Λ system. Phys. Rev. A 82, 010301 (2010).

  23. 23.

    & Dissipative many-body quantum optics in Rydberg media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153601 (2013).

  24. 24.

    & Quantum cryptography: Public-key distribution and coin tossing. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing 175–179 (1984).

  25. 25.

    & Photonic phase gate via an exchange of fermionic spin waves in a spin chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 060502 (2010).

  26. 26.

    & Single-photon diode by exploiting the photon polarization in a waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 173902 (2011).

  27. 27.

    & Strong coupling between single atoms and nontransversal photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213604 (2013).

  28. 28.

    & Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit interaction of light. Science 346, 67–71 (2014).

  29. 29.

    et al. Microwave down-conversion with an impedance-matched Λ-system in driven circuit QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 063604 (2014).

  30. 30.

    & Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons. Preprint at (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support from the Israeli Science Foundation, the Joseph and Celia Reskin Career Development Chair in Physics, and the Crown Photonics Center is acknowledged. This research was made possible in part by the historic generosity of the Harold Perlman family.

Author information

Author notes

    • Serge Rosenblum
    •  & Orel Bechler

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. AMOS and Department of Chemical Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.

    • Serge Rosenblum
    • , Orel Bechler
    • , Itay Shomroni
    • , Yulia Lovsky
    • , Gabriel Guendelman
    •  & Barak Dayan

Authors

  1. Search for Serge Rosenblum in:

  2. Search for Orel Bechler in:

  3. Search for Itay Shomroni in:

  4. Search for Yulia Lovsky in:

  5. Search for Gabriel Guendelman in:

  6. Search for Barak Dayan in:

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design, construction and carrying out of the experiment, discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. S.R., O.B. and I.S. analysed the data and performed the simulations. S.R., O.B. and B.D. wrote the manuscript. S.R. and O.B. contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barak Dayan.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.227