Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Millisecond Delayed Light as an Indicator of Electrical Gradients across Chloroplast Thylakoids

Abstract

DELAYED light emission from photosynthetic organisms was discovered by Strehler and Arnold1. The emitted light has a spectrum similar to that of chlorophyll a fluorescence and can often persist for minutes after terminating the illumination. In recent years it has been found that the intensity of emission during the first few milliseconds of the decay is sensitive to the high energy state of the chloroplasts2. Wraight and Crofts3 have suggested that this sensitivity is due to the establishment of electrical and pH gradients across the thylakoids during the illumination stage. The linking of the high energy state with these gradients is an essential feature of Mitchell's chemiosmotic hypothesis4. Wraight and Crofts3 have argued that the light-induced pH and electrical gradients act in such a way as to decrease the activation energy necessary to lift electrons from the metastable state, created during the preillumination, to the first singlet of chlorophyll. If this hypothesis is correct, the establishment of an electrical gradient across the thylakoid membranes by some means other than light-induced electron transport should change the intensity of millisecond delayed light emission. One possible way to create membrane potentials is to subject chloroplasts to salt gradients. The magnitude of the potentials developed will be a function of the concentration gradients and the relative rates of penetration of the ions across the thylakoid membranes5,6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Strehler, B., and Arnold, W., J. Gen. Physiol., 34, 809 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayne, B. C., Photochem. Photobiol., 6, 189 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wraight, C. A., and Crofts, A. R., Europ. J. Biochem., 19, 386 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchell, P., Biol. Rev., Cambridge Phil. Soc., 41, 445 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barber, J., and Kraan, G. P. B., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 197, 49 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barber, J., and Varley, W. J., J. Exp. Bot., 22 (1971).

  7. Clayton, R. K., Biophys. J., 9, 60 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Junge, W., and Witt, H. T., Z. Naturforsch., 236, 244 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barber, J., FEBS Lett. (in the press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BARBER, J., VARLEY, W. Millisecond Delayed Light as an Indicator of Electrical Gradients across Chloroplast Thylakoids. Nature New Biology 234, 188–189 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio234188a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio234188a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing