Substantial nitrogen pollution embedded in international trade

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 March 2016

This article has been updated

Abstract

Anthropogenic emissions of reactive nitrogen to the atmosphere and water bodies can damage human health and ecosystems1,2. As a measure of a nation’s contribution to this potential damage, a country’s nitrogen footprint has been defined as the quantity of reactive nitrogen emitted during the production, consumption and transportation of commodities consumed within that country, whether those commodities are produced domestically or internationally3. Here we use global emissions databases4,5, a global nitrogen cycle model6, and a global input–output database of domestic and international trade7,8 to calculate the nitrogen footprints for 188 countries as the sum of emissions of ammonia, nitrogen oxides and nitrous oxide to the atmosphere, and of nitrogen potentially exportable to water bodies. Per-capita footprints range from under 7 kg N yr−1 in some developing countries to over 100 kg N yr−1 in some wealthy nations. Consumption in China, India, the United States and Brazil is responsible for 46% of global emissions. Roughly a quarter of the global nitrogen footprint is from commodities that were traded across country borders. The main net exporters have significant agricultural, food and textile exports, and are often developing countries, whereas important net importers are almost exclusively developed economies. We conclude that substantial local nitrogen pollution is driven by demand from consumers in other countries.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Embodied nitrogen emissions and per-capita nitrogen footprints for the top ten net exporters and importers.
Figure 2: International flows of embodied nitrogen emissions between countries of last sale and countries of consumption (top ten flows labelled).

Change history

  • 28 January 2016

    In the original version of the Letter originally published, the sentence comparing the authors' results to those of previous studies was missing a citation and it should have read: 'Our results of per-capita NFPs are higher than those presented in previous studies3,11,12,13—for example 62 kg cap−1 yr−1 for the USA compared to 41 kg cap−1 yr−1 (ref. 3)...'. This has been corrected in the online versions of the Letter.

References

  1. 1

    Erisman, J. W. et al. Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130116 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Sutton, M. A. et al. Too much of a good thing. Nature 472, 159–161 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Leach, A. M. et al. A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment. Environ. Dev. 1, 40–66 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Database Collection of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT, 2015); http://faostat3.fao.org/home.

  5. 5

    Heffer, P. Assessment of Fertilizer Use by Crop at the Global Level 2010-2010/11 AgCom/13/39 (IFA, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    IPCC in 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Vol. 4 (eds Eggleston, H. S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. & Tanabe, K.) Ch. 10–11 (IGES, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K. & Geschke, A. Building EORA: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Econ. Syst. Res. 25, 20–49 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Geschke, A. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 8374–8381 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Galloway, J. N. et al. Nitrogen footprints: past, present and future. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 115003 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Bodirsky, B. L. et al. Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nature Commun. 5, 3858 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Stevens, C. J., Leach, A. M., Dale, S. & Galloway, J. N. Personal nitrogen footprint tool for the United Kingdom. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 16, 1563–1569 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Shibata, H., Cattaneo, L. R., Leach, A. M. & Galloway, J. N. First approach to the Japanese nitrogen footprint model to predict the loss of nitrogen to the environment. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 115013 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Pierer, M., Winiwarter, W., Leach, A. M. & Galloway, J. N. The nitrogen footprint of food products and general consumption patterns in Austria. Food Policy 49, 128–136 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Lassaletta, L. et al. Food and feed trade as a driver in the global nitrogen cycle: 50-year trends. Biogeochemistry 118, 225–241 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Billen, G., Lassaletta, L. & Garnier, J. A vast range of opportunities for feeding the world in 2050: trade-off between diet, N contamination and international trade. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 025001 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Galloway, J. N. et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320, 889–892 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Burke, M., Oleson, K., McCullough, E. & Gaskell, J. A global model tracking water, nitrogen, and land inputs and virtual transfers from industrialized meat production and trade. Environ. Model. Assess. 14, 179–193 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Peters, G. P., Davis, S. J. & Andrew, R. A synthesis of carbon in international trade. Biogeosciences 9, 3247–3276 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Lenzen, M. et al. International trade of scarce water. Ecol. Econ. 94, 78–85 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Alsamawi, A., Murray, J. & Lenzen, M. The employment footprints of nations: uncovering master–servant relationships. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 59–70 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., Lenzen, M. & Geschke, A. International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: new evidence from air pollution. Glob. Environ. Change 24, 52–59 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Balazs, C., Morello-Frosch, R., Hubbard, A. & Ray, I. Social disparities in nitrate-contaminated drinking water in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Environ. Health Perspect. 119, 1272–1278 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Sutton, M. A. et al. Global Overview of Nutrient Management (CEH, Edinburgh on behalf of the Global Partnership on Nutrient Management and the International Nitrogen Initiative, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Erisman, J. W., Grennfelt, P. & Sutton, M. The European perspective on nitrogen emission and deposition. Environ. Int. 29, 311–325 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Mandelker, D. R. Controlling nonpoint source water pollution: can it be done? Chic. Kent Law Rev. 65, 479–502 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Galloway, J. N., Leach, A. M., Bleeker, A. & Erisman, J. W. A chronology of human understanding of the nitrogen cycle. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130120 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Hoekstra, A. Y. & Wiedmann, T. O. Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 344, 1114–1117 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Kander, A., Jiborn, M., Moran, D. D. & Wiedmann, T. O. National greenhouse-gas accounting for effective climate policy on international trade. Nature Clim. Change 5, 431–435 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    O’Rourke, D. The science of sustainable supply chains. Science 344, 1124–1127 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Leontief, W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input–output approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 52, 262–271 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Leontief, W. Input–Output Economics (Oxford Univ. Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Feng, K., Chapagain, A., Suh, S., Pfister, S. & Hubacek, K. Comparison of bottom-up and top-down approaches to calculating the water footprints of nations. Econ. Syst. Res. 23, 371–385 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Wiedmann, T. et al. A carbon footprint time series of the UK—results from a multi-region input–output model. Econ. Syst. Res. 22, 19–42 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Environment at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators (OECD, 2013).

  36. 36

    UNEP & WHRC Reactive Nitrogen in the Environment: Too Much or Too Little of a Good Thing (UNEP, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Wu, R. S. Eutrophication, water borne pathogens and xenobiotic compounds: environmental risks and challenges. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 39, 11–22 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Moran (NTNU, Norway), A. Alsamawi and S. Juraszek (Univ. of Sydney) for technical assistance, J. Shindo (Yamanashi Univ.) and N. Kaneko (Yokohama National Univ.) for their discussions about nitrogen emissions, and C. Jarabak for help with collecting data. A.O. was supported by the Yokohama National University research grant. S.N. and A.O. were supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S9 and S14) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. M.L., K.K., A.G. and A.M. were financially supported by the Australian Research Council through its Discovery Projects DP0985522 and DP130101293. K.K. was also financially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (No. 15H05341).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.O. and M.L. designed the study; A.O., S.N. and K.K. prepared the data; A.M., A.O. and A.G. conducted the analysis; A.M. and A.O. prepared the figures; A.O., M.L. and A.M. wrote the paper; A.O., M.L., A.M. and K.K. contributed to data interpretation and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Lenzen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 3549 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oita, A., Malik, A., Kanemoto, K. et al. Substantial nitrogen pollution embedded in international trade. Nature Geosci 9, 111–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2635

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing