Abstract

The protection of organic carbon stored in forests is considered as an important method for mitigating climate change. Like terrestrial ecosystems, coastal ecosystems store large amounts of carbon, and there are initiatives to protect these ‘blue carbon’ stores. Organic carbon stocks in tidal salt marshes and mangroves have been estimated, but uncertainties in the stores of seagrass meadows—some of the most productive ecosystems on Earth—hinder the application of marine carbon conservation schemes. Here, we compile published and unpublished measurements of the organic carbon content of living seagrass biomass and underlying soils in 946 distinct seagrass meadows across the globe. Using only data from sites for which full inventories exist, we estimate that, globally, seagrass ecosystems could store as much as 19.9 Pg organic carbon; according to a more conservative approach, in which we incorporate more data from surface soils and depth-dependent declines in soil carbon stocks, we estimate that the seagrass carbon pool lies between 4.2 and 8.4 Pg carbon. We estimate that present rates of seagrass loss could result in the release of up to 299 Tg carbon per year, assuming that all of the organic carbon in seagrass biomass and the top metre of soils is remineralized.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  2. 2.

    , & Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, 373–396 (2011).

  3. 3.

    IPCC Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 2003).

  4. 4.

    IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report 104 (IPCC, 2007).

  5. 5.

    , & Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world’s most carbon-dense forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11635–11640 (2009).

  6. 6.

    , , & Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1111 (2003).

  7. 7.

    et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nature Geosci. 4, 293–297 (2011).

  8. 8.

    , & Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 2, 1–8 (2005).

  9. 9.

    et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ 7, 362–370 (2011).

  10. 10.

    & Seagrass biomass and production: A reassessment. Aquat. Bot. 65, 159–174 (1999).

  11. 11.

    & in Handbook of Seagrass Biology, An Ecosystem Prospective (eds Phillips, R. C. & McRoy, C. P.) 87–116 (Garland STPMPress, 1980).

  12. 12.

    et al. Seagrass sediments as a global carbon sink: Isotopic constraints. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB4026 (2010).

  13. 13.

    , , & in Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation (eds Larkum, A. W. D., Orth, R. J. & Duarte, C. M.) 159–192 (Springer, 2006).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Dynamics of millenary organic deposits resulting from the growth of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 44, 103–110 (1997).

  15. 15.

    et al. Geochemistry of Florida Bay sediments: Nutrient history at five sites in eastern and central Florida Bay. J. Coast. Res. 15, 1055–1071 (1999).

  16. 16.

    et al. The Posidonia oceanica marine sedimentary record: A Holocene archive of heavy metal pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 4831–4840 (2011).

  17. 17.

    Marine macrophytes as a global carbon sink. Science 211, 838–840 (1981).

  18. 18.

    et al. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12377–12381 (2009).

  19. 19.

    et al. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. BioScience 56, 987–996 (2006).

  20. 20.

    IPCC in IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (eds H.S. Eggleston et al.) (National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme,IGES, 2006).

  21. 21.

    & The comparative estimation of phytoplanktonic and microphytobenthic production in the oceans. Mar. Microb. Food Webs 4, 31–57 (1990).

  22. 22.

    Balancing the global carbon budget. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35, 313–347 (2007).

  23. 23.

    , , & Assessing the capacity of seagrass meadows for carbon burial: Current limitations and future strategies. Ocean Coast. Manage. 51, 671–688 (2011).

  24. 24.

    , , & Experimental assessment and modeling evaluation of the effects of seagrass (P. oceanica) on flow and particle trapping. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 356, 163–173 (2007).

  25. 25.

    et al. Very high-resolution seismo-acoustic imaging of seagrass meadows (Mediterranean Sea): Implications for carbon sink estimates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18601 (2008).

  26. 26.

    & Natural and human-induced disturbance of seagrasses. Environ. Conserv. 23, 17–27 (1996).

  27. 27.

    et al. Seagrass community metabolism: Assessing the carbon sink capacity of seagrass meadows. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB4032 (2010).

  28. 28.

    et al. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137, 253–268 (2007).

  29. 29.

    , , & Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecol. Manag 168, 241–257 (2002).

  30. 30.

    , , & in Coastal Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach (eds Perillo, M. E., Wolanski, E., Cahoon, D. R. & Brinson, M. M.) (Elsevier, 2009).

  31. 31.

    The future of seagrass meadows. Environ. Conserv. 29, 192–206 (2002).

  32. 32.

    , & Restoring coastal plants to improve global carbon storage: Reaping what we sow. Plos One 6, e18311 (2011).

  33. 33.

    , , & Wind-driven sediment suspension controls light availability in a shallow coastal lagoon. Estuar. Coasts 30, 102–112 (2007).

  34. 34.

    , , , & Seagrass recovery in the Delmarva Coastal Bays, USA. Aquat. Bot. 84, 26–36 (2006).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Seed addition facilitates Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) recovery in a coastal bay system (USA). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 448, 177–195 (2012).

  36. 36.

    et al. Recovery trajectories during state change from bare sediment to eelgrass dominance. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 448, 209–221 (2012).

  37. 37.

    , & Rates of change in organic matter and nutrient stocks during seagrass Cymodocea nodosa colonization and stand development. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 159, 29–36 (1997).

  38. 38.

    , , , & Community metabolism and carbon budget along a gradient of seagrass (Cymodocea nodosa) colonization. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 1642–1651 (2004).

  39. 39.

    et al. Blue Carbon. A Rapid Response Assessment 78 (United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arenal, 2009).

  40. 40.

    Seagrass nutrient content. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 67, 201–207 (1990).

  41. 41.

    , , , & Spatial and temporal variation in the elemental and stable isotopic content of the seagrasses Posidonia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa from the Illes Balears, Spain. Mar. Biol. 151, 219–232 (2007).

  42. 42.

    , , & Spatial and temporal variation in C:N:P ratios, δ15N, and δ13C of eelgrass Zostera marina as indicators of ecosystem processes, Tomales Bay, California, USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 157, 147–157 (1997).

  43. 43.

    , & Phosphorus limitation of primary production in Florida Bay: Evidence from the C:N:P ratios of the dominant seagrass Thalassia testudinum. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37, 162–171 (1992).

  44. 44.

    & Seagrass Ecology (Cambridge Univ.Press, 2000).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is a contribution of the International Blue Carbon Science Working Group. We thank the contributors of unpublished data to our database, including A. Paytan, W.H. Orem and M. Copertino. Partial support for J.W.F.’s contribution was provided by a Gledden Visiting Senior Fellowship from the Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Western Australia and an Australian National Network in Marine Sciences Visiting Scholar fellowship and by the National Science Foundation through the Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research programme under Grant No. DBI-0620409. C.M.D and N.M. were financially supported through the MEDEICG project of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project ID CTM2009-07013). G.A.K. was supported by NHT II- Caring for our Country funding. M.H. was financially supported by the Danish Natural Science Foundation (09-071369). M.A.M. and O.S. acknowledge the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) and the High Council of Scientific Research (CSIC) for financially supporting various pioneering projects to explore the role of P. oceanica as a coastal C sink and a palaeoecological record. D.K.J. acknowledges the Danish National Monitoring and Assessment Programme for the Aquatic and Terrestrial Environment (NOVANA) and colleagues associated with the programme for support. K.J.M. was supported by the National Science Foundation through the Virginia Coast Reserve Long-Term Ecological Research programme under Grant No. 0621014. This is contribution no. 550 from the Southeast Environmental Research Center at Florida International University.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences and Southeast Environmental Research Center, Marine Science Program, Florida International University, 3000 NE 151 St, North Miami, Florida 33181, USA

    • James W. Fourqurean
  2. Department of Global Change Research. IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB) Institut Mediterrani d’Estudis Avançats, C/ Miguel Marqués 21, 07190 Esporles (Mallorca), Spain

    • Carlos M. Duarte
    •  & Núria Marbà
  3. The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia

    • Carlos M. Duarte
    •  & Gary A. Kendrick
  4. School of Ocean Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Askew Street, Menai Bridge, LL59 5AB, UK

    • Hilary Kennedy
  5. Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark

    • Marianne Holmer
  6. Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes, (CEAB-CSIC), Acceso Cala S. Francesc 14, 17300 Blanes, Spain

    • Miguel Angel Mateo
    •  & Oscar Serrano
  7. Institute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, PO Box 2214, 71003, Heraklion—Crete, Greece

    • Eugenia T. Apostolaki
  8. School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia

    • Gary A. Kendrick
  9. Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark

    • Dorte Krause-Jensen
  10. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, PO Box 400123, Clark Hall, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA

    • Karen J. McGlathery

Authors

  1. Search for James W. Fourqurean in:

  2. Search for Carlos M. Duarte in:

  3. Search for Hilary Kennedy in:

  4. Search for Núria Marbà in:

  5. Search for Marianne Holmer in:

  6. Search for Miguel Angel Mateo in:

  7. Search for Eugenia T. Apostolaki in:

  8. Search for Gary A. Kendrick in:

  9. Search for Dorte Krause-Jensen in:

  10. Search for Karen J. McGlathery in:

  11. Search for Oscar Serrano in:

Contributions

All authors contributed extensively to the work presented in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Fourqurean.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1477

Further reading