Letter | Published:

Enhanced tunnelling electroresistance effect due to a ferroelectrically induced phase transition at a magnetic complex oxide interface

Nature Materials volume 12, pages 397402 (2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

The range of recently discovered phenomena in complex oxide heterostructures, made possible owing to advances in fabrication techniques, promise new functionalities and device concepts1,2,3. One issue that has received attention is the bistable electrical modulation of conductivity in ferroelectric tunnel junctions4,5,6 (FTJs) in response to a ferroelectric polarization of the tunnelling barrier, a phenomenon known as the tunnelling electroresistance (TER) effect7,8,9,10. Ferroelectric tunnel junctions with ferromagnetic electrodes allow ferroelectric control of the tunnelling spin polarization through the magnetoelectric coupling at the ferromagnet/ferroelectric interface11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Here we demonstrate a significant enhancement of TER due to a ferroelectrically induced phase transition at a magnetic complex oxide interface. Ferroelectric tunnel junctions consisting of BaTiO3 tunnelling barriers and La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 electrodes exhibit a TER enhanced by up to ~ 10,000% by a nanometre-thick La0.5Ca0.5MnO3 interlayer inserted at one of the interfaces. The observed phenomenon originates from the metal-to-insulator phase transition in La0.5Ca0.5MnO3, driven by the modulation of carrier density through ferroelectric polarization switching. Electrical, ferroelectric and magnetoresistive measurements combined with first-principles calculations provide evidence for a magnetoelectric origin of the enhanced TER, and indicate the presence of defect-mediated conduction in the FTJs. The effect is robust and may serve as a viable route for electronic and spintronic applications.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Oxide interfaces—An opportunity for electronics. Science 327, 1607–1611 (2010).

  2. 2.

    , , , & Interface physics in complex oxide heterostructures. Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 141–165 (2011).

  3. 3.

    et al. Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. Nature Mater. 11, 103–113 (2012).

  4. 4.

    , , & Giant electroresistance in ferroelectric tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 246802 (2005).

  5. 5.

    , , & Theoretical current–voltage characteristics of ferroelectric tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B 72, 125341 (2005).

  6. 6.

    & Tunneling across a ferroelectric. Science 313, 181–183 (2006).

  7. 7.

    et al. Giant tunnel electroresistance for non-destructive readout of ferroelectric states. Nature 460, 81–84 (2009).

  8. 8.

    et al. Tunneling electroresistance effect in ferroelectric tunnel junctions at the nanoscale. Nano Lett. 9, 3539–3543 (2009).

  9. 9.

    et al. Polarization control of electron tunneling into ferroelectric surfaces. Science 324, 1421–1425 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Solid-state memories based on ferroelectric tunnel junctions. Nature Nanotech. 7, 101–104 (2012).

  11. 11.

    , , & Ferroelectric switch for spin injection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 222114 (2005).

  12. 12.

    et al. Magnetic tunnel junctions with ferroelectric barriers: prediction of four resistance states from first principles. Nano Lett. 9, 427–432 (2009).

  13. 13.

    et al. Ferroelectric control of spin polarization. Science 327, 1106–1110 (2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. Crossing an interface: Ferroelectric control of tunnel currents in magnetic complex oxide heterostructures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 2436–2441 (2010).

  15. 15.

    et al. Coexistence of tunneling magnetoresistance and electroresistance at room temperature in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/(Ba,Sr)TiO3/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 multiferroic tunnel junctions. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 07D915 (2011).

  16. 16.

    , , & Reversible electrical switching of spin polarization in multiferroic tunnel junctions. Nature Mater. 11, 289–293 (2012).

  17. 17.

    et al. Multiferroic tunnel junctions. Front. Phys. 7, 380–385 (2012).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Ferroelectric and multiferroic tunnel junctions. Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. 37, 138–143 (2012).

  19. 19.

    , & Polar switch. IBM Tech. Discl. Bull. 13, 2161 (1971).

  20. 20.

    et al. Tunnel junctions with multiferroic barriers. Nature Mater. 6, 296–302 (2007).

  21. 21.

    , & Predicted magnetoelectric effect in Fe/BaTiO3 multilayers: Ferroelectric control of magnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 047201 (2006).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Magnetoelectric effect at the SrRuO3/BaTiO3 (001) interface: An ab initio study. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 052501 (2009).

  23. 23.

    et al. Interface-induced room-temperature multiferroicity in BaTiO3. Nature Mater. 10, 753–758 (2011).

  24. 24.

    , & Colossal magnetoresistant materials: The key role of phase separation. Phys. Rep. 344, 1–153 (2001).

  25. 25.

    & Prediction of electrically induced magnetic reconstruction at the manganite/ferroelectric interface. Phys. Rev. B 80, 174406 (2009).

  26. 26.

    et al. Magnetoelectric effects in complex oxides with competing ground states. Adv. Mater. 21, 3470–3474 (2009).

  27. 27.

    et al. Origin of the magnetoelectric coupling effect in Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3/La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 multiferroic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 127202 (2010).

  28. 28.

    & Giant tunneling electroresistance effect driven by an electrically controlled spin valve at a complex oxide interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 157203 (2011).

  29. 29.

    et al. Atomically resolved mapping of polarization and electric fields across ferroelectric/oxide interfaces by Z-contrast imaging. Adv. Mater. 23, 2474–2479 (2011).

  30. 30.

    , , & Low temperature magnetoresistance and the magnetic phase diagram of La1−xCaxMnO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3336 (1995).

  31. 31.

    & Inelastic tunneling through thin amorphous films. Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 1276–1282 (1988).

  32. 32.

    et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work at Pennsylvania State University (PSU) was supported in part by the DOE (Grant No. DE-FG02-08ER4653) and the NSF (Grant No. DMR-1207474). The PSU NSF MRSEC seed grant and NNIN Nanofabrication facilities are acknowledged. The work at USTC was supported by NBRP-2012CB922003 and NSFC. The work at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) was supported by NSF MRSEC (Grant No. DMR-0820521) and NSF EPSCoR (Grant No. EPS-1010674). Computations were performed at the UNL Holland Computing Center. The work at ORNL was supported by the Materials Science and Engineering Division of the US DOE.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

    • Y. W. Yin
    •  & Qi Li
  2. Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

    • Y. W. Yin
    •  & X. G. Li
  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy and Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0299, USA

    • J. D. Burton
    • , A. Gruverman
    •  & E. Y. Tsymbal
  4. Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee 37831, USA

    • Y-M. Kim
    • , A. Y. Borisevich
    •  & S. J. Pennycook
  5. Korea Basic Science Institute, Daejeon 305-806, Korea

    • Y-M. Kim
  6. IBS-Center for Functional Interfaces of Correlated Electron Systems, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea

    • S. M. Yang
    •  & T. W. Noh

Authors

  1. Search for Y. W. Yin in:

  2. Search for J. D. Burton in:

  3. Search for Y-M. Kim in:

  4. Search for A. Y. Borisevich in:

  5. Search for S. J. Pennycook in:

  6. Search for S. M. Yang in:

  7. Search for T. W. Noh in:

  8. Search for A. Gruverman in:

  9. Search for X. G. Li in:

  10. Search for E. Y. Tsymbal in:

  11. Search for Qi Li in:

Contributions

E.Y.T. and J.D.B. predicted the magnetoelectrically induced TER effect and stimulated the experimental studies. Q.L. designed and supervised the experiment. Y.W.Y. fabricated samples and performed transport measurements. Q.L., Y.W.Y. and X.G.L. analysed the data. Y-M.K. and A.Y.B. carried out STEM and EELS measurements in the laboratory led by S.J.P. S.M.Y. performed PFM measurements under the supervision of T.W.N. A.G. assisted in analysing the PFM data. J.D.B. carried out theoretical calculations under the supervision of E.Y.T. Q.L., E.Y.T., Y.W.Y. and J.D.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the refinement of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. Y. Tsymbal or Qi Li.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3564

Further reading