Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Evidence for a Further Dark Repair Process in Bacteria

Abstract

Resistant (repair proficient) strains of Escherichia coli stop DNA synthesis almost immediately after low doses of ultraviolet (UV). Synthesis ceases for a period that is a function of the UV dose and is resumed at the same rate as unirradiated bacteria1–4. The time at which synthesis restarts correlates well with the time at which excision-repair is completed. Billen and his collaborators showed that when DNA synthesis resumes, a new replication point is initiated preferentially at the chromosomal origin, the existing replication point remaining inactive5–7. In contrast, excision-deficient (Uvr) or recombination-deficient (RecA) bacteria show decreased rates of synthesis as the dose is increased until (when the surviving fraction is very low) synthesis ceases to be measurable1,3,8. Moreover in Uvr bacteria, DNA synthesis after UV continues largely at the existing replication point9. Thus in repair-proficient bacteria there exists after irradiation a “stalled” replication-complex, which must be repaired if the new replication point is to traverse the same region. At the least this must involve the elimination of one replicated arm by some breakage and rejoining process and may also involve the repair of radiation-induced lesions in that region.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Setlow, R. B., Brookhaven Symp. Biol., 20, 1 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doudney, C. O., Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 46, 116 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, K. C., Mutat. Res., 8, 481 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doudney, C. O., Mutat. Res., 12, 121 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hewitt, R., and Billen, D., J. Mol. Biol., 13, 40 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Billen, D., Hewitt, R., and Frampton, E., Radiat. Res., Suppl. 6, 212 (1966).

  7. Billen, D., J. Bacteriol., 97, 1169 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rupp, W. D., and Howard-Flanders, P., J. Mol. Biol., 31, 291 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hewitt, R., and Gaskins, P., J. Mol. Biol., 62, 215 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haynes, R. H., Physical Processes in Radiation Biology, 51 (Academic Press, NY, 1964).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Setlow, R. B., and Carrier, W. L., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 51, 226 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyce, R. P., and Howard-Flanders, P., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 51, 293 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Setlow, R. B., J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 64, Suppl. 1, 51 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alper, T., Nature, 200, 534 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Feiner, R., and Hill, R., Nature, 200, 291 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Witkin, E. M., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 50, 425 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harm, W., Mutat. Res., 4, 93 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vechet, B., Folia Microbiol., 13, 379 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Setlow, J. K., quoted by Witkin, E. M., Ann. Rev. Genet., 3, 525 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Witkin, E. M., Science, 152, 1345 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alper, T., and Hodgkins, B., Mutat. Res., 8, 15 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Swenson, P., and Setlow, R. B., J. Mol. Biol., 15, 201 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cairns, J., and Davern, C., J. Mol. Biol., 17, 418 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gray, W. J. H., Green, M. H. L., and Bridges, B. A., J. Gen. Microbiol., 71, 359 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRIDGES, B. Evidence for a Further Dark Repair Process in Bacteria. Nature New Biology 240, 52–53 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio240052a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio240052a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing