Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Potential slab deformation and plunge prior to the Tohoku, Iquique and Maule earthquakes

Abstract

Megathrust earthquakes rupture hundreds of kilometres of the shallow plate interface in subduction zones, typically at depths of less than 50 km. Intense foreshock activity preceded the 2011 Mw 9 Tohoku-oki (Japan) and 2014 Mw 8.2 Iquique (Chile) megathrust earthquakes. This pre-earthquake activity was thought to be generated1,2,3,4,5,6 by slow slip in the seismogenic zone before rupture, but where this slow slip originated and how it spread rapidly over long distances are unknown. Here we analyse seismic activity deep in the subduction zone before the Tohoku-oki and Iquique ruptures, as well as before the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake in Chile. We find that, before each of these megathrust earthquakes, shallow seismicity occurred synchronously with bursts of seismic activity deep (100 km) in the subducting slab. The extensional mechanism of these deep shocks suggests that the slab was stretched at depth. We therefore propose that, before these megathrust quakes, the slab might have started to plunge into the mantle below part of the future rupture zone. We speculate that synchronization between deep and shallow seismicity may have marked the nucleation phase for these three giant earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Compared evolutions of foreshock activity and deep seismicity before Tohoku.
Figure 2: Plunge/deformation of the slab below northeastern Japan before Tohoku, imaged by the spatial distribution of deep activity increase between 13 January and 9 March 2011.
Figure 3: Evolution of deep and shallow activity before Iquique.
Figure 4: Correlation of shallow (≤40 km) and deep (≥80 km) seismicity occurring in a zone of 2° (222 km) radius around the Tohoku epicentre, in the two years preceding the earthquake.

References

  1. Kato, A. et al. Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-oki earthquake. Science 335, 705–708 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brodsky, E. E. & Lay, T. Recognizing foreshocks from the 1 April 2014 Chile earthquake. Science 344, 700–702 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruiz, S. et al. Intense foreshocks and a slow slip event preceded the 2014 Iquique Mw 8.1 earthquake. Science 345, 1165–1169 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kato, A. & Nakagawa, S. Multiple slow-slip events during a foreshock sequence of the 2014 Iquique, Chile Mw 8.1 earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5420–5427 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lay, T., Yue, H., Brodsky, E. E. & An, C. The 1 April 2014 Iquique, Chile, Mw 8.1 earthquake rupture sequence. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3818–3825 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meng, L., Huang, H., Bürgmann, R., Ampuero, J. P. & Strader, A. Dual megathrust behaviors of the 2014 Iquique earthquake sequence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 411, 177–187 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng, Z. & Gomberg, J. An integrated perspective of the continuum between earthquakes and slow-slip phenomena. Nature Geosci. 3, 599–607 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beroza, G. C. & Ide, S. Slow earthquakes and nonvolcanic tremor. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 39, 271–296 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vidale, J. E. & Houston, H. Slow slip: a new kind of earthquake. Phys. Today 65, 38–43 (January, 2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malgrange, M., Deschamps, A. & Madariaga, R. Thrust and extensional faulting under the Chilean coast: 1965, 1971 Aconcagua earthquakes. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 66, 313–331 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Astiz, L. & Kanamori, H. Interplate coupling and temporal variation of mechanisms of intermediate-depth earthquakes in Chile. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76, 1614–1622 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dmowska, R., Rice, J. R., Lovison, L. C. & Josell, D. Stress transfer and seismic phenomena in coupled subduction zones during the earthquake cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 7869–7884 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lay, T., Astiz, L., Kanamori, H. & Christensen, D. H. Temporal variation of large intraplate earthquakes in coupled subduction zones. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 54, 258–312 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemoine, A., Madariaga, R. & Campos, J. Slab-pull and slab-push earthquakes in the Mexican, Chilean and Peruvian subduction zones. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 132, 157–175 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirose, F., Miyaoka, K., Hayashimoto, N., Yamazaki, T. & Nakamura, M. Outline of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw 9.0)—Seismicity: foreshocks, mainshock, aftershocks, and induced activity. Earth Planets Space 63, 513–518 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marsan, D. & Enescu, B. Modeling the foreshock sequence prior to the 2011, Mw 9.0 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B06316 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schurr, B. et al. Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake. Nature 512, 299–302 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Madariaga, R., Métois, M., Vigny, C. & Campos, J. Central Chile finally breaks. Science 328, 181–182 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bouchon, M. et al. Extended nucleation of the 1999 Mw 7.6 Izmit earthquake. Science 331, 877–880 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bouchon, M., Durand, V., Marsan, D., Karabulut, H. & Schmittbuhl, J. The long precursory phase of most large interplate earthquakes. Nature Geosci. 6, 299–302 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mogi, K. Some features of recent seismic activity in and near Japan (2): activity before and after great earthquakes. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo 47, 395–417 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kanamori, H. in Earthquake Prediction: An International Review (eds Simpson, D. & Richards, P.) 1–19 (AGU, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dodge, D. A., Beroza, G. C. & Ellsworth, W. L. Detailed observations of California foreshock sequences: implications for the earthquake initiation process. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 22371–22392 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the scientists, engineers, and technicians from the International Seismological Centre, the Japan Meteorological Agency and the Centro Sismologico Nacional of Chile who made the catalogues that are used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.B. and D.M. originated and developed the study. V.D. contributed to the methodology. M.C., H.P., R.M. and B.G. contributed to the data analysis and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Bouchon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 472 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouchon, M., Marsan, D., Durand, V. et al. Potential slab deformation and plunge prior to the Tohoku, Iquique and Maule earthquakes. Nature Geosci 9, 380–383 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2701

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2701

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing