Correction: Corrigendum: Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies

Nat. Genet. 38, 209–213 (2006).

In Table 1 of the versions of this article initially published online and in print, the significance thresholds for C2 were incorrect, and the significance thresholds for Cjoint in the case of πsamples = 0.20 were incorrect. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article. This correction has been appended to the PDF version.

Table 1 Significance thresholds and power of joint analysis for two-stage genome-wide association designs

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/ng1706

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skol, A., Scott, L., Abecasis, G. et al. Correction: Corrigendum: Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38, 390 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0306-390

Download citation

Further reading