Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A role for the bacterial GATC methylome in antibiotic stress survival

Nature Genetics volume 48, pages 581–586 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is an increasingly serious public health threat1. Understanding pathways allowing bacteria to survive antibiotic stress may unveil new therapeutic targets2,3,4,5,6,7,8. We explore the role of the bacterial epigenome in antibiotic stress survival using classical genetic tools and single-molecule real-time sequencing to characterize genomic methylation kinetics. We find that Escherichia coli survival under antibiotic pressure is severely compromised without adenine methylation at GATC sites. Although the adenine methylome remains stable during drug stress, without GATC methylation, methyl-dependent mismatch repair (MMR) is deleterious and, fueled by the drug-induced error-prone polymerase Pol IV, overwhelms cells with toxic DNA breaks. In multiple E. coli strains, including pathogenic and drug-resistant clinical isolates, DNA adenine methyltransferase deficiency potentiates antibiotics from the β-lactam and quinolone classes. This work indicates that the GATC methylome provides structural support for bacterial survival during antibiotic stress and suggests targeting bacterial DNA methylation as a viable approach to enhancing antibiotic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Increased sensitivity to β-lactams in the absence of Dam methylation.
Figure 2: Kinetics of the Dam methylome during normal growth and under antibiotic stress.
Figure 3: Pol IV–dependent mutagenesis fuels MMR-mediated DNA damage in β-lactam–stressed Δdam E. coli.
Figure 4: Quinolone toxicity is potentiated in laboratory and pathogenic Δdam E. coli.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

NCBI Reference Sequence

References

  1. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Surveillance Report (World Health Organization, 2014).

  2. Lee, S. et al. Targeting a bacterial stress response to enhance antibiotic action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14570–14575 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu, T.K. & Collins, J.J. Engineered bacteriophage targeting gene networks as adjuvants for antibiotic therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4629–4634 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wigle, T.J. et al. Inhibitors of RecA activity discovered by high-throughput screening: cell-permeable small molecules attenuate the SOS response in Escherichia coli. J. Biomol. Screen. 14, 1092–1101 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brynildsen, M.P., Winkler, J.A., Spina, C.S., MacDonald, I.C. & Collins, J.J. Potentiating antibacterial activity by predictably enhancing endogenous microbial ROS production. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 160–165 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Poole, K. Bacterial stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2069–2089 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wexselblatt, E. et al. Relacin, a novel antibacterial agent targeting the stringent response. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002925 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Grant, S.S., Kaufmann, B.B., Chand, N.S., Haseley, N. & Hung, D.T. Eradication of bacterial persisters with antibiotic-generated hydroxyl radicals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12147–12152 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, C. et al. SOS response induction by β-lactams and bacterial defense against antibiotic lethality. Science 305, 1629–1631 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw, K.J. et al. Comparison of the changes in global gene expression of Escherichia coli induced by four bactericidal agents. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 5, 105–122 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaldalu, N., Mei, R. & Lewis, K. Killing by ampicillin and ofloxacin induces overlapping changes in Escherichia coli transcription profile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 890–896 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Goh, E.B. et al. Transcriptional modulation of bacterial gene expression by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 17025–17030 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mesak, L.R., Miao, V. & Davies, J. Effects of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on SOS and DNA repair gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 3394–3397 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Laureti, L., Matic, I. & Gutierrez, A. Bacterial responses and genome instability induced by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Antibiotics (Basel) 2, 100–114 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Poole, K. Stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 20, 227–234 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sexton, J.Z. et al. Novel inhibitors of E. coli RecA ATPase activity. Curr. Chem. Genomics 4, 34–42 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dwyer, D.J. et al. Antibiotics induce redox-related physiological alterations as part of their lethality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2100–E2109 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kohanski, M.A., Dwyer, D.J., Hayete, B., Lawrence, C.A. & Collins, J.J. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 130, 797–810 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kültz, D. Evolution of the cellular stress proteome: from monophyletic origin to ubiquitous function. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 3119–3124 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schroeder, E.A., Raimundo, N. & Shadel, G.S. Epigenetic silencing mediates mitochondria stress-induced longevity. Cell Metab. 17, 954–964 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chinnusamy, V. & Zhu, J.K. Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 133–139 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Weaver, I.C. et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 847–854 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Provençal, N., Booij, L. & Tremblay, R.E. The developmental origins of chronic physical aggression: biological pathways triggered by early life adversity. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 123–133 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Casadesús, J. & Low, D. Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 830–856 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Marinus, M.G. & Casadesus, J. Roles of DNA adenine methylation in host-pathogen interactions: mismatch repair, transcriptional regulation, and more. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33, 488–503 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vasu, K. & Nagaraja, V. Diverse functions of restriction-modification systems in addition to cellular defense. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 53–72 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Casadesús, J. & Low, D.A. Programmed heterogeneity: epigenetic mechanisms in bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 13929–13935 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Srikhanta, Y.N. et al. Phasevarions mediate random switching of gene expression in pathogenic Neisseria. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000400 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Camacho, E.M. & Casadesús, J. Regulation of traJ transcription in the Salmonella virulence plasmid by strand-specific DNA adenine hemimethylation. Mol. Microbiol. 57, 1700–1718 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Camacho, E.M. et al. Regulation of finP transcription by DNA adenine methylation in the virulence plasmid of Salmonella enterica. J. Bacteriol. 187, 5691–5699 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Brunet, Y.R., Bernard, C.S., Gavioli, M., Lloubès, R. & Cascales, E. An epigenetic switch involving overlapping Fur and DNA methylation optimizes expression of a type VI secretion gene cluster. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002205 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hernday, A.D., Braaten, B.A. & Low, D.A. The mechanism by which DNA adenine methylase and PapI activate the Pap epigenetic switch. Mol. Cell 12, 947–957 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Davis, B.M., Chao, M.C. & Waldor, M.K. Entering the era of bacterial epigenomics with single molecule real time DNA sequencing. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 16, 192–198 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fang, G. et al. Genome-wide mapping of methylated adenine residues in pathogenic Escherichia coli using single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1232–1239 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Flusberg, B.A. et al. Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Nat. Methods 7, 461–465 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Blow, M.J. et al. The epigenomic landscape of prokaryotes. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005854 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Horton, J.R., Zhang, X., Blumenthal, R.M. & Cheng, X. Structures of Escherichia coli DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) in complex with a non-GATC sequence: potential implications for methylation-independent transcriptional repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 4296–4308 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Guyot, J.B., Grassi, J., Hahn, U. & Guschlbauer, W. The role of the preserved sequences of Dam methylase. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3183–3190 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Schadt, E.E. et al. Modeling kinetic rate variation in third generation DNA sequencing data to detect putative modifications to DNA bases. Genome Res. 23, 129–141 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Urig, S. et al. The Escherichia coli Dam DNA methyltransferase modifies DNA in a highly processive reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 1085–1096 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tavazoie, S. & Church, G.M. Quantitative whole-genome analysis of DNA-protein interactions by in vivo methylase protection in E. coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 566–571 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, M.X. & Church, G.M. A whole genome approach to in vivo DNA-protein interactions in E. coli. Nature 360, 606–610 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Holst, B., Søgaard-Andersen, L., Pedersen, H. & Valentin-Hansen, P. The cAMP-CRP/CytR nucleoprotein complex in Escherichia coli: two pairs of closely linked binding sites for the cAMP-CRP activator complex are involved in combinatorial regulation of the cdd promoter. EMBO J. 11, 3635–3643 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hale, W.B., van der Woude, M.W. & Low, D.A. Analysis of nonmethylated GATC sites in the Escherichia coli chromosome and identification of sites that are differentially methylated in response to environmental stimuli. J. Bacteriol. 176, 3438–3441 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Løbner-Olesen, A., Skovgaard, O. & Marinus, M.G. Dam methylation: coordinating cellular processes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8, 154–160 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kunkel, T.A. & Erie, D.A. DNA mismatch repair. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 681–710 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Doutriaux, M.P., Wagner, R. & Radman, M. Mismatch-stimulated killing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2576–2578 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Marinus, M.G. Recombination is essential for viability of an Escherichia coli dam (DNA adenine methyltransferase) mutant. J. Bacteriol. 182, 463–468 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fram, R.J., Cusick, P.S., Wilson, J.M. & Marinus, M.G. Mismatch repair of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)-induced DNA damage. Mol. Pharmacol. 28, 51–55 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Karran, P. & Marinus, M.G. Mismatch correction at O6-methylguanine residues in E. coli DNA. Nature 296, 868–869 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Marinus, M.G. DNA methylation and mutator genes in Escherichia coli K-12. Mutat. Res. 705, 71–76 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Fijalkowska, I.J., Schaaper, R.M. & Jonczyk, P. DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 1105–1121 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Galhardo, R.S., Hastings, P.J. & Rosenberg, S.M. Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42, 399–435 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Pérez-Capilla, T. et al. SOS-independent induction of dinB transcription by β-lactam–mediated inhibition of cell wall synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187, 1515–1518 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Gutierrez, A. et al. β-Lactam antibiotics promote bacterial mutagenesis via an RpoS-mediated reduction in replication fidelity. Nat. Commun. 4, 1610 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rohwer, F. & Azam, F. Detection of DNA damage in prokaryotes by terminal deoxyribonucleotide transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1001–1006 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. McKelvie, J.C. et al. Inhibition of Yersinia pestis DNA adenine methyltransferase in vitro by a stibonic acid compound: identification of a potential novel class of antimicrobial agents. Br. J. Pharmacol. 168, 172–188 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hobley, G. et al. Development of rationally designed DNA N6 adenine methyltransferase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22, 3079–3082 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mashhoon, N., Pruss, C., Carroll, M., Johnson, P.H. & Reich, N.O. Selective inhibitors of bacterial DNA adenine methyltransferases. J. Biomol. Screen. 11, 497–510 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kohanski, M.A., DePristo, M.A. & Collins, J.J. Sublethal antibiotic treatment leads to multidrug resistance via radical-induced mutagenesis. Mol. Cell 37, 311–320 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Baharoglu, Z. & Mazel, D. Vibrio cholerae triggers SOS and mutagenesis in response to a wide range of antibiotics: a route towards multiresistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 2438–2441 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Ysern, P. et al. Induction of SOS genes in Escherichia coli and mutagenesis in Salmonella typhimurium by fluoroquinolones. Mutagenesis 5, 63–66 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, S.L. et al. Identification of genes subject to positive selection in uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli: a comparative genomics approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5977–5982 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Marino Sabo, E. & Stern, J.J. Approach to antimicrobial prophylaxis for urology procedures in the era of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance. Ann. Pharmacother. 48, 380–386 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Prieto, A.I., Ramos-Morales, F. & Casadesús, J. Bile-induced DNA damage in Salmonella enterica. Genetics 168, 1787–1794 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Peterson, K.R., Wertman, K.F., Mount, D.W. & Marinus, M.G. Viability of Escherichia coli K-12 DNA adenine methylase (dam) mutants requires increased expression of specific genes in the SOS regulon. Mol. Gen. Genet. 201, 14–19 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Courcelle, J., Khodursky, A., Peter, B., Brown, P.O. & Hanawalt, P.C. Comparative gene expression profiles following UV exposure in wild-type and SOS-deficient Escherichia coli. Genetics 158, 41–64 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Galhardo, R.S. et al. DinB upregulation is the sole role of the SOS response in stress-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Genetics 182, 55–68 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Tippin, B., Pham, P. & Goodman, M.F. Error-prone replication for better or worse. Trends Microbiol. 12, 288–295 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wyrzykowski, J. & Volkert, M.R. The Escherichia coli methyl-directed mismatch repair system repairs base pairs containing oxidative lesions. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1701–1704 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Bale, A., d'Alarcao, M. & Marinus, M.G. Characterization of DNA adenine methylation mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Mutat. Res. 59, 157–165 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Heithoff, D.M., Sinsheimer, R.L., Low, D.A. & Mahan, M.J. An essential role for DNA adenine methylation in bacterial virulence. Science 284, 967–970 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Pucciarelli, M.G., Prieto, A.I., Casadesús, J. & García-del Portillo, F. Envelope instability in DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella enterica. Microbiology 148, 1171–1182 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. García-Del Portillo, F., Pucciarelli, M.G. & Casadesús, J. DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella typhimurium show defects in protein secretion, cell invasion, and M cell cytotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11578–11583 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Murphy, K.C., Ritchie, J.M., Waldor, M.K., Løbner-Olesen, A. & Marinus, M.G. Dam methyltransferase is required for stable lysogeny of the Shiga toxin (Stx2)-encoding bacteriophage 933W of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Bacteriol. 190, 438–441 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Baym, M. et al. Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes. PLoS One 10, e0128036 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Barrick, J.E. et al. Identifying structura l variation in haploid microbial genomes from short-read resequencing data using breseq. BMC Genomics 15, 1039 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Ferrante, E. Cameron, K. Allison, J. Winkler, J. Way, C. Gruber, P. Bhargava, M. Painter, N. Sherpa, T. Lieberman, L. Certain and Y. Furuta for critical feedback and technical support over the course of this study. We also thank M. Conover and S. Hultgren (Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis) for generously providing the UTI89 strain, as well as related reagents and protocols. Additionally, we are grateful for SMRT sequencing support from M. Zapp and E. Kittler at the University of Massachusetts Medical School Sequencing Core and from S. Mark, K. Luong, M. Weiand and O. Banerjee at Pacific Biosciences. This work was supported by funding from Defense Threat Reduction Agency grant HDTRA1-15-1-0051, US National Institutes of Health grant 1U54GM114838-01, the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine and Donors Cure Foundation, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health and Research, and the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Christian A Ross and Saloni Jain: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Nadia R Cohen & James J Collins

  2. Department of Biological Engineering, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Nadia R Cohen, Saloni Jain, Rebecca S Shapiro, Arnaud Gutierrez & James J Collins

  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA

    Nadia R Cohen & James J Collins

  4. Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Individualized Medicine, Information Technology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

    Christian A Ross & Hu Li

  5. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Saloni Jain & James J Collins

  6. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Rebecca S Shapiro, Arnaud Gutierrez & James J Collins

  7. Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

    Peter Belenky

  8. Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    James J Collins

  9. Synthetic Biology Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    James J Collins

Authors
  1. Nadia R Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian A Ross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saloni Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rebecca S Shapiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arnaud Gutierrez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter Belenky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. James J Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.R.C. conceived of the project, designed and performed experiments, and wrote the manuscript. C.A.R. performed bioinformatics analyses. S.J. performed experiments. R.S.S. performed experiments and bioinformatics analyses. A.G. contributed intellectually to the project and helped design experiments. P.B. contributed intellectually to the project. H.L. performed bioinformatics analyses and provided mentorship. J.J.C. oversaw the project and provided mentorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James J Collins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Susceptibility of MTase-deficient E. coli K12 to sublethal ampicillin treatment.

(a,b) Wild-type (wt) or MTase-deficient E. coli BW25113 (a) or MG1655 (b) were grown in LB to an OD of 0.3 and then treated with ampicillin (2.5 μg/ml) or left untreated. CFUs and/or OD were monitored hourly. (c) Determination of ampicillin MIC (left) and MBC90 (right) for E. coli BW25113 by broth microdilution in LB. Wild-type and Δdam MIC values were 6 μg/ml and 4 μg/ml, respectively; wild-type and Δdam MBC90 values were 2.7 μg/ml and 1.5 μg/ml, respectively. Dotted lines indicate cutoff values for MIC (OD < 0.1) or MBC90 (10% survival). MBC90 values were interpolated using a sigmoidal curve fit model as shown. In a–c, data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of n = 2–3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Figure 2 Complementation of Δdam E. coli ampicillin sensitivity with wild-type or catalytically inactive mutant Dam.

Wild-type or Δdam E. coli BW25113 were transformed with the indicated Cmr plasmid expressing gfp, dam or mutant dam in which the catalytic DPPY motif is disrupted by a single amino acid change (D181S, D181N or P183R). Plasmid-bearing strains were grown in LB supplemented with chloramphenicol (15 μg/ml). (a) Genomic DNA extracted from the indicated strains at stationary phase was either digested with DpnII, which cleaves at GATC sites only in the absence of methylation, or left undigested. Digests were run on a 0.8% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. (b) OD kinetics of wild-type or Δdam E. coli BW25113 harboring the indicated Cmr plasmids cultured in LB supplemented with chloramphenicol (15 μg/ml) with or without ampicillin (2.5 μg/ml) at log phase. (c) The indicated E. coli BW25113 strains were grown in LB to an OD of 0.2 and then treated with 2 μg/ml ampicillin or left untreated. In b and c, CFUs and/or OD were monitored hourly to assess survival. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of n = 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Figure 3 Stability of GATC methylome kinetics during growth in the presence or absence of ampicillin.

Genome-wide GATC methylation kinetics displayed as in Figure 2d during growth in LB (top) or in LB supplemented with 2.5 μg/ml ampicillin (bottom). The top panel is the same as the plot displayed in Figure 2d. The empty green arrowhead highlights the only GATC site displaying statistically significant differential methylation between untreated and ampicillin-treated samples (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Data Set 1).

Supplementary Figure 4 dinB, mutS and mutH dependence of Δdam E. coli sensitivity to ampicillin.

The indicated E. coli BW25113 strains were grown in LB to an OD of 0.3 and then treated with 2.5 μg/ml of ampicillin or left untreated. OD was monitored hourly to assess survival. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of n = 2 independent experiments.

Supplementary Figure 5 dinB, mutS and mutH dependence of Δdam sensitivity to ofloxacin.

The indicated E. coli BW25113 strains were grown in LB to an OD of 0.3 and then treated with ofloxacin (50 ng/ml) or left untreated. CFUs in bacterial cultures were monitored hourly to assess survival. Data are shown as mean percent survival ± s.e.m. of n = 2 independent experiments.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Tables 1–3. (PDF 2670 kb)

Supplementary Data Set 1

Raw methylation data and statistical analyses. (XLSX 10603 kb)

Supplementary Data Set 2

SMRT sequence coverage. (XLSX 6317 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, N., Ross, C., Jain, S. et al. A role for the bacterial GATC methylome in antibiotic stress survival. Nat Genet 48, 581–586 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3530

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3530

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology