Article | Published:

The dynamic organic p–n junction

Nature Materials volume 8, pages 672676 (2009) | Download Citation

Abstract

Static p–n junctions in inorganic semiconductors are exploited in a wide range of today’s electronic appliances. Here, we demonstrate the in situ formation of a dynamic p–n junction structure within an organic semiconductor through electrochemistry. Specifically, we use scanning kelvin probe microscopy and optical probing on planar light-emitting electrochemical cells (LECs) with a mixture of a conjugated polymer and an electrolyte connecting two electrodes separated by 120 μm. We find that a significant portion of the potential drop between the electrodes coincides with the location of a thin and distinct light-emission zone positioned >30 μm away from the negative electrode. These results are relevant in the context of a long-standing scientific debate, as they prove that electrochemical doping can take place in LECs. Moreover, a study on the doping formation and dissipation kinetics provides interesting detail regarding the electronic structure and stability of the dynamic organic p–n junction, which may be useful in future dynamic p–n junction-based devices.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The path to ubiquitous and low-cost organic electronic appliances on plastic. Nature 428, 911–918 (2004).

  2. 2.

    & An organic electronics primer. Phys. Today 58, 53–58 (2005).

  3. 3.

    , , , & A polymer/semiconductor write-once read-many-times memory. Nature 426, 166–169 (2003).

  4. 4.

    Organic electronics: The ions have it. Adv. Mater. 20, 837–841 (2008).

  5. 5.

    , & An electrochromic nanostructured liquid crystal consisting of pi-conjugated and ionic moieties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13206–13207 (2008).

  6. 6.

    , & Synthesis and self-limited electrochemical doping of polyacetylene ionomers. Macromolecules 41, 4071–4080 (2008).

  7. 7.

    & Photoelectrochemical cell and its applications in optoelectronics. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2, 897–912 (2007).

  8. 8.

    , , & Polymer photovoltaic devices employing a chemically fixed p-i-n junction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 1212–1219 (2008).

  9. 9.

    , , & Toward improved and tunable polymer field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 3744–3746 (2004).

  10. 10.

    & Gate electrode processes in an electrolyte-gated transistor: Non-faradaically versus faradaically coupled conductivity modulation of a polyacetylene ionomer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 133507 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Use of ionic liquids for pi-conjugated polymer electrochemical devices. Science 297, 983–987 (2002).

  12. 12.

    , & The donor–acceptor approach allows a black-to-transmissive switching polymeric electrochrome. Nature Mater. 7, 795–799 (2008).

  13. 13.

    , , & European Congress and Exhibition on Advanced Materials and Processes (Euromat 2007) 640–643 (Wiley–VCH, 2007).

  14. 14.

    , , & Polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells: Frozen-junction operation of an ‘ionic liquid’ device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 043506 (2005).

  15. 15.

    et al. Cyclodextrin-threaded conjugated polyrotaxanes for organic electronics: The influence of the counter cations. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 2419–2427 (2008).

  16. 16.

    & How electrode work function affects doping and electroluminescence of polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells. Adv. Mater. 20, 3298–3302 (2008).

  17. 17.

    & The effect of annealing/quenching on the performance of polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells. Org. Electron. 9, 347–354 (2008).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Polymer light-emitting electrochemical-cells. Science 269, 1086–1088 (1995).

  19. 19.

    & Planar polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells with extremely large interelectrode spacing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3027–3029 (2003).

  20. 20.

    & Visualization of electrochemical doping and light-emitting junction formation in conjugated polymer films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2778–2780 (2004).

  21. 21.

    et al. A supramolecularly-caged ionic iridium(III) complex yielding bright and very stable solid-state light-emitting electrochemical cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 14944–14945 (2008).

  22. 22.

    , & Long-lifetime polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells. Adv. Mater. 19, 365–370 (2007).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Improved electron injection in polymer light-emitting diodes using anionic conjugated polyelectrolyte. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 123304 (2008).

  24. 24.

    , & Synthesis of diarylamino-benzo[de]anthracen-7-ones and their light emitting property. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 28, 1393–1397 (2008).

  25. 25.

    et al. Novel green-light-emitting polymers based on cyclopenta[def]phenanthrene. Macromolecules 41, 5548–5554 (2008).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Water-soluble polyfluorenes as an electron injecting layer in PLEDs for extremely high quantum efficiency. Adv. Mater. 20, 1624–1629 (2008).

  27. 27.

    et al. Pi-conjugated poly(anthracene-alt-fluorene)s with X-shaped repeating units: New blue-light emitting polymers. Polymer 49, 2282–2287 (2008).

  28. 28.

    et al. Thermophysical properties of conjugated polyelectrolytes. Adv. Mater. 20, 298–302 (2008).

  29. 29.

    , & LED to LEC transition behavior in polymer light-emitting devices. Adv. Mater. 20, 1191–1193 (2008).

  30. 30.

    et al. Ion motion in conjugated polyelectrolyte electron transporting layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10976–10977 (2007).

  31. 31.

    , & Polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells for high-efficiency low-voltage electroluminescent devices. J. Disp. Technol. 3, 211–224 (2007).

  32. 32.

    Bringing light to solid-state electrolytes: The polymer light-emitting electrochemical cell. Electrochim. Acta 50, 3878–3885 (2005).

  33. 33.

    et al. Light emission at 5 V from a polymer device with a millimeter-sized interelectrode gap. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 013509 (2006).

  34. 34.

    & Light-emitting electrochemical cells with millimeter-sized interelectrode gap: Low-voltage operation at room temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 15568–15569 (2006).

  35. 35.

    , , & Polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells: Doping concentration, emission-zone position, and turn-on time. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 1807–1813 (2007).

  36. 36.

    et al. Electroluminescent devices from ionic transition metal complexes. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 2976–2988 (2007).

  37. 37.

    & Operating mechanism of light-emitting electrochemical cells. Nature Mater. 7, 167–167 (2008).

  38. 38.

    , , , & Polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells: In situ formation of a light-emitting p–n junction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 3922–3929 (1996).

  39. 39.

    , , & Doping front propagation in light-emitting electrochemical cells. Phys. Rev. B 74, 155210 (2006).

  40. 40.

    , , & Imaging the structure of the p–n junction in polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells. Adv. Mater. 8, 985–987 (1996).

  41. 41.

    Interfacial feedback dynamics in polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells. Phys. Rev. B 66, 235210 (2002).

  42. 42.

    , , & Ionic space-charge effects in polymer light-emitting diodes. Phys. Rev. B 57, 12951–12963 (1998).

  43. 43.

    et al. Direct measurement of the electric-field distribution in a light-emitting electrochemical cell. Nature Mater. 6, 894–899 (2007).

  44. 44.

    et al. Operating mechanism of light-emitting electrochemical cells—Authors’ response. Nature Mater. 7, 168–168 (2008).

  45. 45.

    , , , & Scanning kelvin probe imaging of the potential profiles in fixed and dynamic planar LECs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 15903–15910 (2007).

  46. 46.

    , , & Identifying and alleviating electrochemical side-reactions in light-emitting electrochemical cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 4562–4568 (2008).

  47. 47.

    , & On the desired properties of a conjugated polymer-electrolyte blend in a light-emitting electrochemical cell. Org. Electron. 9, 699–710 (2008).

  48. 48.

    , & Electrochemical and optical characterization of p- and n-doped poly[2-methoxy-5-(2-ethylhexyloxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene]. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 044704 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

L.E. and P.M. acknowledge the Swedish Research Council (VR) and Wenner-Gren stiftelserna for scientific financial support. L.E. is a ‘Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Research Fellow’ supported by a grant from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. N.D.R. acknowledges VR and Norrköpings Kommun for financial support of part of this work. The work of K.M. is made possible by a NanoNed grant (NanoNed is the Dutch nanotechnology initiative by the Ministry of Economic Affairs). The authors acknowledge A. Shchukarev at Umeå University for help with the X-ray photoemission spectroscopy measurements.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. The Organic Photonics and Electronics Group, Department of Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden

    • Piotr Matyba
    •  & Ludvig Edman
  2. Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    • Klara Maturova
    •  & Martijn Kemerink
  3. The Transport and Separations Group, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden

    • Nathaniel D. Robinson

Authors

  1. Search for Piotr Matyba in:

  2. Search for Klara Maturova in:

  3. Search for Martijn Kemerink in:

  4. Search for Nathaniel D. Robinson in:

  5. Search for Ludvig Edman in:

Contributions

P.M., K.M. and N.D.R. carried out the experiments. L.E., N.D.R. and M.K. wrote the manuscript. P.M., K.M., M.K., N.D.R. and L.E. contributed to data analysis and project planning.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludvig Edman.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2478

Further reading