Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Ribosomal RNA Turnover in Contact Inhibited Cells

Abstract

CONTACT inhibition of animal cell growth is accompanied by a decreased rate of incorporation of nucleosides into RNA1–3. Contact inhibited cells, however, transport exogenously-supplied nucleosides more slowly than do rapidly growing cells4,5, suggesting that the rate of incorporation of isotopically labelled precursors into total cellular RNA may be a poor measure of the absolute rate of RNA synthesis by these cells. Recently, Emerson6 determined the actual rates of synthesis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and of the rapidly labelled heterogeneous species (HnRNA) by labelling with 3H-adenosine and measuring both the specific activity of the ATP pool and the rate of incorporation of isotope into the various RNA species. He concluded that contact inhibited cells synthesize ribosomal precursor RNA two to four times more slowly than do rapidly growing cells, but that there is little if any reduction in the instantaneous rate of synthesis of HnRNA by the non-growing cells. We have independently reached the same conclusion from simultaneous measurements on the specific radioactivity of the UTP pool and the rate of 3H-uridine incorporation into RNAs (unpublished work of Edlin and myself). However, although synthesis of the 45S precursor to ribosomal RNA is reduced two to four times in contact inhibited cells, the rate of cell multiplication and the rate of rRNA accumulation are reduced ten times. This suggests either “wastage”7 of newly synthesized 45S rRNA precursor, or turnover of ribosomes in contact inhibited cells Two lines of evidence suggest that “wastage” of 45S RNA does not play a significant role in this system. (1) The rate of synthesis of 45S RNA in both growing and contact inhibited cells agrees well with that expected from the observed rates of synthesis of 28S and 18S RNAs (unpublished work of Edlin and myself). Emerson has made similar calculations6. (2) 45S RNA labelled with a 20 min pulse of 3H-uridine is converted in the presence of actinomycin D to 28S and 18S RNAs with the same efficiency (approximately 50%) in both growing and contact inhibited cells. These results indicate that, in order to maintain a balanced complement of ribosomal RNAs, contact inhibited cells must turn over their ribosomes. We present evidence here that rRNA is stable in rapidly growing chick cells, but begins to turn over with a half-life of approximately 35–45 h as cells approach confluence and become contact inhibited.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Todaro, G., Matsuya, Y., Bloom, S., Robbins, A., and Green, H., in Growth Regulating Substances for Animal Cells in Culture, Wistar Institute Symposium Monograph, 7 (edit. by Defendi, V., and Stoker, M.) (Wistar Institute Press, Philadelphia, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Levine, E., Becker, Y., Boone, C. W., and Eagle, H., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 53, 350 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhode, S. L., and Ellem, K. A. O., Exp. Cell Res., 53, 184 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham, D. D., and Pardee, A. B., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 64, 1049 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber, M. J., and Rubin, H., J. Cell. Physiol., 77, 157 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, C. P., Nature New Biology, 232, 101 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, H. L., Nature, 227, 1107 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duesberg, P. H., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 59, 930 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Darnell, J. E., Bad. Rev., 32, 262 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eagle, H., Piez, K. A., Fleischman, R., and Oyama, V. I., J. Biol. Chem., 234, 592 (1959).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hershko, A., Mamont, P., Shields, R., and Tomkins, G., Nature New Biology, 232, 206 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, G. D., Stoker, M. G. P., Ludlow, A., and Thornton, M., Nature, 117, 798 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber, M. J., and Edlin, G., J. Biol. Chem., 246, 1828 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WEBER, M. Ribosomal RNA Turnover in Contact Inhibited Cells. Nature New Biology 235, 58–61 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio235058a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio235058a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing