Letter | Published:

Accelerating uplift in the North Atlantic region as an indicator of ice loss

Nature Geoscience volume 3, pages 404407 (2010) | Download Citation

Abstract

Vertical motions of the rocky margins of Greenland and Antarctica respond to mass changes of their respective ice sheets1,2. However, these motions can be obscured by episodes of glacial advance or retreat that occurred hundreds to thousands of years ago3,4,5,6, which trigger a delayed response because of viscous flow in the underlying mantle. Here we present high-precision global positioning system (GPS) data that describe the vertical motion of the rocky margins of Greenland, Iceland and Svalbard. We focus on vertical accelerations rather than velocities to avoid the confounding effects of past events. Our data show an acceleration of uplift over the past decade that represents an essentially instantaneous, elastic response to the recent accelerated melting of ice throughout the North Atlantic region. Our comparison of the GPS data to models for glacial isostatic adjustment suggests that some parts of western coastal Greenland were experiencing accelerated melting of coastal ice by the late 1990s. Using a simple elastic model, we estimate that western Greenland’s ice loss is accelerating at an average rate of 8.7±3.5 Gt yr−2, whereas the rate for southeastern Greenland—based on limited data—falls at 12.5±5.5 Gt yr−2.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Weighing the ice sheets using space geodesy: A way to measure changes in ice sheet mass. Eos. Trans. AGU 72 (Spring Meeting Suppl.), 71 (1991).

  2. 2.

    & Present-day Antarctic ice mass changes and crustal motion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 973–976 (1995).

  3. 3.

    & Predictions of crustal deformation caused by changing polar ice on a viscoelastic earth. Surv. Geophys. 18, 303–312 (1997).

  4. 4.

    & Greenland glacial history and local geodynamic consequences. Geophys. J. Int. 150, 198–229 (2002).

  5. 5.

    Global glacial isostasy and the surface of the Ice-Age Earth: The ICE-5G (VM2) model and GRACE. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 32, 111–114 (2004).

  6. 6.

    & Constraints on the Greenland Ice Sheet since the Last Glacial Maximum from sea-level observations and glacial-rebound models. Quat. Sci. Rev. 23, 1053–1077 (2004).

  7. 7.

    et al. Glacio-isostatic deformation around the Vatnajokull ice cap, Iceland, induced by recent climate warming: GPS observations and finite element modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B08405 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Acceleration in thinning rate on western Svalbard glaciers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L18502 (2007).

  9. 9.

    , & GRACE observes small-scale mass loss in Greenland. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20501 (2008).

  10. 10.

    , , , & Progressive increase in ice loss from Greenland. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L10503 (2006).

  11. 11.

    & Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 311, 986–990 (2006).

  12. 12.

    & Mass balance of polar ice sheets. Science 297, 1502–1506 (2002).

  13. 13.

    & The elastic response of the Earth to interannual variations in Antarctic precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 3183–3187 (1995).

  14. 14.

    , , & Geodetic measurements in Greenland and their implications. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 16567–16582 (2001).

  15. 15.

    et al. Geodetic measurements of postglacial adjustments in Greenland. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B02402 (2008).

  16. 16.

    & Glacial isostatic adjustment: New developments from advanced observing systems and modeling. J. Geodyn. 46, 69–77 (2008).

  17. 17.

    et al. Recent Greenland ice mass loss by drainage system from satellite gravity observations. Science 314, 1286–1289 (2006).

  18. 18.

    et al. Elastic uplift in southeast Greenland due to rapid ice mass loss. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L21701 (2007).

  19. 19.

    , & Surface deformation induced by present day ice melting in Svalbard. Geophys. J. Int. 179, 1–13 (2009).

  20. 20.

    , , & Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B06402 (2006).

  21. 21.

    et al. Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in ‘stable’ North America with GPS. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L02306 (2007).

  22. 22.

    et al. Space-geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment in Fennoscandia. Science 291, 2381–2385 (2001).

  23. 23.

    et al. Geodetic GPS measurements in South Iceland: Strain accumulation and partitioning in a propagating ridge system. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B11405 (2005).

  24. 24.

    , , & Crustal deformation associated with glacial fluctuations in the eastern Chugach Mountains. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 8055–8077 (2000).

  25. 25.

    et al. Mass changes of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets and shelves and contributions to sea-level rise: 1992–2002. J. Glaciol. 51, 509–527 (2005).

  26. 26.

    et al. Runoff and mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet: 1958–2003. J. Geophys, Res. 110, D13108 (2005).

  27. 27.

    et al. Partitioning recent Greenland mass loss. Science 326, 984–986 (2009).

  28. 28.

    Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L19503 (2009).

  29. 29.

    , & Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics 4th edn (Blackwell, 2007).

  30. 30.

    , & Ice sheet mass balance: Assessment, attribution and prognosis. Ann. Glaciol. 46, 1–7 (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Alley, S. Anandakrishnan, A. Clement and P. Koons for discussions. The GPS data used in this study are archived at SOPAC and CDDIS, generously made available by a number of national mapping and geodetic authorities including NMA, KMS, FGI, LMV and NRCan, the Universities of Colorado, Newcastle, Nottingham and Latvia, and other members of IGS. US-funded stations in Greenland are maintained by UNAVCO. This work was supported by grants from ONR, NSF and NASA. Y.J. was supported by a NASA Fellowship.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33149, USA

    • Yan Jiang
    • , Timothy H. Dixon
    •  & Shimon Wdowinski

Authors

  1. Search for Yan Jiang in:

  2. Search for Timothy H. Dixon in:

  3. Search for Shimon Wdowinski in:

Contributions

Y.J. processed the GPS data, conducted the time series analysis and wrote the manuscript. S.W. constructed the elastic model and error analysis. T.H.D. designed the study, did the background research and edited the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy H. Dixon.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo845

Further reading