Letter | Published:

Atomic-scale determination of surface facets in gold nanorods

Nature Materials volume 11, pages 930935 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the physical properties of nanostructures depend on the type of surface facets1,2. For Au nanorods, the surface facets have a major influence on crucial effects such as reactivity and ligand adsorption and there has been controversy regarding facet indexing3,4. Aberration-corrected electron microscopy is the ideal technique to study the atomic structure of nanomaterials5,6. However, these images correspond to two-dimensional (2D) projections of 3D nano-objects, leading to an incomplete characterization. Recently, much progress was achieved in the field of atomic-resolution electron tomography, but it is still far from being a routinely used technique. Here we propose a methodology to measure the 3D atomic structure of free-standing nanoparticles, which we apply to characterize the surface facets of Au nanorods. This methodology is applicable to a broad range of nanocrystals, leading to unique insights concerning the connection between the structure and properties of nanostructures.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Redshift of surface plasmon modes of small gold rods due to their atomic roughness and end-cap geometry. Phys. Rev. B 77, 035418 (2008).

  2. 2.

    , , & Resolving the structure of active sites on platinum catalytic nanoparticles. Nano. Lett. 10, 3073–3076 (2010).

  3. 3.

    et al. The crystalline structure of gold nanorods revisited: Evidence for higher-index lateral facets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 9397–9400 (2010).

  4. 4.

    et al. Three-dimensional morphology and crystallography of gold nanorods. Nano Lett. 11, 273–278 (2011).

  5. 5.

    , & Sub-ångstrom resolution using aberration corrected electron optics. Nature 418, 617–620 (2002).

  6. 6.

    , , & Atomic-resolution imaging with a Sub-50-pm electron probe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 096101 (2009).

  7. 7.

    , & Onset of catalytic activity of gold clusters on titania with the appearance of nonmetallic properties. Science 281, 1647–1650 (1998).

  8. 8.

    , , & Shape control in gold nanoparticle synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1783–1791 (2008).

  9. 9.

    & Electron tomography and holography in materials science. Nature Mater. 8, 271–280 (2009).

  10. 10.

    & 3D electron microscopy in the physical sciences: The development of Z-contrast and EFTEM tomography. Ultramicroscopy 96, 413–431 (2003).

  11. 11.

    , , & Nanotomography in the chemical, biological and materials sciences. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 1477–1494 (2007).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Three-dimensional atomic imaging of crystalline nanoparticles. Nature 470, 374–377 (2011).

  13. 13.

    et al. Three-dimensional atomic imaging of colloidal core-shell nanocrystals. Nano. Lett. 11, 3420–3424 (2011).

  14. 14.

    et al. Electron tomography at 2.4-ångström resolution. Nature 483, 444–447 (2012).

  15. 15.

    , , & Gold nanorods: Synthesis, characterization and applications. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 249, 1870–1901 (2005).

  16. 16.

    & Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem. Mater. 15, 1957–1962 (2003).

  17. 17.

    , , & Crystallographic facets and shapes of gold nanorods of different aspect ratios. Surf. Sci. 440, L809–L814 (1999).

  18. 18.

    , & Conditions and reasons for incoherent imaging in STEM. Ultramicroscopy 63, 93–114 (1996).

  19. 19.

    et al. Atom-by-atom structural and chemical analysis by annular dark-field electron microscopy. Nature 464, 571–574 (2010).

  20. 20.

    & The principles and interpretation of annular dark-field Z-contrast imaging. Adv. Imag. Elect. Phys. 113, 147–203 (2000).

  21. 21.

    & An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 25, 21–30 (2008).

  22. 22.

    Compressed sensing. IEEE Trasns. Inform. Theory 52, 1289–1306 (2006).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Electron tomography based on a total variation minimization reconstruction technique. Ultramicroscopy 113, 120–130 (2012).

  24. 24.

    et al. Three-Dimensional morphology of iron oxide nanoparticles with reactive concave surfaces. A compressed sensing-electron tomography (CS-ET) approach. Nano Lett. 11, 4666–4673 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. J. Theoret. Biol. 36, 105–117 (1972).

  26. 26.

    , , , & An interior-point method for large-scale l(1)-regularized least squares. IEEE J-Stsp 1, 606–617 (2007).

  27. 27.

    et al. Transmission of topological surface states through surface barriers. Nature 466, 343–346 (2010).

  28. 28.

    Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 271, 933–937 (1996).

  29. 29.

    , & Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from HREM micrographs. Ultramicroscopy 74, 131–146 (1998).

  30. 30.

    et al. Effects of elastic anisotropy on strain distributions in decahedral gold nanoparticles. Nature Mater. 7, 120–124 (2008).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Atomistic origin of lattice strain on stiffness of nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 1543–1549 (2010).

  32. 32.

    , , , & Gemini-surfactant-directed self-assembly of monodisperse gold nanorods into standing superlattices. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9484–9488 (2009).

  33. 33.

    , & Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Rosenauer from IFP, Bremen, for the use of the STEMsim program and A. Béché from FEI for his technical advice. The work was supported by the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (FWO Vlaanderen) through a PhD research grant to B.G. G. Van Tendeloo acknowledges financial support from the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant 24691—COUNTATOMS). L.M.L-M. acknowledges financial support from the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant 267867—PLASMAQUO). The authors appreciate financial support from the European Union under the Seventh Framework Program (Integrated Infrastructure Initiative N. 262348 European Soft Matter Infrastructure, ESMI). The authors also acknowledge financial support from the Flemish Hercules 3 programme for large infrastructure.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Electron Microscopy for Materials Research (EMAT), University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium

    • Bart Goris
    • , Sara Bals
    • , Wouter Van den Broek
    •  & Gustaaf Van Tendeloo
  2. Departamento de Quı´mica Fı´sica, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain

    • Enrique Carbó-Argibay
    • , Sergio Gómez-Graña
    •  & Luis M. Liz-Marzán
  3. Institute for Experimental Physics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany

    • Wouter Van den Broek

Authors

  1. Search for Bart Goris in:

  2. Search for Sara Bals in:

  3. Search for Wouter Van den Broek in:

  4. Search for Enrique Carbó-Argibay in:

  5. Search for Sergio Gómez-Graña in:

  6. Search for Luis M. Liz-Marzán in:

  7. Search for Gustaaf Van Tendeloo in:

Contributions

B.G. and S.B. performed the experiments and analysed the 3D reconstructions, B.G. and W.V.d.B. developed the reconstruction algorithm, E.C-A., S.G-G. and L.M.L-M. carried out particle synthesis and interpreted the results, G.V.T. contributed to the methodology, the interpretation and to the redaction. All the authors read and commented on the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Bals.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie S1

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3462

Further reading