Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse

Abstract

We demonstrate that the binding sites for highly conserved transcription factors vary extensively between human and mouse. We mapped the binding of four tissue-specific transcription factors (FOXA2, HNF1A, HNF4A and HNF6) to 4,000 orthologous gene pairs in hepatocytes purified from human and mouse livers. Despite the conserved function of these factors, from 41% to 89% of their binding events seem to be species specific. When the same protein binds the promoters of orthologous genes, approximately two-thirds of the binding sites do not align.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Strategy to analyze interactions between transcription factors and DNA in mouse and human.
Figure 2: Comparison of binding in human and mouse.

References

  1. Bird, C.P., Stranger, B.E. & Dermitzakis, E.T. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 559–564 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moses, A.M. et al. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e130 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prabhakar, S., Noonan, J.P., Paabo, S. & Rubin, E.M. Science 314, 786 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. King, M.C. & Wilson, A.C. Science 188, 107–116 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyer, L.A. et al. Cell 122, 947–956 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loh, Y.H. et al. Nat. Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Odom, D.T. et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 2006.0017 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaret, K.S. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 499–512 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Richert, L. et al. Drug Metab. Dispos. 34, 870–879 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qi, Y. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 963–970 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Natarajan, A.T. & Darroudi, F. Mutagenesis 6, 399–403 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Macisaac, K.D. et al. Bioinformatics 22, 423–429 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz, S. et al. Genome Res. 13, 103–107 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, S.H. et al. Diabetes 53, 1375–1384 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guccione, E. et al. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 764–770 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to S. Strom and K. Dorko (University of Pittsburgh) for human liver samples (DK92310); T. DiCesare, S. Gupta, R. Kumar, J. Rodriguez and K. Walker for technical assistance and R. Young and G. Gerber for discussions. This work was supported by funding from US National Institutes of Health (grants DK68655 and DK70813 (D.T.O.) and DK076284 (R.D.D.)), Cancer Research UK (D.T.O.) and the Whitaker Foundation (E.F.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.T.O., R.D.D. and E.F. designed experiments; R.D.D. designed the arrays; D.T.O., E.S.J., W.G. and C.M.C. performed experiments; R.D.D., T.W.D, K.D.M., P.A.R. and E.F. analyzed the data and D.T.O, R.D.D., D.K.G. and E.F. created the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest Fraenkel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Binding to known liver-specific genes. (PDF 198 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Species-specific binding does not arise from technical limitations. (PDF 369 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Distance from binding maxima to motif sequences. (PDF 109 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Conservation of transcription factors and expression in human and mouse liver. (PDF 88 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Species-specific binding does not arise from technical limitations. (PDF 266 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Analysis of motif sequences and alignments. (PDF 583 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 27 kb)

Supplementary Note (PDF 53 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odom, D., Dowell, R., Jacobsen, E. et al. Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse. Nat Genet 39, 730–732 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2047

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing