Article | Published:

Evidence for subduction in the ice shell of Europa

Nature Geoscience volume 7, pages 762767 (2014) | Download Citation


Jupiter’s icy moon Europa has one of the youngest planetary surfaces in the Solar System, implying rapid recycling by some mechanism. Despite ubiquitous extension and creation of new surface area at dilational bands that resemble terrestrial mid-ocean spreading zones, there is little evidence of large-scale contraction to balance the observed extension or to recycle ageing terrains. We address this enigma by presenting several lines of evidence that subduction may be recycling surface material into the interior of Europa’s ice shell. Using Galileo spacecraft images, we produce a tectonic reconstruction of geologic features across a 134,000 km2 region of Europa and find, in addition to dilational band spreading, evidence for transform motions along prominent strike-slip faults, as well as the removal of approximately 20,000 km2 of the surface along a discrete tabular zone. We interpret this zone as a subduction-like convergent boundary that abruptly truncates older geological features and is flanked by potential cryolavas on the overriding ice. We propose that Europa’s ice shell has a brittle, mobile, plate-like system above convecting warmer ice. Hence, Europa may be the only Solar System body other than Earth to exhibit a system of plate tectonics.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & in Europa (eds Pappalardo, R. T., McKinnon, W. B. & Khurana, K. K.) 199–236 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2009).

  2. 2.

    Cryovolcanic and Tectonic Resurfacing Mechanisms on Europa and Ganymede PhD dissertation, Univ. Arizona (2002)

  3. 3.

    & Forming Europa’s folds: Strain requirements for the production of large-amplitude deformation. Icarus 221, 694–709 (2012).

  4. 4.

    , & in Europa (eds Pappalardo, R. T., McKinnon, W. B. & Khurana, K. K.) 161–180 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2009).

  5. 5.

    et al. Morphology of Europan bands at high resolution: A mid-ocean ridge-type rift mechanism. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1–26 (2002).

  6. 6.

    Dynamics of rifting and modes of extension on icy satellites. J. Geophys. Res. 109, 1–13 (2004).

  7. 7.

    , & Model constraints on the opening rates of bands on Europa. Icarus 177, 297–304 (2005).

  8. 8.

    et al. Polar wander and surface convergence of Europa’s ice shell: Evidence from a survey of strike-slip displacement. Icarus 158, 24–41 (2002).

  9. 9.

    & Folds on Europa: Implications for crustal cycling and accommodation of extension. Science 289, 941–944 (2000).

  10. 10.

    & Does folding accommodate Europa’s contractional strain? The effect of surface temperature on fold formation in ice lithospheres. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2534–2538 (2013).

  11. 11.

    & Formation mechanisms of Europan ridges with apparent lateral offsets. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. Abstr. 39, 2036 (2008).

  12. 12.

    , , & Double ridges on Europa accommodate some of the missing surface contraction. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 1–9 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Stresses generated in cooling viscoelastic ice shells: Application to Europa. J. Geophys. Res. 109, 1–10 ( 2004).

  14. 14.

    & The great thickness debate: Ice shell thickness models for Europa and comparisons with estimates based on flexure at ridges. Icarus 177, 397–412 (2005).

  15. 15.

    Side-scan sonar studies of North Atlantic fracture zones. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 136, 283–292 (1979).

  16. 16.

    Late Paleozoic strike-slip faults and related vein arrays of Cape Elizabeth, Maine. J. Struct. Geol. 28, 456–473 (2006).

  17. 17.

    & in Europa (eds Pappalardo, R. T., McKinnon, W. B. & Khurana, K. K.) 259–281 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2009).

  18. 18.

    , , & Active formation of ‘chaos terrain’ over shallow subsurface water on Europa. Nature 479, 502–505 (2011).

  19. 19.

    , & in Continental Transpressional and Transtensional Tectonics Vol. 135 (eds Holdsworth, R. E., Strachan, R. A. & Dewey, J. F.) 1–14 (Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 1998).

  20. 20.

    et al. Cryoflotation: Densities of amorphous and crystalline ices. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 14167–14175 (2011).

  21. 21.

    & One-hundred-km-scale basins on Enceladus: Evidence for an active ice shell. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, 1–5 (2009).

  22. 22.

    & A common origin for icy satellite extensional ridge-and-trough terrain by sluggish lid convection. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. Abstr. 45, 2427 (2014).

  23. 23.

    & Workshop on Ices, Oceans, and Fire: Satellites of the Outer Solar System Vol. 1357 108–109 (LPI Contribution, 2007).

  24. 24.

    et al. Does Europa have a subsurface ocean? Evaluation of the geological evidence. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 24015–24055 (1999).

  25. 25.

    et al. Transient water vapor at Europa’s south pole. Science 343, 171–174 (2014).

  26. 26.

    , & Plate motion on Europa and nonrigid behavior of the icy lithosphere: The Castalia Macula region. J. Struct. Geol. 28, 2237–2258 (2006).

  27. 27.

    et al. Polar wander and surface convergence of Europa’s ice shell: Evidence from a survey of strike-slip displacement. Icarus 158, 24–41 (2002).

  28. 28.

    Strike-slip fault evolution on Europa: Evidence from tailcrack geometries. Icarus 172, 582–602 (2004).

Download references


Images used in this analysis are available through the NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) Imaging Node at We thank C. Cooper for input on geodynamic considerations, H. Meyer for assistance with image mosaics in ArcGIS, and P. Figueredo for sharing original data on surface area calculations for dilational bands. Artwork for Fig. 4 was created by N. Kroese.

Author information

Author notes

    • Simon A. Kattenhorn

    Present address: ConocoPhillips Company, 600 N. Dairy Ashford, Houston, Texas 77079, USA.


  1. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 3022, Moscow Idaho 83844-3022, USA

    • Simon A. Kattenhorn
  2. Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel Maryland 20723, USA

    • Louise M. Prockter


  1. Search for Simon A. Kattenhorn in:

  2. Search for Louise M. Prockter in:


S.A.K. was responsible for the tectonic reconstructions of the study area. L.M.P. was responsible for the morphological analyses of the boundaries. Both authors contributed to the interpretation and analysis and to the preparation and finalization of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon A. Kattenhorn.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history





Further reading