Perspective | Published:

The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty

Nature Geoscience volume 8, pages 907912 (2015) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Most of the world's extreme poor, surviving on US$1.25 or less per day, live in rural areas and farm for a living. Many suffer chronic poverty that lasts for years or generations, rather than the transitory poverty that dominates developed, urban economies. Such chronic, structural poverty arises when an individual's productive assets — such as their ability to work or their soils — and the technologies and markets that transform their assets into food and income are insufficient to attain satisfactory living standards. Research reveals strong links between economic status and soil quality, and these can be self-reinforcing. For example, poor soil constrains agricultural production and household capital, and low household capital constrains investments in improving soils. Price, availability and access to credit can limit farmers' applications of nutrients, which are often the primary constraint on agricultural productivity. Soil micronutrient deficiencies can lead to dietary mineral deficiencies and negative health outcomes that further constrain productivity and household asset accumulation. Soils may also be important for smallholder resilience to stressors and shocks. For example, high-quality soil can reduce vulnerability to drought, and insurance against risk may promote investment in soils. Interventions such as fertilizer subsidies, micronutrient-fortified fertilizer and improved access to information, insurance and credit may all help break the soil–poverty cycle.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development (World Bank, 2008).

  2. 2.

    & The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: empirical and policy implications. J. Dev. Stud. 49, 976–990 (2013).

  3. 3.

    & in Handbook of Economic Growth (eds Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S.) 295–384 (Elsevier, 2005).

  4. 4.

    & The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: an asset-based approach. J. Dev. Stud. 42, 178–199 (2006).

  5. 5.

    Nutritional status, the capacity for work and poverty traps. J. Econometrics 77, 5–37 (1997).

  6. 6.

    , , Multiple equilibria, soil conservation, and the resilience of agricultural system. Environ. Dev. Econ. 11, 477–492 (2006).

  7. 7.

    in Economics of Poverty, the Environment and Natural Resource Use (eds Ruis, A. & Dellink, R.) Ch. 2, 17–40 (Springer, 2008).

  8. 8.

    et al. Modeling the impact of natural resource-based poverty traps on food security in Kenya: the crops, livestock and soils in smallholder economic systems (CLASSES) model. Food Sec. 4, 423–439 (2012).

  9. 9.

    & When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res. 143, 76–90 (2013).

  10. 10.

    et al. Escaping poverty and becoming poor in 36 villages of central and western Uganda. J. Dev. Stud. 42, 346–370 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Welfare dynamics in rural Kenya and Madagascar. J. Dev. Stud. 42, 248–277 (2006).

  12. 12.

    , , & Fertilizer use in African agriculture: lessons learned and good practice guidelines (World Bank, 2007).

  13. 13.

    How long will it take to lift one billion people out of poverty?” World Bank Res. Obser. 28, 139–158 (2013).

  14. 14.

    IFDC Report 31 (International Fertilizer Development Center, 2006).

  15. 15.

    On first World Soil Day, Secretary-General says in message, sustainable management should be universal priority, as healthy planet requires healthy soils. United Nations Press Release (3 December 2014);

  16. 16.

    & Soil quality and fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Agr. Econ. 40, 561–572 (2009).

  17. 17.

    & State-conditional fertilizer yield response on Western Kenyan Farms. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 91, 991–1006 (2009).

  18. 18.

    & Determinants of adoption and continued use of stone terraces for soil and water conservation in an Ethiopian highland watershed. Ecol. Econ. 61, 294–302 (2007).

  19. 19.

    Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degr. Dev. 17, 197–209 (2006).

  20. 20.

    & Hunger in Africa: the link between unhealthy people and unhealthy soils. Lancet 365, 442–444 (2005).

  21. 21.

    , & The impact of voucher coupons on the uptake of fertilizer and improved seeds: evidence from a randomized trial in Mozambique. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 95, 1345–1351 (2013).

  22. 22.

    , , & Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 119, 112–126 (2007).

  23. 23.

    Selection and comparative advantage in technology adoption. Econometrica 79, 159–209 (2011).

  24. 24.

    , , & Self-Selection into Credit Markets: Evidence from Agriculture in Mali Report No. w20387 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014).

  25. 25.

    & Soil fertility management in west Kenya: dynamic simulation of productivity, profitability and sustainability at different resource endowment levels. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 71, 131–145 (1998).

  26. 26.

    & Household adoption behaviour of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Land Use Policy 17, 321–336 (2000).

  27. 27.

    Poverty, consumption risk, and soil conservation. J. Dev. Econ. 65, 267–290 (2001).

  28. 28.

    , & Determinants of demand for purchased fertilizers in Mbale district in Uganda. Proc. Afr. Crop Sci. Conf. 7 771–774 (2005).

  29. 29.

    & Household-level determinants of adoption of improved natural resources management practices among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Food Policy 32, 515–536 (2007).

  30. 30.

    , , & Nutrient allocation strategies across a simplified heterogeneous African smallholder farm. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116, 60–71 (2006).

  31. 31.

    , , & Variable grain legume yields, responses to phosphorus and rotational effects on maize across soil fertility gradients on African smallholder farms. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 80, 1–18 (2008).

  32. 32.

    , , & Multiple benefits of manure: the key to maintenance of soil fertility and restoration of depleted sandy soils on African smallholder farms. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 80, 267–282 (2008).

  33. 33.

    & Forecasting profitability. Working Paper 19334 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013).

  34. 34.

    , & Within-farm soil fertility gradients affect response of maize to fertiliser application in western Kenya. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 76, 171–182 (2006).

  35. 35.

    , & Sesbania tree fallows on phosphorus-deficient sites: maize yield and financial benefit. Agron. J. 90, 717–726 (1998).

  36. 36.

    , , & Profitability of fertilizer: experimental evidence from female rice farmers in Mali. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 381–386 (2013).

  37. 37.

    et al. Cereal yield response to conservation agriculture practices in drylands of West Africa: a quantitative synthesis. J. Arid Environ. 78, 13–25 (2012).

  38. 38.

    & Farm-level benefits to investments for mitigating land degradation: empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Environ. Dev. Econ. 6, 335–358 (2001).

  39. 39.

    & Soil and water conservation decision behavior of subsistence farmers in the Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: a case study of the Hunde-Lafto area. Ecol. Econ. 46, 437–451 (2003).

  40. 40.

    & Poverty and soil conservation efforts among smallholder farmers in the central highlands of Ethiopia: economics. South Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 9, 244–261 (2006).

  41. 41.

    & Investment in soil conservation in northern Ethiopia: the role of land tenure security and public programs. Agr. Econ. 29, 69–84 (2003).

  42. 42.

    , , , & Understanding poverty dynamics in Kenya. J. Intl Dev. 22, 978–996 (2010).

  43. 43.

    The Condition of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure (Allan and Urwin, 1965).

  44. 44.

    & Geographic poverty traps? A micro model of consumption growth in rural China. J. Appl. Econometrics 17, 329–346 (2002).

  45. 45.

    , & Geography and poverty traps. J. Econ. Growth 8, 355–378 (2003).

  46. 46.

    Low use of fertilizers and low productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 47, 135–147 (1996).

  47. 47.

    , , , & The supply of inorganic fertilizers to smallholder farmers in Uganda: evidence for fertilizer policy development Discussion Paper 01228 (International Food Policy Research Institute, 2012).

  48. 48.

    Food marketing liberalization and trader entry: evidence from Madagascar. World Dev. 25, 763–777 (1997).

  49. 49.

    Imperfect competition in agricultural markets: evidence from Ethiopia. J. Dev. Econ. 76, 405–428 (2005).

  50. 50.

    , & Optimal investment in transportation infrastructure when middlemen have market power: a developing-country analysis. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 91, 462–476 (2009).

  51. 51.

    , & Spatial integration at multiple scales: rice markets in Madagascar. Agr. Econ. 40, 281–294 (2009).

  52. 52.

    & Land tenure and investment in African agriculture: theory and evidence. J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 28, 265–297 (1990).

  53. 53.

    & Tenure security and land-related investment: evidence from Ethiopia. Eur. Econ. Rev. 50, 1245–1277 (2006).

  54. 54.

    & Fractal poverty traps. World Dev. 34, 1–15 (2006).

  55. 55.

    et al. The impact of improving nutrition during early childhood on education among Guatemalan adults. Econ. J. 119, 734–763 (2009).

  56. 56.

    in Trace Elements in Human and Animals Nutrition 5th edn (ed. Mertz, W.) 465–488 (Academic, 1986).

  57. 57.

    & in The Fight Against Hunger and Malnutrition: The Role of Food, Agriculture, and Targeted Policies. (ed. Sahn, D. E.) Ch. 3, 61–88 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).

  58. 58.

    Soil-to-human mineral transmission with an emphasis on zinc, selenium, and iodine. Springer Sci. Rev. 3, 77–96 (2015).

  59. 59.

    in Essentials of Medical Geology (eds Centeno, J. A., Finkelman, R. B., Fuge, R., Lindh, U. & Smedley, P) 417–432 (Springer, 2013).

  60. 60.

    Minerals in Animals and Human Nutrition. 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2003).

  61. 61.

    , , , & An environmental approach to correcting iodine deficiency: supplementing iodine in soil by iodination of irrigation water in remote areas. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 22, 1–8 (2008).

  62. 62.

    et al. Iodination of irrigation water as a method of supplying iodine to a severely iodine-deficient population in Xinjiang, China. Lancet 344, 107–110 (1994).

  63. 63.

    Biogeochemistry of selenium and its impact on food chain quality and human health. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 18, 309–318 (2005).

  64. 64.

    , Changes in selenium, zinc, copper, and cadmium contents in human milk during the time when selenium has been supplemented to fertilizers in Finland. J. Trace Elem. Med. Bio. 15, 11–17 (2001).

  65. 65.

    Low selenium status and cot deaths. Med. Hypotheses 35, 311–314 (1991).

  66. 66.

    The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 356, 233–241 (2000).

  67. 67.

    Review: micronutrient selenium deficiency influences evolution of some viral infectious diseases. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 143, 1325–1336 (2011).

  68. 68.

    & Bimodal actions of selenium essential for antioxidant and toxic pro-oxidant activities: the selenium paradox. Mol. Med. Rep. 5, 299–304 (2012).

  69. 69.

    Micronutrient nutritional problems in soils of India and improvement for human and animal health. Indian J. Fert. 5, 11–16 (2009).

  70. 70.

    Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition 2nd edn (International Zinc Association and International Fertilizer Industry Association, 2008).

  71. 71.

    Zinc is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent: its role in human health. Front. Nutrition 1, 14 (2014).

  72. 72.

    , , , , A food-based approach to improving zinc nutrition through increasing the zinc content of rice in Bangladesh. J. Hunger Environ. Nutr. 2, 19–39 (2007).

  73. 73.

    et al. Maize grain and soil surveys reveal suboptimal dietary selenium intake is widespread in Malawi. Scientific Reports 1, 72 (2011).

  74. 74.

    Smallholder market participation: concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy 33, 299–317 (2008).

  75. 75.

    , , & Iron and zinc content of selected foods in the diet of school children in Kumi district, East of Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Nutr. J. 10, 81–93 (2011).

  76. 76.

    & Agricultural production and children's diets: Evidence from rural Ethiopia Working Paper 69 (International Food Policy Research Institute, 2014).

  77. 77.

    , & How much nutritional iron deficiency in humans globally is due to an underlying zinc deficiency? Adv. Agron. 115, 1–40 (2012).

  78. 78.

    & Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci. 50, S20–S32 (2010).

  79. 79.

    , Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371, 243–260 (2008).

  80. 80.

    The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2013).

  81. 81.

    Zinc deficiency has been known of for 40 years but ignored by global health organizations. Brit. Med. J. 326, 409–410 (2003).

  82. 82.

    & Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control. Food Nutr. Bull. 25, S91–204 (2004).

  83. 83.

    & in Handbook of Nutritionally Essential Mineral Elements (eds O'Dell, B. L. & Sunde, R. A.) 557–582 (Marcel Dekker, 1997).

  84. 84.

    , , & Selenium in reproductive health. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206, 21–30 (2012).

  85. 85.

    , , , & Effect of a nutrition intervention during early childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults. Lancet 371, 411–416 (2008).

  86. 86.

    & Wealth, weather risk, and the composition and profitability of agricultural investments. Econ. J. 103, 56–78 (1993).

  87. 87.

    & Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14625–14630 (2014).

  88. 88.

    Observations on the current status of Orobanche and Striga problems worldwide. Pest Manag. Sci. 65, 453–459 (2009).

  89. 89.

    , & Host-parasite dynamics of Sorghum bicolor and Striga hermonthica — the influence of soil organic matter amendments of different C:N ratio. Crop Prot. 30, 1613–1622 (2011).

  90. 90.

    et al. Evergreen agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Sec. 2, 197–214 (2010).

  91. 91.

    et al. Ecology of Aspergillus flavus, regulation of aflatoxin production, and management strategies to reduce aflatoxin contamination of corn. Toxin Rev. 28, 142–153 (2009).

  92. 92.

    , & Population ecology of Aspergillus flavus associated with Mississippi Delta soils. Food Addit. Contam. 24, 1102–1108 (2007).

  93. 93.

    & Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: Evidence from Ethiopia. J. Dev. Econ. 96, 159–173 (2011).

  94. 94.

    , & Productivity, credit, risk, and the demand for weather index insurance in smallholder agriculture in Ethiopia. Agr. Econ. 44, 399–417 (2013).

  95. 95.

    et al. Integrated soil fertility management: operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook Agr. 39, 17–24 (2010).

  96. 96.

    , Fertilizer subsidies in sub-Saharan Africa. ESA Working Paper No. 12–04 (FOA, 2012).

  97. 97.

    & Do fertilizer subsidies crowd out organic manures? The case of Malawi. Agr. Econ. 43, 303–314 (2012).

  98. 98.

    , Assessment of soil nutrient depletion in Sub-Saharan Africa: 1983–2000 (Vol. 1). Report 28 (Winand Staring Centre, 1990).

  99. 99.

    & Agricultural production and soil nutrient mining in Africa: implications for resource conservation and policy development (International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development, 2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Julia Berazneva, Ken Giller, Teevrat Garg, Chris Golden, Stein Holden, Johannes Lehmann, Linden McBride, Pedro Sanchez, Ross Welch, Meghan Sheahan, Rachel Hestrin and Bernard Vanlauwe each offered helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. The Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA

    • Christopher B. Barrett
    •  & Leah E. M. Bevis

Authors

  1. Search for Christopher B. Barrett in:

  2. Search for Leah E. M. Bevis in:

Contributions

Both authors conceived of and designed the research, and drafted, reviewed, edited and revised the manuscript. L.E.M.B. performed data analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher B. Barrett.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2591

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing