Solution-processed small-molecule solar cells with 6.7% efficiency

Abstract

Organic photovoltaic devices that can be fabricated by simple processing techniques are under intense investigation in academic and industrial laboratories because of their potential to enable mass production of flexible and cost-effective devices1,2. Most of the attention has been focused on solution-processed polymer bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells3,4,5,6,7. A combination of polymer design, morphology control, structural insight and device engineering has led to power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) reaching the 6–8% range for conjugated polymer/fullerene blends8,9. Solution-processed small-molecule BHJ (SM BHJ) solar cells have received less attention, and their efficiencies have remained below those of their polymeric counterparts10. Here, we report efficient solution-processed SM BHJ solar cells based on a new molecular donor, DTS(PTTh2)2. A record PCE of 6.7% under AM 1.5 G irradiation (100 mW cm−2) is achieved for small-molecule BHJ devices from DTS(PTTh2)2:PC70BM (donor to acceptor ratio of 7:3). This high efficiency was obtained by using remarkably small percentages of solvent additive (0.25% v/v of 1,8-diiodooctane, DIO) during the film-forming process, which leads to reduced domain sizes in the BHJ layer. These results provide important progress for solution-processed organic photovoltaics and demonstrate that solar cells fabricated from small donor molecules can compete with their polymeric counterparts.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Molecular structures, ultraviolet absorption spectra and energy levels in SM BHJ solar cells.
Figure 2: Device performance of SM BHJ solar cells.
Figure 3: High-magnification TEM images.

References

  1. 1

    Kippelen, B. & Brédas, J. L. Organic photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 251–261 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Krebs, F. C. Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A review of printing and coating techniques. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93, 394–412 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Boudreault, P-L. T., Najari, A. & Leclerc, M. Processable low-bandgap polymers for photovoltaic applications. Chem. Mater. 23, 456–469 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Brabec, C. J. et al. Polymer–fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 22, 3839–3856 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Scharber, M. C. et al. Design rules for donors in bulk-heterojunction solar cells—towards 10% energy-conversion efficiency. Adv. Mater. 18, 789–794 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Cheng, Y. J., Yang, S. H. & Hsu, C. S. Synthesis of conjugated polymers for organic solar cell applications. Chem. Rev. 109, 5868–5923 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Walker, B., Kim, C. & Nguyen, T-Q. Small molecule solution-processed bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem. Mater. 23, 470–482 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Park, S. H. et al. Bulk heterojunction solar cells with internal quantum efficiency approaching 100%. Nature Photon. 3, 297–302 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Liang, Y. et al. For the bright future—bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%. Adv. Mater. 22, E135–E138 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Roncali, J. Molecular bulk heterojunctions: An emerging approach to organic solar cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 1719–1730 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Thompson, B. C. & Fréchet, J. M. J. Polymer–fullerene composite solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 58–77 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Roncali, J. Synthetic principles for bandgap control in linear π-conjugated systems. Chem. Rev. 97, 173–205 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Meier, H. Conjugated oligomers with terminal donor–acceptor substitution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 2482–2506 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Ko, H. M. et al. Molecular engineering of push-pull chromophore for efficient bulk-heterojunction morphology in solution processed small molecule organic photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 7248–7253 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Mayerhoffer, U. et al. Outstanding short-circuit currents in BHJ solar cells based on NIR-absorbing acceptor-substituted squaraines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 8776–8779 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Bagnis, D. et al. Marked alkyl- vs alkenyl-substitutent effects on squaraine dye solid-state structure, carrier mobility, and bulk-heterojunction solar cell efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 4074–4075 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Shang, H. et al. A solution-processable star-shaped molecule for high-performance organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 23, 1554–1557 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Walker, B. et al. Nanoscale phase separation and high photovoltaic efficiency in solution-processed, small-molecule bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 3063–3069 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Loser, S. et al. A naphthodithiophene-diketopyrrolopyrrole donor molecule for efficient solution-processed solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 8142–8145 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Würthner, F. & Meerholz, K. Systems chemistry approach in organic photovoltaics. Chem. Eur. J. 16, 9366–9373 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Rousseau, T. et al. BODIPY derivatives as donor materials for bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem. Commun. 1673–1675 (2009).

  22. 22

    Welch, G. C. et al. A modular molecular framework for utility in small-molecule solution-processed organic photovoltaic devices. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 12700–12709 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Wei, G., Wang, S., Sun, K., Thompson, M. E. & Forrest, S. R. Solvent-annealed crystalline squaraine: PC70BM (1:6) solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 184–187 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Fitzner, R. et al. Dicyanovinyl-substituted oligothiophenes: Structure-property relationships and application in vacuum-processed small-molecule organic solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 897–910 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Blouin, N. et al. Toward a rational design of poly(2,7-carbazole) derivatives for solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 732–742 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Hou, J. H. et al. Synthesis, characterization, and photovoltaic properties of a low band gap polymer based on silole-containing polythiophenes and 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16144–16145 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wu, W., Liu, Y. & Zhu, D. π-Conjugated molecules with fused rings for organic field-effect transistors: Design, synthesis and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1489–1502 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Sun, Y. et al. Efficient, air-stable bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells using MoOx as the anode interfacial layer. Adv. Mater. 23, 2226–2230 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Peet, J. et al. Efficiency enhancement in low-bandgap polymer solar cells by processing with alkane dithiols. Nature Mater. 6, 497–500 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Lovinger, A. J., Katz, H. E. & Dodabalapur, A. Direct imaging of conducting and insulating submolecularly wide pathways in an organic semiconductor. Chem. Mater. 10, 3275–3277 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Drummy, L. F. et al. Molecular-scale and nanoscale morphology of P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunctions: Energy-filtered TEM and low-dose HREM. Chem. Mater. 23, 907–912 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The design, synthesis and characterization of DTS(PTTh2)2 was supported by the Center for Energy Efficient Materials, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy (DE-DC0001009). The solar-cell fabrication and optimization was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-11-1-0063). The TEM studies were supported by the National Science Foundation (DMR-0856060). The authors thank M. Chabinyc (UCSB) for useful discussions on the TEM analysis, C. Hoven (UCSB) for contributions to the development of the device fabrication methodology and B.B.Y. Hsu (UCSB) for the thickness measurement. W.L.L. thanks the Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*Star) of Singapore for a postdoctoral fellowship.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.C.B. and A.J.H. proposed the research. G.C.W. designed, synthesized and characterized the materials. Y.S. and W.L.L. carried out the fabrication and measurement of electronic devices. C.J.T. carried out the TEM characterization and image analysis. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guillermo C. Bazan or Alan J. Heeger.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 2569 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Welch, G., Leong, W. et al. Solution-processed small-molecule solar cells with 6.7% efficiency. Nature Mater 11, 44–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3160

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing