Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Is pain in the brain?

Abstract

There has been much interest in pioneering neuroimaging experiments that study brain responses to sensory stimulation in patients in a minimally conscious or persistent vegetative state. Here, we discuss a recent study by Melanie Boly and her colleagues, in which brain responses to stimulation of the median nerve were measured by use of PET in healthy volunteers and in patients in either a minimally conscious or persistent vegetative state. The stimulation was considered to be painful by the volunteers but did not elicit behavioral responses in either of the two patient groups. Nevertheless, brain activation in patients in a minimally conscious (but not persistent vegetative) state was seen in areas very similar to those activated by the stimuli judged to be painful in healthy volunteers. Here, we discuss whether such data can be used to conclude that individuals with severe brain damage feel pain, and we consider the ethically appropriate clinical response to such important new data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Haynes JD and Rees G (2006) Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 523–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boly M et al. (2008) Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol 7: 1013–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giacino JT et al. (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58: 349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rees G (2007) Neural correlates of the contents of visual awareness in humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362: 877–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rees G et al. (2002) Neural correlates of conscious and unconscious vision in parietal extinction. Neurocase 8: 387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nachev P and Husain M (2007) Comment on “Detecting awareness in the vegetative state”. Science 315: 1221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards SJL (2001) The doctrine of double effect is difficult but not impossible to apply. BMJ 323: 388–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandin P (2004) Better Safe than Sorry: Applying Philosophical Methods to the Debate on Risk and the Precautionary Principle. Theses in Philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm: KTH, Infrastructure

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraint Rees.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rees, G., Edwards, S. Is pain in the brain?. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 76–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1001

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing