Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Himalayan strain reservoir inferred from limited afterslip following the Gorkha earthquake


The magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake in April 2015 ruptured a 150-km-long section of the Himalayan décollement terminating close to Kathmandu1,2,3,4. The earthquake failed to rupture the surface Himalayan frontal thrusts and raised concern that a future Mw ≤ 7.3 earthquake could break the unruptured region to the south and west of Kathmandu. Here we use GPS records of surface motions to show that no aseismic slip occurred on the ruptured fault plane in the six months immediately following the earthquake. We find that although 70 mm of afterslip occurred locally north of the rupture, fewer than 25 mm of afterslip occurred in a narrow zone to the south. Rapid initial afterslip north of the rupture was largely complete in six months, releasing aseismic-moment equivalent to a Mw 7.1 earthquake. Historical earthquakes in 1803, 1833, 1905 and 1947 also failed to rupture the Himalayan frontal faults, and were not followed by large earthquakes to their south. This implies that significant relict heterogeneous strain prevails throughout the Main Himalayan Thrust. The considerable slip during great Himalayan earthquakes may be due in part to great earthquakes tapping reservoirs of residual strain inherited from former partial ruptures of the Main Himalayan Thrust.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Rupture zone of 25 April Nepal earthquake.
Figure 2: Post-seismic GPS data from 25 of 28 sites surrounding the 2015 rupture (violet).
Figure 3: North–south cross-section comparing synthetic afterslip (violet line) and observed post-seismic displacements (vertical bars).


  1. 1

    Avouac, J.-P., Meng, L., Wei, S., Wang, T. & Ampuero, J.-P. Lower edge of locked Main Himalayan Thrust unzipped by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Nature Geosci. 8, 708–711 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Hayes, G. P. et al. Rapid characterization of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Nepal (Gorkha). Earthq. Seism. Res. Lett. 86, 1557–1567 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Lindsey, E. et al. Line of sight deformation from ALOS-2 interferometry: Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake and Mw 7.3 aftershock. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6655–6661 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Galetzka, J. et al. Slip pulse and resonance of the Kathmandu Basin during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Science 349, 1091–1095 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Grandin, R. et al. Rupture process of the Mw = 7.9 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal): insights into Himalayan megathrust segmentation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8373–8382 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Wang, K. & Fialko, Y. Slip model of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake from inversions of ALOS-2 and GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 7452–7458 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Denolle, M. A., Fan, W. & Shearer, P. M. Dynamics of the 2015 M7.8 Nepal earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 7467–7475 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Elliott, J. R. et al. Geometry of the Main Himalayan Thrust. Nature Geosci. 9, 174–180 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Bilham, R., Larson, K., Freymueller, J. & Project Idylhim members. GPS measurements of present-day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya. Nature 386, 61–64 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Ader, T. et al. Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: implications for seismic hazard. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B044403 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Avouac, J. P. Mountain building, erosion, and the seismic cycle in the Nepal Himalaya. Adv. Geophys. 46, 1–80 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Bilham, R. Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history. Ann. Geophys. 47, 839–855 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Sapkota, S. N. et al. Primary surface rupture of the great Himalayan earthquakes of 1255 and 1934. Nature Geosci. 6, 71–76 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bollinger, L. et al. Estimating the return times of great Himalayan earthquakes in eastern Nepal: evidence from the Patu and Bardibas strands of the Main Frontal Thrust. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 7123–7163 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kumar, S. et al. Paleoseismic evidence of great surface rupture earthquakes along the Indian Himalaya. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B03304 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Bettinelli, P. et al. Seasonal variations of seismicity and geodetic strain in the Himalaya induced by surface hydrology. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 266, 332–344 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Fu, Y & Freymueller, J. Seasonal and long-term vertical deformation in the Nepal Himalaya constrained by GPS and GRACE measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 117, 2156–2202 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Bilham, R. Location and magnitude of the 1833 Nepal earthquake and its relation to the rupture zones of contiguous great Himalayan earthquakes. Curr. Sci. 69, 101–127 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bilham, R. & Wallace, K. Future Mw > 8 earthquakes in the Himalaya: implications from the 26 Dec 2004 Mw = 9.0 earthquake on India’s eastern plate margin. Geol. Surv. India Spl. Pub. 85, 1–14 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Mugnier, J.-L. et al. Structural interpretation of the great earthquakes of the last millennium in the central Himalaya. Earth Sci. Rev. 127, 30–47 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Wallace, K., Bilham, R., Blume, F., Gaur, V. K. & Gahalaut, V. Surface deformation in the region of the 1905 Kangra Mw = 7.8 earthquake in the period 1846–2001. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L15307 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Avouac, J.-P. From geodetic imaging of seismic and aseismic fault slip to dynamic modeling of the seismic cycle. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 43, 233–271 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Jackson, M. & Bilham, R. Constraints on Himalayan deformation inferred from vertical velocity fields in Nepal and Tibet. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 13897–13912 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Satyabala, S. P., Yang, Z. & Bilham, R. Stick–slip advance of the Kohat plateau Pakistan. Nature Geosci. 5, 147–150 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Scholz, C. H. & Campos, J. The seismic coupling of subduction zones revisited. J. Geophys. Res. 117, BO5310 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Feldl, N. & Bilham, R. Great Himalayan earthquakes and the Tibetan plateau. Nature 444, 165–170 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Stevens, V. L. & Avouac, J. P. Interseismic coupling of the Main Himalayan Thrust. Geophys. Res Lett. 42, 5828–5837 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Schiffman, C., Bali, B. S., Szeliga, W. & Bilham, R. Seismic slip deficit in the Kashmir Himalaya from GPS observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5642–5645 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Ambraseys, N. & Jackson, D. A note on early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet. Curr. Sci. 84, 570–582 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Bollinger, L., Tapponier, P., Sapkota, S. N. & Klinger, Y. Slip deficit in central Nepal: omen for a repeat of the 1344 AD earthquake? Earth Planets Space 68, 1–12 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Details of support from NSF EAR 1345136, 1546636 and 1261833 and NASA and from numerous organizations and individuals that made the measurements possible are found in the Supplementary Information. We especially thank J.-P. Avouac for his important role in working with the Ministry of Mines and Geology in Nepal to install and maintain the Nepal GPS network and the NSF-operated UNAVCO facility for supporting the rapid response.

Author information




All authors gathered the data. J.G. directed GPS instrumentation and telemetry. D.M. analysed the GPS data. R.Bendick, D.M. and R.Bilham undertook the elastic modelling and wrote the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Bilham.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 4785 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mencin, D., Bendick, R., Upreti, B. et al. Himalayan strain reservoir inferred from limited afterslip following the Gorkha earthquake. Nature Geosci 9, 533–537 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing