Optical two-way time and frequency transfer over free space

Article metrics

Abstract

The transfer of high-quality time–frequency signals between remote locations underpins many applications, including precision navigation and timing, clock-based geodesy, long-baseline interferometry, coherent radar arrays, tests of general relativity and fundamental constants, and future redefinition of the second1,2,3,4,5,6,7. However, present microwave-based time–frequency transfer8,9,10 is inadequate for state-of-the-art optical clocks and oscillators1,11,12,13,14,15,16 that have femtosecond-level timing jitter and accuracies below 1 × 10−17. Commensurate optically based transfer methods are therefore needed. Here we demonstrate optical time–frequency transfer over free space via two-way exchange between coherent frequency combs, each phase-locked to the local optical oscillator. We achieve 1 fs timing deviation, residual instability below 1 × 10−18 at 1,000 s and systematic offsets below 4 × 10−19, despite frequent signal fading due to atmospheric turbulence or obstructions across the 2 km link. This free-space transfer can enable terrestrial links to support clock-based geodesy. Combined with satellite-based optical communications, it provides a path towards global-scale geodesy, high-accuracy time–frequency distribution and satellite-based relativity experiments.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Optical two-way time–frequency transfer.
Figure 2: Example data.
Figure 3: Power spectral densities.
Figure 4: Precision (residual Allan deviation) and offset of the optical TWTFT, evaluated over multiple data sets covering 24 h of acquisition.

References

  1. 1

    Chou, C. W., Hume, D. B., Rosenband, T. & Wineland, D. J. Optical clocks and relativity. Science 329, 1630–1633 (2010).

  2. 2

    Bondarescu, R. et al. Geophysical applicability of atomic clocks: direct continental geoid mapping. Geophys. J. Int. 191, 78–82 (2012).

  3. 3

    Müller, J., Soffel, M. & Klioner, S. Geodesy and relativity. J. Geod. 82, 133–145 (2008).

  4. 4

    Schiller, S. et al. Einstein gravity explorer—a medium-class fundamental physics mission. Exp. Astron. 23, 573–610 (2009).

  5. 5

    Wolf, P. et al. Quantum physics exploring gravity in the outer solar system: the SAGAS project. Exp. Astron. 23, 651–687 (2009).

  6. 6

    Uzan, J. The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 403–455 (2003).

  7. 7

    Gill, P. When should we change the definition of the second? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 4109–4130 (2011).

  8. 8

    Bauch, A. et al. Comparison between frequency standards in Europe and the USA at the 10−15 uncertainty level. Metrologia 43, 109–120 (2006).

  9. 9

    Samain, E. et al. The T2L2 ground experiment time transfer in the picosecond range over a few kilometres. Proceedings of the 20th European Frequency and Time Forum 538–544 (2006).

  10. 10

    Cacciapuoti, L. & Salomon, C. Space clocks and fundamental tests: the ACES experiment. Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 172, 57–68 (2009).

  11. 11

    Chou, C. W., Hume, D. B., Koelemeij, J. C. J., Wineland, D. J. & Rosenband, T. Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al+ optical clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070802 (2010).

  12. 12

    Katori, H. Optical lattice clocks and quantum metrology. Nature Photon. 5, 203–210 (2011).

  13. 13

    Ludlow, A. D. et al. Sr lattice clock at 1 × 10−16 fractional uncertainty by remote optical evaluation with a Ca clock. Science 319, 1805–1808 (2008).

  14. 14

    Fortier, T. M. et al. Generation of ultrastable microwaves via optical frequency division. Nature Photon. 5, 425–429 (2011).

  15. 15

    Jiang, Y. Y. et al. Making optical atomic clocks more stable with 10−16-level laser stabilization. Nature Photon. 5, 158–161 (2011).

  16. 16

    Yamaguchi, A. et al. Direct comparison of distant optical lattice clocks at the 10−16 uncertainty. Appl. Phys. Express 4, 082203 (2011).

  17. 17

    Predehl, K. et al. A 920-kilometer optical fiber link for frequency metrology at the 19th decimal place. Science 336, 441–444 (2012).

  18. 18

    Lopez, O. et al. Simultaneous remote transfer of accurate timing and optical frequency over a public fiber network. Appl. Phys. B 110, 3–6 (2013).

  19. 19

    Sprenger, B., Zhang, J., Lu, Z. H. & Wang, L. J. Atmospheric transfer of optical and radio frequency clock signals. Opt. Lett. 34, 965–967 (2009).

  20. 20

    Djerroud, K. et al. Coherent optical link through the turbulent atmosphere. Opt. Lett. 35, 1479–1481 (2010).

  21. 21

    Andrews, L. C. & Phillips, R. L. Laser Beam Propagation through Random Media (SPIE Press, 1998).

  22. 22

    Coddington, I., Swann, W. C., Nenadovic, L. & Newbury, N. R. Rapid and precise absolute distance measurements at long range. Nature Photon. 3, 351–356 (2009).

  23. 23

    Kim, J., Cox, J. A., Chen, J. & Kärtner, F. X. Drift-free femtosecond timing synchronization of remote optical and microwave sources. Nature Photon. 2, 733–736 (2008).

  24. 24

    Lee, J., Kim, Y. J., Lee, K., Lee, S. & Kim, S. W. Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses. Nature Photon. 4, 716–720 (2010).

  25. 25

    Shapiro, J. H. Reciprocity of the turbulent atmosphere. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 492–495 (1971).

  26. 26

    Parenti, R. R., Michael, S., Roth, J. M. & Yarnall, T. M. Comparisons of Cn2 measurements and power-in-fiber data from two long-path free-space optical communication experiments. Proc. SPIE 7814, 78140Z (2010).

  27. 27

    Marra, G. et al. High-resolution microwave frequency transfer over an 86-km-long optical fiber network using a mode-locked laser. Opt. Lett. 36, 511–513 (2011).

  28. 28

    Roy, J., Deschênes, J-D., Potvin, S. & Genest, J. Continuous real-time correction and averaging for frequency comb interferometry. Opt. Express 20, 21932–21939 (2012).

  29. 29

    Giorgetta, F. R. et al. in CLEO: Applications and Technology CTh5D.10 (Optical Society of America, 2012).

  30. 30

    Conan, J., Rousset, G. & Madec, P-Y. Wave-front temporal spectra in high-resolution imaging through turbulence. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 1559–1570 (1995).

  31. 31

    Koishi, Y. et al. in International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) 88–92 (IEEE, 2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) QuASAR program and by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with S. Diddams, J.-D. Deschênes, S. Kaushik, S. Michael, R. Parenti, T. Parker, F. Quinlan and T. Rosenband, and assistance from E. Williams and A. Zolot.

Author information

W.C.S., L.C.S., I.C., E.B., F.R.G. and N.R.N. set up and operated the measurement system. F.R.G. and N.R.N. analysed the TWTF data. L.C.S. and N.R.N. analysed the turbulence data. N.R.N., F.R.G., L.C.S., W.C.S., E.B. and I.C. prepared the manuscript.

Correspondence to Fabrizio R. Giorgetta or Nathan R. Newbury.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 1253 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giorgetta, F., Swann, W., Sinclair, L. et al. Optical two-way time and frequency transfer over free space. Nature Photon 7, 434–438 (2013) doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.69

Download citation

Further reading