Circulation response to warming shaped by radiative changes of clouds and water vapour

Nature Geoscience volume 8, pages102–106(2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The atmospheric circulation controls how global climate change will be expressed regionally. Substantial circulation changes are expected under global warming, including a narrowing of the intertropical convergence zone1,2, a slow down and poleward expansion of the tropical circulation3,4, and a poleward shift of mid-latitude stormtracks and jets5,6. Yet, climate model projections of the circulation response to climate change remain uncertain7. Here we present simulations with two different aquaplanet climate models and analyse these simulations using the cloud and water-vapour locking method. We find that radiative changes of clouds and water vapour are key to the regional response of precipitation and circulation to global warming. Model disagreement in the response of key characteristics of the atmospheric circulation—the intertropical convergence zone, the strength of the Hadley circulation, and the trade winds—arises from disagreement between the models in radiative changes of tropical ice clouds and their coupling to the circulation. We find that cloud changes amplify a poleward shift of the extratropical jet, whereas water vapour changes oppose such a shift, but the degree of compensation is model-dependent. We conclude that radiative changes of clouds and water vapour are not only integral to the magnitude of future global-mean warming but also determine patterns of regional climate change.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Precipitation response in two CMIP5 aquaplanet models under a uniform 4 K surface warming.
Figure 2: Decomposition of tropical precipitation and vertical velocity response to global warming.
Figure 3: Impact of radiative changes of clouds and water vapour on the atmospheric temperature and zonal wind response to global warming in MPI-ESM (top) and IPSL-CM5A (bottom).

References

  1. 1

    Neelin, J. D., Chou, C. & Su, H. Tropical drought regions in global warming and El Niño teleconnections. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2275 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Huang, P., Xie, S-P., Hu, K., Huang, G. & Huang, R. Patterns of the seasonal response of tropical rainfall to global warming. Nature Geosci. 6, 357–361 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Lu, J., G. Vecchi, G. A. & Reichler, T. Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L06805 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Yin, J. H. A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18701 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Barnes, E. A. & Polvani, L. M. Response of the midlatitude jets and of their variability to increased greenhouse gases in CMIP5 models. J. Clim. 26, 7117–7135 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Collins, M. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. et al.) Ch. 12, 1029–1136 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Knutti, R. & Sedlacek, J. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nature Clim. Change 3, 369–373 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Stevens, B. & Bony, S. What are climate models missing? Science 340, 1053–1054 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Medeiros, B., Stevens, B. & Bony, S. Using aquaplanets to understand the robust responses of comprehensive climate models to forcing. Clim. Dynam. 1–21 (2014).

  11. 11

    Neale, R. B. & Hoskins, B. J. A standard test for AGCMs including their physical parametrizations: I: The proposal. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 1, 101–107 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Blackburn, M. et al. The Aqua-Planet Experiment (APE): Control SST simulation. J. Meteorol. Res. Jpn 91A, 17–56 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Stevens, B. et al. Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 5, 146–172 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Dufresne, J-L. et al. Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: From CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim. Dynam. 40, 2123–2165 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Chou, C. & Neelin, J. D. Mechanisms of global warming impacts on regional tropical precipitation. J. Clim. 17, 2688–2701 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Bony, S. et al. Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation. Nature Geosci. 6, 447–451 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Hartmann, D. L. & Larson, K. An important constraint on tropical cloud–climate feedback. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1951 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Schneider, T. The general circulation of the atmosphere. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34, 655–688 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Held, I. M. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Program (Woods Hole Oceanogr. Institute, 2000); http://gfd.whoi.edu/proceedings/2000/PDFvol2000.html

  21. 21

    Frierson, D. M. W., Lu, J. & Chen, G. Width of the Hadley cell in simple and comprehensive general circulation models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L18804 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Held, I. & Soden, B. Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 25, 441–475 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Bony, S. & Dufresne, J-L. Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L20806 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Voigt, A., Bony, S., Dufresne, J-L. & Stevens, B. Radiative impact of clouds on the shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 4308–4315 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Grise, K. M. & Polvani, L. M. Southern Hemisphere cloud-dynamics biases in CMIP5 models and their implications for climate projections. J. Clim. 27, 6074–6092 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Su, H. et al. Weakening and strengthening structures in the Hadley Circulation change under global warming and implications for cloud response and climate sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 5787–5805 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wetherald, R. T. & Manabe, S. Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci. 1397–1416 (1988).

  28. 28

    Mauritsen, T. et al. Climate feedback efficiency and synergy. Clim. Dynam. 41, 2539–2554 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Kang, S. M., Held, I. M., Frierson, D. M. W. & Zhao, M. The response of the ITCZ to extratropical thermal forcing: Idealized slab-ocean experiments with a GCM. J. Clim. 21, 3521–3532 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Voigt, A., Stevens, B., Bader, J. & Mauritsen, T. Compensation of hemispheric albedo asymmetries by shifts of the ITCZ and tropical clouds. J. Clim. 27, 1029–1045 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.V. and T.A.S. are supported by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. T.A.S. is also supported by NSF award AGS-1255208. We thank L. Polvani for helpful comments, and H. Liu for downloading the CMIP5 aquaplanet data. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modelling groups of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology and the Institute Pierre Simon Laplace for producing and making available their aquaControl and aqua4K aquaplanet simulations. For CMIP, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, New York 10964, USA

    Aiko Voigt & Tiffany A. Shaw

  2. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10025, USA

    Tiffany A. Shaw

  3. Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10025, USA

    Tiffany A. Shaw

Authors
  1. Aiko Voigt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiffany A. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.V. designed the study and conducted the simulations. A.V. and T.A.S. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aiko Voigt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 327 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voigt, A., Shaw, T. Circulation response to warming shaped by radiative changes of clouds and water vapour. Nature Geosci 8, 102–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2345

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing