Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Immunological Difference between Glucose-6-P Dehydrogenase and Hexose-6-P Dehydrogenase from Human Liver

Abstract

SHAW and Barto1 have demonstrated the presence of an autosomally inherited glucose-6-P dehydrogenase (G6PD) in the deer mouse. Subsequently, Ohno et al.2 found a similar enzyme in trout and showed that this enzyme and the autosomally inherited mouse enzyme differed from the sex-linked G6PD in possessing marked catalytic activity with galactose-6-P. This autosomally inherited G6PD was therefore named hexose-6-P dehydrogenase (H6PD)2,3. It was shown to oxidize glucose-6-P, galactose-6-P, mannose-6-P, and 2-deoxy glucose-6-P with a Km of the order of 10−5 M. It also oxidizes glucose with a Km of 0.7 M3. It appears to be identical to the so-called “glucose dehydrogenase”. The enzyme utilizes both NAD and NADP and is microsome-bound. G6PD is localized in the soluble fraction of the cells of various tissues. Although it has been shown that two dehydrogenases from liver have different substrate specificity, molecular weight and elec-trophoretic mobility3,4, it has been suggested that the two enzymes are merely isozymes and they might be interconvertible5–7. We have now partially purified the two enzymes from human liver and show that they have different immunological properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Shaw, C. R., and Barto, E., Science, 148, 1099 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohno, S., Payne, H. W., Morrison, M., and Beutler, E., Science, 153, 1015 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beutler, E., and Morrison, M., J. Biol. Chem., 242, 5289 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandula, B., Srivastava, S. K., and Beutler, E., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 141, 155 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hori, S. H., and Matsui, S., J. Histochem. Cytochem., 15, 530 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamada, T., and Hori, S. H., Jap. J. Genet., 45, 319 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hori, S. H., and Noda, S., J. Histochem. Cytochem., 19, 299 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida, A., Stamatoyannopoulos, G., and Motulsky, A., Science, 155, 98 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stegeman, J. J., and Goldberg, E., Biochem. Genet., 5, 579 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shatton, J. B., Halver, J. E., and Weinhouse, S., J. Biol. Chem., 246, 4878 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SRIVASTAVA, S., BLUME, K., BEUTLER, E. et al. Immunological Difference between Glucose-6-P Dehydrogenase and Hexose-6-P Dehydrogenase from Human Liver. Nature New Biology 238, 240–241 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio238240a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio238240a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing