Letter | Published:

The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA

Nature Genetics volume 39, pages 544549 (2007) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Retention of juvenile traits in the adult reproductive phase characterizes a process known as neoteny, and speculation exists over whether it has contributed to the evolution of new species. The dominant Corngrass1 (Cg1) mutant of maize is a neotenic mutation that results in phenotypes that may be present in the grass-like ancestors of maize. We cloned Cg1 and found that it encodes two tandem miR156 genes that are overexpressed in the meristem and lateral organs. Furthermore, a target of Cg1 is teosinte glume architecture1 (tga1)1, a gene known to have had a role in the domestication of maize from teosinte. Cg1 mutant plants overexpressing miR156 have lower levels of mir172, a microRNA that targets genes controlling juvenile development2. By altering the relative levels of both microRNAs, it is possible to either prolong or shorten juvenile development in maize, thus providing a mechanism for how species-level heterochronic changes can occur in nature.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  1. 1.

    et al. The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature 436, 714–719 (2005).

  2. 2.

    , , , & microRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9412–9417 (2005).

  3. 3.

    & Patterns in Plant Development (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989).

  4. 4.

    Land and water forms: Physiological aspects. Handb. Pflugers Physiol. 15, 1236–1255 (1965).

  5. 5.

    & Developmental analysis of leaf plasticity in the heterophyllous aquatic plant Hippurus vulgaris. Am. J. Bot. 77, 399–412 (1990).

  6. 6.

    Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science 250, 923–930 (1990).

  7. 7.

    & Glossy15 controls the epidermal juvenile-to-adult phase transition in maize. Plant Cell 6, 1343–1355 (1994).

  8. 8.

    , & Heterochronic effects of glossy15 mutations on epidermal cell identity in maize. Development 120, 1971–1981 (1994).

  9. 9.

    & glossy15, an APETELA2-like gene from maize that regulates leaf epidermal cell identity. Genes Dev. 10, 3018–3027 (1996).

  10. 10.

    Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize. Genetics 119, 959–973 (1988).

  11. 11.

    & The developmental morphology of the mutant “Corn grass”. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 77, 274–286 (1950).

  12. 12.

    Corn grass. I. Corn grass as a prototype or a false progenitor of maize. Am. Nat. 88, 101–104 (1954).

  13. 13.

    Inheritance of Corn grass, a macromutation in maize, and its possible significance as an ancestral type. Am. Nat. 305, 81–96 (1951).

  14. 14.

    , & Organ initiation and the development of unisexual flowers in the tassel and ear of Zea mays. Am. J. Bot. 70, 450–462 (1983).

  15. 15.

    Corn grass. II. Effect of the Corn grass gene on the development of the maize inflorescence. Am. J. Bot. 41, 803–806 (1954).

  16. 16.

    et al. ramosa2 encodes a Lateral Organ Boundary domain protein that determines the fate of stem cells in branch meristems of maize. Plant Cell 18, 574–585 (2006).

  17. 17.

    , , , & The control of spikelet meristem identity by the branched silkless1 gene in maize. Science 298, 1238–1241 (2002).

  18. 18.

    Molecular and morphological evolution in Andropogoneae. in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons. Vol. 2. Symposium on Grass Systematics and Evolution (eds. Everett, J.E. & Jacobs, S.W.L.) (CSIRO, Melbourne, 2000).

  19. 19.

    & Molecular basis of mutations at the waxy locus of maize: correlation with the fine structure genetic map. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4177–4181 (1985).

  20. 20.

    et al. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 110, 513–520 (2002).

  21. 21.

    The Material Basis of Evolution, 436 (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Connnecticut, 1940).

  22. 22.

    Neoteny and the Origin of Flowering Plants, 207–219 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1976).

  23. 23.

    The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226, 792–801 (1984).

  24. 24.

    & Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129, 285–295 (1991).

  25. 25.

    et al. A chimeric ecdysone receptor facilitates methoxyfenozide-dependent restoration of male fertility in ms45 maize. Transgenic Res. 11, 455–465 (2002).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetal expression of the Ms45 gene. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14, 135–142 (2001).

  27. 27.

    , , , & CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer homolog, and HEN1, a novel protein, act in microRNA metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 12, 1484–1495 (2002).

  28. 28.

    In situ hybridization in plants. in Molecular Plant Pathology: a Practical Approach (eds. Bowles, D.J., Gurr, S.J. & McPherson, M.) 163–174 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).

  29. 29.

    , , & Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from rice. Plant Cell 17, 1397–1411 (2005).

  30. 30.

    , & Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120, 405–413 (1994).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank B. Li for his assistance with the isolation of the flanking sequences for Cg1-Pio allele, E. Unger for her helpful discussions and C. Lunde and E. Bortiri for reviewing the manuscript. G.C. was supported by US Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative grant 2004-03387. S.H. was supported by the US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service. K.S. was supported by the University of California Leadership Excellence through Advanced Degrees (LEADS) research program.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Plant Gene Expression Center, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, California 94710, USA.

    • George Chuck
    • , Koy Saeteurn
    •  & Sarah Hake
  2. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Johnston, Iowa 50131, USA.

    • A Mark Cigan

Authors

  1. Search for George Chuck in:

  2. Search for A Mark Cigan in:

  3. Search for Koy Saeteurn in:

  4. Search for Sarah Hake in:

Contributions

A.M.C. did the experiments described in Figure 2a,b and Supplementary Figure 1c. K.S. helped with positional cloning of Cg1-ref (Figs. 2c and 3b). G.C. carried out the analysis of Cg1-ref and analyzed the expression patterns of the microRNAs and target genes (Figs. 1, 2c–j, 3 and 4). G.C. wrote the manuscript with help from S.H. and A.M.C.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Chuck.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Fig. 1

    Corngrass1 epidermal peels and expression in transgenic lines.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Table 1

    Primers used in this study.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Note

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2001

Further reading